Skip to content

The Great Stephen King Reread: The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon

16
Share

The Great Stephen King Reread: The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon - Reactor

Home / The Great Stephen King Reread: The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon
Books Stephen King

The Great Stephen King Reread: The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon

By

Published on July 24, 2015

16
Share

Publishers have learned to be indulgent when their bestselling authors get bitten by the sports bug. In 2004, John Grisham published Bleachers and three years later he released his football novel, Playing for Pizza. In 1993, Tom Clancy became part-owner of the Baltimore Orioles. And in 1999, Stephen King suddenly decided that he wanted to publish a slim (for King) 244-page book called The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon.

At the time, Gordon was a pitcher for the Boston Red Sox, and his new publisher, Scribner, probably decided that this was just a sports itch their new acquisition needed to scratch. “If books were babies, I’d call The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon the result of an unplanned pregnancy,” King said in a letter to the press, and Scribner decided to roll with it, eager to release anything from their new star, who definitely had some blockbusters in the pipeline once he got this Tom Gordon nonsense off his chest. Expecting something forgettable, instead they wound up publishing a small miracle.

The idea for The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon came to King during a Red Sox game when he was in a lull between finishing Bag of Bones and starting Hearts in Atlantis. King has often used the period between books to write a novella (which is how most of the stories in Different Seasons came about) but he’d never written a completely new book during one of these breaks before. But, as he says, “Stories want only one thing: to be born. If that’s inconvenient, too bad.”

Gordon5If King ever wrote a YA novel, it would be The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon. When her divorced mom takes her and her brother on a hike up the Appalachian Trail, Trisha McFarland ducks off the path to pee and gets lost. Nine years old and scared of the dark, Trisha winds up stumbling through the woods for nine days, wandering farther and farther from civilization as she tries to make her way back home, striking out confidently in exactly the wrong direction again and again. As she walks, dehydration, hunger, and exhaustion cause her to hallucinate, and she begins to believe that she’s being stalked by a supernatural beast known as The God of the Lost. Her one contact with civilization is listening to Red Sox games on her Walkman as pitcher Tom Gordon, her personal hero, sets a record with 43 consecutive saves in the 1998 season. As Trisha becomes more and more beat down by nature and The God of the Lost, Gordon appears to her in a vision to offer guidance and counsel (King got Gordon’s approval to use him in the book before he started writing). At the end of the book, Trisha confronts the God of the Lost, who turns out to be a black bear, defeats him, and finds her way home. It’s a small story, but King tells it from Trisha’s point of view, and inside her feverish brain it’s a metaphysical epic.

Gordon4King, like Nathaniel Hawthorne and centuries of American writers before him, finds a flinty spirituality in the wilderness, and what makes Tom Gordon such a spectacular coming of age novel is that it addresses faith, something that’s all too often left out of young adult books due to nervous editors who don’t want to offend readers. The fact is, at some point in their teens, most kids grapple with the idea of God with an intensity that would put many adults to shame. King portrays the wrestling that Trisha does without an ounce of condescension, dealing with her spiritual struggle honestly. In this endless forest, Trisha, who doesn’t really believe in God, comes to believe that something bigger is going on around her. Guided by Tom Gordon, who ritualistically points to the sky after every save, Trisha’s interior life and exterior life merge in a series of hallucinations that lead her to believe in her own version of God. According to her, “What is God? The one who comes in at the bottom of the ninth.”

King gets away with so much that editors wouldn’t allow these days. The story of one girl lost in the woods for nine days fits in neatly with his novels like Misery (two people trapped in a house) and Gerald’s Game (one woman trapped on a bed), but today an editor would probably insist that Tom Gordon is “too small” and require some kind of high concept twist. I can easily imagine an editor insisting that The God of the Lost and Trisha battle throughout the book, whereas King lets the challenges that face Trisha mostly be mundane — hunger, thirst, hard walking, cliffs. She’s stalked by the God of the Lost throughout but only confronts him 17 pages from the end.

Gordon3King is also allowed a degree of ambiguity that I think a lot of writers would have a hard time getting since, in my experience, editors usually require things to be spelled out clearly for readers. An editor would probably insist that the God of the Lost either be a supernatural phantom, or a bear, but it would have to be one or the other. Instead, King gives us an ambiguous creature that could be just a bear, but is also somehow larger than that. King walks a middle ground between reality and dreams here, investing his book with a symbolic weight, rooting it both in the reality of wilderness survival and in the reality of spirituality. The result is a book that is smaller in concept than what I think would be acceptable today, but is ultimately so much bigger in spirit.

King’s second-shortest book, The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon, hit shelves on April 6, opening day of the Red Sox 1999 season. It’s a still, small marvel of a book, one of King’s most spiritual and most moving, accomplishing a lot of what The Green Mile set out to do only with less plot machinery and visible effort. It was launched with the standard 1.25 million copies in its first printing, and landed at #2 on the New York Times bestseller list, then rose to #1 where it remained for 18 weeks. While it was on the list, King went out walking in the woods himself one day, only instead of encountering the God of the Lost he was hit by a van and nearly died. He wouldn’t write for five weeks, and by the time he returned he was off the wagon and addicted to painkillers. It would be a long time before his writing got this good again.

Grady Hendrix has written for publications ranging from Playboy to World Literature Today and his latest novel is Horrorstör, about a haunted Ikea.

About the Author

Grady Hendrix

Author

Grady Hendrix is a novelist and screenwriter living in New York City. His latest book is How to Sell a Haunted House, and you can learn more dumb facts about him at gradyhendrix.com.
Learn More About Grady
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MattHam
MattHam
10 years ago

This book, very much, is great. When it first came out, I wasn’t at all sure about it because I couldn’t give a flip about baseball (still don’t) so I didn’t think I’d get into it very much (I still haven’t read King’s non-fiction baseball book). I guess I made the same mistake as the publishers because it was fantastic in a way that was totally unexpected. I may not like baseball, but I love Hockey, and I still don’t think I would get very excited about a book about a girl or boy lost in the woods and hallucinating a Chicago Blackhawks player like Jonathan Toewes or Patrick Kane, but it works; it works because that would have been me at that age, wandering through the endlessness of the forest-a place that is still vast, but somehow seems smaller as I’ve gotten older-and perhaps it would have been a book I was reading while lost that gave me my hallucinatory hero, or maybe it would have been Charlie Chaplin, whom I was obsessed with at that age (still kind of am, come to think of it) guiding me away from the terror that was stalking me that, to my young mind, was no simple animal of the woods, NO, it was a beast, sent to punish me from wandering away from my mother and/or father. It was coming after ME and no amount of planning or prayer was going to stop it. I was done for. This book made me feel like that again, like the forests were still so very large to me, and filled with wonders-and even a few terrors-that could fill my mind as I hoped to find my way out.

Aeryl
10 years ago

Are you going to cover On Writing? 

Ellynne
Ellynne
10 years ago

The meeting with the bear that convinced the guy who shot at it (who was an experienced woodsman and poacher) it wasn’t just a bear had me convinced.

So far as I know, this is the only Stephen King book that was adapted as a children’s pop-up book. I don’t know who they thought the target audience for that was but, if you want a way to traumatize children for life, it’s the book for you.

Stefan Raets
Admin
10 years ago

. I agree in principle but I believe your thesis would benefit from further development, especially when it comes to supporting arguments.

R0bert
R0bert
10 years ago

I’ve always been a fan of brevity, so this is pretty fucking great in its own right.

ErikHarrison
10 years ago

Mostly great. It goes off the rails a bit when his obvious (and understandable) anger at his car accident wants to turn it from a book about the craft or writing, to a memoir.

Aeryl
10 years ago

@7, See I think it’s pretty cogent.  To talk about the struggles he had in returning to writing, he had to talk about what caused it.

I also wonder if it was because he knew at that point he would be inserting himself into the Dark Tower series.  Because I’ve read the descriptions of the accident in both consecutively to see if he changed any details from fiction to non fiction, and there aren’t any, IIRC.

JeanTheSquare
10 years ago

@6: “Brevity is…wit.”

Cloric
10 years ago

It’s been a VERY long time since I listened to this during a long car ride, but isn’t there another clue that the bear is more than it appears? I seem to recall that she saw it wearing a metal skullcap and some other mechanisms right before it was shot, though it looked like a normal bear afterwards. Based on the similarity to the Guardian of the Beam in the Dark Tower series, I’ve always assumed that there was some synchronicity there.

 

My 2¢.

iapag
10 years ago

I thought King DID write a YA novel in The Eyes of the Dragon.

He also wrote a couple of other sports stories. I can think of one in Nightmares & Dreamscapes (it’s called Head Down. I looked it up) and Blockade Billy. Both are short. Oh and he co-wrote Faithful about a Red Sox season. I think of him as writing about sports a lot. Many of his characters seem to follow sports.

I own this book but haven’t read it yet… do you need to know about baseball to enjoy it?

Lord yes – On Writing is pfg.

Jaime Chris
Jaime Chris
10 years ago

: Things you need to know about baseball before reading “The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon:”

1.) Baseball is a REALLY BIG DEAL to a lot of New Englanders

2.) The Red Sox are a REALLY BIG DEAL to a lot of New Englanders.  As in, almost a religion.  I grew up in Massachusetts and lived a few blocks away from Fenway Park for a while.  The only fans I have found that approach the dedication level of Sox fans are Mets fans.  ;)

I REALLY enjoyed “The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon.”  I liked the economy of plot and language, which is rare in King’s books.  I also found it SERIOUSLY creepy (and, if you’ve ever been up to northern New Hampshire or Maine, you know that Trisha’s plight is FAR too likely for people who leave the marked trails).

“Of Writing”  is pretty f*cking great.  I fully approve of GradyHendrix’s thesis and think it needs no further support.  :P  I’ve recommended/given copies of “On Writing” to many of my aspiring student writers

iapag
10 years ago

Thanks Chris.

So – I don’t need to know anything about the players or the language? No plot points or characterisations rely on knowing what a “wide-out” or a “big-end” is or anything? (I really don’t know what I’m talking about). I don’t, for example, need to know who Tom Gordon is?

The only things I’ve learnt about baseball have been through Sam Malone in Cheers. So I have heard of the Red Sox, and also the Metz and the Yankees. And that’s it!

Ellynne
Ellynne
10 years ago

So long as you know what the bottom of the ninth is–the last part of the game–you’re fine.

By the way, baseball is nothing at all like religion in Boston. Religion is optional. The Red Socks aren’t.

Chuk
10 years ago

As a parent, the kid in this book mostly seemed way older than nine when I was reading this book. Maybe I’ll take it out for a re-read someday.

Mike magness
Mike magness
7 years ago

All I can say about the girl is Roland himself would bow to her strength  and Flagg would cower in a corner from her power best read I have had in many many years