Skip to content

Endurance: Seveneves by Neal Stephenson

17
Share

Endurance: Seveneves by Neal Stephenson

Home / Endurance: Seveneves by Neal Stephenson
Books book reviews

Endurance: Seveneves by Neal Stephenson

By

Published on May 19, 2015

17
Share
Seveneves US cover

You certainly can’t judge a book by its cover, but its first sentence, I find, can be tremendously telling—and so it is with Seveneves, the latest doorstopper of a novel to bear Neal Stephenson’s name, and his greatest since Cryptonomicon in 1999.

It starts simply: with eleven ordinary words arranged in such a straightforward way that the eye absorbs them almost automatically. It’s only when the significance of said sentence registers that the eye tracks back to take in its content more carefully. Still, it takes a few seconds to make sense, for as easy to read as these words may be—as indeed is the entirety of Seveneves—their meaning is a world away from mundane.

This is a sentence so shocking, so appalling, that the brain demands a double-take. But even a second look later, the song remains the same:

The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason.

In this way, the extraordinary and extraordinarily complex content belied by the seeming simplicity of Seveneves is revealed, and the fate of something like seven billion human beings is sealed.

In short, Seveneves startling first sentence sets the tone for much of what’s to come, but in a novel approximately a thousand pages long, there’s just so much to come that it’s hard to know where to start, and when to stop. I won’t be giving the game away, that much I can say. Nobody’s going to hold it against you, however, if you opt to stop reading this review right now—so long as you immediately start reading Seveneves instead.

So where were we? Why, I couldn’t forget if I tried! “Everyone was going to die.” But why? Because the moon, when it blows up, doesn’t simply cease to be; on the contrary, it becomes an exponential presence, shattering into fragments which nevertheless have the heft to shatter other fragments which… well. I guess you get the picture. And it isn’t pretty, is it?

The world wastes a week wondering how in the heavens this kind of catastrophe could have happened without stopping to think what it might mean, but Doc Dubois, man of science—and a bit of a Brian Cox, what with his four million followers on Twitter and his frequent appearances on TV to translate unfathomable jargon into language the common man can understand—Doc Dubois, or Doob to his nearest and dearest, eventually puts two and two together.

You have to be asking what could conceivably be worse than the utter destruction of planet Earth’s sole natural satellite. As ever, Doob has the answer:

“A meteorite bombardment such as the Earth has not seen since the primordial age, when the solar system was formed. […] Those fiery trails we’ve been seeing in the sky lately, as the meteorites come in and burn up? There will be so many of those that they will merge into a dome of fire that will set aflame anything that can see it. The entire surface of the Earth is going to be sterilised. Glaciers will boil. The only way to survive is to get away from the atmosphere. Go underground, or go into space.”

For fully five thousand years! Given which, space seems the more reasonable option—the thought process being that it’s better to get the hell out of the sinking ship than to dig in to its deeper reaches.

A spate of surprising solidarity follows, during which the planet’s spacefaring nations fling their political and spiritual differences to the wind in order to create “an ark [containing] a repository of the entire genetic heritage of the Earth. We have two years to build it. Two years to get as many people and as much equipment as we can into orbit. The nucleus of that ark is going to be Izzy.” So says Julia Bliss Fletcher, the last president of the United States of America and the closest thing Seveneves has to a villain… aside, I suppose, from the unidentified Agent that made such a meal of the moon.

Seveneves UK coverIt bears saying that the author never deigns to explain the exact nature of the Agent. What caused the moon to multiply so malevolently—be it a device of extraterrestrial origin, “set to detonate when certain conditions were met” or merely some speedy debris—is beside the point. Instead, it’s presented as not purely but primarily a theoretical problem. Solving it, and others like it, is what seems to excite Stephenson.

In that sense, Seveneves reminded me of nothing so much as The Martian, but for all that Andy Weir’s bestseller had to recommend it, it became bogged down in tedious technical troubleshooting because its interstices proved pointless as opposed to punctuative. Stephenson’s story of space-based survival is by leaps and bounds the better book, in that it has a head and a heart in the same frame—sweets and smarts rather than The Martian’s grab-bag of impenetrable parts.

Take the president’s project—the Cloud Ark, as it comes to be called. The idea, interesting as it is, will be as familiar to science fiction fans as the backs of their hands… but how in the world would it work? Explaining that, clearly and cleverly, is Stephenson’s specialty:

The brain trust behind the Cloud Ark—an ad-hoc working group of governmental space agency veterans and commercial space entrepeneurs—had opted for the only strategy that could possibly work, which was decentralised and distributed. Each arklet, as the component ships were being called, would be small enough that it could be heaved into orbit on the top of a single heavy-lift rocket. It would draw power from a small, simple nuclear reactor, fueled by isotopes so radioactive that they would throw off heat, and thereby generate electricity, for a few decades. […] It went without saying that, in the long run, the Cloud Ark as a whole was going to have to be self-sustaining in terms of food production. Water would have to be recycled. Carbon dioxide exhaled by humans would have to be used to sustain plants, which would produce oxygen for the humans to breath and food for them to eat. All of this had been the subject matter of science fiction stories and practical experiments for decades.

That said, the experiment is more fully fledged in Seveneves than in any of the other iterations I’ve encountered, and Stephenson makes it all feel real by draping his decisions in determinedly researched detail. Though there are those moments when he tends toward the digressive, nine times out of ten, the detail is needful, not to mention nicely described. It adds to our understanding of the story and the stakes instead of obscuring it, as in The Martian. And happily, the minutiae of this book is wrapped up in character rather than related in isolation. As the fate of the planet hangs in the balance, Doob daydreams about the president’s greying hair, and justifies himself thus:

This was how the mind worked. The mind couldn’t think about the End of the World all the time. It needed the occasional break, a romp through the trivial. Because it was through trivia that the mind was anchored in reality, as the largest oak tree was rooted, ultimately, in a system of rootlets no larger than the silver hairs on the president’s head.

Not too long later, Doc Dubois finds himself assigned to Izzy—the International Space Station, I should say—where he hand the proverbial protagonist’s baton to Dinah, a fabulously unflappable robotics crackerjack who takes centre stage in the second section of Seveneves’ three.

Doob’s down-to-earth perspective is a perfect fit for the first, which chronicles the last years of humanity—specifically our species’ struggle to survive the extinction event to end all extinction events—but in the second section, Earth is essentially dead, and the inhabitants of the Cloud Ark are on the edge of a similar precipice. As it transpires, the project’s foremost focus was to keep seven billion souls docile until their inevitable deaths. The long-term prospects of the handful aboard Izzy and the arklets was a secondary concern at best, so they’ll go the way of the rest of their race unless they can find a way to change that—to produce enough food and fuel to take them somewhere safer.

Hope comes in the form of a cold comet: an irradiated, ice-rich rock that’ll have to be manhandled into Izzy’s orbit. Dinah’s expertise is of huge import here—as is her hard-hearted outlook on life. She single-handedly keeps Seveneves’ vast narrative on track by refusing to give in to her grief, or be paralysed by the fears others feel. That isn’t to say she isn’t sad or scared: Dinah just doesn’t let these feelings define her.

Whilst Doob and Dinah are cracking characters, deeply and deftly developed over the course of the respective sections they star in, I’d struggle to say the same about Kath Two, the hero of part three: an epilogue extended, in typical Stephenson style, to the length of a normal novel, which picks up the pieces of books one and two fully five thousand years after the fact. Alas, Kath Two spends the larger part of this last act in transit: an unknown quantity trapped in a poorly paced tale that goes almost nowhere as the author insists on backfilling in multiple millennia of future history highlights.

Though swathes of this section of Seveneves feel more like a showcase than a story, what we have here is a minor weakness in the scheme of things—especially in the scheme of things involving Neal Stephenson. Even his weakest ideas are intriguing, and his best are basically mindblowing. Furthermore, the plot does pick up at a point, and Kath Two is transformed into a fascinating figure before the finale, such that the last act’s drawbacks do not substantially detract from the planet-cracking impact of this otherwise awesome novel.

Seveneves is available now in the US and May 21st in the UK from HarperCollins.

Niall Alexander is an extra-curricular English teacher who reads and writes about all things weird and wonderful for The Speculative Scotsman, Strange Horizons, and Tor.com. He’s been known to tweet, twoo.

About the Author

Niall Alexander

Author

Niall Alexander is an extra-curricular English teacher who reads and writes about all things weird and wonderful for The Speculative Scotsman, Strange Horizons, and Tor.com. He’s been known to tweet, twoo.
Learn More About Niall
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wiredog
9 years ago

Sounds like a (much better…) version of a Martin Caidin novel I read in the mid 80’s when I was in the Army.  “Exit Earth”, I think, after some googling.    

Avatar
Evan Payne
9 years ago

I’m a bit trepidatious to pick up a new Stephenson book after Reamde.  As good as it was in parts, I felt like it was hopelessly drawn out, and sometimes quite bombastic and, shall we say, Bond-esque.  Give me the good old days of the Baroque Cycle any day.  Hmm, I might have convinced myself with that last thought…

Avatar
9 years ago

I’m going to work for just a couple hours, then going to see Mad Max. When I get back, I’m starting this. Will I get any sleep tonight?

Avatar
9 years ago

Pah, I have to wait for two more days to start reading this, but given how much I love Anathem, and space in general, I think I’ll enjoy myself.

JKC27
9 years ago

One thing that scares me with this is the shear length of it.  I have Anathem on my shelf, and keep passing it over for other reads.  Mind you, I did really enjoy Stephen King’s It, and it is 1100 or so pages.  This issues also is scaring me away from Peter F Hamilton’s books (Pandora’s Star?).

I really like the basis of this book though – I am just unsure of it for some reason.  Anathem is one that had a lot of mixed reviews – mostly due to the made up language and stuff like that.  That is one reason why I really did not like China Mieville’s Embassytown – could not finish it.

 

I like my sci-fi!  It’s #2 for me, next to horror.  That being said….with sci-fi – I have military sci-fi – don’t we have enough wars in real life…..  but I also like lots of “real” science in my sci-fi.

Avatar
Admin
9 years ago

It’s a fun novel. Actually, I’d say it’s a fun couple of novels, given the size and especially given how much difference there is between the different parts: it goes from a crazy “Shiva Descending The Earth is Ending” thing to a relatively hard SF space colonization/survival thing and then lands on a weird far future thing with some real Banksian gosh-bang sense of wonder space constructs. I read through it twice and loved it, but then I have a really high tolerance for Stephenson’s quirks. 

beautyinruins
9 years ago

Hmm, I would have never thought of Stephenson and Weir in the same realm or niche of science fiction, but now you have me intrigued (despite my experience). The challenge for me is that while Stephenson may be the better educator, I’ve always found him lacking as an entertainer. I’ve started Seveneves three times since first landing an ARC months ago, and I’ve barely progressed. It’s a lot of info-dumping and exposition, and not early enough narrative or character building. As fascinated by it as I am, it’s like binge watching science documentaries – at some point your brain just says ‘enough’ and change the channel.

I was fortunate to be a very early reader of The Martian, before the hype began, and I’ll say it hooked me from page one. It was fun, it was smart, and it made me care about what happened Mark Watney. Maybe it’s not as sophisticated as Stephenson, but it entertained me and made me want to sign up for the long ride. I’ll likely give Stephenson another chance or two (the final arc sounds really interesting), but it gets harder and harder to keep going back.

Avatar
9 years ago

I’ll disagree with you on Cryptonomicon being his greatest- having studied both History and Computer Science, it was a great entry point into the Stephenson realm, and certainly good enough to get me hooked. I have not yet read Reamde, but Anathem was an absolute joy to read, and is the candidate i would choose as his greatest. However, I do feel Stephenson tends to cut his endings off a little abruptly.

Seveneves looks like it will be a lot of fun. I suspect the 1 in 10 digressions that you found unnecessary may be necessary to other readers.

JKC27
9 years ago

@@@@@ beatyinruins – not to sidetrack, but I have not read The Martian…yet.  When I read about the story though – it sounds very similar to Ben Bova’s Mars – which was a great read!  I am not sure if you’ve read that or not, but was curious if my suspicions are right.

Avatar
9 years ago

Looks like I will be picking up Seveneves, probably in paperback.

@9: The Martian was a fun rather-hard SF thriller where you have to keep reading to find out what ridiculous and probably lethal situation Mark Watney gets himself into while trying to fix the last problem that nearly killed him. James Nicoll’s review is representative: http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/castaway-on-mars. When it comes to “trekking across Mars” novels, I might be tempted to compare it with Mars Crossing by Geoffrey A. Landis, though I’m not sure how accurate that is.

Avatar
9 years ago

I love Stephenson, including all of his glorious diversions and excursions.  The sheer passion of it all just sweeps you along.  You must, however, be willing to put your life on hold for a few weeks each time you dive between the covers…

Avatar
9 years ago

Honestly, I have to disagree – I’ve only read two of Stephenson’s books, this and anathem, which I loved. This, to me, was tone of the most frustrating examples of sci-fi gone wrong. I’m not a stickler for scientific accuracy, generally – I read primarily fantasy and softer sci-fi, but this, this book kept throwing me out. In a book this size I’ll accept a couple significant errors, I’l say, ok, it’s fantastically unlikely but this isn’t real life. But, there were problems on every other page! Inconsistencies (not with things like eye color, but with basic important timeline details) etc abounded.

The most frustrating thing to me, though, was that it could have been so good. One or two harsh round of edits, and it would have been all the heart and science and character described here.

But instead, plotlines were abandoned, at several major junctions characters would propose two solutions only to choose the more dangerous without any discussion or explanation other than to acknowledge that it’s not as good an option as the other, and, probably worst of all, nobody (especially Stephenson) seemed to have any conception that five thousand years is a Long Time. Slightly spoilery, but not really: societies that have been completely separated for five thousand years shouldn’t be able to talk to each other (they have slightly different accents, but it’s not problem with communication), and after constantly reminding us that they only have a supply of key items to last a few hundred years, and with a much smaller population, maybe a few thousand, we flash forward and learn that there was a huge population boom very quickly and somehow the lack of vitamins was no problem?

 

Maybe this is all influenced by reading the martian very recently, which, if improbable, at least was incredibly consistent. But I found this a frustrating and unsatisfying read.  It’s not just the bad science – if you’re going to write a book this big, you’re making a promise to fact check yourself.

 

I don’t know, but not sure I’m going to pick up anymore of his books ever.

Avatar
9 years ago

Goldberry

 

I haven’t finished yet so can’t comment much on your issues but before you abandon him, give Cryptonomicon and Snow Crash a shot. Snow Crash is a fast and incredibly enjoyable read while Crypto is just plain brilliant (at least to those of us that are into the things he explores in it). Also Zodiac is a bit lighter but still a fun read.

Avatar
Croaker
9 years ago

I just finished this. I really liked it, but the third act felt a bit rushed, and the ending too abrupt. It could probably due with a second book to answer many unanswered questions. Like what happened to the Mars expedition for starters. 

Avatar
Admin
9 years ago

The thing with the Mars expedition is driving me nuts. I even went back and re-read the novel to make sure I didn’t somehow miss the resolution of that line. I figure it’s most likely they all died, but then I’d have guessed the same outcomes for the other three remnant populations if someone described their starting positions at the end of act 2 to me. I thought Seveneves was a tremendous amount of fun while reading it, but the more I think about it, the more apparent its flaws become. (Then again, I liked REAMDE so I probably have a higher than average tolerance for Stephenson’s little idiosyncracies.)

Werechull
9 years ago

I just got around to this book and found it very frustrating. There are so many exciting things that happen in it, but they mostly happen off camera. At any given time I was more interested in what was going on elsewhere (and only referred to later) than where the book’s focus was. 

If you’ve read The Princess Bride, imagine the dad doing the inverse when editing it for his son:  i.e. taking out all the good parts and leaving in the countless pages about choosing dresses. To me, that was this book.

Avatar
Pieter
9 years ago

Seveneves is visual and dynamic story. It punches out events and characters.

Stephenson creates a realistic environment by leaving many mysteries that occur in the novel unanswered, because the characters could not possibly know the outcome so neither will the reader. The dramatic loss of characters in the novel that you learn to love or respect adds to that aspect.

On the whole I am left with the shock of the ending and hope/wish there will be a follow up novel. That of course won’t happen Neal.

The massive novel had me glued and entertained. And more importantly, thinking!