Welcome back to the Lovecraft reread, in which two modern Mythos writers get girl cooties all over old Howard’s original stories.
Today we’re looking at “Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family,” written in 1920, and first published in the March and June 1921 issues of The Wolverine. You can read it here.
Spoilers ahead.
“In a rational age like the eighteenth century it was unwise for a man of learning to talk about wild sights and strange scenes under a Congo moon; of the gigantic walls and pillars of a forgotten city, crumbling and vine-grown, and of damp, silent, stone steps leading interminably down into the darkness of abysmal treasure-vaults and inconceivable catacombs. Especially was it unwise to rave of the living things that might haunt such a place; of creatures half of the jungle and half of the impiously aged city—fabulous creatures which even a Pliny might describe with skepticism…”
Summary: Our unnamed narrator opens with the cryptic salvo that “Life is a hideous thing.” And science threatens to loose hidden truths that will make it a thousand times uglier. If we knew what we really are, we might run mad and immolate ourselves like Arthur Jermyn, Baronet, whose very existence some deny.
The Jermyns were a reputable and comely family until the 18th century, when Sir Wade started exploring the Congo and telling wild tales about a lost jungle city, once the seat of a prehistoric white civilization but now overrun by apes (or worse, their hybrid offspring with the last white humans.) Wade took a “Portuguese” wife who lived unseen in Jermyn House. She accompanied Wade on his last African expedition and never returned.
Their son Philip succeeded to the title after Wade’s enforced retirement to a madhouse. Though small and “densely stupid,” he was strong and agile. After disgracing the family name by marrying his gamekeeper’s daughter, he compounded the sin by becoming a common sailor. One night, off the Congo coast, he disappeared.
His son Robert returned the Jermyns to respectability. Handsome despite some proportional peculiarities, he took up Wade’s African studies. He married well, but two of his children were so deformed they were never seen in public. The third, Nevil, had his grandfather’s surliness and proclivity for low company. Nevil married a “vulgar” dancer and ran off, to return a widower with an infant son.
Yet it wasn’t these family troubles that unhinged Robert’s mind. He continued looking for a connection between Wade’s tales of the lost city and legends of the Onga tribes. In 1859, an explorer visited Robert with notes he thought the ethnologist would appreciate. Whatever they contained, Robert first strangled his visitor, then murdered all three of his children. Only Nevil’s intervention saved grandson Alfred. Two years later, confined like Wade, Robert died.
Alfred became baronet, but his tastes never lived up to the title. He eventually abandoned his music hall singer wife and his son Arthur to join an American circus. There he grew fascinated with an oddly pale gorilla and trained it to box with him. During a rehearsal, the ape landed a punch that enraged Alfred. He attacked the beast with an inhuman shriek, tearing at its throat with his teeth. Normally tame, the gorilla fought back and left Alfred a mangled corpse.
Young Arthur received an excellent education despite the family’s reduced wealth. Unlike his forebears, he was a dreamer and poet, and so didn’t mind his odd, off-putting looks. He took up Wade and Robert’s studies and traveled to the Congo, where he met an aged Kaliri chief well-versed in legends of the lost city. Mwanu claimed its hybrid residents had been exterminated by the war-like N’bangus, who’d carried off a certain stuffed goddess. She’d been a princess among the hybrids, later consort to a white god. She bore his son, then went away with him. Years later, the god and princess returned. On her death, the god mummified her as an object of worship for the hybrids. Some said the god himself died before her shrine. Others said their son, though unconscious of his heritage, finally returned to the lost city.
In 1912, Arthur confirmed the existence of the lost city by uncovering what little the N’bangus had left. A Belgian agent told him he could obtain the stuffed goddess and would send it to Arthur in England.
In 1913, Arthur received the box containing this storied totem. He opened it alone in the chamber housing the earlier fruits of Jermyn exploration. Servants heard him scream, then watched him run from the chamber as if pursued by Nemesis. Later that night, Arthur drenched his clothes in oil, went out on the moor, and sparked himself into a human torch.
No one collected his remains after seeing the artifact from which he’d fled. It was a mummified white ape of unknown species, shockingly nearer mankind than any other primate. Worse, it wore a gold locket bearing the Jermyn arms. Worse yet, its shriveled features bore a ghastly resemblance to Arthur Jermyn’s!
Members of the Royal Anthropological Institute burned the mummy and threw the locket into a well.
What’s Cyclopean: This story is distinctly lacking in cyclopean.
The Degenerate Dutch: To be descended from non-human primates is horrible enough, but it leads to one’s family consorting with all sorts of people who aren’t rich and white.
Mythos Making: No particular Mythos connection here, more’s the pity. The white apes would be ever so much more interesting if they worshipped Shub-Niggurath.
Libronomicon: Sir Arthur Wade’s book, Observations on the Several Parts of Africa, earns him ridicule…
Madness Takes Its Toll: …and eventually a place in a madhouse. Talking about African ruins is apparently a terrible idea if you want a reputation as a sane, stable member of the community. Genealogically-induced infanticide won’t do your reputation any favors either, honestly.

Anne’s Commentary
In a letter to Edwin Baird, Lovecraft claimed his motivation for writing “Arthur Jermyn” came from reading Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio. Its exposure of the dark secrets behind “whited village lives” had struck him as tame, and he was sure he could, in his “weirder medium,” come up with “some secret behind a man’s ancestry which would make the worst of Anderson’s disclosures sound like the annual report of a Sabbath school.” Zing! Another influence was probably Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Opar, a lost African city appearing in the Tarzan novels, also peopled by hybrid ape-men.
Winesburg and Opar aside, this story’s deeper springs are the classic Lovecraft obsessions. The opening could come from an early draft of “Call of Cthulhu,” with its insistence that science will be the psychic death of us all by illuminating that which should have been left obscure. The narrator has already had his mind blasted, it seems, for he straight off declares that life is hideous. Why? I guess because of the same thing that made Stephen Jay Gould entitle his great Burgess Shale history “Wonderful Life”—evolution. From Gould’s point of view, which I share, what could be cooler than the intricate processes of speciation over time? To Jermyn’s narrator, however, evolution—and its reverse—are terrible. If we know what we really are, we’ll freak out. We’re apes, people! Naked apes! Capable (Lovecraft postulates) of interbreeding with hairier apes and sliding right back down the evolutionary ladder!
Ugh. Reverse evolution is always waiting to pounce. Last week we saw what happens when isolated people get inbred—too similar mating with too similar. This week we see that more exotic pairings can also degrade us. And, you know, this can even happen to rich and well-bred white people. In fact, it can especially happen to them, because they’re the ones with the money and spare time to explore exotic locales and mingle with exotics, exotically.
This is bad. This is really, really bad. If you, however personally innocent, find out you’re the product of such interspecies miscegenation, you better not just kill yourself. You better kill yourself with fire! And other people better not even touch your ashes. In fact, they better just pretend you never were. Yup, top this, Sherwood Anderson.
Some years later, Lovecraft will write about another hybrid population where the participants are even more widely separated in evolutionary time. “The Shadow Over Innsmouth” is rife with repulsion at the mixing. Repulsion, terror, that one extreme of the Lovecraftian reaction to the weird or the other. Yet in “Shadow Over Innsmouth,” we’ll also see the opposite reaction: attraction, wonder. Self-recognition, for we all come from the sea and can return to it. Acceptance.
In “Arthur Jermyn,” the fact that we all come from the jungle is not at ALL acceptable. Doesn’t matter that you’re a poet and a dreamer, the highest form of Homo sapiens. If you’re tainted by the past, you’re screwed. Or as Faulkner wrote, “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” Part of your identity (identity!) comes to you through blood, like genes and tendencies to illness or madness, or it comes as psychic reverberations, ancestral ghosts. Don’t just ask Arthur Jermyn. Ask Charles Dexter Ward or Jervas Dudley or the last of the de la Poers.
I’ll tell you one thing. You may not be able to escape the past no matter how hard you try. But messing around with old family artifacts, or tomes, or keys, or houses—sure to cause trouble. If only Arthur Jermyn had sold Jermyn House and gone off to Italy to write poetry and admire safe European ruins!
Nah. He probably would have run into that Belgian guy in a cafe, and the Belgian guy would have said, Whoa, you look just like this Congolese mummy I stole off the N’bangus.
The past. Gonna get you sometime, somehow.
Ruthanna’s Commentary
“Tell me about Winesburg, Ohio,” I say to my wife, who grew up in Ohio and therefore got assigned the thing in school. A look of horror appears on her face and she makes a ‘shoot me now’ gesture. I explain: “Apparently Lovecraft wasn’t impressed by it, and ‘Arthur Jermyn’ is him saying ‘I’ll show them all what a real family scandal looks like.’”
“Go, Howard!” says Sarah.
“No,” I say. “Don’t go, Howard.”
But he did. He went there, and wallowed in it. All Sarah can remember of Winesburg are nasty intimations about an effeminate man doing something uncouth with a younger gentleman, so it may still be an improvement over the inspiration. But dear lord, the catalogue of Degenerate Dutch snickering gets old quickly.
I vaguely recalled the denouement involving the revelation that Arthur’s great-great-grandmother was an ape. Which, yeah, having kids with something less sapient than you certainly bespeaks unfortunate taste in lovers, not to mention a distinct lack of interest in consent. But in fact, what we appear to have here isn’t an ape, but a previously unknown close relative on the homo tree. (Or human-ape hybrids, but this appears to be hearsay and makes little difference by the time of the story. Homo relatives are more interesting, so that’s what I’m going with.) They build cities, they have a religion—albeit unfortunate taste in gods—and they likely have language. In short, they’re just as smart as humans. Sure, they’ve got violent tempers, but frankly Homo Sap isn’t one to go throwing stones about that sort of thing. (The killer from The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll was born in the house where I now live; to the best of my knowledge the worst thing in his ancestry was a long line of Maryland aristocrats. He might have done better with a Congolese primate or two.)
So Arthur Jermyn’s horrifying revelation is that he’s got some not-quite-human heritage. Lovecraft would probably not have been delighted by the current controversy over whether we all carry a bit of Neanderthal in us. Admittedly it would be startling to discover it only a few generations back (perhaps some hobbit blood?), but I like to think most modern folk would handle it better than Arthur and his murderous grandfather.
Speaking of whom, I have little patience for infanticide stories at this point, and basically none when they’re written by people without kids and with a… narrow… idea of who deserves to live. This story’s narrator seems to have a lot of opinions about who doesn’t, or at least who shouldn’t want to. Even before Arthur’s ancestry comes out, we get the suggestion that plenty of people would kill themselves just for having his looks. Weirdly, the world is full of people who have rich, fulfilling lives in spite of not meeting societal appearance standards. Perhaps this early in his career, Howard remained sheltered from such tame deviations—or perhaps he simply disapproved.
Much of the story seems devoted to demonstrating what a blight on Wade’s noble ancestry was created by his wife’s contribution to the gene-line. His descendants—those who look human enough to be permitted out in the light of day—have tempers and wanton ways. They run off to join circuses. They consort with “gypsies” [sic] and music hall performers, and join the Navy as common sailors.
This is tepid stuff compared to the familial secrets that will come out in later and better stories: murderous cults with vast underground boneyards, anglophobic cannibalistic apes, and of course the terrifying glories of Y’ha-nthlei. Lovecraft comes back to this theme again and again—and no wonder, given his fears about his own family’s imperfect nobility. Every single one of these stories has something to make me flinch—also no wonder, given Lovecraft’s ideas about what might constitute ‘taint’ on a proud line. And yet, the theme gets at something real, something important, that he never quite does justice to.
No family—even or maybe especially those that appear perfectly reputable on the surface—is without its horrors. Sometimes these are right out on the surface, so nasty that you kind of wish you could hide them in an attic. Sometimes they’re buried deep, in lairs that no one outside the dread inner circle ever sees. And in rare cases, overt disreputability may mask hidden wonders and glories.
In other words, families are weird, and there’s a reason why so many people envy the Addams household. I’d love to see more neo-Lovecraftian stories explore this without tripping over the originals’ extraordinarily pedestrian bigotry.
Join us next week for “He,” and yet another reminder of Lovecraft’s minor issues with New York City.
Ruthanna Emrys’s neo-Lovecraftian novelette “The Litany of Earth” is available on Tor.com, along with the more recent but distinctly non-Lovecraftian “Seven Commentaries on an Imperfect Land.” Her work has also appeared at Strange Horizons and Analog. She can frequently be found online on Twitter and Livejournal. She lives in a large, chaotic household—mostly mammalian—outside Washington DC.
Anne M. Pillsworth’s short story “Geldman’s Pharmacy” received honorable mention in The Year’s Best Fantasy and Horror, Thirteenth Annual Collection. “The Madonna of the Abattoir” is published on Tor.com, and her first novel, Summoned, is available from Tor Teen. She currently lives in a Victorian trolley car suburb of Providence, Rhode Island.
More Lovecraftian girl cooties, please!
Yeah, not one of his better works.
This one really shows off a lot of Lovecraft’s weaknesses and prejudices and none of it’s good. I do wonder just how personal some of this was to him, though, despite his bluster of showing up Sherwood Anderson. He often referred to himself as a “poet and dreamer” and IIRC considered himself less than pleasant to look at. Is being 1/32 (or maybe 1/64, since great-great-grandma was a hybrid) gorilla better or worse than having both parents institutionalized? I’m not sure how Howard would have answered that question either.
This one is really just too pulpy to have much to say about it. Next week isn’t much better. I hope we get back to some serious mythos work we can sink our teeth into soon.
“The Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family” is just plain bad. An allegedly “mysterious” opening is followed up with a painful infodump and the reveal is something that even one of the Degenerate Dutch would worked out in the first half. The sole redeeming feature is that this became the much better “The Shadow Over Innsmouth”, after being welded to “Dagon” with the aid of 15 years writing experience.
Weird Tales: twice, if you can believe it, under the title “The White Ape” (which Lovecraft never liked). The first was April 1924, alongside Harry Houdini’s essay “The Hoax of the Spirit Lover” and the second part of the serial “The Spirit-Fakers of Hermannstadt” (I wonder who wrote them…), as well as Lovecraft and Eddy’s “The Ghost-Eater” and Lovecraft’s “Nemesis”. A reprint came in May 1935, along with the first part of Robert E. Howard’s “Beyond the Black River”, Clark Ashton Smith’s “The Flower Women”, August Derleth’s “Muggridge’s Aunt” and Robert Bloch’s “The Secret in the Tomb”.
Winesburg, Ohio: was credited by Ray Bradbury as an influence on The Martian Chronicles and Dandelion Wine. I would recommend those books over this story.
Gerry O’Brien @@@@@ 1 – Don’t worry. Girl cooties reproduce at a staggering rate and will one day RULE THE EARTH. Benevolently, of course.
“But in fact, what we appear to have here isn’t an ape, but a previously unknown close relative on the homo tree.”
Pedantically, a previously unknown close relative on the homo tree would by definition be an ape. That’s right folks, we’re all apes. LET THE PSYCHIC HORROR SEEP INTO YOUR SOULS AT THIS HIDEOUS REVELATION.
This one was literally painful to read. Racism? Class-ism? That charming latter-19th-century take on eugenics? Yep, double servings of those. Not one of HPL’s better works – hasn’t aged well, but I suspect was plenty lousy even when first published.
Phrases such as “it remained for a European to…” provided a bit of desperate comic relief. Still, given the overall horror and loathing inspired by the task of reading this tale, I found myself wishing, long before the end, that the final revelation would be that the stuffed goddess was in fact some long-lost Welsh tourist.
If I remember correctly, this one got a few jabs in “Scream for Jeeves,” where Bertie Wooster asserts that Arthur’s death had nothing to do with with that unfortunate prank pulled off by some members of the Drones Club where they got ahold of a stuffed gorilla and dressed it up with a necklace with the family crest before sending it to him. No, Bertie has to take the blame for this one. It was all his fault for telling Arthur (who always had to have his suits specially made because of the really, incredibly long arms) that he should go burn the latest one. Bertie admits he forgot to tell Arthur to take it off first.
It also makes me think of Farmer’s “Tarzan Lives” where he lists all the reasons Tarzan couldn’t have been raised by apes. It was a lost tribe of Neanderthals, people, duh. Have a clue. Although Arthur’s family, like Burroughs apes and Farmer’s Neanderthals, do seem to have a genetic tendency to insane rages.
I know, I know. Some of the themes in this story deserve more horror than snickers. But, I’m with Bertie on this one. Arthur should have remembered what the Drones were like before taking stuffed ape seriously.
I thought that this story was OK.Not major Lovecraft (“Colour,” “Cthulhu,” etc), but readable.As others have noted, the fact that it is yet another example of HPL working out story ideas that reach fruition later on (“Shadow Over Innsmouth”) adds interest.It’s always intriguing, after all, to see how themes and concepts mature over time.
Anne:”If we know what we really are, we’ll freak out. We’re apes, people! Naked apes! Capable (Lovecraft postulates) of interbreeding with hairier apes and sliding right back down the evolutionary ladder!
Ugh. Reverse evolution is always waiting to pounce.”
As I’ve said before, it’s this feeling that decay and degeneration are inevitable that makes HPL’s evolutionary ladder tolerable.Ascent is not inevitable.Indeed, the reverse seems to be true. Descent is the universal law. Regardless of how high your “race” climbs, it will fall.Only the Great Race of Yith have vanquished darkness and decay.They alone are eternal.
Aw yeah.
Portrayals of interspecies hybridization vary widely in fiction, including but not limited to: Commonplace, weird but cool, accepted but repulsive, too horrific to survive, and too horrific to write about. Xanth is at one end of the spectrum: almost everyone does it, which is titillating for a while but eventually lost its edge. Wheel of Time is at the other end, hinting briefly at things “you don’t want to know more about,” and if you want details, you have to envision them yourself.
Lovecraft’s stories fall at differing points on the spectrum from traumatizing glimpse (Arthur Jermyn) to meticulous detail (Dunwich), but often slide along it over the course of a story with slow buildup of clues leading to a climactic revelation. Innsmouth’s hero almost hit the “too horrific to live” point, but then reversed and landed happily in “weird but cool.” Wise man.
In Great Waters shows another kind of in-story diversity.. There, the circumstances of a human-merperson hybrid’s birth and upbringing determine whether he/she is a celebrated (if physically challenged) member of landbound royalty, or a misfit on both land and sea who might not really know why, or an abominable bastard who must be burned alive to protect the royal lineage.
“Stuffed goddess” ..*giggling*
“Life is a hideous thing…[science’s] reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world…” It’s perhaps not unreasonable to draw such apocalyptic conclusions from the revelations in “The Call of Cthulhu” or At the Mountains of Madness that the universe is swarming with advanced and dangerous alien life-forms. It makes less sense when an unstable Arthur Jermyn immolates himself because he finds archaeological proof that he had ancestors a little more simian than he likes–and his survivors seem to think he was right to kill himself!!
This reminds me of the much-quoted (if perhaps apocryphal) reaction by a prissy Victorian lady, upon being told of Darwin’s theory: “Descended from apes! Let us hope that it is not true, but if it is, let us hope that it does not become widely known.” Arthur’s suicidal overreaction is so melodramatically silly that I just want to laugh, give him a good shaking followed by a hug, and tell him “Wake up, get over this BS! What if some of your forebears did consort with vulgar dancers and music-hall performers, and got along (up to a point) with circus gorillas? You are an OK guy, a refined poet and scholar, so mellow out and enjoy yourself.” “Arthur Jermyn,” if nothing else, is a caricature highlighting the ultimate absurdity of racism. Among Lovecraft’s works, it is rivaled in this respect only by the supremely underwhelming climax of Medusa’s Coil: “…in deceitfully slight proportion, Marceline was a negress.”
And one of the “hideous things” that Science tells us is that populations that can fertilely interbreed are … the same species. So, whoever those “Portuguese” folks were, they were Homo Saps like us.
One can imagine that stuffed goddesses were available in the Lost City of the Onga People gift shop at reasonable prices.
@12, not quite. *Can* interbreed is not an absolute defining characteristic any more. If Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons had sufficiently different culture, habitat, and were socially isolated so as to constitute mostly separate gene pools (all of which we have to surmise at mostly) then they probably would be considered separate species even if they could and did occasionally interbreed. (Wolves and dogs can sometimes interbreed, there are species of cricket that are separated by habitat and emergence time but can interbreed if placed together in an artificial environment, etc. )
Anyway, Arthur’s suicidal horror that an ancestor 4 or 5 generations back was not quite human does seem like a comical overreaction today.
It reminds me of what purported to be a true story I once read (I’ve no idea how to go about finding it again without some rather, er, interesting, web searches).
It concerns a researcher working with orang-outangs in the forest. He had earned the trust of a particular female and spent much of his days following her around the forest and documenting everything.
One day, she lead him into a secluded spot behind a tree and, er, presented herself to him, in a way that her recognised as being an invitation to mate.
He declined, but his colleagues back in camp told him that he should have gone ahead in the spirit of scientific enquiry.
Regarding ape-human hybrids, I am sadly aware of this: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19926701.000-blasts-from-the-past-the-soviet-apeman-scandal.html?full=true#.VYE38blRHIU.
Sorry, I should have said, not a modern para-sapient ape, but one of our evolutionary closer relatives. Biological specificity and word count limits are sometimes at odds.
And yeah, inter-species boundaries are more fuzzy than once thought. Fuzzier once you bring genetic engineering into the mix. Spock was my formative example; I don’t think I realized when first watching how politically pointed his existence was in the 60s.
The story is pretty bad, for all the reasons other people have mentioned. There’s a part to the story that’s struck me as especially melancholy:
Perhaps I read too much into this passage, but the parallels with Lovecraft’s own life jump out at me. It reflects his own father’s absence (as a traveling salesman) and then confinement in a madhouse, but in a way that suggests that the cause was the son’s growing monstrousness.
Edward Lucas White wrote a much better and shamefully forgotten story on the same theme a few years later, “The Snout”. Three thieves break into the mansion of a wealthy recluse, and find themselves in a strange Xanadu-like palace full of surreal anthropomorphic artworks and other peculiarities. The recluse, it becomes clear, is very much a Jermeyns-type: bright, artistically brilliant, but isolated and bitterly ashamed of his not-quite-human primate nature. It’s a story that seriously needs rediscovering.
Erdosign @@@@@ 17 Interesting idea. I, too, was struck by Wade’s attitude toward the madhouse. His son Philip must have been a handful, though, what with his proclivity for climbing stuff and his fits of rage. The curtains! The furniture! The family china!
OneRatNoWall @@@@@ 18 Thanks for the tip! I’ll look for this story.
@18 & 19: I recall Edward Lucas White’s “Amina” being mentioned previously as introducing ghouls into supernatural literature. This is what Lovecraft had to say about him in “Supernatural Horror in Literature”:
“Very notable in their way are some of the weird conceptions of the novelist and short-story writer Edward Lucas White, most of whose themes arise from actual dreams. The Song of The Siren has a very persuasive strangeness, while such things as Lukundoo and The Snout arouse darker apprehensions. Mr. White imparts a very peculiar quality to his tales–an oblique sort of glamour which has its own distinctive type of convincingness.“
ETA: Have these been posted before? Anyway, new to someone: http://darkcornerbooks.com/2015/05/12/tintin-meets-h-p-lovecrafts-cosmic-horror/
Somewhat belatedly: I remember someone (Kenneth Hite, in his Tour de Lovecraft) pointing out that there’s another repellent point here … the location of the City of the Ape-Men is in the Belgian Congo, itself not without a seriously blood-soaked history, and A. Jermyn retains a Belgian agent to acquire the ape-goddess. One wonders how the “once-mighty” N’bangus were “persuaded” to part with it.
@21: The oppressive Belgian rule of the “Congo Free State” was the background for one of the grimmest Lovecraftian stories I’ve ever read, David Drake’s “Than Curse the Darkness”:
“It’s like this,” Sparrow said. “If they was evil, I guess that makes us good. I’d never thought of that before, is all.“
@14 I hadn’t heard that one, but I do remember a story about a zookeeper in charge of the penguin habitat making friends with a certain female penguin after her mate left her for another female (she’d been depressed and he wanted to cheer her up). There wasn’t anything unusual about it until one day his penguin friend brought him nesting material, an obvious gesture (for a penguin) that she considered him to be her mate.
So, I figure if a species as dissimilar to humans as a penguin can interpret a human’s attention as possible mating behavior, it wouldn’t be that much of a stretch for a much more similar species, like an orangutan, to do the same.
People in Lovecraft’s time were deathly afraid of being ‘outed’ if it was revealed they were passing as white – with the ‘one-drop rule’ meaning that whiteness was lost if there were any known African ancestry at all. I recall reading about various suicides of people who suddenly discovered that one of their ancestors was black. There’s nothing reasonable or admirable about such attitudes, but they were quite common at the time Lovecraft was writing, and clearly the gorilla is just a metaphor for ‘Negro’ ancestry.
Keep in mind that Lovecraft wrote “The Rats in the Walls” in response to learning that his grandmother was… Welsh. (The horror… the horror…)
It’s thankfully difficult for us to understand the old attitudes towards ‘race mixing’ – we don’t even sympathize with their ideas about what constituted a ‘race’.
From the 16C to the 18C Jews were still technically illegal in England (as they had been since 1290) but small numbers of Sephardim were tolerated if they didn’t make a fuss. (Spain didn’t formally lift the Alhambra Declaration until 1968, a full century after de facto toleration.) Indeed, when Dickens wrote Oliver Twist, he had probably never met a Jew.
This is relevant because one of the common euphemisms for Sephardim was “Portuguese”; Queen Elizabeth I had a “Portuguese” doctor who was a converso and possibly a crypto-Jew. When he was executed for high treason (hanged, drawn, quartered, all that) on trumped-up charges of attempting to poison the Queen, he said he loved the Queen as much as he loved Jesus Christ. The crowd jeered.
For what it’s worth, humans have the same number of hairs as other apes, just shorter and finer.