Welcome back to the Lovecraft reread, in which two modern Mythos writers get girl cooties all over old Howard’s original stories. Today we’re looking at “The Nameless City,” written in January 1921 and first published in the November 1921 issue of The Wolverine. You can read the story here.
Spoilers ahead.
“This hall was no relic of crudity like the temples in the city above, but a monument of the most magnificent and exotic art. Rich, vivid, and daringly fantastic designs and pictures formed a continuous scheme of mural painting whose lines and colours were beyond description. The cases were of a strange golden wood, with fronts of exquisite glass, and contained the mummified forms of creatures outreaching in grotesqueness the most chaotic dreams of man.”
Summary: Deep in the Arabian desert lie ruins ancient beyond all cities of men. The Arabs shun them, though Abdul Alhazred dreamed of them and wrote his famous couplet: “That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons even death may die.” Nevertheless, our narrator seeks the city, accompanied only by his camel; he’s always sought the strange and terrible.
He finds the ruins at night but waits to enter until dawn, when the sun rises through an oddly local sandstorm and a metallic clash seems to reverberate from deep underground to greet the day. The crumbled foundations offer little illumination into the history of the city, for time and blasting sand have long obliterated any carvings. Night comes with a chill wind that raises another local sandstorm amidst the gray stones.
The next day the narrator discovers a cliff riddled with low-ceilinged temples. He explores on hands and knees, more and more disturbed by the disproportionate lowness of the temple fixtures—disproportionate, that is, for human use. Night finds him still in the city. While attending to his suddenly edgy camel, he notices that the sand-stirring evening wind issues from a particular point in the cliff. Though troubled by a spectral presence, he goes to the spot and finds a larger temple with traces of painted murals, altars with curvilinear carvings, and an interior door opening onto a flight of curiously small and steep steps.
Equipped only with a torch, the narrator crawls feet-first down innumerable steps and through low tunnels. His torch dies. He keeps crawling, cheering himself with snippets from the daemonic lore he’s read. At last he comes to a level corridor lined with wood and glass boxes like coffins. Here he can kneel upright as he scrambles onward. Subterranean phosphorescence begins to light the scene, and he sees the boxes are indeed coffins containing not the human makers of the place but the preserved bodies of vaguely anthropomorphic reptiles, richly arrayed.
Huh, these must be totem animals of supreme importance to the ancient people, since they also take the place of people in the fantastic murals that cover the walls and ceiling of the passage. The narrator can’t read the script, but the pictures tell him the whole history of the race from its nomadic youth to its heyday to the coming of the desert that drove it deep underground, to a world foretold by its prophets. Death is shown only as the result of violence or plague, yet the allegorical reptiles seem gradually to be wasting away and growing more fierce in their hatred of the outer world—the final scene depicts them tearing apart a primitive-looking human. Some foreign tribesman, no doubt.
The narrator reaches the source of the phosphorescence—beyond a great brass door lies a descent into a vast space of misty light, the entrance into that promised inner world. He rests on the threshold in uneasy speculation, then starts at the sound of moaning coming from the coffin-lined passage. But it can only be the wind, returning home with the dawn.
He braces to withstand its force. The wind seems animated by a vindictive rage that claws and drags him toward the misty-bright underworld. Somehow he withstands it. As it passes over him, the wind curses and snarls in an unknown language, and he thinks that against the lit portal, he sees a rushing crowd of semi-transparent reptilian devils—the true inhabitants, after all, of the nameless city.
The wind dies with the last of the creatures to descend, and the great brass door clangs shut, leaving the narrator in utter darkness. Presumably he crawls back to the surface to write down this account, and to shiver when the night wind rattles his windows.
What’s Cyclopean: “Cacodaemoniacal” is the adjective of the day.
The Degenerate Dutch: There’s a little bit of orientalism here, though nothing that would be out of place in another author of the same period.
Mythos Making: We have here both the first appearance of Abdul Alhazred, and of the couplet that eventually turns out to be A) from the Necronomicon, and B) about the Big C himself. We also get a shout-out to the Dreamlands cities of Sarnath and Ib.
Libronomicon: The narrator’s “cherished treasury of daemoniac lore” includes Alhazred (presumably the Necronomicon), Damascius (a Platonist not generally prone to “apocryphal nightmares”), Gauthier de Metz’s Image du Monde, Lord Dunsany (the quote’s from Probable Adventure of the Three Literary Men), and Thomas Moore (a search doesn’t turn up the direct quote but suggests it’s from Alciphron). One quote from de Metz which might have gone through the narrator’s mind: “The ether is of such startling brilliance that no sinner can gaze at it with impunity: this is why men fall down in a faint when angels appear before them.”
Madness Takes Its Toll: Alhazred is mad (by definition and title), and the narrator goes “almost mad” during his final not-quite-confrontation with the city’s inhabitants.
Ruthanna’s Commentary
I talked a couple of weeks ago about Lovecraft’s obsession with old things—and how he has mixed success communicating the terror of antiquity. Here, where the time periods in question stretch far earlier than human history, it works. The alligator people of the Nameless City don’t quite illustrate the deep time rise and fall of civilizations as well as the Yith, but that’s a high bar. And this story is clearly an early rehearsal for some of those later takes on ancient cities, pre-human races, and long-lost civilizations that eternal lie.
The connection between the depths of the earth and the depths of time also works for me, and the contrast of the relic hall with what lies above… Here we are in what seems to be a relatively ordinary, if creepy, archeological site, descending into caves with absurdly limited safety equipment, finding carved stone rooms and stone altars. And then, we turn a corner, and there are wood-and-glass display cases. They’re so ridiculously out of place in their familiarity, so unlikely to have survived through unimaginable aeons, that they push over the hump of disbelief and become effectively shocking. And hell, maybe the alligator people just have really good preservatives. It’s a pity our intrepid explorer isn’t actually set up to retrieve decent samples.
Or to sketch out those fabulous murals. An image search turns up no illustrations that seem even remotely adequate to Lovecraft’s description. Anyone know of any good ones? Someone must have at least tried—I don’t do visual arts at all, and I got itchy fingers.
Something else I want to see—if Lovecraft thinks these alligator dudes violate all known biological principles, has anyone ever tried to replicate what his description of a platypus would sound like?
Then at the end, we get the alligator people ghosts. This part doesn’t quite work for me, as by this point my expectations have been raised to the point of expecting full-on live alligator people. But even this limited form of immortality is an interesting alternative reading on the Alhazred couplet—a couplet that Lovecraft later reused under more memorable circumstances. That re-use makes one wonder. Does the desert city have a connection to R’lyeh, the alligator people to Cthulhu? I kind of like the idea of a sunken desert twin to the more famous sunken ocean city.
Finally, the brief mention of Sarnath and Ib: I’ve always tended to think of the Dreamlands stories as largely separate from the Mythos stories, an interpretation that doesn’t stand up at all on this closer reread. This isn’t the only place where aspects of both appear together, and of course Randolph Carter has adventures touching on both. And yet the rules and style remain quite different. I hesitate to suggest this, because it certainly wasn’t authorial intent and Lovecraft would have screwed it up if it had been, but for “Dreamlands” should we be reading “Dreamtime”? Events and places that have prehistorical reality, but can also be reached under the right circumstances by modern seekers?
And of course we know that there are some important Mythos artifacts hidden in the Australian desert. I’d love to see a take on this—in story form or otherwise—from someone more familiar with Australian aboriginal cultures. As a bonus, they could also have a stab at that platypus description.
Anne’s Commentary
Another story based on a dream (per Lovecraft), this one does have the logistics of nightmare—the practical aspects of the narrator’s journey go neglected in favor of mood, atmosphere and improbable feats. I’m tempted to think our unnamed is actually Randolph Carter, that incorrigible seeker of wonder and terror, on another of his dream-quests. After all, he mentions Sarnath and Ib in the same breath as Chaldaea, as if they’re equally real to him. And how but in dream-quest can one camel carry enough water and provisions for such an expedition? And who but a dreamer would dare keep crawling into the bowels of the earth long after his single torch expired? Who but a dreamer could, in fact, “see” that a lightless passage was long, even before it was illuminated by underworld phosphorescence?
The realistic counter for “Nameless City” is the later and longer “At the Mountains of Madness,” another tale centered on the exploration of an ancient city whose history can be read on its walls, and where there are certain survivals. In “Mountains,” the logistics of the Miskatonic expedition are given in great detail, as are all its movements and findings on the frozen continent. In keeping with the heft of the novella, the survivals are material, no mere phantoms, and they are far from impotent. Along with the Australian ruins of “Shadow out of Time,” “Mountains” is the final flowering of Lovecraft’s love for the lost civilization trope.
But the basic themes and features are all in “Nameless City.” We have a narrator who is at once open to the weird but who nervously clings to conventional interpretations long after they’re tenable. The lowness of the structures and furniture in the ruins is “disproportionate” only because the narrator assumes the ancient people were humans. Maybe they were really short humans? And those reptiles in the murals and coffins can only be animal totems, so central to the society that they become universal avatars for the dominant humans. Long after the reader has figured it out (um, the mummies with their hand-like foreclaws and huge, even super-Jovean craniums?), our narrator begins to question his assumptions. Even then, he hopes that the memorials in the phosphorescent underworld will be more human. Hunger for the strange, for discovery, drives such men onward; fear of the unknown pulls them back. A constant tug-o-war for Lovecraft’s characters, and, I think, for Lovecraft himself.
Many of us can relate, can’t we?
Dyer and company, in “Mountains,” will initially assume the barrel-shaped organisms they uncover are animals, but they admit the truth much sooner. Good for them, and appropriate for the more science fictional story.
After the dynamics of wonder and fear, survival is the big concern of “Nameless.” Two kinds of survival, in fact, that of one’s self and that of one’s history. Lovecraft has enormous sympathy for the collective memory preserved in a society’s cultural artifacts, notably art and literature. In “Nameless,” the narrator is uneasy until he discovers carvings, painting and, critically, a written alphabet. Ah, the city previously personified as “inarticulate,” steeped in “unending sleep,” “unvocal,” “forgotten,” even “an ogre under a coverlet,” starts to come alive for him. The murals in the passage of coffins are the ultimate thrill, a comprehensive history of millions of years!
In “Mountains,” the history on the walls is more concrete—not painted but carven, since stone is much more likely to survive the eons than pigments. It’s also disjointed, but novella-length gives Dyer and Danforth time to piece together the narrative, tentatively, in the manner of realistic historical research.
For Lovecraft, the survival of collective memory, history, is overall a positive thing, even if he does worry about occult literature, like the Necronomicon, and about the ultimate knowledge that may make us flee back to ignorance. The survival of individuals (and even of species) is more of a problem. Look at what Joseph Curwen and friends must do for it. And the icy doctor of “Cool Air.” And Herbert West, the reanimator. And the Great Race of Yith. And the K’n-yan of “The Mound,” who fade into a ghostly semi-material existence, just like the reptilian race of “Nameless.” Interesting that the reptilian race also lives in a phosphorescent underworld, and have become cruel and ridden with hatred for the upper world.
On earth only the Deep Ones get away with living in glory forever, but then again, the narrator has discovered he’s one of them. Identity matters, it seems. Nameless narrator is overjoyed that the history of the nameless city survives. He’s not so happy about the survival, however phantasmal, of its inhuman inhabitants. Not that one can really blame him, considering how they do their windy best to rip him to shreds.
Oh well. We all must try to survive, and for Lovecraft, sympathy even for alien survivors will come in time.
Last word: Weird winds. Like green mists, never good. The flying polyps create them, and whatever invades Erich Zann’s attic, and now the reptilian phantoms of the nameless city! Better get you some good storm shutters.
Next week, we gaze into the starry abyss with “The Haunter of the Dark.”
Ruthanna Emrys’s neo-Lovecraftian novelette “The Litany of Earth” is available on Tor.com, along with the more recent but distinctly non-Lovecraftian “Seven Commentaries on an Imperfect Land.” Her work has also appeared at Strange Horizons and Analog. She can frequently be found online on Twitter and Livejournal. She lives in a large, chaotic household—mostly mammalian—outside Washington DC.
Anne M. Pillsworth’s short story “Geldman’s Pharmacy” received honorable mention in The Year’s Best Fantasy and Horror, Thirteenth Annual Collection. “The Madonna of the Abattoir” is published on Tor.com, and her first novel, Summoned, is available from Tor Teen. She currently lives in a Victorian trolley car suburb of Providence, Rhode Island.
A likeable story, perhaps most notable for the first appearance of Alhazred. Is this a story about how one should never confuse an archaeologist’s hypothesis with actual history?
Weird Tales: “The Nameless City” appeared in the Fall 1936 issue of Don Wollheim’s Fanciful Tales of Space and Time, along with Robert E. Howard’s “Solomon Kane’s Homecoming” and August Derleth’s “The Man from Dark Valley”. It made it into Weird Tales in the November 1938 issue, alongside Robert Bloch’s “The Hound of Pedro” and Robert E. Howard’s “Recompense”.
Potentially relevant: Randall Garrett’s “The Horror Out of Time” also features a narrator who has an unpleasant experience while exploring a long-deserted city: since this is a Takeoff! story (like the classic “Backstage Lensman”), there’s a sting in the tail.
The quote from Alciphron: is, in the Google Books edition, on page 49 as part of Letter 4.
Silent Conversation: is a game with three levels based on “The Nameless City”. Literally. http://futureproofgames.com/games/silent/
Model trains: Stolen from File 770. Non-enthusiasts might like the images of old Salem. http://www.ottgallery.com/MRR.html
A line from Ganpat’s (M.L. Gompertz) Harilek is ringing through my head- I’m glad the camels are dead.
1: you don’t travel the desert alone, it’s dangerous.
2: when you find an ancient city that nobody has seen in millenia, you don’t explore it alone. First, once again, it’s not safe. Second, there is too much to analyse to do it properly on your own.
3: when you make a discovery that completely changes the known history of the world, you publish something better that incoherent ramblings. And if possible, without specism: compared to what the humans were at that time, alligator people clearly are a great people.
Once again, the setting is great, but the narrator disappoints.
One of my issues with this story and with Mountains is the incredible precision with which the narrators can read the murals and the carved reliefs.
Readers on the East Coast are warned that there is a high chance of Wendigo activity. You are advised to hide from all of the servitors of Ithaqua and hope that you may live to see another dawn.
I’ve always liked this one. Pretty sure that the narrator is so insistent on the animal-avatar hypothesis because he knows better and is having a spot of denial.
He’s quite lucky about their form of immortality, isn’t he? Given that the legends state that people don’t come back from the place– there’s only one casualty shown in the murals, but there may well have been more after the murals stopped.
The legends about the part of the Arabian desert in which the Nameless City lies are, I am told, real, though I have never read the primary sources; but you can find depictions of the vicinity as a no-man’s-land in stories by both Machen and Blackwood, who probably shared the same sources Lovecraft used, and of course lost Irem of the Pillars is mentioned both in the Koran and in ‘The City of Brass’ in the Thousand-and-One Nights.
I’d had no notion the Gauthier du Metz was real. What a find! Must poke around for a translation.
I’ve never been able to work out what’s going on at the end of this story before. It never occurred to me to think of the reptiles as ghosts, despite their being described as “half-transparent”, but that makes a lot more sense—I couldn’t picture where they were going or coming from in this corridor, but if they’re immaterial they can be travelling with the wind, or even constituting the wind, as it rushes past the narrator. I do wonder if there are still material reptile-people down in the luminous abyss beyond the brass door, though.
StrongDreams @6:
Lovecraft’s narrators do seem to be remarkably lucky in finding stretches of murals or carvings from which they can, over the course of a few hours, reconstruct the entire history of a society despite not being able to read the captions. One might consider whether there are any such places in our own civilization. None of them even seem to be trained art historians, either, which doesn’t stop Dyer from confidently identifying which sculptures are “decadent”.
Nor are those two the only examples of this in Lovecraft—in The Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath Randolph Carter is led past frescoes in the windowless stone monastery on the plateau of Leng from which, despite seeing them fleetingly in the rays of a dim and moving lamp, he is able to construct a remarkably detailed outline of that country’s history.
ngogam @@@@@ 10: There’s a set of bas reliefs and murals in one room of the US Capitol Building that are intended to do just that. Though they stop mid industrial revolution. Next time I’m there, I may try to figure out how much, and how accurately, a beetle person might be able to infer from them.
But agreed that Lovecraft’s archaeologists are not at the top of their field. Better site preservation technique than Indiana Jones, but worse documentation.
ngogam (@10): Physicist and author Gregory Benford worked with the US Department of Energy on the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) for storing radioactive materials in salt domes. He participated on the topic of designing warning markers that would be effective over the 10,000 years of toxic potential for such wastes. The short answer is that they could not find a format, be it linguistic, artistic, or symbolic, that could be expected to communicate “Danger! Stay Clear!” for that timespan. Or even one that might be accepted today as a standard by all nations (like France, India, Russia, China) that face the same storage/warning problem. His book, Deep Time: How Humanity Communicates Across Millennia, delves into the topic of long-term message transmission.
Not just the short poetry extract but the entire plot is cribbed from Alciphron; the narrator stops his quote, not because he “feared to recite more” but because he would then have been in the awkward position of narrating what was about to happen to him.
This is again not really a horror story that he tries to interpret in a way that makes it a horror story, but it doesn’t really work. The narrator is too curious and reckless to be suddenly frightened just because the ghosts aren’t human.
The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is a story which ISFDb classes as part of the Dream Cycle but I think is closer to the Cthulhu Mythos: this is a story which ISFDb has as a mythos story but seems to me to be closer to the cycle. My reread has led me to wonder whether the events of this story might be a vivid desert dream: our narrator heads beneath the Nameless City as night falls and escapes it as dawn breaks. I also wonder whether the insubstantial reptiles went the way of the K’n-yan.
I’ve tried posting several times with no luck. I keep winding up in moderation hell. All those missing posts are mine. Let’s try one more time with no link:
This one starts off well, but for me, the deeper the narrator goes, the worse the story becomes. There are some interesting elements, but Lovecraft just doesn’t convey them well. He eventually made use of most of them in much better forms.
The obvious inspiration here is Irem of the Pillars, which he references in the story. There are plenty of other lost cities attributed to central Arabia as well. Ubar, which is sometimes identified as the same as Irem, though that may have come more into travel literature in the 30s or 40s. There’s also Azzanathkona, which does get a mention in Clement of Alexandria, but really came to the fore in the late 20s and again during the war, so probably not on HPL’s radar.
Add Afrasiab to the Libronomicon. He’s a character from the Shahnameh. I don’t know if that was also in the family library or if Lovecraft got it from one of the libraries in town, but the reference is obscure enough, he must have read it at some point.
What did strike me here has to do with Lovecraft’s approach to deep time. He clearly expects the reader to find a sense of dread, if not outright horror, at the idea that there were intelligent races before humankind who achieved more than our kind have even dreamt of. When it’s come up before in the reread, most of us have expressed more interest than dread. But I got to thinking: Lovecraft hopes to instill dread by calling humanity’s place in the cosmos into question. Could it be that what’s really affecting him here is the idea that the Phillipses (who, when you get right down to it and despite the protestations of the aunts, were esssentially nouveau riche) weren’t really more special than the common folk of the town? Or perhaps even the idea that northwestern Europeans weren’t inherently better than others? I’m not articulating this all that well, but I think that might be some of the psychology behind him finding this idea uncomfortable.
@DemetriosX: apologies for the commenting issue; I think I’ve fixed the problem (and also added your link back in), but sorry for all the trouble!
@17
Thanks, Bridget. The story in that link is rather interesting. An entire unit of the Long Range Desert Group (which helped inspire The Rat Patrol) got wiped out after discovering a lost city in Central Arabia.
Eugene R @@@@@ 12: Ooh, thank you for the reminder of Deep Time. I was lucky enough to get to read it for work a few years back, for an article on how people think about as-yet-non-existent technology. Amazing book, and I need to pick up my own copy.
Birgit @@@@@ 14: Agreed–this is something that bothers me in a lot of horror stories. More so in Crichton’s stuff, where characters actively try to act like they’re in science fiction and get punished for it. At least in Lovecraft, you can imagine that it really was SF and the characters were just too chicken to notice.
For this particular narrator… that sort of abrupt about-face is extremely common in Lovecraft’s stuff. I get the distinct impression that he was fascinated by the things he was phobic of (not uncommon), and felt guilty for being fascinated by things he’d been raised to dismiss (ditto). Still frustrating, even though the fascination/revulsion dynamic is central to many of these stories.
SchuylerH @@@@@ 15: The further I get in this reread, the more convinced I am that the boundaries between Dreamlands and Mythos are very fuzzy.
DemetriosX @@@@@ 16: Yes. And every time the narrator starts to sympathize with a strange alien species, it abruptly becomes clear that said species was at the top of their social food chain… and then got bumped off by those they conquered or enslaved. Quel coincidence!
More generally, he’s very attached to the idea that your worth comes from your own race/species being THE BEST. Very Victorian “ladder of creation” attitude, and one we still get in modern obsessions with ranking everyone and everything. I once read a rant (for the same reason I read Deep Time, actually) about how cognitive enhancement (hypothetical really good enhancement with no side effects) would be terrible because then we wouldn’t be able to tell whose kids were really smartest.
Really, we’re an exasperating species.
@16: It’s an interesting story but I’m having difficulty finding corroboration: all of the other online references to Azzanathkona as a city which I can find come after that article and reference it. I’m wondering if it’s the result of some exceptional Invisible Cities style project and whether I dreamt that I was an inhabitant of lost Carcosa, or whether an inhabitant of Carcosa dreamt that he was a 21st century Lovecraft fan. Either way, I now have a headache and I’m going to read some straightforward Robert E. Howard adventures until I calm down.
@20
Well, I first heardabout it through Judith Weingarten’s Zenobia blog. Azzanathkona is a goddess with a temple in Dura-Europos, but is thought by archaeologists to refer to a city as well. One possibility is an island in the Euphrates, but there are a couple of possibilities putting it in the Nejd, so who knows. In any case, southern central Arabia probably has quite a few abandoned cities in it, victims of both climate change and shifting trade routes.
Can’t wait for the next one! Don’t forget Haunter of the Dark is a sequel to Robert Bloch’s The Shambler from the Stars, then Bloch wrote a third part called the Shadow from the Steeple. Both are very entertaining.
@21: I’m no expert on ancient history but I think I can definitely discount the LRDG bit: in 1942, the LRDG were fighting Rommel’s forces in Libya and Tunisa: they were in later years active in the eastern Mediterranean but I’m pretty sure they never got to Arabia. Besides, they were a small, elite, group (~350 men): losing a “unit” from that number is a substantial loss and the kind of thing that would have merited serious investigation.
The temple of Artemis Azzanathkona is at Dura-Europos: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dura-Europos. Chemical warfare in the 3rd century!
The search for lost cities of Arabia is ongoing: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantis_of_the_Sands
As a follow-up to @7, have we lost Anne to the Wind-Walker?
In Declare, Tim Powers has a great, creepy scene in Irem of the Pillars.
Regarding Lovecraft’s narrator in this story, it’s comical how deep his denial is in the face of the mounting evidence.
Do the “alligator people” also remain nameless? I used to think they were the followers of Yig, but those appear to be from different stories.
@25 AeronaGreenjoy
You’re thinking of the Serpent-men of Valusia, who were originally created by Robert E. Howard. We’ll get a bit about them next week. Howard’s serpent men are more upright and generally taller than the alligator people here. Nevertheless, apparently Lin Carter and Clark Ashton Smith did try to equate the two after HPL’s death. It’s all very fluid, of course, but I see them as two distinct groups.
So they are nameless. Or rather, we never learn what they called themselves.
I just read this IO9 piece about what makes a good twist, and am thinking about how that applies here and in many of Lovecraft’s other stories.
I don’t think Lovecraft has ever shocked me with an ending–for a genre-savvy reader, it’s usually obvious that the hallucination/legend/mural refers to something real, that the person who suddenly acts sick has been replaced or changed, and that italics are coming. But it’s never obvious to the characters, usually because they’re in deep denial about something that just doesn’t fit their preferred worldview.
Which brings up two questions for me. Did Lovecraft intend these endings to work as shockers, or are they meant to be all about the psychology of the character’s comfortable worldview breaking down? (The latter is clearly the case in, for example, “The Unnamable,” where the narrator forces the breakdown on someone else.) And what makes the difference between the stories that work in spite of the predictable revelation, and those that don’t?
@28 Ruthanna
I think Lovecraft probably did mean for these to shock. They are less shocking for us today, because we have nearly a century’s more worth of genre (much of it influenced by him) than readers did in his day. Certainly, there were already plenty of tropes in weird and horror fiction and the shock reveal was one of them, but Lovecraft’s approach seems to be a little different.
There are a couple of factors that I can see that make the difference between success and failure despite the predictability. The first is a sound framework leading up to the end. When he takes the time for a slow build-up to the ultimate horror, carefully layering incidents and clues, he is much more successful. Good examples would be “The Shadow over Innsmouth” or “The Colour out of Space”. When he resorts to thesaurrhea or outright telling us that things are creepy, weird, or terrifying, he is far less successful.
But a good framework isn’t always enough. “The Festival” builds nicely, but fails at the end, for example. The separation between event and reveal also seems to be a factor. The longer he goes between saying a horrible thing happened and the italics, the more things we hear about in the interval, the less the stories work. “The Whisperer in Darkness” is about the only one we’ve covered so far that manages to work in spite of this, but that’s extremely rare.
@28: It’s an interesting question. Lovecraft’s twists tend to be ones which pull the rug from under the characters. For the horror audience though, twists and scares decay over time as the readership gets genre-savvier: even if Lovecraft originally intended his endings as shocks, they will eventually turn into the psychological category as his characters are left behind (I would be very interested to know what kind of reception Lovecraft’s stories got when they were new). I would also suggest that the reveals which still work are ones where the line, if not entirely unpredictable in context, is still a striking image in its own right: one of my favorite examples of this is from T. E. D. Klein’s “The Events at Poroth Farm”, which I’m rot13ing and despacing for those who haven’t yet read it: fbzrgvzrfjrsbetrggboyvax.
@16 DemetriosX
Agreed – I suspect a lot of the ‘cosmic horror’ in the work of HPL is actually driven by worry that people from the ‘good families’ of New England may not actually represent the pinnacle of existence. Just look at the race politics in ‘Call of Cthulhu.’
@28 R.Emrys
Despite the italics, I don’t believe most were intended as twist endings. After all, there’s usually so many clues provided that most readers can scarcely be surprised. (I was disappointed, after the ‘no natural death’ hint in this story, not to see real, live lizard people.) These stories are working more on the level of letting the reader watch events remorselessly prying open a door that the narrator is desperately trying to keep shut.
There are a few comic book versions:
Esteban Maroto and Roy Thomas created one for Cross Plains Comics in 2000; it’s been reprinted several times.
Selfmadehero gave us an adaptation by Pat Mills, illustrations by Attila Futaki in the Lovecraft Anthology #2; this is a lovely version, and i my favorite.
Tim Spavero did an adaptation for Planet Lovecraft (I have never yet got my hands on a copy of that magazine; I collect’s it’s heir, Stragne Aeons assiduously). This version may be seen as an electronic publication. It is quite good.
There are a few recordings of the story. I like Nick Gisburne: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTcn8DqGEgk
Morgan Scorpion is, frankly, irresistable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIMKGtjVgyY
One of course must tip the hat to The HP Lovecraft Literary Podcast: http://hppodcraft.com/2009/11/12/episode-19-ex-oblivione-the-nameless-city/
There is a nice map showing how you, too, can get lost in The Nameless City (by Jsaon Thompson): http://mockman.com/2012/06/08/lovecraft-sketch-mwf-the-nameless-city/
I haven’t mentioned it before, but another very good and thoughtful analysis of the rekative merits of HPL’s stires was by Kenneth Hite on his Livejournal. It is collected in the breezy and entertaining book, Tour de Lovecraft. Here are Mr. Hite’s thoughts about The Nameless City: http://princeofcairo.livejournal.com/97564.html
@5: I don’t think it’s fair to judge a story from the 1920s based on modern standards of archaeology.
@24: “In Declare, Tim Powers has a great, creepy scene in Irem of the Pillars.”
And it’s true that, as described in Declare, Kim Philby’s father explored the area.
This is one of my favourite Lovecraft tales; it has a rich, poetic quality that grips me every time I read it.
Just last night I discovered Lovecraft had written a short fragment called ‘The Descendent’ in 1926, in which a grey, wrinkled and “harmlessly mad” man, once a “scholar and aesthete”, now a total recluse, who lives alone in London (except for a feline companion), reveals his true identity to a young, would-be scholar of the Necronomicon.
He is Lord Northam — a man of ancient nobility who can trace his family line back to the Roman invasion of Britain and whose family castle is located on the Yorkshire coast. Now he lives at an inn, desperately trying to drown out his thoughts in “books of the tamest and most puerile kind” and “gay, insipid novels”.
Lord Northam has spent his former life studying every kind of mystical, religious and occultic tradition in a desperate quest to escape the mundanities of drab, everyday life. In the brief, tragically incomplete fragment, Northam does manage to reveal that he…
“…once went into the desert of Araby to seek a Nameless City of faint report, which no man has ever beheld.”
About a million years after this post was written, I stumbled upon the Lovecraft Reread posts and have been hungrily devouring them. I got this far when I had to comment, because something struck me as I was reading this review.
When I was a kid, I heard the palindrome attributed to Napoleon, “Able was I ere I saw Elba.” I quoted it to a teacher, who pointed out to me that Napoleon would have spoken it in French, rendering it a statement that was NOT a palindrome, and thus refuting my assertion g hat he actually said this. I was disappointed, but figured it made more sense that someone else came up with it and just attributed it to Napoleon.
My point here being, if Lovecraft says the dude who coined the couplet, “that is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons even death may die,” was an Arab… wouldn’t he have written it in Arabic? I mean, I know Lovecraft was a racist PoS, but he was also a good writer. Wouldn’t he have known he should either the original would be a couplet in Arabic but wouldn’t translate that way in English (think of Japanese haikus – in Japanese they follow the strict 5-7-5 syllable rule, but can translate to over 20 syllables in English), or else that the original wasn’t a couplet, but for some reason the English translator made it that way when converting it?
Is it even possible to write a couplet in Arabic?
Why attribute the couplet to a language he obviously didn’t know and just assume the rules would work in his favor?
I guess I’m odd – amoral outer gods who fly through universal aether, I can buy, but this stupid couplet breaks my suspense of disbelief.
I’ve always assumed that, as with the Odyssey or the Eddas, some translators put the Necronomicon in rhyme and some prefer prose. The English translator of the Poetic Necronomicon remains anonymous due to having been eaten by an Unspeakable Abomination just after submitting it to her editor. But I kind of like the idea that Al-Hazred is in fact some white dude trying to sound ancient and mystic–which has the advantage of being true on a meta level.
And now I’d love for someone fluent in the appropriate flavor of Arabic to take a stab at creating the “original” version of the couplet, complete with a literal translation as well as the poetic version we all know and love.
The obvious analogy here is Omar Khayyam. Even if they don’t know the attribution, almost everybody knows the “loaf of bread, a jug of wine…” bit. But Edward FitzGerald took huge liberties in his translation. Rhyme might not even have mattered in Arabic poetry of the 7th/8th centuries. In Classical Greek all that mattered was the meter, so rhyme isn’t necessarily an essential component to poetry.
Since this thread has already been raised from essential saltes before I guess it’s not an issue if I indulge in some thread necromancy of my own. Also catching up on the series like Tazzy.
To the question of the Arabic translation of the Eternal Aeons couplet, a search found some suggestions. Most of them seem to come from, as would be expected, gaming supplements like “Further Notes on the Necronomicon” which gives it as:
ما ميتا ما قارد يتبقي
سر مدي فانا يجي الشذاذ الموت
“La mayyitan ma qadirun yatabaqa sarmadhi
fa itha yaji Ash-Shuthath al-mautu qad yantahi”
I have no way to judge that for correctness, in spite of my probable descent from Andalusi stock. I haven’t done further digging yet – saving some links for later, but these may be useful if anyone’s interested in the topic:
I took the translation above from: http://al-azrad.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-much-discussed-couplet.html
And this site seems to be entirely devoted to translation of Mythos terms:
http://alhazret.blogspot.com/
I would like to take the chance to thanks the authors and commenters here for the fun read thus far, too.
The passage of time certainly does change interpretations. I don’t know if it was Suneel Joshi who first put Lovecraft into the framework he now calls cosmic horror or cosmicism, but he certainly influenced me in seeing Lovecraft as emblematic of that era when humanity was still coming to terms with the scale of time [most geological revelations were only a few generations old or less] and space [still current news when HPL was alive]. Just as the dark side of religion, or electricity, or disease had once driven horror [and HPL still used them too], so now he was driven by scale.
And biology and archaeology still have not provided us with ancient civilizations before our known pre/history, nor sentient earlier species, nor sentient aliens, still less any of the above who existed for far longer ages than we now have, or accomplished more or as much.
SO tough to say for sure. I would have been shocked if anyone of his time would not have found the idea of millions of year old alligator people terrifying and unnerving. I am not at all convinced that it would not be terrifying and shocking to almost all humans of today.
I didn’t see the specism, either. Archaeologists today are fully as prone, at least in writing that reaches the public, to seek metaphorical implications of things that might be taken literally. Images of stone-age combat got that treatment for a long time. Maya art depicting warfare and violent ritual ditto. There was that era in which the literal simply could not be understood as such, it must be something else. The idea of representative totem animals certainly has generations of professional tradition, and seems to still be accepted as part of many cultures.
SO I don’t think it either unreasonable that even a professional of that era, let alone adventurer, or even of our own era, would reach such a conclusion, even if tentatively. The narrator gives it up more slowly than most readers do today, but then we have had our mental pumps primed to assume the existence of alien races. By a lot of pop culture that just assumes they exist, must exist, and suggests forms for them.
FWIW, my pet theory is that pre-Enlightenment humans would have been reasonably well able to accommodate ancient lifeforms or aliens, by fitting them into their preconceptions. They would not have had a grip on the scale of space or time, or believed it. But ancient and powerful beings and civilizations, on earth or from beyond? They were primed by religions to believe these things, they just would have given pre-existing category names to them. A workable, if inaccurate picture. Consider the material available in Hinduism, or even Judaism with its very loose, eminently expandable pre-cataclysmic world.
The Enlightenment has ultimately given us the tools to work toward understanding of geologic time, the Earth’s biological history, the scale of space and more accurate ways of categorizing any future aliens, as such. But for a few hundred years it actually got rid of the old models and imposed a material and conceptual straitjacket of the purely observable, rational, categorizable, systematic structure that we needed to get us there. An early modern of the 20th century saw that world of new and liberating knowledge of humanity massively upturned by new scientific progress, at least as much as any traditional Christian saw his world upturned, and probably more than your average Hindu scholar did. Thus we were probably more prone to panic about aliens or ancient gators in 1930 than in 1430. Or at least have fewer ways to accommodate the revelation on a daily go forward basis.
Now we are in an interesting position. We are primed to expect aliens. We may even have reached the tipping point or be approaching one at which more people expect them than not. We may still panic at the revelation, but we expect it on some level. Maybe not predecessors here on earth, but the idea is out there.
What if neither of those things is ever proved to be true? Right now there is no basis for assuming otherwise, but that might one day be a more traumatizing revelation.
Either way, a modern observer of the nameless city is still likely to consider the possibility of totem or symbolic content in the art, probably the more so if a professional archaeologist. A regular person will certainly leap more quickly than in the 20s to the conclusion that they actually were alligator people. I’m not sure either approach is condemnable.
Then again, if I were that explorer i’d probably assume the latter early on, like most readers, be interested in the discovery, give serious thought to hiding it, and be grateful this people is not still around.
Thank you for this. I find that I enjoy summaries of Lovecraft’s stories way more than the originals. Old HP had a wonderful imagination, but he was a terrible writer. Some of his stories are somewhat readable, but most are just plain awful in their execution. I’d love for a competent writer to rework his stories to make them actually engaging.