The James Tiptree, Jr. Literary Award Council has just announced the 2015 winners and honor list. The Tiptree Award “is presented annually to a work of science fiction or fantasy that explores and expands gender roles. The award seeks out work that is thought-provoking, imaginative, and perhaps even infuriating. It is intended to reward those writers who are bold enough to contemplate shifts and changes in gender roles, a fundamental aspect of any society.”
The 2015 James Tiptree Jr. Award goes to “The New Mother” by Eugene Fischer and Lizard Radio by Pat Schmatz. More on this year’s winners, and the complete honor list, below the fold.
2015 Tiptree Award Winners:
“The New Mother” by Eugene Fischer (Asimov’s Science Fiction, April/May 2015)

Lizard Radio by Pat Schmatz (Candlewick, 2015)

Honor List:
- Susan Jane Bigelow, “Sarah’s Child” (Strange Horizons, 19 May 2014)
- Nino Cipri, “The Shape of My Name” (Tor.com, 2015)
- Carola Dibbell, The Only Ones (Two Dollar Radio, 2015)
- Matt Fraction (writer) and Christian Ward (artist), ODY-C, Vol. 1: Off to Far Ithicaa (Image, 2015)
- Alex Marshall, A Crown for Cold Silver (Orbit, 2015)
- Seanan McGuire, “Each to Each” (Lightspeed, June 2014, Women Destroy Science Fiction!)
- A Merc Rustad, “How to Become a Robot in 12 Easy Steps” (Scigentasy, March 2014)
- Ian Sales, All That Outer Space Allows (Whippleshield, 2015)
- Taneka Stotts and Sfé Monster, editors, Beyond: The Queer Sci-Fi and Fantasy Comic Anthology (Beyond Press, 2015)
- Rebecca Sugar (creator and executive producer), Steven Universe (Cartoon Network, 2013-15)
- Catherynne M. Valente, Radiance (Tor, 2015)
“2015 was a particularly good year for gender exploration in science fiction and fantasy,” the James Tiptree, Jr. Literary Award Council said in a press release. “In addition to the honor list, this year’s jury also compiled a long list of more than thirty other works they found worthy of attention.” Read the long list here.
Why does the cover make the story out to be an evil thing?
Sounds like a great concept story.
@1, I agree that it sounds like a great story that I’d like to read, but that isn’t inconsistent with the ramifications of the concept being alarming rather than positive, on the whole. Two elements that immediately spring to my mind that could fit with the “evil” cover painting: women becoming pregnant against their will before the phenomenon is understood well enough to invent the right kind of contraceptive, and potential harm to the human genome because of the huge reduction in genetic mixing in this scenario (there would probably still be crossing-over, but the genetics of a parthenogenic species are definitionally really different from a sexually reproducing one). And all the identity issues that would result from a society where children are their parents’ genetic identicals. . .
Yes, I can see this story getting very scary while still exploring interesting non-essentialist issues of sex and gender.
Or, of course, it could just be a bad cover painting commissioned before the story was out of editorial and painted by an artist who hadn’t read the story. :)