We have been watching X-Men films for twenty years, which feels like a weighty and auspicious number. Our hope, as viewers, is that these films will do their best to get better and better as they continue, or at the very least, that they continue to surprise us with new stories and more of characters that we enjoy spending time with. The state of the X-verse is changing as we speak; with no more Hugh Jackman as Wolverine and the purchase of 20th Century Fox by Disney, whatever the future holds for mutantkind is anyone’s best guess.
Which makes Dark Phoenix such a depressing note to end these film on.
The film already had a rough act to follow, as the plot of the Dark Phoenix comic arc had mostly been wasted on 2006’s X-Men: The Last Stand. But given the promise left by X-Men: Days of Future Past—a new timeline in which to set right any previous flubs—it was only a matter of time before the Dark Phoenix plot reemerged. In this case, the story was meant to more closely follow the comics version of events, set in 1992 following a space rescue mission gone wrong. Jean Grey (Sophie Turner, wasted on a character that no one can be bothered to write dynamic dialogue for) gets caught in an accident while attempting a rescue of the Endeavor crew with her X-Men cohort, and comes out the other end with miraculous space powers that she cannot control. These new abilities tear down all the “walls” put up in her mind by Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), revealing all that Professor X kept secret from her before adopting her into his school and becoming her mentor.
The problem with Dark Phoenix is not that it’s a bad film, but rather that it’s a vacant one. Very little actually happens, be it character development or epic set pieces or thoughtful interactions or even enjoyable special effects. It exists, the characters move through it as though they’re being directed through a badly rendered MMORPG, people say how they’re feeling rather than show it, and the film seems to end before it ever really started. Ideas are tossed into the mix and then promptly discarded before the next sequence of events. Scenes full of dialogue seem to hinge on points that are never actually made. Somewhere in the middle of it all, the plot of Dark Phoenix happens, but it’s not particularly moving or engaging. It’s like watching someone painstakingly fill in a Connect-the-Dots page when you can already tell what the picture is meant to be at a glance.
There are two glaring issues with the movie, the first being that it has no real interest in making Jean Grey the central character of her own film. On the one hand, that’s hardly surprising—we only met this version of Jean one story ago (in the incredibly lukewarm X-Men: Apocalypse), so it’s hard to feel attached to her, or even have an idea of who she is. On the other hand, if you don’t know how to make Jean Grey a dynamic and interesting lead, maybe this isn’t the X-Men story you should have your heart set on retelling every decade or so. Maybe it would have been better to let this crew of actors go out on a fun adventure for their final bow, and let poor Jean come into her own as a team asset, and a friend, and a mutant still figuring out her power.
The only thing you really know about Jean Gray by the end of the film is that space powers give you utterly flawless full-face makeup that never budges from your face, no matter how many times you cry or how often your skin cracks from cosmic energy buildup. (Seriously, if anyone knows where that glitter eyeshadow set can be found, hook me up.) It would be funnier if this weren’t, at its core, a story about male fear of female power, which the movie never remotely manages to touch on.
Which brings us to the second problem with the film: the constant realignment of morality around Charles Xavier. X-Men fans know the Professor is far from the benevolent figure these movies have often made him out to be—the comics give Kitty Pryde room to cry out “Professor Xavier is a JERK!”, and the casual old guard sexism that Xavier displays in First Class and Days of Future Past highlights that he’s got a wide range of blind spots, some of them hypocritical and unforgivable in the extreme. Since the franchise renewed itself by going prequel in First Class, this series has dedicated time to deconstructing Xavier’s myth of benevolence, and worked occasionally to call him out on how he leverages his power constantly in order to make decisions on behalf of others… most of them women.
Apocalypse at least tried to suggest that maybe Charles Xavier had learned a lesson for once; he acknowledges the importance of Jean’s power, puts Raven in charge of the X-Men, and gives Moira MacTaggart back the memories he stole from her following the events of First Class. But the opening of Dark Phoenix sees a self-aggrandizing Xavier who doesn’t actually seem to have learned a thing from his prior errors. It seems as though the film is gearing up to really make the professor the true villain in this particular story, to show the audience that he’s to blame for these problems and he never really learned better—but the narrative sharply pulls that punch because it simply can’t stomach the thought of not allowing Xavier to be a hero and a good person deep down. What this leaves us with is a Charles Xavier who admits to his culpability in the X-Men’s problems, but still ultimately insists that he means well in the same breath. Rather than this coming across as true moral ambiguity, the good kind that can drive narrative, it only serves to further point out that the film can’t settle on a story to tell. We never really figure out how we’re meant to feel about the man.
All of this could possibly be forgiven if the film gave us something to latch onto, but nothing arises. The action sequences are dark and slippery beyond recognition. The true villain—they’re aliens—are never interesting enough to serve as more than canon fodder. Most of the actors who made the more recent films enjoyable (Jennifer Lawrence, Michael Fassbender, Nicholas Hoult) are so far checked out you can practically see their next projects lurking in the reflections of their eyes. And what’s worse, Dark Phoenix’s moral is one that was already tackled better in another superhero film of 2019: Captain Marvel. When Dark Phoenix moves for the same crux, it does so with the most trite dialogue any superhero film has ever thrust on its unsuspecting audience. The whole story collapses under its weight and then it’s just over. The tag scene to tie the whole experience up at the end is honestly lovely, but it belongs to an entirely different movie. Something sweeter, smarter, more balanced as a whole.
So this era of X-filmmaking comes to a end with none of the excitement that powered its entrance. Hopefully when we see the X-Men again (because you know we will someday), it will be under better circumstances.
Emmet Asher-Perrin did honestly love that ridiculous tag scene, though. You can bug him on Twitter, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.
That’s disappointing to hear on the Xavier stuff. The only thing from the trailers that seemed interesting was Magneto’s “You’re always apologizing, Charles. Then there’s always a speech, and nobody cares” bit.
Unsurprising, given what a dull fart Apocalypse was.
I think the real problem here is that, despite fond memories, the X-Men films simply don’t hold up in a post-MCU world. With the exception of Logan and Days of Future Past, none of these movies are really all that good. And yes, I am including X2, which is a fantastic five minute short about Nightcrawler followed by an hour and a half of eh.
Here’s hoping Disney and Marvel can figure out a way to reinvent the X-Men for an MCU phase 5 (or so?) that really helps to reinvigorate what will be a sorely aging franchise at that point (not that I think the MCU appears to be slowing down any time soon) and will make people remember the days before giant tentpole superhero movies when seeing the X-Men on the big screen was a huge thrill rather than a tedious slog.
I will agree that the reboot x-men movies do not hold up well compared to the other MCU fare. In my view they waited far too long to introduce Jean Grey and did not provide enough time for the movie goes to relate to her before going the Dark Route. the original trilogy at least gave us time to emphasize with the character. I will also disagree with the autor in that in my view JG was not the star of the saga in the comic. my recall was it focused (rght or wrong) on the trauma DP did to Scott and Logan at the expense of Jean.
I think part of the problem is that, Quicksilver aside, none of the new generation of young mutants, the rebooted Cyclops et al, have any screen presence whatsoever. They are all bland and interchangeable. When they do speak, their lines carry no weight.
It is hard to catch lightning in a bottle a second time, especially when you are apparently trying to do it without having a bottle at all.
@2
I hope Disney gives the X-Men a nice long rest (except for the Deadpool part of the verse) and maybe comes back with Alpha Flight or one of the other less explored parts of the Mutant Mythos. There is a lot of stuff to mine without focusing on the X-Men specifically. Marvel has shown it can side step the big names and build up the less well recognised heroes into successful franchises. In fact I think that actually helps, not using the big names, it means not having a legion of angry and obsessed fans dominating the media space.
With regard to rebooting the X-Men… I find myself asking ‘do I really want a third reboot in 20 years?’ Maybe it’s an age thing as I approach the big four zero, but what scares me is that we seem to be in an endless reboot cycle, be it X-Men or Star Wars, telling the same – but slightly different – stories again and again and again. Oh great, ‘another’ Batman is coming… and then another and another… I fear it will never end.
@5 Except there have been no Star Wars reboots? So that doesn’t make any sense?
Anyway, we’ve seen the third reboot of Spider-Man in a decade and Tom Holland is the best yet. Spider-Man Homecoming is easily the best live action Spider-Man. Especially after the dull toilet that was the two Amazing movies. And now we’ve got Miles Morales in the Spider-Verse. Spidey is riding higher than ever. I wouldn’t mind seeing Alpha Flight or something like Madrox, but I think we’re fooling ourselves if we don’t think they’re going to go straight for the big money maker.
@2 – X2? How dare you, good sir!
Well, I wasn’t sure if I was going to bother going to the theater for this one or if I’d just wait until I could see it at home, and now it sounds like my decision has been made.
I’ve said it before, but while I wouldn’t be opposed to an X reboot at some point, I really don’t want them getting folded into the existing MCU. But that ship has probably sailed on a giant sea made of money.
@6
Star Wars hasn’t had a hard reboot (yet) but it definitely repeats itself. Poetry and rhyming and whatnot.
Star Wars has had a reboot, actually, in the replacement of the EU content. It’s what made me stop caring about the new films.
@9 I thought that was what TLJ was, with its whole ignore the past thing.
@10
Sure, but the subject was movies.
@11
Doubtful they’ll continue that thread with JJ back. If there’s one thing he and Disney have in common it’s looking in the rear view.
@9, not a reboot. @10, also not a reboot. @11, not a reboot.
I mean, people can say that TLJ repeated ANH all they want, or complain about the loss of a bunch of non-movie stuff that is being reconsidered with the better stuff slowly dribbling back in, but these things aren’t reboots. They are perhaps questionable movie making (I liked TLJ, but I know not all did) and definitely a long-overdue clean up of a lot of unnecessary cruft. “Oh no, The Truce at Bakura is no longer canon!” No big loss. And also not a reboot. When a snake sheds its skin it isn’t a whole new snake, folks.
@13 It was TFA that allegedly repeated ANH, not TLJ. And it didn’t.
TLJ is definitely a hard reboot. I hope they go back to the Prime timeline in SW.
@13
Well, whatever you want to call it, the original comment @5 was about Star Wars and these bloated blockbuster type movies repeating themselves, with only slight changes to appear fresh. Which they do.
It’s Malibu Stacy syndrome.
Critics: “Wait! It’s the same Malibu Stacy. They just gave her a new hat.”
Fans: “But she has a new hat! I want it, I want it, I want it!”
TLJ: Not a reboot. It continues the story from the previous movies, including characters from the previous movies.
Amazing Spider-Man: A reboot. It ignores the previous Spider-Man movies.
X-Men: First Class/JJ Abrams Star Trek: A soft reboot/reset — they don’t throw out all previous history, precisely, but they arrange things in such a way that they can tell new stories without worrying about the original “future” of the franchise. (Actually, as I think about it, First Class is kind of an interesting case — the movie taken on its own terms could’ve been a full-on reboot, but Days of Future Past linked it firmly to the Stewart/McKellan films.)
@14 Ah, you’re one of those people. Got it. Well, I hope the petition.org you’re putting together to demand Disney remake TLJ or whatever goes well?
@15 Naw.
@17 Well first I have to sign the petition to God to bring Carrie Fisher back to life (frankly, I think that would be a very popular petition for all sorts of reasons; give us back our Carrie!!!), but right after that…
@18 — Now THAT is a petition I would sign.
@18 and @19: I’m sure Disney is in conversations to buy the afterlife as we speak.
I’ve been a defender of the Fox-era X-Men films (the good ones I mean) and it saddens me to see this era go out on a whimper when they already had such a great conclusion with Logan.
Textbook definition of “Should’ve quit while you were ahead”.
So, no Hellfire Club? Or Shi’ar/Imperial Guard/Lilandra? The review mentions aliens, so maybe?
Read that Kinberg thought this movie should be more of a character study. No. This should’ve have been the one where they pulled out all the stops, a la Endgame. He/they got it backwards. First character work in earlier movies: establish relationships, deepen the personalities. Then, once we know them, you go for the big story. Matthew Vaughn said they (Hollywood/Sony) didn’t understand pacing and build-up. You don’t shrink down one of the biggest X-Men stories ever.
@17, I made an online petition years ago (requesting that Fox cast Eddie Izzard as Arcade in a future X-Men movie) but it was mainly a lark and a joke among some friends. Now I’ve retroactively become one of those people who start quixotic and ridiculous online petitions directed at studios who already pay actual writers for ideas.
So, this was apparently supposed to be a two-film epic . . . that got reduced to one. And the third act was entirely reshot, at a much lower cost than before.
Two-part epic superhero movie cut down and sabotaged by reshoots? Sounds familiar . . .
I agree with the review, it’s mediocre film for most of the run time… but then, 15-10 minutes before the end, it completely defiles Nightcrawler.
Even ignoring 40+ years of characterization in the comics, and going only by the 5 minutes of meaningful screentime he’s gotten in the past era of X-Men films (and even his appearance in X2), there is NO WAY it makes any sense that just because the aliens killed a soldier (who was taking the mutants to a concentration camp), Kurt will turn into a Wolverine-style murdering machine that slaughters three sentient beings in less than thirty seconds.
This made me FURIOUS, and I acknowledge it’s because I’m a Nightcrawler fan, but nobody who watched the film, even without knowing the character’s name, can agree that it makes sense.
Add to that that it makes no sense either for Beast to turn that radically against Jean just because Mystique died while Jean is going through an uncontrollable power surge he himself diagnosed.
Then there’s the issues that make obvious the sloppy rewrites and/or reshoots. Magneto is flanked by two mutants, and one of them, the woman, absolutely looks like Frenzy, a mutant from the comics. She’s a strong fighter, apparently with physical powers, no-nonsense, a black woman, in the comics a former Acolyte of Magneto… but then the plot needs her to have mind control powers to stop one of the X-Men, she does, and Magneto refers to her as “Selene”.
The credits confirm it’s Selene Galio, who in the comics is an immortal psychich vampire who shares no traits with the character seen on screen and is never a morally-ambiguous, maybe-right-antihero like Magneto, she’s an all out evil person.
Back to Jean, having her be responsible for her mother’s death, which causes her father to be afraid of her is so unnecessary, so lazy. It’s like no character can have a loving family.
As for the background characters, both in the Xavier mansion and in Magneto’s island, except for one or two, everybody looks like a regular human being. Absolutely no care for details.
The same goes for the final fight against [alien woman]. While the fight in New York was fun, and so was the space shuttle rescue sequence; the end fight is absolutely flat and uninteresting.
@22 – Sunspear: Nothing of that sort, no Hellfire, no Lilandra, no Shi’ar.
Haven’t seen this and don’t plan to, at least till it’s on video, but I read something mind-boggling. Supposedly the Phoenix force is portrayed at an energy cloud. After all the mockery Fox got for showing Galactus the same way in Rise of the Silver Surfer, this seems immensely stupid. A planet-sized firebird eating the D’bari star is iconic. How in hell, why in heaven, would they pass that up?
Taking the X-Men away from Kinberg couldn’t have happened soon enough. I still hope Marvel Studios lets them lie fallow for a couple years though. Reboot the Fantastic Four first.
God, what a profoundly underwhelming film! I’ve been telling friends that instead of going to see Dark Phoenix, they should just rewatch Captain Marvel and pretend Carol is Jean and Yon-Rogg is Xavier. Admittedly not a beat-for-beat match, in terms of plot points–but it’s damn close in terms of thematic elements, and way better in terms of execution.
We just rented this, and I figured I would enjoy it – I actually quite liked Apocalypse and tend to have a soft spot for these movies.
But man, what a slog!!! It was just a bunch of loosely strung together fight scenes and whiplash character development that made zero sense. Oh, Magneto is good now. Nope, he’s bad again! Nope, he’s good again! Beast goes bad a bit…then he goes good again! Nightcrawler kinda goes dark for a hot second…Storm tries to convince Cyclops that all along Jean was evil, but then is all gung ho about saving her…and so on. And why on earth would Xavier actually start a fight in the middle of frickin NYC???? Aaaargh.
The “aliens” were the most shallow, cardboard plot device ever…and how on earth did the X-Men get away with ZERO CONSEQUENCES for all of the carnage anyway? (Also, did they totally just genocide the remains of a dying civilization?)
Raven is really the only character that seems to have some interesting depth in her talk of family and recognizing Xavier’s overly controlling ways, but then they kill her off so a bunch of people can be sad about it and try to kill Jean, and then try to save Jean, in her honor.
As for Jean, I always thought the ‘Dark Phoenix’ idea was WAY more interesting as something that was solely inside herself; that at the end of Apocalypse she had learned embrace her power (I mean, come on, Frozen II is a WAY better movie when it comes to female empowerment than this). Bringing in the whole ‘brainwashing cosmic…thing’ was just lazy, imo. And then she just…morphs and fles away after all the talk of her emotions/love making her stronger and finding family and stuff? I’m not even sure what triggered her actual integration in this movie? The power of forgiveness? Realizing Xavier Cared All Along? I do think the ‘enter my mind’ trick was a nice touch, and in another movie could have been an incredibly powerful scene of trust/vulnerability.
As for Xavier – so, I definitely agree with the movie in that yup, he’s controlling and paternalistic and things he knows better than everybody else (although I don’t think that’s inconsistent with him MEANING well. Many well meaning people do unfrotunately keep secrets because they think it’s the best thing to do.). But hasn’t he already learned this lesson? Didn’t we already go through this in the last movie (not to mention the whole thing with coming to terms with Jean’s powers/mind?).
But on a meta level I’m also generally just kind of sick of the idea that benevolence is a ‘myth’ that needs to be deconstructed in the first place. It can definitely be a good twist when done well, but it seems like it’s not even a twist anymore. Like, just let people be generally well-meaning (if not sometimes flawed or making the wrong decisions) heroes occasionally without some sinister implication.
Also, how does any of this fit with the future (good) 2023 we see at the end of DoFP, or Logan for that matter? Eh, they all get killed by Charles in the end anyway ;)
The only cool thing about it was seeing how they used their powers together and Cyclops getting more to do. But I am so glad this was one of our free rentals, ha.