Not for the first time since I began rereading Andre Norton’s science fiction and fantasy, I discovered that I remembered the titles of this novel (there are two), the main character, the fact that I loved it when I first read it, and nothing else. I do understand why Star Man’s Son became Daybreak etc.: the original title makes one think one will be getting a space adventure, but that’s not what it is at all.
Though right at the end, there is an explanation.
What we have here is a postapocalyptic quest across a blasted landscape full of mutants and ruined cities, with huge piles of rusted machinery, and “blue areas” where no one goes because of the radiation. Plucky protagonist Fors is the proto-Norton hero (and later heroine): all alone, friendless except for an awesome animal companion, and exiled from his mountain tribe because he’s different. He’s dreamed all his life of becoming a Star Man like his father, an explorer and looter (in so many words) of the Old Ones’ remnants and a seeker after forgotten knowledge.
Fors is not only a mutant, he’s mixed race: his otherwise completely invisible and unregarded mother was (is?) one of the nomadic Plains people. He knows he’s a mutant because his hair is white and he has exceptionally keen hearing and night vision. His ability to communicate telepathically with his cat Lura appears to be normal and unremarkable.
Lura for her part is also a mutant: a puma-sized Siamese cat who is, as I said, telepathic. Her species often forms bonds with Fors’ tribe, and specifically with Star Men. She’s very independent and stays with Fors because she wants to; he can use her up to a point, but past that she doesn’t cooperate and he doesn’t push his luck.
After he is finally and conclusively rejected by the Star Men, Fors steals his father’s belongings and takes off into the wild. He hopes to find the ruined city his father supposedly found before he died, and to bring back enough valuables to essentially buy his way into the Star Men.
He does in fact find the city, with remarkably little difficulty, and in the process meets a stranger, Arskane, who is a scout for his own tribe. Arskane’s tribe has been driven out of their lands by volcanic eruptions and is looking for a place to settle.
It is stated implicitly that Arskane is Black. Fors is white, and so are the Plains people. (The actual Plains Indians do not exist, though there’s mention of people in the forests who state that they were the original inhabitants.)
Fors’ luck runs out after he finds a museum in the city. While he’s congratulating himself on his success, the vile and evil Beast Things find the humans and the cat. Their only hope for escape is to run through an atom-blasted wasteland, on the other side of which they run afoul of a new incursion of Plains horsemen under the command of a warlord with ambitions.
The Plainsmen are out to take over, Arskane’s people just want to find a place to settle down, and the inhuman Beast Things want to kill all of them horribly. Ultimately Fors joins forces with the Star Captain, Jarl, who originally rejected him and who is now allied with the Plainsmen. Jarl concocts a plan to use Arskane’s people to drive the Beast Things toward the Plainsmen, thereby distracting them from their campaign of human conquest and compelling them to fight together against the common enemy.
Fors is delegated to serve as bait. Inevitably he’s captured and tortured, but the plan succeeds. Farmer/artisans and horsemen cooperate to destroy the nonhumans. The farmers find a place to settle, the warlord dies heroically leaving much less aggressive people in charge, and both sides offer to accept Fors among them.
But Fors is stubborn. He insists on going back home to the mountain Eyrie and pleading his case. To his amazement, Jarl speaks up for him, exonerates him, and offers him a new form of Star Man-ship: a sort of ambassador to the various peoples of their broken world. He also reveals the secret at the core of both the order and the Eyrie, that their ancestors were developing a space program. They were literally aiming for the stars.
Jarl speculates that they all must be mutants by now, or they would never have survived the radiation after the bombs fell. (And we the readers observe that telepathy is one of the things that’s taken for granted here which most certainly was not in the pre-atomic world.) We’re all one world and one people, he declaims, and it’s time to get back together and forge a new, and someday starfaring, future.
I happen to have reread this book in the midst of one of the seasonal storms in the science fiction genre, with a particular faction declaring that science fiction in the good old days was completely apolitical, and we should all go back to that. I found this particularly interesting in light of the fact that this novel was first published in 1952. It’s the oldest of all the Norton novels I’ve read so far, and one of her very first published science fiction works. And it’s political from one end to the other. It’s a Message Novel in bright neon lights.
Here, seven years after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Norton gives us the complete destruction of Western civilization and the near-destruction of the human race. She knows about radiation poisoning, she speculates about the range and quality of mutations from it, and she makes it clear that she sees no other end to the atomic age than a cataclysmic blowup.
She also, even before Brown v. Board of Education and right in the middle of the McCarthy era, made clear that the future will not be pure white, though it may be relentlessly patriarchal. Her hero may have fair skin but he’s something other than Aryan-Caucasian, and his closest friend is African-American, descended from the Tuskegee Airmen. The implicitly white Plains people actually have a female leader, and the only women who speak in the whole novel speak at the end against the men’s insistence on perpetual war.
This is pretty radical for the dawn of the Eisenhower era. Fors grows through the novel to become a uniter of tribes, and the overriding message is that war is evil, humans need to stick together, and racism based on skin color is a bad idea.
From the perspective of 2018, there are problematical elements. Norton calls out racism and colonialism and speaks strongly against war, but buys completely into the patriarchy. She has one token female leader who plays the token female role of lone pacifist among the warriors, and one token Adorable Little Girl who inspires Fors to go along with Jarl’s plan despite the cost to himself. Fors’ mother is a complete cipher—serious missed opportunity there for him to claim her half of his heritage while dealing with the Plainsmen. Women for the most part are invisible when they’re not property, and they play no role in Fors’ life or world view.
That’s not the only problem. Norton literally dehumanizes the enemy. It’s human exceptionalism on a global scale, turning the big bad into hideous Beast Things. Initially I thought they must be mutated rats, which might not have been quite so bad (considering the history of rats versus humans, Plague, etc., etc.), but late in the story Fors and company speculate that they’re either mutated city folk or radiation-damaged opponents in the atomic war. No one speculates about where the enemy came from, just that they must have turned into inhuman, subhuman, vicious and cannibalistic monsters. This form of antagonist became a trope as the years and the books went by, in the Witch World as well as the science-fiction worlds—though by the time of the Simsa books, Norton’s sentient villains turned out to be various forms of human.
It was completely serendipitous that I read Daybreak immediately after the Simsa books. Luck of the bookshelf arrangement, is all. But there’s a distinct link between the books, from the silver-haired mutant with the telepathic animal ally to the secondary protagonist who is a man of color, to the history itself: Thom tells of an atomic holocaust that killed off most of Earth’s humans, leaving the few survivors forever changed. Two of the changes were a high tolerance for radiation, and enhanced psi powers.
It’s really interesting to see how Norton’s plots and narrative techniques remained essentially the same over the decades, and also to see how passionate she was about so-called social justice issues. Her theme here, just as much as in her works of the Eighties and later, is that all humans need to work together, that cultural differences are not measures of superiority or its opposite, and that the real future of humanity is among the stars.
Apolitical? Not even slightly.
Next up: The Beast Master. Stand by for more politics, and lots more cool animal companions.
Judith Tarr’s first novel, The Isle of Glass, appeared in 1985. Her new short novel, Dragons in the Earth, a contemporary fantasy set in Arizona, was published last year by Book View Cafe. In between, she’s written historicals and historical fantasies and epic fantasies and space operas, some of which have been published as ebooks from Book View Café. She has won the Crawford Award, and been a finalist for the World Fantasy Award and the Locus Award. She lives in Arizona with an assortment of cats, a blue-eyed dog, and a herd of Lipizzan horses.
And I managed to leave out the paragraph in which I noted the erasure of Native Americans even while their culture was appropriated wholesale. Arrgh. Big problem there.
In my Apocalypse, all the white supremacists kill each other off, the Native and First Nations tribes come back to their ancestral lands, the Tuskegee Airmen get their farmland, and the few descendants of scientists (only a few of whom are white–the rest are from all over) get to put all the remnants of What The Old Ones Knew together and eventually get back to space.
At which point, as we know from the Simsa books, at least some of the spacefarers are Asian, because Thom is. Maybe all of them are. The ones, that is, who aren’t Black or Native American.
My favorite Norton of all time, and probably the first one I ever read, which got me hooked on her in the first place. (It’s a year older than I am!) When I reread it last weekend, there was no struggling; I just sat down and read it right through.
Three things, Judith.
1. I thought the token female leader was of Arskane’s farmer people, not the plains people, although I agree that female voice(s) spoke up in the plains people after the war leader was killed off.
2. At this point it looks like almost all of Norton’s non-WW books are set in the same basic universe, with Zacathans once man reaches the stars and later leaves earth behind.
3. What book are you reading next?
@2 The Plains women were the ones who did most of the talking, insofar as women ever got a voice.
I’ll add that other paragraph, too, with apologies. Reading The Beast Master next.
I was having an epic braindead day, leaving out two rather important bits.
Much to agree with here, but it’s not true that “No one speculates about where the enemy came from.” They certainly do. “Certainly the misshapen Beast Things must once have had a human origin…”, and “The book of air-borne messages treasured in the Eyrie had spoken once or twice of invaders coming from the sky”. So, they don’t know who those ancestors were, but we know they were Russian/Soviet troops who invaded the US. And their descendants were so badly damaged by the radiation as to become the Beast Men.
I Iove that she was able to write “And color of skin, or eyes, or the customs of a man’s tribe must mean no more to strangers when meeting than the dust they wash from their hands before they take meat.” Unfortunately, the whole message is undermined by just choosing a new criterion for determining who is “subhuman”. They don’t “cooperate to destroy the nonhumans.” They cooperate to destroy other humans.
Same old, same old
@@.-@ In the book,there is a debate as to whether the Beast Things are mutated city folk or mutated enemies. There’s no definite answer. What’s definite is what you note, that all the ones who look human regardless of skin color are one people, but the enemy is literally dehumanized. It’s disappointing from our perspective, but for 1952, it’s pretty radical to even see non-whites as people, let alone present them as equal.
Since this book was written for the young male audience of that period, the absence of lots of female characters isn’t surprising or offensive. Norton’s inclusion of any female characters that weren’t there just to be rescued was subversive.
The Beast Things, mutated from whatever source, was a standard trope of that period and no more offensive than zombies are in current media.
@6 Perhaps it’s not clear that this series is not strictly a historical analysis, though it often touches on the methodology. It’s my reread of a favorite author and my reactions, then and now, to the books I loved back in the day. When I read from the viewpoint of 2018, I can see problems that I never saw when I read this book in the Sixties, or that would have been imperceptible to readers in 1952.
I disliked this book in the reread–I can’t find any vestige of the love I had for it as a teen. Unlike the Gryphon books and the Moonsinger series, which have held up for me over the years, this one was a big giant “Ehh.”
What I want to do now is figure out which book I actually remembered when I thought I was remembering this, because that memory is of a completely different plot and characters. For one thing, the protagonist’s father was alive and active in the story. Could well be I’m remembering something by another author altogether. I read a Lot of SF around that time.
@7 I can’t take the historical element out of my analysis of books. It’s the English major in me.
You may be thinking of SEA SIEGE, 1957. It’s set during that time, and a nuclear war devastates the Earth.
When I was just looking for that title, I found a great source– Andre Norton Books.
http://andre-norton-books.com
It has a description of SEA SIEGE if you are interested.
@7 I’m a PhD in Medieval Studies. :) I turn it on and off depending on what I’m doing, and here I’m revisiting my kidhood.
I’ll check out SEA SIEGE, thank you! I read it, I remember the title, but the plot is a blank. It may well be I conflated these two books.
This was the first paperback book I ever bought and it holds a fond place in my heart because of that. In fact, I still have the book, purchased in the early sixties. Like you, Judith, I have vague recollections of what I read back then, but I do remember some of the key scenes, especially Fors taking all of his father’s possessions except for the star that hung on his leather pouch. I also know that I enjoyed the book.
I want a telepathic Siamese cat.
I was thinking about this article a bit ago, and one point clarified for me. The problem with ignoring what was happening and what was thought when the story was written is that we, with our current mindset, condemn what wasn’t written. Instead, we should be admiring what was said that was ahead of that time period.
Andre Norton was an awesome human being who put people who weren’t white or male into stories and made them important characters. She delved into issues that weren’t talked about. She was also the author who told me and my generation that women could write fantasy and science fiction, and it was even possible to throw in a tiny bit of romance. She was a pioneer and one of my writer heroes.
In my own review I quoted the “color of skin” line I quote above, and pointed out that this was truly amazing stuff for the time, and I’m actually quite surprised anyone was willing to publish that! But I’m not condemning “what wasn’t written”, I’m condemning what was. Treating the Beast Things–who we know were once men–as either Beast or Thing is no better than calling someone subhuman for the color of their skin.
Like Judith, I loved this when I read it as a kid. At the time, I doubt I even knew how subversive her attitude to skin color was, so rereading it 45 years later, that came as a very pleasant surprise. But I still can’t get the foul taste of her attitude to the Beast Things out of my mouth.
I’ve never read this novel, but the title stirs a memory — perhaps a false one — of seeing a film or TV show or some such that claimed to be based upon Daybreak — 2250 AD. Maybe I’m misremembering? Can’t think of what it could have been … maybe one of Gene Roddenberry’s attempts (Genesis II?). Maybe someone else has the same recollection …
@14 A quick google shows a 1993 film of that title, but IMDB says it’s based on Alan Bowne’s play “Beirut.” I also found that the rights to this book were optioned around 1996, but haven’t found a mention of any film being made.
Beast Master was filmed, abominably, with Marc Singer in the lead. I’ll never forget that one. Gag.
capriole@15: No, you know what it was? I was thinking of Armageddon 2419 AD, by Philip Nowlan, which was the basis for Buck Rogers. Wrong apocalypse, out by 169 years. My bad memory!
I remember this one fondly from my youth.
@15 Other than the companion animals, that Beast Master movie bears no resemblance at all to the novel. Which is a shame, because that book is one of my favorite Norton works. Almost as drastic a departure from the original as the movie Blade Runner, where Hollywood grafted the title of an Alan Nourse book onto a Phillip Dick story.
I’ve always thought that the Beast Things were mutated rats. She uses rats or rat-like creatures as monsters in many books. I know I never thought of them as humans. I haven’t re-read the book in many years. I’ll have to see if I can find it for a re-read.
Andre Norton was way ahead of her time as a writer. Can we blame her for not being as far ahead of her time as we are now?
re @7: my first reaction on ~”completely different plot and father still active” is The Stars Are Ours!, but Wikipedia tells me the two leading males were actually brothers (though I recall a significant age/gravitas gap between them). Ice Crown includes the hero’s father — but that was late enough that the hero is a young woman rather than a young man. I’ll be interested to see if you recall this, as one of the tropes Norton tended to carry from mundane fiction is that parents get in the way of young adult heroes — many of hers are abandoned or isolated, or at least independent (e.g. Travis Fox in Galactic Derelict).
One of the first novels I ever read, and I picked it up only because it looked like the cover of a Jack Kirby comic called “Kamandi.” I thought one might be based on the other. (I was kid.) But reading it at 10 or 11, all the politics went over my head and I just enjoyed the action/adventure. It contributed to my voracious appetite for reading. I re-read it in college and loved it all the more, finally able to see deeper into it. I still have that original paperback on my shelves. Thanks for your analysis.
@17 I actually saw the movie in a theater because I thought I was going to see one of my favorite novels on screen. I was disappointed to say the least.
@18 The description reads “rat” to me, too, but it’s explicitly stated that the Beast Things are descended from humans–rather than evolved from rats, they’re devolved into ratlike monsters. Actual rats show up late in the book in weaponized but not extensively mutated form.
@19 Thank you. I’m thinking I may be conflating another author’s story with Norton’s title. I’ll keep looking.
@20 It’s lovely to see how many people essentially imprinted on this book. My first sf was Nourse’s Star Surgeon, but I found my way to my local library’s extensive Norton collection fairly soon after that.
@21 As I recall, I discovered Nourse because he was shelved right next to Norton in the juvenile SF section of the library.
@22 That’s how I discovered Nourse, too. He’s now practically unknown. My libraries don’t have any of his; though there seems to be a fair bit on Amazon. I’m still bitter that they stole his title to make a movie about some other guy’s book: Blade Runner
I discovered Nourse because somewhere we had picked up a secondhand hardcover copy of Scavengers in Space. (TBH, that might be the only Nourse I’ve actually read.)
I’m honestly not sure when I discovered Norton — might have been some of the Magic books in the elementary school library? Otherwise, probably Forerunner Foray in junior high.
Nourse may be worth resurrecting, though it’s been ages since I read anything of his. I remember he lured me into the genre, and I never left. :)
Concerning the Beast Things: it occurs to me that 1952 was not so far removed from 1925 (see: Scopes trial), and it’s possible that Norton (or her editor) thought that devolution from a once-human base would be less offensive than evolution from a rat base. (She had quite a thing about devolution, in any case – it shows up again and again in her fiction.)
Now of course public opinion has done a 180, and evolved mutant rats are a “better” answer. (Personally I always thought that Fors et al were just guessing in the dark and/or jumping to conclusions – they didn’t really know how the Beast Things came to be, and their working hypothesis might be way wrong.)
You’re right, it could be “way wrong”, but it was bolstered by actual recorded history from the airmen. Something more than guessing in the dark, but not reinforced by an independent history.
I read this when I was ten or something.My friend Kelly McCloskey read his copy fast.Me I took longer.I lazy or something.But I liked so I decided toto rip it off and reat my Conan version of Fors.Still working on that,now it only remotely appears to copy this book.Still Daybreak /Starman is fun.
I read this book when I was a kid and it stuck with me, but I wonder if I’d be disappointed if I re-read it now. Curiously, I remember it as having a female protagonist.