Skip to content

Almost Slumming It: Black Sheep

13
Share

Almost Slumming It: Black Sheep

Home / Almost Slumming It: Black Sheep
Column Georgette Heyer

Almost Slumming It: Black Sheep

By

Published on November 12, 2013

13
Share

Miss Abigail Wendover, the protagonist of Black Sheep, is under the very understandable impression that she is in a Georgette Heyer novel. After all, she is a sensible young woman in her twenties with a great deal of humor and a small independence, with an older sister, Miss Selina, with an impeccable taste for style and color, and a lovely and very wealthy young niece, Fanny, that the sisters are carefully shepherding through the excitements of Bath society. She has a few decidedly worthy suitors. She has wit and energy. She should be in a Heyer novel.

And yet, when she meets Her Hero, it is evident that something is dreadfully, shockingly wrong for a supposed Heyer novel. For the Hero is a shocking, shocking fellow indeed, who was not only cast out by his family, but, since then, has—hold onto something—worked to earn his money. Not inherited, or married, but worked. And, more shocking still, Mr. Miles Cavendish—are you still holding onto something?—Mr. Miles Cavendish doesn’t care about his clothes.

I know. I need to give you all a moment. And it gets worse. He wears the wrong outfit when he comes to visit Selina and Abby. This later proves beneficial, since this sort of thing helps to convince Selina—at least temporarily—that not only is Miles most certainly not the hero, because no woman could ever fall for him, because, clothes. He wears garments that are not molded to his form. He—he—I’m not sure if I can even type this—throughout the entire novel, he doesn’t seem to have a valet.

GULP.

To be fair, Heyer had somewhat prepared us for this in previous books, offering Hugo, who waited until the middle of the book to get a valet, which was horrifying enough, and Damerel, who could occasionally dress in a slovenly manner. But—and this is key—Hugo, remembering that he was, after all, in a Heyer novel, had prepared himself for this event by obtaining linen of excellent quality, and bowed to the necessity of having a valet. And Damerel had, of course, always had a valet, because, of course, all men—all men of quality, at least—have valets. If you are now thinking, hey, wait, I’ve gone through life without one, you are clearly not a man in a Heyer novel. (And also not watching enough Downton Abbey but that’s another problem entirely.) Men in the world Heyer created always need valets. Always. Unless, like Miles, they just don’t care. And have enough money that they can afford to care.

Mind you, the other men in Black Sheep, fully aware that they are in a Heyer novel, have remembered to engage valets and dress with elegance. These include Miles’ nephew, Stacy Cavendish, who is always dressed with elegance, and, moreover, has an estate—one heavily mortgaged and crumbling into ruins, true, but still, he’s quite proud of it, and of his name. Proud enough indeed that he’s more than willing to do the proper thing, and marry an heiress to save his estate. (I’ll pause again to allow you to contemplate the self-sacrifice involved here.) But not quite desperate enough—at least not yet—to marry just any heiress: he wants one of high birth and beauty. Having completely failed to elope with heiress number one (never named) he has now come to Bath and found heiress number two, the very pretty Fanny. She is, he admits, rather silly, and a little too young (seventeen). Not that he’s overly worried about the age of consent, but he is worried that he won’t gain control of Fanny’s money for a few years (he thinks until she turns 21; in reality, not until she’s 25) and that could prove disastrous. Still, as he realizes philosophically, the world does not offer that many unmarried heiresses, and after his previous failed seduction attempt, he’s not exactly welcome in that many homes. So, Fanny it is. A few carefully chosen phrases, and she’s—almost—willing to elope with him. Almost. Except for the slight problem that it might ruin her aunts’ rout-party.

To be fair, this is not exactly the first time we’ve sensed that Fanny may not exactly be that deeply in love, despite her claims that this is a fairy tale love that will last forever and ever. (She’s rather dramatic.) And if Fanny is convinced, at 17, that she is more than old enough to marry, and Stacy is equally convinced that he can overlook the age gap, Fanny’s relatives are less convinced. Her oldest aunt, the elegant but not exactly clever Selina, has been won over by Stacy’s charm, but the rest have heard enough alarming tales about Stacy to be seriously concerned, and to do what they can to scotch the relationship without forbidding it entirely. They are wise enough to realize that forbidding Fanny to see him might make her run away with him. But still, it’s just enough resistance to make Stacy even worse, and make Abigail turn to Miles for assistance—even if the man does not have a valet.

In Black Sheep, Heyer continued to question the world she had so carefully created in several books. It’s not just that this book does not (gasp) contain a single aristocrat, or dance at Almack’s. More seriously, Heyer was questioning the very social structures she had championed and artificially maintained in previous books. If in A Civil Contract and An Unknown Ajax she had finally brought herself to admit that yes, yes, middle class characters could marry aristocrats and yet not completely ruin their lives, in Black Sheep she took a look at other assumptions of birth and the necessity of marriage.

In her early books, Heyer had insisted on the paramount importance of good, if not noble, birth. Decades later, after another world war, and societal transformation, she had changed her mind. For here Heyer pulls an elaborate joke on her readers: not only does Black Sheep not contain a single aristocrat, but the exquisitely dressed, well mannered young man with an ancestral home and no job other than trying to seduce heiresses is the villain, while the careless, badly dressed man exiled from London’s ton, who has spent the last twenty years working is the hero. Worse, the working man is the one about to rescue the ancestral estate (just so we know we’re still in a Heyer book, although the careful description of everything the women wear certainly helps.) And, not content with saving the estate, he’s the one to enact a brilliant and thoroughly satisfying revenge on Stacy—helped out by a woman.

Strikingly, Stacy the villain is the only character (in a book with many many many characters) who has been part of London’s highest society. Heyer goes out of her way to note that the Wendovers are not (although they could be), and their friends and acquaintances do not include any aristocrats. Indeed, the novel’s second hinted at hero is the son of a not well off mother, who has also had to work for his living—and gotten ill in the process. And in another switch from previous books, the main women of the novel—Abby, Selina and Fanny—are all comfortably well off, able to marry, or not marry. The men are the ones in financial peril.

And then, we have Miss Selina Wendover.

Miss Selina is not, we must admit, the cleverest of women, although she is thoroughly kind hearted, generous, devoted to her family, and has a decided eye for color and style. But that is not her most important quality. It’s not, of course, polite to focus on a lady’s age. But we must admit a sobering truth: Miss Selina Wendover is 40 and unwed, beyond any hopes of marriage.

And yet, she is happy. Thoroughly, completely, happy.

Heyer had, of course, featured other single women in their 40s in previous books as supporting characters. But with no exceptions, these women had either been bitter and resentful, or had been forced to work as governesses, companions, or servants, and were seen as clear social inferiors. Even the younger and superior Miss Ancilla Trent to a certain extent falls into this category. Miss Selina Wendover, however, is a social leader, whose select party invitations are considered to honor recipients. It helps, of course, that she’s independently wealthy, able to hire servants and dress in expensive clothing, and that she has exquisite taste. It also helps that everything she likes to do—dress well, read silly novels, gossip, and entertain friends—is well within the bounds of acceptable social behavior. But it’s still astonishing to see a single woman able to do exactly what she wants to do, and be happy doing it, with no hopes or need for marriage, in a Heyer novel.

Other independent women include a former courtesan horrified enough by Stacy that she agrees to help out with an elaborate revenge; the actress she hires, so disgusted that she adds an additional and very satisfying touch to said revenge; and the various gossips of Bath, who, like the patronesses of Almack’s in other books, hold very real social power—without the benefits of high birth, wealth, or political station.

The social structures described in Black Sheep remain rigorous, indeed: James Wendover does not want his sister to marry Miles based on something that happened twenty years ago that has been so thoroughly hushed up no one remembers it; Fanny is not allowed to walk around in Bath without an escort, and goes into a near panic attack at the thought of meeting Stacy in, gasp, a library; respectable women are most certainly not supposed to be kissing men unless they plan to marry said men; and Abby tells Miles that social structures, not lack of affection, prevents their marriage. It remains a world of unequals, where men can do what women cannot. And yet, Black Sheep provides hints that this world might be more flexible than Heyer had previously admitted. It may not be her most entertaining or funniest novel, but after some of her previous works, it’s a welcome touch of subversion. And the banter between Abby and Miles is among her very best.


Mari Ness is sad to note that this is the last of the good Heyer novels, but will continue to blog through the last few.

About the Author

Mari Ness

Author

Mari Ness spent much of her life wandering the world and reading. This, naturally, trained her to do just one thing: write. Her short fiction and poetry have appeared in numerous print and online publications, including Clarkesworld Magazine, Apex Magazine, Daily Science Fiction, Strange Horizons and Fantasy Magazine.  She also has a weekly blog at Tor.com, where she chats about classic works of children’s fantasy and science fiction.  She lives in central Florida, with a scraggly rose garden, large trees harboring demented squirrels, and two adorable cats. She can be contacted at mari_ness at hotmail.com. Mari Ness spent much of her life wandering the world and reading. This, naturally, trained her to do just one thing: write. Her short fiction and poetry have appeared in numerous print and online publications, including Clarkesworld Magazine, Apex Magazine, Daily Science Fiction, Strange Horizons and Fantasy Magazine.  She also has a weekly blog at Tor.com, where she chats about classic works of children’s fantasy and science fiction.  She lives in central Florida, with a scraggly rose garden, large trees harboring demented squirrels, and two adorable cats. She can be contacted at mari_ness at hotmail.com.
Learn More About Mari

See All Posts About

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PhoenixFalls
PhoenixFalls
11 years ago

This is my favorite Heyer novel other than A Civil Contract. Before this chronological read-through I’d never realized that they were written so close together, nor had I quite twigged to *why* it’s always been my second-favorite, the way that it does subvert so many of Heyer’s tropes.

Also, this review made me giggle in a way entirely unsuited to the library I’m posting this from. :)

Janhavi
Janhavi
11 years ago

Black Sheep is increasingly one of my favourites, every re read makes me appreciate it more (as is the case with Talisman Ring. The opposite happens with Arabella).

Your review has spot on critical analysis. But it doesnt convey the fun of the book enough! The dialogues between Miles and Abby are hilarious, I really like both characters a lot, and their interactions are generally delightful. Its one of Heyer’s more romantic books, I would say. The Stacy plotline drags on a bit, though.

You are right that its the last of the good Heyer novels, though I quite like Lady of Quality. I am really sad this series is almost ending, and that I only caught on with Sylvester! To think I missed more than a year of reviews :(

On a side note, readers here may be interested in the Goodreads Heyer fans group, we have fun conversations :D

phuzz
11 years ago

I think it’s more likely that I’d be a valet, rather than have one of my own.

Margaret R. Dean
Margaret R. Dean
11 years ago

Miles Calverleigh (note the name) is one of my favorite Heyer heroes, and his relationship with Abby is wonderful! I’m not sure I would describe Selina Wendover as “happy,” though; her personality doesn’t come across that way. Contented, perhaps, and certainly she has her life arranged pretty much the way she likes it. That’s one reason she’s so terrified at the prospect of losing Abby to Miles…

IClare
IClare
11 years ago

I think that ‘working for his money’ is too positive a description of how Miles Calverleigh made his pile. I’m a bit hazy on what exactly the English got up to in India at this time, but it definitely wouldn’t measure up to the strict standards you set for other Heyer characters.

I find ‘do I approve of the characters’ actions and morals’
a rather strange yardstick to judge a book by, but you chose it and stuck by it, so why does Miles Calverleigh suddenly get a pass?

bookworm1398
bookworm1398
11 years ago

In defense of Miles, while he may have worked for a living in the past, he seems to be retired now:-)
Thanks for the perspective on this book, it gives me a whole new viewpoint.

between4walls
between4walls
11 years ago

I’m a bit hazy on what exactly the English got up to in India at this time

Pretty much exactly what you’d expect a private company to get up to if they had the run of a country and their own army. I don’t know what years Miles is meant to have worked there, but a rough timeline of their misdeeds is here.

Ironically, whenever I analogize social structures in India to 19th century British ones, one of the major differences that comes up is the 19th century British stigma against working for a living, which doesn’t hold in upper-class India (the subsection with which I am familiar, at least).

Amy
Amy
9 years ago

While „Black Sheep“ is not my favorite novel by Heyer, I do enjoy it and I reread it a few days ago. And I cannot quite agree with your review. Georgette Heyer was undoubtedly a Tory, but what made her a good writer was mostly her capacity for observation and her psychological finesse and love for detail in describing a notable variety of characters, places, social classes, situations and circumstances; certainly not, as you seem to interpret it, her love for describing a time long past, whose rules and customs are, for today’s reader, laughable on account of being both old-fashioned and foolish.

 

While everybody of course notices Miles Calverleigh’s slattern outfit and the fact that he does not employ a valet, no one is shocked about it: it is commonly assumed that his appearance, together with his rather careless manners, are the result of the past twenty years which he spent in India.

Additionally, no one is shocked about the fact that he had to work to earn money: it is something younger sons very often had to in those days, and Miles was sent to India expressly not only because he had almost caused a scandal but also because there he could engage in trade (though we never quite know what kind of trade it is). Miles himself is reasonable enough not to show off that he has become quite rich, in particular when he gets to know his unscrupulous and highly indebted nephew Stacy; but he also knows that no one will oppose his marriage to Abby exactly due to his wealth.

 

Fanny is not quite the fool you take her for: she is disturbed at the idea of ruining her aunt’s party not because of the party itself, but because the circumstance reminds her of the hurt she would inflict on her family by eloping. Also, she hardly dares to meet Stacy alone not because they have to meet in a library, but because the meeting is secret on account of Fanny being guarded closely by her family and their friends, who suspect that Stacy might convince her into eloping – with good reason.

 

As for Selina, I am surprised at your positive opinion of her. Selina is as narrow-minded and selfish as James, an obvious foil to the bright, open-minded Abby. She is by no means “happy”; she delights in having “nervous spasms” and in exaggerating her and any other person’s physical sickness, and she can only exist when clinging to others. I found her attitude particularly exasperating during the last chapters, when she clung to Abby with “her hands like claws” and blackmailed her emotionally with every argument she could find afraid that Abby could leave her if she married Miles, although by that time nobody knew where Miles would decide to put up his home (that he bought Danescourt is revealed only on one of the last pages). Of course she wanted Abby to find a husband; but she obviously found only Mr Dunston acceptable because she knew instinctively that Abby would never choose him. Things become worse when Abby rejects Miles and Selina jubilates into her wretched face declaring that “now we can be happy again!” I would have found such selfishness inexcusable had it not been for the fact that Selina is depicted as slightly mentally retarded.

 

Miles’ remark to Abby that she must immediately become his wife now that they kissed is unmistakably not literal: he is obviously funning her. Georgette Heyer loved to mock her own characters in her novels, although kindly. Additionally, one must note that Abby is not rejecting Miles on account of “social structures”, but due to her family’s blackmailing her emotionally, everybody for his own reasons. Miles, thank goodness, is not a person who will allow others to blackmail him but who sets his own boundaries clearly; and by carrying her off to marry her he does the only right thing, freeing her from the restrictions of her family – which may not be noble, but extremely square and bourgeois, which is why Abby never truly fitted in there and has found the right mate with the independent, worldly experienced Miles.

JennyH
JennyH
6 years ago

By the way, surely Abby’s sister is ‘Miss Wendover’ not ‘Miss Selina Wendover’? Isn’t it only younger daughters who have their first names added in?

Madeleine
Madeleine
5 years ago

I love this review,I have been binging my mums georgette heyer and this book was one of here best. I was 2 chapters from the end when i read this and realised he bought Danescourt I had to quickly finish the book. 

Whackywitch
Whackywitch
3 years ago

I really love this writing period of Heyer’s. She explores a lot of themes like family expectations and relationships, and what happens when one’s need for family approval runs right up against the desire of one’s heart is really well written here. Abby, despite all her self-reflections and inclination to see herself as a free spirit, really doesn’t want to upset her brother and sisters. But she finds Miles irresistible and a true kindred spirit. He doesn’t have all these heart searchings, which makes for some amusing conversation between the two, especially at the end. The scene where she is busy convincing herself that her family desperately needs her, so she can’t possibly be selfish and marry away from them, and Miles just takes the whole issue out of her hands, is insightful, hilarious and rings very true. A great couple, and well supported by the other minor characters, plus the delightful descriptions of Regency Bath makes this one of my favourite Heyers. 

 

Whackywitch
Whackywitch
3 years ago

I forgot to add – I really don’t understand what Heyer is on about with the mortgages and Miles buying up Danescourt. It’s a good plot device, but really she should know better. Entailed properties do not have mortgages – one could possibly mortgage the income from the farms, but one could not mortgage any property – it was entailed and had to be passed on by the trustees to the heir whoever that was. Miles could certainly have bought an equity of redemption from Stacey – this was a reasonable outcome for Stacey as it is a quantifiable item, and it meant that Miles then had the right to redeem any mortgage from the mortgagee once he had paid it out in total. Obviously Stacey couldn’t afford to do this. Miles was also generous in knocking off the interest so Stacey got a little more in his pocket – but no way could Miles then turn around and foreclose on Stacey – he would then be both mortgagor and mortgagee which is ridiculous. And how he could become owner of Danescourt if it was entailed  – I’m scratching my head here. If he was Stacey’s heir presumptive – but Heyer doesn’t mention this – maybe they could break the entail together – but it seems very unlikely. 

Perhaps she couldn’t be bothered explaining it all but that’s not Heyer – she likes to lecture constantly to lesser minions on her superior knowledge – but maybe just maybe she got this all wrong? 

Fernhunter
3 years ago

@@@@@ 12, Whackywitch

I forgot to add – I really don’t understand what Heyer is on about with the mortgages and Miles buying up Danescourt. It’s a good plot device, but really she should know better. Entailed properties do not have mortgages – one could possibly mortgage the income from the farms, but one could not mortgage any property – it was entailed and had to be passed on by the trustees to the heir whoever that was. Miles could certainly have bought an equity of redemption from Stacey – this was a reasonable outcome for Stacey as it is a quantifiable item, and it meant that Miles then had the right to redeem any mortgage from the mortgagee once he had paid it out in total. Obviously Stacey couldn’t afford to do this. Miles was also generous in knocking off the interest so Stacey got a little more in his pocket – but no way could Miles then turn around and foreclose on Stacey – he would then be both mortgagor and mortgagee which is ridiculous. And how he could become owner of Danescourt if it was entailed  – I’m scratching my head here. If he was Stacey’s heir presumptive – but Heyer doesn’t mention this – maybe they could break the entail together – but it seems very unlikely. 

I don’t remember anything about Danescourt being entailed. Where was that mentioned?

If it was entailed, how did Scacey—and his father before him—mortgage the property?

That was a risky business for the lender. If Stacey died untimely, the property would revert to the next designated heir. Who would have no obligation to pay off those loans.