Skip to content

Game of Thrones Season 8, Episode 5 Discussion Thread: “The Bells”

228
Share

Game of Thrones Season 8, Episode 5 Discussion Thread: “The Bells”

Home / HBO’s Game of Thrones / Game of Thrones Season 8, Episode 5 Discussion Thread: “The Bells”
Books Game of Thrones

Game of Thrones Season 8, Episode 5 Discussion Thread: “The Bells”

By

Published on May 12, 2019

Photo: Helen Sloan; Courtesy of HBO
228
Share
Photo: Helen Sloan; Courtesy of HBO

Do you have your tissues handy?

This is it, people! The penultimate episode; the true end is in sight. Who will sit on the Iron Throne…and do you even care anymore? It’s easy to feel like you know exactly where this show is going, but Game of Thrones still manages to bust out some real show-stopping surprises when you least expect it.

As this is the very final stretch of the very final season, we’re going to keep the ravens flying with an open discussion thread. Come join us in drinking even more Cersei haterade (i.e. even more wine), mourning the beloved characters who’ve fallen this week, and placing bets on how the very last episode will pan out.

As always, all spoilers for show episodes that have aired on HBO, as well as the published books, are fair game in the comments—this does not include leaked information and plot details for the final episode; please do not share leaked spoilers/speculation in this thread. We ask that you keep our commenting guidelines in mind and keep the conversation constructive and civil—otherwise, make like a Targaryen and go nuts!

What was everyone talking about this past week?

Courtesy of HBO

Post-watch update:

Women be crazy, amirite?

Is it wrong that I’m still Team Dany and want her and Drogon to go to wherever the showrunners live and burn that place next? Because this episode was predictable, lazy bullshit. But I expect not much better from the dudes who think making a show called Confederate is reading the room correctly in 2019.

It’s not just that I rankle at Dany suddenly going mad like every other damn Targ before her except for, you know, that one Targ she admired above all others, Rhaegar. It’s not even that the straw that broke the dragon’s back was kinda implied to be Jon Snow rejecting her love. It’s not even that I’m still pissed that Missandei was fridged to motivate Grey Worm’s emotional arc. (I still am, but it was also the death that propelled Dany over the edge.)

Let’s say it’s not even the ire I feel at watching a capable, empathetic woman who worked hard for her goal only to fall apart at the very end because of EMOTIONS! Stupid woman, having EMOTIONS. So incompetent.

Dany’s madness never seemed believable to me. Like, all of a sudden, she suffers a ludicrous amount of losses in quick succession—Euron fucking Greyjoy killed a dragon! Everyone she was worried about betraying her did betray her!—and she’s being plotted against by literally every single person around her who isn’t dead. So she goes from zero to Aerys in two episodes. There was just no nuance here, at all, in the rush to get to the stunning fireworks.

Power corrupts both men and women. I super get that. It’s a tired but timeless point to make for good reasons. But power doesn’t accomplish that corruption in two weeks and all of the ruthless things Dany did before this point—even burning Dickon Tarly—all made sense in terms of her character. She has never, ever been the person who would torch thousands of children. You can’t expect me to believe that she has changed so much that she would murder everyone in King’s Landing to be the Queen of Ashes.

Cersei gets a humanizing touch at the very end and Dany goes mad so we’ll all be okay with Jon killing her next week. Jon Snow knows one thing: failing upward.

There’s subverting expectations and then there’s just utter nonsense. UGH. They did you wrong, my Khaleesi.

Elsewhere in King’s Landing, this was a much more gorgeous, visceral battle that what we saw (or didn’t see) in the Battle of Winterfell. The utter terror of watching Arya flee from the destruction was so well done, especially when it was contrasted with the weight of blows landing in CleganeBowl. Really, really epic, beautiful destruction to see and hear and feel viscerally, like a stone to the chest. This is what Minas Tirith would really have looked like during the Battle of Pelennor — crushed brains, burnt horses, ash, chaos, stampedes.

It’s so awful, you’d think Sandor would’ve warned Arya against revenge before she set foot in the Red Keep.

Oh well, makes as much freaking sense as anything else this season.

Courtesy of HBO

I still thought CleganeBowl as it was set up on the show was kinda silly, too. All these years and Sandor still wants revenge for his face? For the smallfolk Gregor tortured? I think Sandor would have moved beyond that after his time in the monastery and with Beric, but, nope —Dany’s not the only one with a personal grudge.

The showdown felt like a character regression.

There was a lot of that going around.

I’ll be the first to admit I feel dumb after being so damn sure Jaime was going to kill Cersei and try to prevent all this bullshit because six seasons of character development from “A Man With No Honor” should change him into… still a man with no honor, apparently, neither saving Cersei nor killing her for what she did to cause this whole fucking war in the first place. And for leaving Brienne to bawl her eyes out like a schoolgirl in the snow.

It’s like after Cersei’s Walk of Shame, the writers couldn’t be arsed to think up a satisfying way to kill her. So they just dumped some rocks on her and Jaime. Rocks. Rocks killed Cersei. Any of the available fan theories would’ve been better—death by childbirth, Arya with Jaime’s face, Tyrion! But nope, buried in the basement of the Red Keep. Not an ounce of poetic justice served to one of fiction’s best monsters.

Twincest. Courtesy of HBO.

Final thoughts:

  • So, did Bran not see this bloodbath coming? We did see a vision of Drogon flying over King’s Landing. Did he just not care to tell anyone about that because he wants Jon on the throne so bad? The Three-Eyed Raven must obey the Federation’s Prime Directive? How can you see this coming and do nothing?
  • Jon’s gonna feel dumb going back to Sansa now, eh?
  • Tyrion is hopefully smart enough to hide from Dany until he can become Jon Snow’s Hand.
  • Qyburn got off easy, all things considered.
  • So did Varys, who was so freaking good at whispers but got caught out in the most obvious game of telephone ever. Weak. Somewhere, Littlefinger is laughing his mustache off.
  • LOL. The Redshirt Golden Company. Goodbye, Prince Valium and your goofy face.
  • Arya looked like she still has a queen on her list. I bet, just like with the Night King, Arya will do Jon’s dirty work for him.
  • Next week: On a scale of Dexter (the worst) to Six Feet Under (the best), I see Thrones landing somewhere in Lost/Battlestar Galactica series finale territory. *sad trombones*

Theresa DeLucci is a regular contributor to Tor.com covering TV, book reviews and sometimes games. She’s also gotten enthusiastic about television for Boing Boing, Wired.com’s Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast and Den of Geek. Send her a raven via Twitter.

About the Author

Theresa DeLucci

Author

Theresa DeLucci is a regular contributor to Tor.com covering TV, book reviews and sometimes games. She’s also gotten enthusiastic about television for Boing Boing, Wired.com’s Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast and Den of Geek. Send her a raven via Twitter.
Learn More About Theresa
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


228 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
6 years ago

Is there even an iron throne left for bats^^t khaleesi to sit on, or does she just stand on a clump iif previously molten iron?

Avatar
6 years ago

So next week it’s Jon vs Dany? 

Avatar
6 years ago

Here comes The mad queen 🤷♂

Avatar
Rob
6 years ago

Jon Snow will continue to be the useless little shit he is, & Arya will kill Daenerys. Jon will be all mopey on the Iron Throne with Tyrion as his drunken & depressed Hand. 

Avatar
prometheus
6 years ago

I stayed up late to watch David Benioff and D. B. Weiss broadcast their resume to Lucasfilms. The most obvious thing but beautifully done.

Avatar
WisJohnsin
6 years ago

Iiiiiis Arya dead? 

Avatar
Robert Rose
6 years ago

I wonder if Winterfell is safe? Is that her next destination? 

Avatar
Fiona
6 years ago

That was Cersei’s death!??? After all she’s done? Why does she get to die being held by a loved one? , she deserved far worse….wtf

Avatar
Jeecy
6 years ago

I just want somebody here to say something that will give me that “AHA” moment, point out something that went completely over my head, make me hate this episode a little less.

Avatar
6 years ago

I wish now that I had never started down the GoT road so many years ago…

Avatar
6 years ago

Three thoughts:

 

1.  I think Arya is done being the messenger of Death.  Gonna go get a life and screw Gendry until he can’t walk.

2.  Jon is useless.  The second the Lannister army started dropping swords he should have been yelling “stand down” to his troops.

3.  Dany is CRAZZZZZZZZZY!  Yeah, we get it.  She burned the whole city down when all she really had to do was fly right for the Red Keep and blast the tower Cersei was in.  Game over.  Throne won.  But no, we have to have Dany is CRAZZZZZZY! 

 

One episode left.  I guess Dany is gonna go CRAZZZZZZY! some more and force Jon to act.  If there’s any justice at all, both will die and Gendry will become King with Arya as his queen.

Avatar
eight-years-for-this
6 years ago

I have watched 8 years for THIS????

And Cersei died much too easily & comforted by Jamie.

 Is there even an iron throne left?

Very disappointed…

 

 

 

 

Avatar
ALYo
6 years ago

I think there is some foreshadowing with Arya riding out of the ashes where everyone is burned, yet she and a horse are not.  It’s a parallel to Dany coming out of the fire with dragons. 

Avatar
6 years ago

Acting and sets is really top notch. They’re in service to a trainwreck, but the actors are trying and everything looks good. Sadly, the episode devolves at the bells and just gets lost in the weeds.

 

Notes:

There is no plan before  the gate falls. I guess everyone was going to charge the walls and grind them down.

Ballistae and Euron are suddenly not magic. I guess one dragon being cheap really did win here. Also, the city’s defences are gone in about thirty seconds.

It was hilarious to see that one Northerner get wacked in the face during the Very Cool Walk-In (TM) with Grey Worm, Jon, and Davos. Peripheral vision is for losers.

Cleganebowl is kinda lame. It’s a confined space, and has two actors wack each other while the camera just kind of hops around to weird angles. Feel like it could gave been cut and nothing would gave been lost.

Anyway, big plot point: it doesn’t work. The narrative needs Dany to be nutso, so she’s nuts. They try to sell it earlier with the “Fear it is, then.”on Dragonstone, but the last shot of Dany doesn’t play to that. The writers decided Jon is the winner, probably, so they’ve decided to sacrifice Dany on his altar. Shame really.

 

Avatar
Corey Grunenberg
6 years ago

dany will kill Jon, Aria will kill dany. Tyrion will rule Westeros with Sansa ruling the north, and they both have a new found respect for each other this season. Boom and done

Avatar
Peter Cohen
6 years ago

Episode three of season eight had the most utterly incompetent battle plan I have ever seen depicted on television and movies, and that’s saying a lot given how utterly asinine they usually are. It absolutely blew my suspension of disbelief. Then in episode four, well, I probably don’t have to describe it’s litany of faults. Add to that half Danny’s army has apparently resurrected itself from the ashes. Now along comes episode five. The scorpions which were SO powerful, a mere handful on a dozen ships were able to perfunctorily dispatch one of Danny’s dragons, are now destroyed with impunity by the hundreds. And Danny, who has been the sole beacon of hope for seven and a half seasons, has virtually instantaneously transformed into the worst villain in the entire series. I could not possibly be more disappointed in this. For shame.

Avatar
6 years ago

I…I just cant wait…

Avatar
Maureen Black
6 years ago

Drogon could only get one pass at flaming the army of the Dead, but now has enough to flame the Iron Fleet and ALL of Kings’ Landing?  (Okay, so the Dead outnumber the latter no matter how many passes.  But still…)

Thinking about the fact that Sandor made the decision to throw both of them into the fire.  Hard choice, but inevitable when fighting someone already dead.

captain_button
6 years ago

Bleah.

Only bit I really like was the Hound’s moment of clarity when he tells Arya not to ruin her life living only for revenge, like he did.

Avatar
max
6 years ago

Why is everyone acting like Daenerys is some kind of villain? For 8 seasons know every sensible character has gone on and on about how Kings Landing is a cesspool that smells like feces from 10 miles out. Everything north of the Red Mountains is an Ohio trailer park when it comes to diversity and tolerance but now we are supposed to wash our hair about Dany breaking the wheel for real. I say  “Let’s burn this mfer down pookie!“ Winterfell next.  

Avatar
Croaker
6 years ago

Well I guess GRRM is laughing his ass off.  Now I’ll have to read the last book (if it ever happens) and hope for a decent ending to this series. 

Avatar
littlebit_liz
6 years ago

I don’t know. I have actually liked where the show has gone this season – I just think it’s all been too rushed. I find the Dany-going-mad storyline to be fascinating, I just wish we’d had more time with it. That said, I don’t think it comes completely out of nowhere. Dany has been ruthless before, such as when she decided to crucify all the masters. I also totally buy the reason Varys gave for her descent into madness – her unshakeable faith in what she perceives to be her destiny, her right to rule. She continues to use her vision of a “better world” to justify her actions, even now that those actions go directly against her ideals (she claims that she is still holding true to being “merciful” – if not now, then she will be to future generations). 

In other words, I don’t believe that it was Missandei’s death or Rhaegal’s death or Jon’s rejection that suddenly turned her mad. I don’t think it was about her being emotional at all. I think those things helped tipped her over the edge (as well as the loss of Jorah, because in the past he has sometimes been able to talk her back from the edge). 

But for me, this madness didn’t come out of nowhere. I can’t claim to have foreseen this turn five seasons ago, and yet, it doesn’t feel unearned to me now, and I can only assume that’s because it was seeded, in some ways. I think of the fervor and the conviction Dany spoke with when trying to convince the Thirteen in Qarth how special she was. I think of how she unflinchingly burned the masters in Astapor and in Meereen. Burning thousands of people to death is nothing new to her; it’s just in the past, she did it to “bad” people, so we cheered her on. It doesn’t mean it wasn’t monstrous. 

So although I was never one of the fans who supported the theory that Dany would go mad – and certainly since the last book came out, there have been book readers with that theory – I do buy into it. But I can understand that that can be a very subjective thing. There are certainly other characters beats that have no felt earned to me, that have seemed to come out of nowhere. And I do agree with your review when you say that it was very rushed in these last couple of episodes. I just think there have been some hints of where she was going earlier, in the first couple episodes of this season, in last season, and even in previous seasons. 

On another note, Cleganebowl was the dumbest thing ever, because they left it so late – with the city falling down around them, who cared? There were no stakes. And Jaime and Cersei’s end was incredibly anticlimatic and disappointing. The show has just been determined that Jaime continue to be a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure, and Cersei? Honestly, I don’t know why they didn’t kill her off last season. (Oh, wait, yes I do – because she was the impetus for Dany coming to burn KL.) Seriously, if I was Lena Heady, I’d be super pissed with this last season, because they gave her nothing. Her death has been one of the most anticipated, and it was a total letdown.

Avatar
littlebit_liz
6 years ago

Oh, and a couple of other things I forgot (more in response to some comments here, rather than the review) – 

I actually found this battle more believable that the previous two this season. I think Rhaegal was killed so easily because he, and Dany, were completely taken by surprise. (They shouldn’t have been, because, hello, aerial view, but whatever, that’s obviously what the show wants us to think.) This time, Dany and Drogon flew like they should have – they kept circling around, so the ballistae – which are obviously very heavy and therefore slow to move – had to keep being circled around. And before they could get in position, she would burn them. It’s obviously not too difficult for Drogon to dodge the bolts when he can see them coming, and anyway, they didn’t get many shots off because of how slow they were to move.

@14 – I mean, the plan obviously was to wait until Dany felled the gate from the inside. That’s why they waited. I don’t think Dany did that on a whim (that came later), that was obviously part of their strategy.

Avatar
6 years ago

Rocks killed Cersei.

It was good enough for James T. Kirk.

Avatar
matt
6 years ago

This season has worked for me far more than it hasn’t. Dany did NOT go mad in two episodes. It’s been a long time coming. Go back and watch Season 7. This wasn’t the beginning of her madness, but the rage has been building since Euron had the temerity to sink Asha’s fleet instead of bend the knee. (tbh, that was one lazy piece of writing. He just happens to be able to ambush a fleet he had no way of knowing was coming in the middle of dense fog?)

And what are Dany’s real credentials? Sure, she’s got some king blood in her…but that kingdom was overthrown. She did some cool things, like free some slaves, but she’s hardly the only one in this world who does good things. She proved in Mereen she’s not a very good ruler. Bout the only thing she IS good at is kicking ass. I don’t care what anyone says. Burning King’s Landing is consistent with the arc she’s been on.

My only real complaints this season are Tyrion being uncharacteristically out-maneuvered at every point and the lack of some final confrontation with the Night King. I loved Arya being The One, but it needed a little more time to marinate.

And sorry to be such a downer, but those who still have faith in Martin providing a more satisfying conclusion obviously don’t remember reading Dance with Dragons when it was released 47 years ago. Hell, even Feast was a mess.

Avatar
matt
6 years ago

Oh, also. Cersei’s death was fine, if not amazing. Her world literally fell down all around her. She died beaten and despondent. Good enough for me.

Landstander
6 years ago

Tell me why can’t this be love?

I found myself asking one question very often in this episode: Why?

When that happens, it’s a failure of storytelling. I’m usually very forgiving about certain mistakes (I mean, do we really need to know how fast a scorpion bolt flies?) But I can’t forgive character-based flaws. Making sure your characters have sufficient motivation for their actions is the minimum I expect from any story.

And I failed to see enough justification for many actions in this episode.

PS: That Tyrion and Jaime farewell scene made me cry like a baby.

PPS: I’m definitely getting major Lost vibes from this ending. A lot of people are going to hate it. But hey, it’s an ending…

Sunspear
6 years ago

So Dany is now a genocidal Starfleet admiral…

If the Hound had let Arya come she would’ve simply stabbed Cersei as she went past him down the stairs. List complete.

Arya dragging the mother and child out into the open got them killed. Plenty of houses and even some colonnades were left standing.

Maybe this is what has GRR Martin stumped. Waiting so many years for Dany to arrive in Westeros only to have her be the ultimate villain. He may have a sense that many readers won’t be happy if he goes down the same route and may be tempted to change course. There’re plenty of plot elements that the show ignored. Maybe he’ll follow one of those.

Really hope the books turn out differently, or at least, with the use of PoV, give us a more nuanced portrayal of Dany’s turn. Otherwise, Varys’ basic message of “a man will do a better job as ruler” gets affirmed. The Crazy Lady burned King’s Landing, and before that Cersei fucked it up, so lets not have any more girls running things. That does not subvert fantasy tropes as this series was meant to do.

Avatar
6 years ago

Honestly, at this point so much has been tossed out the window in terms of logistics, logic, basic physics, strategy, characterization, pacing, etc. that next week feels like a mercy killing. In a week’s time we went from magically effective scorpions killing conveniently ineffective dragons and Euron-on-the-spot to conveniently ineffective scorpions (because multiplying them breaks the spell?) getting destroyed by a magically effective dragon and, well, Euron-on-the-spot.

Dany’s long-foreshadowed bent toward tyranny could have been turned into something compelling, but instead we get her just going nuts, and that’s just boring and lazy.

Jon is supposedly the great leader, and Davos the great compassionate/pragmatic one, but when both are faced with the Lannister army that clearly knows it’s a lost cause and is leaning toward surrender, neither says a thing (not a thing!), and when the atrocities start neither does enough  or what is in their character to do. And so much more so wrong.

This season has felt like there were two writing rooms: one assigned the character-driven scenes and one the spectacles.  The former is doing mostly a bang-up job, as seen again this week in the scenes with Tyrion and Jamie, or Arya and the Hound. Really, so many scenes that involve just two or three characters, or that were “quiet” have been excellent this year. Meanwhile, the other room feels like it’s been staffed by a bunch of folks hanging out partying until they realize their deadline was an hour ago, and so they turn in crumpled slips of paper stained with beer and burrito drippings that say things like:  “We think it’d be cool if a dragon gets shot out of sky and falls into the sea” or “What if Dany goes full-scale bonkers?”

The whole episode was a perfect metaphor for how the entire show is crashing and burning at the end

 

Avatar
R
6 years ago

Dany will forever be my queen, my unburnt, my breaker of chains. She is compassionate, just, and while she doesn’t always succeed, she tries to do good in the world.

This season, that’s all been thrown out the window. “Oh she’s a Targaryen, they all go crazy” NO. She was never that. “Losing Jorah and Missandei sent her over the edge” again, no. She would take harsh and painful revenge for Missandei, but that revenge would only ever be directed at those who truly deserved it.

The city surrendered, and she would have accepted that. Through her pain, her loss, her anger, she would have struggled but she would have shown mercy. She was never destined to be queen of the ashes. I am disgusted with how all her development, all her lessons, her triumphs and losses were just swept aside so we could have a dramatic city-burning. 

My Daenerys hasn’t been in the show for a long time. I can only hope the books do her justice.

Avatar
noeyed
6 years ago

It’s a very strange thing to try and subvert pretty much all expectations of where the characters have been building to. Previously, some of the writing felt lazy, but in this episode they switched it up to being insulting.

I think most of the writing “slaps to the face” have been covered here already, but another that stuck out to me was the end of the pathetic cartoon villian that is/was Euron. The payoff of all that smug prick’s antics was that he continued to be a smug prick while he was dying? The writers need to take a step back and literally fuck their own faces (Les Grossman, 2008).

Avatar
6 years ago

Looks like my decision to just leave everyone after the battle for the dawn is looking wiser and wiser. Agree we are heading towards a Lost style disaster. So not happy!  

Avatar
JasonD
6 years ago

The sense I’m getting, and I shouldn’t be surprised by this, is that “how dare they make the woman crazy?” This has been a LONG time coming. Emilia Clarke did a wonderful job selling the emotion of pure snapped rage when the bells rang. She lost Jorah. Jon revealed the secret against her wishes. She sees Tyrion as a traitor-in-waiting. Missandei is dead. One of her children was killed in front of her eyes. Her support system has eroded to almost nothing. She hoped they wouldn’t surrender, and when they did, she wouldn’t let them get off that easy. She snapped, and that is a very human thing to do. It wasn’t because she had a uterus, or because she is a Targaryen, although that family’s potential for instability certainly didn’t help. No, the camel’s back was finally broken, the bells were the final straw.

Tyrion being outmaneuvered, I can believe, because he is experiencing something he had never had to deal with up to this point: faith, and being blinded by it. It makes people do stupid things.

Varys never said “a man would make a better ruler because he is a man.” He said a man would be more accepted by the people. He wasn’t wrong.

Cersei was literally buried by her own hubris.

Missandei was not “fridged” because her death was used to motivate Dany, not Grey Worm. Grey Worm just mourned, and was not furthered by it.

That’s all I got.

Avatar
6 years ago

Next week it will be King Gendry and Queen Arya. They’re going for the Tudor ending to this War of the Roses. 

Avatar
Jude
6 years ago

Actually I think this season has been very good so far and this episode is one of the best I’ve seen.

I’m a Psychiatrist, and I worked with very dangerous patients. In my professional opinion Dany’s slide into full blown paranoia is totally believable. As other people have said this is not s sudden thing – she has had moments of ruthless nastiness before, as well as moments of well almost believing she is a goddess. She has always a tendency to extreme commitment to ideas and/or beliefs, even to the point of mass murder. None of this is about her being female – it’s about her having a really sh*tty set of genes and a really damaging childhood and adolescence. Remember she was only 13 when she was sold off as a sex slave aka wife.

Also I have seen many, many, many patients who have seemed quite normal to their close ones right up till a few weeks before they are obviously seriously mentally unwell. There aren’t always clear warning signs in their past and if there were they are often very subtle, and perhaps even in hindsight only recognised by a mental health professional.

On a slight tangent, I didn’t see her sadness during the victory feast as a reaction to seeing other people loving Jon, which would make him a threat to her throne. I thought she saw other people being friendly, relaxed and human with Jon, and him being friendly, relaxed and human back to them … and Dany doesn’t really know how to do any of that. She looked so lonely and lost my heart went out to her.

Avatar
6 years ago

This is clearly where the books are headed. Anyone who thinks the books will have a happier ending is fooling themselves.

And the Internet reaction to them is why GRRM will not want to finish them.

Avatar
6 years ago

Up until literally tonight, I’ve been telling people “For me, A Song of Ice and Fire is just the Game of Thrones show now. I’m done with the books, and when the show ends I’ll be done.” Now, I’m going back to the books. Oh, I’ll finish the show — I may as well at this point. But however long the books take, I’ll be reading them to see how one character is different.

I could believe that Dany would burn the city.
I could believe that Jaime would turn back to Cersei.
I could believe that Euron would prove to be just as annoying and ultimately ineffectual as he has been up to this point.
What I could not believe was Arya deciding, after a few words from The Hound, to just say “Thank you” and peace out of there. Bull. Literally nothing in her arc has shown her to be one to back down because she was told to. This is the girl who told her /beloved father/ that she didn’t want to be a Lady and marry for the family. This is the girl who went blind, and still fought for what she wanted. This is the girl who killed the Night King, then turned down a proposal with a ladyship in it with a “Nah, Imma go do some more murderin’.”

And yes, of all the things in this episode, that’s the one I found hard to swallow.

Avatar
Sam
6 years ago

@36 I don’t think anyone who really follows the show – not to mention the books – expects a happy ending. We all know what happened by the end of season/book 1 and we are still surprised by that.

The thing is: D&D just don’t want to write a good story anymore, I believe. They surely have lots of pressure on them, the producers, the audience, all of us. (let’s skip the CGI budget interfering in storytelling, if that’s really true) But if you have been working with a set of strong characters for so long, shouldn’t you know how they would act and react to certain things? And if you’re stuck and can’t think of a good, powerful ending to all this – ask for help! I’m sure lots of people had amazing alternative courses for this story, ones that would amaze us just like killing Ned, Drogo giving Vyseris a crown, Daenerys coming from the fire with three dragons and so on.

We don’t want happy endings, or fan service. We want a good story to end the way it’s progressed for this long.

And as for the books, I don’t know if GRRM cares about what people say about the story – and he shouldn’t. But I also don’t think that after someone else writing an end for his epic he still has the interest in writing his own.

Avatar
Kate
6 years ago

Is anyone going to talk about Ian McElhinney dropping the news that George is actually done with the books but has a deal with HBO not to mention or release them until the show concludes?  I don’t know it it’s just a rumor, but I feel hope again. I was so happy waking up this morning thinking it might be true.

As for the show, the conversations with D&D after each episode make it clear that they’ve never understood the story and characters to begin with, so they’re just writing what they think is cool and will shock people. And what’s shocking is them throwing all the character progression from the first 6 seasons out of the window. They don’t understand that our jaws are dropping not at their brilliance but at their utter disregard to the art of storytelling.

Those books will come. The books will come. The books have to come.

Avatar
6 years ago

“If it weren’t for you, I never would have survived my childhood.” – Tyrion

“You would have.” – Jaime

“You were the only one who didn’t treat me like a monster. You were all I had.” – Tyrion

Such a great scene. Never really realized the full extant  of what it must have been like for baby Tyrion. Literally every person he came in contact with hated him, was disgusted by him, blamed him for Joanna’s death. And then his big brother actually treats him like a worth while human being. Tearing up again just thinking about it. 

Avatar
6 years ago

I have read Feast of Crows and Dance of Dragons.  George is a discovery writer who has lost control of his story.  I do not understand this religious faith that people have in his writing. He might draw out the story more, but I do not think his ending will be meaningfully different for people unhappy with this story.

Avatar
Matthew Carpenter
6 years ago

Loved the episode and the season so far and here is my reason why –  – 

Game of Thrones works best when it doesn’t do fan service. If every prediction in a comment section or Internet post was the reality of the show what fun would that be? Now everyone is mad – Jamie didn’t kill Cersei, Ayra didn’t kill Cersei, Dany went mad, etc etc. It wouldn’t matter HOW this all ended – people wouldn’t be satisfied. The world had become a place full of entertainment critics instead of entertainment connoisseurs.

My 2 cents.

 

 

Avatar
Peter
6 years ago

HERE DANNY HAVE A SNICKERS BECAUSE YOU'RE JUST NOT YOURSELF WHEN YOUR HUNGRY | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

Avatar
Msb
6 years ago

 “how dare they make the woman crazy?”

just because it’s a tired old trope in a show that made its name by doing the unexpected? 

Avatar
RW
6 years ago

The Jamie and Tyrion scene was the best scene in this episode. And I like the scene where the Hound warned Arya against revenge. The rest of the story and character development that has been built up since season 1, has gone down in flames.

Dany’s madness has been slightly hinted at through the series with her constantly saying “I will not be like my father”. But having her make the split second decision to burn down the entire city, instead of getting revenge on Cersei and just going straight to the red keep baffles me. Dany has been a compassionate ruler who showed that she cared for ‘the people’ and knew how to punish those who wronged her (and those who followed her). Yet, the writers decide to make her go “nah, I’m going to burn them all!” despite the fact that she only needed to kill Cercei. I guess the writers wanted to make it so that they could put Jon on the throne and not feel bad about it.

Speaking of, Circei had one of the most unsatysfying deaths. Being smothered to death while in her brothers arms? Really?!

What they have done to this series is sad.

Avatar
6 years ago

I. DID. NOT. SEE. THIS. ONE. COMING. At all.

It’s not even that the show went full apocalyptic grimdark. It went FULL STUPID. Which, OK, it has had its moments, but it was never stupid. Even the image of Tyrion wandering among the carnage, Hamlet-like, is an old, bad, stupid cliché.

I have said before that I was kinda done with the books, but now I’m really done. Done with the show, the books, the whole rigmarole.

Avatar
paivi
6 years ago

42: Sure it’s a fine thing to subvert expectations, but there is a way to do it skillfully and this sure wasn’t it. A satisfying story has to make sense to the audience even if they didn’t see it coming. After all these years, to me, these last episodes just stink of the writers trying to outdo themselves.

I guess the story would have been even more surprising (and historically accurate) if the protagonists and half of the army had died of diarrhea they caught from contaminated water on the way to KL. Arya could decide to just say nah, sod it all and go back to selling clams in Braavos. It would be surprising, but would it be satisfactory? Nah, this is a story for entertainment, not real life where epic plot arcs rarely happen.

Avatar
6 years ago

The show-runners ditched the whole idea of “warging” a few seasons ago.  If they hadn’t, this would be the set-up to an epic battle between Targaryens to see who could warg the last dragon.  

Like everything that has happened the last few seasons, I have the distinct impression that it would have made a lot more sense if they were working off of a DRRM novel.  

Avatar
6 years ago

“one of fiction’s best monsters”

That she was, and a bag of chips. Her arc from a strong woman chafing at the restrains of a brutal man-dominated society into full, unrestrained monstrosity was a joy to watch. She was the anti-Daenerys, taking all the necessary decisions to achieve control over her life –only in her case the decisions were selfish, and unjust, and dark.

Or so I thought. Now all we have left is Daenerys I –yet another mad Targaryen monarch, who actually did what Aerys II could not do because of Jaime: lay waste to all of King’s Landing.

Avatar
6 years ago

@47 paivi: “A satisfying story has to make sense to the audience even if they didn’t see it coming.”

THIS

Avatar
6 years ago

I was wondering if the green explosions at the end were wildfire traps set by Cersie or left-overs from the stuff Dany’s crazy father was going to use to burn down the city.  

Avatar
6 years ago

@41 Walker: Seconded.

Avatar
6 years ago

@@@@@ 51: Most likely the second, IMHO.

Avatar
6 years ago

@41 – It’s not that Martin is such a great writer.  It’s that there is far less wiggle room in a novel to take short-cuts that don’t make sense.  Characters have to be developed.  Situations have to be set up for the readers.  Things have to progress logically to make it past a decent Editor.  

When the show was based on the novels, it generally made sense.  The Battle of Blackwater Bay made sense in the book and made sense in the show.  It felt much better scripted than last night’s chaos. 

Avatar
Jeanette M Baker
6 years ago

You can really tell that the final books  have not been written yet, this season is flat and uninspired. 

 

Avatar
Thomas
6 years ago

If GRRM really has finished the series and is holding back publication until the show finishes, maybe that deal includes the show runners completely pissing off viewers so the ending doesn’t tank the market for the books? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Avatar
6 years ago

Arya seems very fickle these last two seasons.

First thing she does when she arrives in Westeros? Kill all the Freys. So vengeance seems to be her prime motivation.

Second thing she does? Go to another person in her hit list (like Cersei)? No, go visit her family. Guess she got her vengeance fix, so she was OK for a while. Then she kills Littlefinger, so she got another dose of vengeance. That made her last until she got to see all her family reunited and for her to kill the Night King.

When Gendry came and offered to marry her, she was all like “Forget man, you’re just a fling to me. I got some murderin’ to do. I didn’t know the Night King at all, so that wasn’t satisfying. So here I come, Cersei!”.

A long journey later, the Hound talks to her in the Red Keep, in the middle of a battle, and she’s “Yeah, you’re right. Don’t want revenge anymore”. Why didn’t you have this conversation back in Winterfell, you two? Or anywhere in the middle of the journey?

I know why, because D&D had to show how horrific Dany was, and Arya is the character closest to the common folk. So Arya can feel justified in murdering Dany.

Lazy writing. Arya doesn’t seem to have clear motivations at all. Her motivations are what the writer wants them to be, so she gets to be in the right place at the right time (to kill LF, to kill the Night King, to kill Dany, to not kill Cersei). 

Avatar
6 years ago

I don’t understand what character development the producers supposedly thrown down the sewer with this episode?

That Dany will be a benevolent well-loved Queen merely because she freed a fee slaves and is presented as the slighed one? I felt her plunge made sense in the context of the series: she was terribly entitled, he believed this crown belonged to her and she failed to grasp perhaps the people of Westeros aren’t interested in seeing another dragon-based dynasty. If she wanted what is best for Westeros, then she would have listened to counsel, but she was blinded by her revenge and ended seeing everyone as her enemy. I thought it narratively made sense she’d lose a fuse, I mean, it’s been in the coming for seasons (she has no love nor pity for the people of Westeros, she sees them all as enemies who killed her father/brother), so what character development was ignored here? The one where Dany ended believing the thrown belonged to her and others had to bow to her as Queen or die? Or the one where readers expected her to succeed because she starts as the under-dog? Or the one when an abused young girl sold into slavery to rapists and murderers ended up perpetuating the same atrocities she tried to stop when push too far down the line? That she’d react in the only way she ever know, by brow-beating everyone into submission? Her is a sad story. It was never going to end well.

That Jon would be a better King? This has been obvious from the start. Jon has a way to develop relationship with people, to bring them together and he is humble enough not to demand to have a crown nor dos he think he should have it merely because his blood line says so. Who would want Dany and her terrifying dragons on the throne when you can get Jon instead? Why Dany when Jon would be the king to unify both the South and the North? Why Dany when Jon could sit on the throne without any more blood needing being shed?

That Jamie didn’t redeem himself? He lived by his words, so he died as he lived, trying to stay true to himself. He wouldn’t break his oath to the North when the White Walkers attacked, but neither is he able to break his word to his sister in stating he’ll always love her. I thought the twins death was poetic, being crushed by a moutain, dying as they lived, together. I thought it was very touching that Tyrion tried to save his sister despite her having hated him all his life, still he wouldn’t sacrifice her unborn child and was willing to die for it. My only disappointment is Jamie didn’t get to tell Cersei what Tyrion tried to do for them.

That Cersie doesn’t die a painful death being burned by Drogo or assassinated by Arya? That Jamie didn’t kill his sister? I loved how Cersei died, with the weight of her mistakes crumbling upon her as she remembers why she fought to begin with: her children. This was the moment she realized just how badly she messed up and ultimrately caused her last child’s death. I couldn’t think of a more fitting ending. What would Arya or Jamie killing her accomplished? I love that Arya chooses to drop he revenge, chose to live. I wouldn’t have wanted her to kill Cersei, it would have ruined her “coming back to herself” character arc. I don’t understand why so many think what we saw contradicted her development? Her entire arc was about becoming herself and dropping the revenge and the anger. It has started seasons ago…

So really, I do not understand why all the hate here. Sure, the denouement could have been less rushed, but they only had 6 episodes to finish the series. I loved the King’s Landing battle, I love the focus being put on the poor people trying to run away from death as opposed to putting on mad Dany. I love watching Jon’s despair in being unable to stop the carnage once it starts or Arya trying to save this one family and falling. Ah, I wanted her to save them, the little girl, at least.

The focus was right where it needed to be, one the victims and I loved it for it.

Avatar
Tiaar
6 years ago

This season managed to character assassinate Tyrion too. Apparently he really is as dumb and gullible as Cersei said! He has consistently backed the wrong horse throughout the last two seasons. Most of his assumptions and advice has been bad.

What a wreck.

Avatar
6 years ago

Next episode predictions:

1) Arya kills Jon.

2) Sansa kills Tyrion.

3) Dany kills Gendry.

4) Ser Davos kills Arya.

5) Greyworm kills Ser Davos.

6) Drogon kills Dany (traffic accident).

7) Cersei, who was not dead, kills Drogon (poisoned goat).

8) Shadow kills Cersei.

9) Sansa kills Shadow.

10) PETA kills Sansa.

11) PETA kills all survivors (for good measure, because the animals).

12) That R’hllor priestess we all forgot about by now comes and brings EVERYBODY back to life –including the Night King. The cycle starts anew.

13) But first, they all join forces and exterminate PETA. All three dragons burn the PETA headquarters to the ground. The last shot is of a PETA magazine being consumed by flames. THE END.

14) Or is it? After the final credits, we see Melisandre wandering among the smoking ruins of PETA’s headquarters. She smiles, raises her arms and sings “Never be enough.” Blackout.

Avatar
Thomas
6 years ago

@59,

Did they “only have 6 episodes” to work with, or did they give themselves 6 episodes by choice?  I don’t know if we know how much of the decision was the showrunners’ idea of how they wanted to tell the story and how much was the result of scheduling or budget constraints imposed by HBO.  Does anyone really know the answer to that?

Avatar
6 years ago

I don’t understand everyone complaining about Cersei’s death. GoT has always been about realistic and unexpected deaths, because in this brutal world people really can die at any time, even if they are a named POV character. Hollywood tropes require epic deaths for main characters, and that’s not how GoT is supposed to be.

Avatar
6 years ago

Ya know, I gave up on the SOAIF books a loooong time ago and thought that the TV series would give me closure I would never get from the books. Now I realize the crappy writing of the show is a clever ploy to get me to buy the books (if they ever come out) to get the closure I’m not getting from the TV Series…

Avatar
Austin
6 years ago

As sucky as the show writing has become, enjoy the finale however you can, because that’s the only ending we’re ever getting. GRRM has clearly passed on that great burden (as he sees it) to the TV show. 

Avatar
Dr. Thanatos
6 years ago

Arya has building dropped on her. Next scene she shakes it off and gets up.

Arya is trampled by a crowd. Next scene she shakes it off and gets up.

Arya is caught in dragon-fire. Next scene she shakes it off and gets up.

I expect Arya to be receiving a package from the Acme Corporation any day now because the only other character in all media who is this indestructible is Wile E. Coyote (Genius).

Avatar
6 years ago

People don’t want a happy ending; they want an ending they’re happy with. There’s a difference.  Romeo and Julietisn’t a happy ending, but people are happy with how it ends because there’s a tragic inevitability to it built on how humans act and interact.

As for Dany, no, those of us complaining didn’t think she’d rule wisely or benevolently. Just the opposite. But the reasons for that should be much more interesting than “she crazy” with the reason for that being “Cause her family crazy.”  She doesn’t burn Sam’s father and brother because she’s crazily sadistic or because she “snapped.”  She does it out of very human desires and flaws and miscalculations, which is far more interesting.  Crazy is the lazy writer’s shortcut to having characters service plot, for having characters do irrational or self-destructive things, even though we all know people who act irrationally and self-destructively without being “crazy.” 

Why don’t we ever see her flaming the city as closeup from her perspective? My guess is because the writers knew watching her see herself flaming children and still doing it would make it all wholly implausible (not to mention that thanks to no ordered troop movement in the city but just street fighting and random pillaging, she’s as likely to be flaming her own people given what we see). If you want her to perform an atrocity, there are ways to get her there without the crazy crutch. If you want her to level the Red Keep to get at Cercei, makes perfect sense in lots of perfectly understandable ways. But flaming children?  Only explanation is “crazy.”

Why does Grey Worm do what he did? Nothing save the lazy shortcut of “my woman was killed!”

 

What in Jon’s character makes us think he wouldn’t be trying a hell of a lot harder to rein his army in, send them out of the city, set them to protect the people even against the unsullied?  Or Davos doing the same? We get lip service to it and that’s it.

We spent years seeing how smart Tyrion was and a year seeing how incredibly stupid he is because plot.  We get scorpions that work and ones that don’t because plot.  We get the faceoff between Euron and Jamie because Euron happens to wash up in the tiniest of beaches with the exact 12 second window of time Jamie crosses it cause plot. Again, just lazy—you can put the two together in a way that makes sense but there’s not even an attempt here.

The scene with Tyrion and Jamie is so great because it is centered on character/relationship and comes organically out of the characters’ beliefs (about each other, about themselves) that we’ve seen throughout the show. That it parallels Jamie rescuing Tyrion is icing on the cake, character and plot working in tandem but with character leading to plot, not the other way around.  The scene with Arya giving up her vengeance is also great because again it’s centered on character and relationship themses that are long-standing. We’ve seen her heading this way—taking the other path at the crossroads, becoming re-enveloped in her family, leaving the Hound on the parapet and seeking life, softness,  youth, and warmth instead of cold, hard, and old. Though afterward we can see her still torn.  And then she gets the proposal, where it seems people expect her to fall back into the “right” life for a woman. And we’ve seen the relationship with The Hound as one that has impact on her throughout as well. I wish we’d seen her struggle with that more, both in in conversation and visually, but it’s there at least. 

The best episode this season was before the battle because it was focused on character and they gave them time to have actual moments together—conversations and visuals. And those scenes are what makes it all so frustrating, because it’s there you see the potential for the show. Instead we too often get the opposite this season.

Avatar
6 years ago

The Internet today is 50% people who are pissed off because they just found out that Dany was NEVER a hero (in a series whose tagline is basically, “There’s no such thing as heroes,” that feels…naive) and 50% of those of us who basically said, “Ah HA! THERE’S the skull hiding behind the pleasant mask of everyone who actively seeks absolute power.”

And @62, that’s the question *I’d* like to understand.  I could see that even a really successful show would have trouble going to the money men and saying, “We need two and three times our budget to do the last two seasons right.” Followed by having to answer the question, “Will we get two and three times the viewership? with “Not really.”

Avatar
6 years ago

I’m pretty sure what we’re seeing with Dany, is what in the books is the FAegon storyline.  Dany will probably burn King’s Landing to defeat the other Aegon, then will go North to fight the White Walker, redeeming herself.  Which works, while this….doesn’t.

We always knew Dany was going to have to confront her brutal nature, but this, this is just too rushed.  Not three episodes ago, she was risking her crown to fight the White Walkers, now she burns innocent children?  All because the people, who have been given no reason to, don’t love her??? 

The loving death scene for Jaime and Cersei was just too much.  With the smash cut, I thought Arya had fallen into the dungeons where the dragon skulls are, and would still kill Cersei.  Instead, they are in the same place they were at the start, Jaime blind to everything but Cersei, and Cersei blind to anything but her legacy. 

I appreciated what they did with Arya, and the viewpoint the audience got, but really they had her go all the way South to be told by the Hound what she’d already decided when she walked away from the House of Black and White!?!?!  “A girl is Arya Stark, and I’m going home to Winterfell”.  Arya has forsaken her vengeance SO MANY TIMES.  But these writers don’t believe in growth.

The scene with Jaime and Tyrion was incredible, and I’m glad we got it, but this is all your fault Jaime, Tyrion’s gonna have to die for releasing you, and he couldn’t have done anything but what he did, but why couldn’t you JUST STAY IN WINTERFELL!!! 

The smallest quibble I had, actually was Cleganebowl.  If it happens in the books, I except it will come by trial by combat, with Sandor representing the Faith, and it not being about his own vengeance. 

But my problem with it, has always been two-fold.  Number one, it negates any growth Sandor has made(not that these writers care).  Number two, killing the thing formerly known as Gregor wouldn’t actually mean anything, because it’s not his brother anymore.

And they somewhat addressed it by having the automaton demonstrate agency here, by deciding to face off with the Hound.  So, like I said, smallest quibble.

Avatar
6 years ago

@37, Except Arya had already forsaken vengeance when she returned to Winterfell.  That was literally the entire point of her run in with Nymeria. 

It was the decision to go down South that was the aberration, not the decision to back away. Arya had already made that decision on her own, she didn’t need the Hound to make it for her.  D&D just needed a way to get her into KL for her to be the audience viewpoint for the carnage Dany caused.

Avatar
6 years ago

Okay, so I guess the writers are now only capable of doing one of three things: 1- Small personal character-based scenes; 2-Nonsense B.S. needed by them reverse-engineering the plot in order to reach a certain ending in a certain timeframe; 3-Things that make sense for the plot, but are handled in the dumbest possible manner to the point that they seem as nonsensical as those mentioned above.

It’s sad to see the characters we followed for so many years through all manner of hardship act stupid and against their personalities so consistently, and to see the actors doing their best to sell it.

On a final note, Danaerys didn’t snap in two episodes. She has always been the exact same type of tyrant her father and her brother Vyseris were, and just because her motivations are supposedly admirable (or so she claims) it doesn’t change the fact that she’s always been an entitled delusional idiot who has seldom listened to her counselors and expects blind loyalty and obedience from everyone, or they deserve death because she’s Danaerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, Breaker of Chains and Mother of Dragons. GRRM didn’t fail to subvert the trope by having her be a “crazy woman because emotions.” He succeeded admirably in subverting the trope by making everyone believe that one of villains of the story was actually the hero just because the audience sympathized with the horrible things she went through as a young girl and because the characters kept insisting she was so good and merciful and the bees knees despite there being no real evidence of that in her actions, to the point where people are still defending her and claiming that the twist came out of nowhere. It didn’t, you just bought the propaganda and never paid any real attention to the character in the books or in the show.

Avatar
Swein
6 years ago

Whoa! First half hour of this episode really had me. All was forgiven. This is how GoT is to be run. Strong characters intrigating and making tough life changing decisions for all the wrong reasons … sort of. 

But then they let the silliness loose unfortunately. The dragon that was oh so vulnerable in last episode suddenly is totally OP. Impossible to hit and knocking down countless solid stone walls with its breath (Big Bad Wolf would definitely be in ave). Flying back and forth over the city for quarter of an hour burning everything, like a British bomber armada in WW2. Yeah I’ve seen people burning by know. Please bring the story forward instead.

Same with the battle scenes. Sure it is possible to do interesting battle scenes, even if I usually find them lacking. This episodes battle was not as dumb as in previous episodes, but this running around killing randomly appearing enemies again and again is boring in the long run. Cut it out and enter some character playing instead, I say.

My Epic highlights of the episode:
– The trial and death of Varys (good acting of Varys and Tyrion and Danys hardness on a slippery slope to madness)
– The Golden company line up in front of the gates (I am all in favour of good looking armour)
– Jamie and Cersei (I don’t care a bit if they deserved it, but it was good acting and even somewhat in line with their characters).
– Arya riding out through a burning city (I’m a poor lonsome cowboy and a long way from home…).

And Theresa; stop whining about them making the women stupidly emotional at the wrong moments. Do I have to mention Jon? Or Jamie? Danys madness was logical anyway. An effect of
1. Not beeing loved by the people she considered herself the saviour of.
2. The betrayal from her advisor.
3. Not even beeing loved by her true love (getting pretty lonely at the top).
4. (most imporatant) A hardness combined with a fanatical belief in her right.  

I can agree that they overdid it though.

Avatar
Swein
6 years ago

@72 Hear Hear!

Avatar
6 years ago

I expected Jaime to go back to Cersei because he realizes he’s the only one she might listen to and he’s trying to stop the slaughter of KL. I then expected Cersei to go mad queen and Jaime to kill her the same way he’d killed a king to save innocents. Granted, the show deliberately does the unexpected, but I thought it would have fit the characters. 

Now, if it turned out that Jaime taking this final, terrible step turned out to be meaningless because A) Dany goes crazy and isn’t accepting surrender, or B) Cersei had planted flammable liquids all over the city either for use in the up coming battle or because she’d really gone mad queen and decided it was better to burn the city than surrender, then that’s a tragic irony for Jaime to go out on, but it’s not character regression.

If the city burned because of Cersei but, in the chaos of battle, people believed Dany was the one responsible, she would still have to deal with the consequences and get to walk into the ruined keep while ash rained down, contemplating what her fight for the throne had cost. She and Jon would also likely still be on a collision course.

And Jon would have accepted the surrender and saved the lives he could if Grey Worm didn’t. It sets up the collision course between him and Dany. He believes, by saving those lives, he’s already taken a stand against her.

Double irony points if Dany, still grieving her dead friend and overwhelmed with guilt, can’t bring herself to punish Grey Worm, but Jon reads this as further proof that Dany is OK with what Grey Worm did because she deliberately burned the city.

 

Avatar
I'm Not Holding the Door Anymore
6 years ago

I was hanging on by a thread this season but it was over for me when Arya, with no lead up, no suspense, no visible storytelling to the audience, came flying out of the darkness from an unknown perch and with a slick hand slip of the knife, killed the Night King. All those years of training and struggle to end in this low budget storytelling move?

My expectations were much lower at that point on. And the writers haven’t disappointed. Garbage narrative after garbage narrative continues to plague this season.

Last night’s Dany-Freak-Out was my favorite episode of the season. Take it as you will because this season is the most awful season they’ve created.

How bad could it get now? Maybe Bran wakes up from a coma after his head wound from being pushed out of the window and it was all a dream? Seems like a likely plot now, doesn’t it?

Avatar
6 years ago

Theresa – I’m with you.  Dany’s not crazy – she’s just pissed that she’s bent over backwards and lost two dragons trying to save the Kingdom from the White Walkers and clean out an incompetent and mean spirited evil ruler and every single person in her ruling circle (except Davos) backstabs her, directly or indirectly, and that expressly includes Tyrion who keeps getting hit by the idiot stick again and again and again.. ARGHH.  t that point, she is definitely in the camp of they may not like me but at least they’ll fear me and comply with what I ask.  Still, she would have accomplished her goal by skipping the King Landing neighborhoods and burning the Red Keep to the ground.  It makes no sense whatsoever to burn all of KL before polishing off Cersei.    Only reason is to seT up a “She’s crazy” denouement.  ARGHH.  Great, and I mean great acting, but lazy writing for the win.   

Avatar
6 years ago

It was just a big shortcut to blow up the city and I think if they really wanted to sell us on Dany being mad, we would see her yelling “Dracarys!” at fleeing civilians. 

Exactly.  It would have then at least created the most tenuous of connections to Missandei’s final words, despite the fact, as I said last week, the incident Missandei was recalling with those words was a time when Dany only targeted those with power, and spared the innocent, so you know, the OPPOSITE of what she did here.

Avatar
6 years ago

@66. Dr.Thanatos

That’s Wile E. Coyote (SUPER Genius)😁

Avatar
6 years ago

she’s always been an entitled delusional idiot who has seldom listened to her counselors

She has literally done everything Varys, Tyrion and Jorah told her to.

and expects blind loyalty and obedience form everyone,

Except Tyrion and Varys, who were both told explicitly by Dany that if she became a tyrant, she expected them to do something about it. 

Has Dany always had the capacity to be this person??  Of course no one is arguing otherwise.

But the woman who ordered the Unsullied the slay only the masters?  The woman who locked up her dragons when they caused the death of one innocent person??  The woman who just three episodes ago told Sansa she was risking her throne to save the realm??  That person was nowhere in evidence this episode, despite her being that person two episodes ago. 

She decides she must rule through fear, because Jon is questioning their relationship, after she, in the previous episode was also questioning her love for Jon because of the risk he posed? 

The problem with this, is that Dany has been tempted to be this person time and time again, and has always ultimately rejected it, embracing her better nature.  And now it fails, because the plot calls for it.  That’s what people are calling bullshit about.

Avatar
Kate
6 years ago

D&D said that the reason Jaime went back to Cersei is because he always loved her and needed to be by her side. Even though the books clearly showed us early on that he was completely done with her and her manipulations and evil nature. Sure, the show isn’t the book, but they continued with the idea until they decided not to, and gave no reason for it. It’s not believable.

Dany, sure she probably would have ended up this way naturally, but it was too fast. It’s just not believable that in a space of a week she goes from trying to save everyone to killing babies. They didn’t want to take the time to make it more believable because that would lower the shock value. And in doing so, they didn’t earn her breakdown. 

Arya was the same way. She rides down from Winterfell with the Hound, and she’s going to kill Cersei the entire way, for weeks, and gets all the way into the keep, then the Hound gives her a sentence and she just ups and says OK and leaves? How about some discussion between them leading up to that? That’s just bad.

Jon is as bland as always. I have no arguments about how he’s portrayed. I never expected anything out of him.

Cersei was perfect as always. But as for her death scene, D&D decided how to frame it. I’m fine with how she died. But they framed the whole thing as a romantic tragedy, which is just ewwww. It’s like someone making a movie where Hitler and Eva Braun’s last moments are them swooning in each others arms as music swells, which is just inappropriate.

Tyrion has obviously been losing brain cells to drink. There’s nothing that excuses his mental lapses of the past season or two. At least they acknowledged this by Sansa making fun of how stupidly he’s being written now.

The whole Euron debacle was ridiculous. He served no purpose whatsoever in this episode, and his ability last episode was completely reversed and negated by Drogon’s power boost and the scorpions’ power loss. And why didn’t Winterfell get completely obliterated by dragon fire if it can now explode buildings?

There has been problem after problem with this season, and no amount of hand-waving can make it seem like the writers are doing their job well with the way they’re skipping along the tops of waves to get to the end as quickly as they can.  They’re the ones that wanted 6 episodes when HBO offered them ten plus more seasons. 

Avatar
6 years ago

Re Arya.  Growth rarely occurs in linear fashion without second guessing, backsliding, etc. so I can accept Arya not giving up vengeance once and that’s it. But what caused this particular step in her journey is what interests me rather than it feeling just random. Is it now that she’s back with family a sense that Cersei threatens her family and the north, so killing her is not just vengeance but a burden of obligation? Is it still solely vengeance, and if so what reminded her of all she’s lost? Is it Gedry’s expectation she’d be a lady?  is she wrestling with this new decision and if so how much?  What a waste of acting talent to not show any of that

 

On Dany. Delusional?  Yes. Entitled?  Yes. Tyrannical? Ruthless? Yes and yes. But those are qualitatively different from “crazy”.  You can have thought she was all those things and thus wholly unfit to rule and still not believe she is likely to burn hundreds/thousands of innocents including children when, and this is even more key, they do not stand in her way or show her open defiance. Burn the Golden Company?  Cersei?Absolutely. The Lannister army post-surrender?  Less likely but certainly plausible and within character in the “they defied me once and I can’t trust them again” idea. Tyrion or Jon?  Yes, though sadly, because they actively betrayed her and are political threats. But the non combatants? After she’s won?  You can understand her doing a lot of nasty angry killing in “sane” mode, but it’s pretty impossible for me to explain “I won and I’m still going to slaughter thousands who did nothing to me” outside of “crazy”.  And the dialogue and little montage of voices over her at the start send us to “Crazy” rather than “villainous”

Avatar
Ducky
6 years ago

Can we talk about the crosscutting in the scene where the Hound fights the Mountain, and Arya escapes the Keep and while it’s stylistically very impressive ultimately the Hound and Arya having the same blocking comes across as hollow because it’s suggesting there’s a larger connection between the two (such as the suffering of one is linked to another, or that at the moment the Hound either dies or is victorious will be the moment that Arya is saved) that at least to this viewer doesn’t pan out.

Avatar
6 years ago

It was a bad episode for all the reasons listed, however I don’t think Dany’s heel-turn was quite the shark jump that it’s stated to be . . . at least not for her in the books. The show really skipped through her slave cities story pretty quickly, but in the books the extended version of that travesty really made it clear that Dany makes rash, emotional decisions far too often and is a pretty bad leader overall. In particular she’s incredibly short-sighted. She also has a history of lashing out in sudden righteous vengeance, it’s just that we didn’t care when it happened to the woman who killed her husband/baby for totally valid reasons or a bunch of slavers. Because the show always painted her in a more heroic light than the books though, I really don’t think they built up to this moment sufficiently for it to really work.

Avatar
6 years ago

@62: Honestly, I have no idea. All I am seeing is there were 6 episodes left to complete the series. I felt they did a decent job in bringing all characters to the end of their narrative arcs. It may be they would have wanted more episodes, but were told to make it fit in 6, this is a possibility. I agree 2-3 additional episodes would have made the denouement less rushed, the whole dragons against the ballista fight might have come up better, but still I felt they did a good job given the constraints they had, either they chose them or they were imposed on them.

@67: I don’t think they portrayed Dany as crazy: there were several layers of subtility built within her character. She always had a penchant for dramatic revenge, she grew up being told life has been unfair towards her and owed her. Realising her family name isn’t enough to get the support of the people, finding out the common folks aren’t seeing her as a savior, worst they do not even care who sits on the Iron Throne was a harsh reality she refused to accept. She refused to accept her life-long goal might not mean much to the common folks.

More-over, Dany was blinded by her desire to see herself as the breaker of chains, because she did well in Mereen in freeing the slaves, she expected Westeros to be the same, she expected to be freeing people from a tyran. She never realized she has slowly become a tyran as what it a tyran if not someone who asks for complete obedience? The closer she got to her target, the less she listened to her counsellors, the more single-minded she got. She was very goal driven and try to achieve it in the only way she ever known: by crushing the opposition.

She also could not accept the people not automatically loving her because that’s what has happened all her life. She was sold to the Dothraki? She ended up leading them. She freed the Unsullied? Now she leads them. She just naively expected Westeros would be the same… that those people would either recognize her claim and bow down or recognize her threat and bow down yet again. She never expected needing to negociate (which is why she mishandled Sansa in the worst possible way), she never expected the people who’d oppose her not to be tyrans. She never considered the possibility she might not be the savior she wanted to be or that her dragons were more of a threat than a benediction.

She is not crazy, but she acted the only way she ever knew how to act: by taking by force what she believes is hers. If the people will not support her, then she’ll incinerate them and replace them with people who will see how much more benevolant she can be. She messed up. Big time. And I felt it was obvious what she perceives as Jon and Varys’s betrayal were the drop which broke the camel’s back… She couldn’t accept someone else had a better claim than her to this throne, she was unwilling to let go of her goal. All her sense of self-identity has been built upon how unfair it was her throne was stolen from her.

Dany is a conquerer, she has always been and this last episode, she showed it. She always wanted to own and to sit on the throne: she deluded herself into thinking she was doing it for the good of the people, but she wasn’t. She was doing it for her, hence flaming children isn’t crazy for her, it just was the next step in her journey. She could have chosen differently, but her path was set a long time ago.

@68: I never thought Dany was a hero which is probably why I liked the episode.

@70: The whole Cersei thing started up when Ned tried to harm his children. To her eyes, all she ever did was trying to protect her children, hence having her die in a moment where she realized all she did was causing their death truly was, IMHO, the best death she could have had.

My take on Dany is she was always going to end in a similar way because she always took what she wanted by force and felt justified in taking it. She was a bully hidden under a load of self-denial as to what her actions truly made of her. I thought there were enough scenes of people doubting her, not being sure with her, her being a tyran to justify how she might have snapped and killed innocent people she never cared for (they were all strangers and in leagues to have kill her father).

I think the story unfolds in ways to make you want to believe Dany is a good person, the rightful Queen, the liberator, the savior, but her track record speaks otherwise. I wanted Dany to be genuine, I loved Dany in the books, but she was a conquerer and a conquerer, well, conquers. She wanted her revenge against the city who killed her family, against the people who wouldn’t support her: she lost it. No doubt she’ll regret it though, but too late for that now.

@78: Dany has always been this person: she has always been the one to kill or to burn those to oppose her. Back in Mereen, it was lucky for the narrative those turned out being evil slave owners, but once in Westeros, those ended up being innocent civilians. That’s the crux of her character: she would do anything, anything to reach the Iron Throne. She claims she cares about the realm? Than why did she see it as her right to launch 10 000 Dothraki barbarous monsters onto Westeros in her campaign to win back her throne? It was lucky the Nightwatcher killed them all… but this was her plan.

If she had truly cared about the people of Westeros, then she wouldn’t have come back as an invader and a conquerer.

Her mad moment has been in the making for a loooong time, it just wasn’t what most people expected, so many are upset. They feel betrayed in having the one they saw as a genuinely good character turn out being the villain.

Avatar
6 years ago

I’m fine with how she died. But they framed the whole thing as a romantic tragedy, which is just ewwww.

YES!!!!

OK, bury Cersei under the weight of her own hubris?  It’s no valonqar, but it will do.  Dying embraced in Jaime’s arms as her last wish that he come to save her is fulfilled.

Thanks, I hate it!

There’s nothing that excuses his mental lapses of the past season or two. 

Well, his freeing of Jaime is completely excusable.  But aside from that, yes.

@85 Well, if the show didn’t want me to think Dany was special, they never should have given her the first three dragons born in centuries. 

This, I don’t agree with.  It’s completely in the nature of the show, and the books, that magic doesn’t discriminate between good and evil, it just is, and can be accessed by anyone willing to put in the work for it.  And considering the “work” is blood magic and sacrifice, perhaps that should be taken into account.  (In the books, there is also the anti-magic plot of the Citadel, which may have been impacting the Targaryens attempt to birth dragons).  I have never read that moment as making Dany touched by destiny(though I get she saw it that way).

Avatar
6 years ago

Seems like Jon is being set up as the winner of the Game of Thrones. He was handed the throne of the North for nothing after all. Why break the trend?

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

I wasn’t able to watch the episode last night, so I’m very late to this. I agree mostly with 22, 25, and 33. I think 36 is right that the storyline is pretty much where the books are headed (though with more buildup). @39: I’ve thought for some time that it was possible that GRRM’s contract with HBO prevented him from publishing any new books. That doesn’t mean it’s true, but I do think it’s possible.

My $.02: I’ve thought from the very beginning that Dany was unlikely to be a hero, and I’ve been describing her for years as “a conqueror not a ruler”. I love the character, and I love Emilia, but I’m not surprised. The one thing I’d say is that I don’t see Dany as “mad”, notwithstanding Varys’ effort to sell that. What I see is that the Khaleesi who would listen to her advisors and to those whom she knew loved her, has been stripped of any support over the last few seasons. Barriston, Jorah, Missandei, Daario — all gone. She rightfully stopped listening to Tyrion after he has consistently given her bad advice for 2 seasons now. She gave her heart to Jon and he pulled back from her. In short, she lacks the restraints which held in check her worst impulses, and that’s what we saw last night.

It didn’t surprise me that Jaime returned to Cersei. I never saw him as being on a redemption arc, neither in books or show. 

I agree with whoever it was who said that the little character moments are the best of the season. However, I loved S3, think it’s one of the best of the series, and think most of the “military” criticisms of it are nonsense. I also think last night did a brutal but realistic job of showing us what the sacking of cities looks like. Whatever the merits of those 2 episodes, Sapochnik deserves an Emmy for his direction.

Avatar
Jude
6 years ago

I just want to make it clear, I am not just a fully trained Psychiatrist, as I said in my last post, I am also a woman (despite the fact everyone I know calls me by an androgynous name) I have been involved in the fight for woman’s rights for many decades now, so please don’t take my post as yet another male doctor running a woman down.

@59  I totally agree with your assessment of the way people reacted about Dany. She’s never been a “hero” and she’s never been vaguely competent. (I’m not sure how she managed to organise the mass moving of people and ships …  I think the onion knight must have done it for her.)

But it’s not just the viewing-a-hero-through rose coloured glasses thing, there’s also the problems people have with acknowledging mental illness.

A/. Loads of people don’t think serious, life wrecking mental illness exists – and the corollary to this is that people who are “crazy” are really just over emotional in response to life events. So they are weak rather than stark raving bonkers.

B/ Lots of people think that saying a woman has a mental illness is firstly labelling and cubby-holing her because she is a woman, and secondly it’s an an insult to all women.

C/. Lots of people hate the idea that serious major mental illness does have a very significant genetic component and that incest and inbreeding just heightens this effect. They feel that this is just another case of “blame the mother”. It seems to be impossible to change peoples minds no matter how high the towering mountains research and proof you have to back up the “runs in families” proposition.

The fact is that people do suffer major biological upsets in their brains, and this makes them see, hear, believe and behave in ways that don’t make sense to other people. The fact is also that some of these people are women. Saying this is no anti-feminist or belittling those of us without a Y chromosome … it’s just facing what really happens.

Dany has a strong family history of serious mental illness, as well as a strong family history of incest and close inbreeding. She is in the age group where most mental illnesses show themselves. All through both the series and the books we have been told over and over that Targaryans go mad and become violent, dangerous rulers … so why is it such a shock that she has a mental illness? Why do people see this as something that has suddenly come out of left field with no warning?

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

Oops. S8, E3, not S3.

Avatar
6 years ago

Realising her family name isn’t enough to get the support of the people, finding out the common folks aren’t seeing her as a savior, worst they do not even care who sits on the Iron Throne was a harsh reality she refused to accept.

But this isn’t what the show did.  We never got a chance to see what common folk, aside from the North, thought about Dany.  It was the North, which was going to be aloof regardless, that rejected her.  The rest of the Westerosi nobles rallied to her, and were taken out by Cersei.  The only evidence the show gives you to support this, is that the Northerners loved Jon, and the Wildlings, whom he literally saved from extinction.  

Dany knows she isn’t owed loyalty, she has to earn it.  She says this to Tyrion and Varys, why would she no longer believe this.  She earned the loyalty of the Unsullied by turning on the Masters.  She earned the loyalty of the Dothraki by proving her strength.  She had done nothing to earn the loyalty of Westeros, except defeat an enemy most of Westeros didn’t believe existed.  The time to earn their loyalty was after Cersei’s defeat, but all her actions  did was ensure she’ll never get it. 

she has always been the one to kill or to burn those to oppose her.

And how exactly were the people of King’s Landing “opposing” her.  You rightfully point out that this is how Dany has always treated her enemies, yet ignore all the different ways she has always treated the innocent, and claim for her to treat the innocent as her enemies isn’t out of character to her.

Avatar
6 years ago

Aargh! So many feelings! I should be asleep!

Thanks for the reviews Theresa. I enjoy them, even if I think you’re wrong about the sexism and far too harsh on the showrunners.

Despite it’s flaws, this episode is settling well in my head. Yes, Dany’s descent was rushed – but not so much it was unbelievable. It’s been superbly set up and plays into lots of the show’s main themes:

1) The importance of family. Dany, like Cersei or Ramsay, grew up without no or really messed-up familial love. When her makeshift family died (except Drogon), and it was clear she wasn’t going to get the adoration of the people she had in Mereen, there was nothing to restrain her worst self. Contrast with the Starks. Or Tyrion, who had Jaime.

2) The danger of too much power in one person’s hands.

3) The horror of vengeance. Sandor’s talk with Arya was a highlight – and the timing was fine, it was only then they realised just how close the Keep was to destruction.

4) The danger of absolutes. Dany thinks she has an absolute right to rule. It’s destiny and her noble ends justify the means. Just like Stannis.

 

Other random thoughts:

I would have been satisfied with Jamie killing Cersei, but (for the tv character at least) him coming back to be with her made sense. Brienne restored his honour, but he still spent his life in a toxic, addictive relationship. If every character arc was neat we’d be complaining about predictability.

As @59 said, Cersei’s ending was poetic. Lena Headey was superb with what little she had this season. I thought it was fitting there was some poignancy there too. She was evil, but a mother and sister too.

The criticism of lazy  nonsensical plotting for the sake of drama is overblown, but partly fair. The timing of Cersei’s pregnancy and all the travel to and from Winterfell makes no sense. But whatever, the quality of the visuals, acting and dialogue are so high I can ignore it.

Cleganebowl didn’t disappoint. Above all the Hound is an object lesson for Arya. And it was nice to have at last some fan service this episode. Give me at least some wish fulfillment!

Varys and Tyrion. You deserved a better world.

 

Prediction for the final: Sansa to bring Bran down to warg Drogon and wipe out Dany’s army. Jon to leave to be with the Wildlings. Sansa and Gendry on the throne. I really hope for something good for Tyrion, but I fear suicide.

Avatar
6 years ago

@89 She gave her heart to Jon and he pulled back from her.

She pulled back from Jon first. 

neither in books or show. 

Really, because the last thing we saw Jaime do was burn Cersei’s request to come save her.

Avatar
Worffan101
6 years ago

7/10.  

Plot SETUP was stupid.  

Character bits (undoubtedly enforced by GRRM) were gold.  

The Hound sacrificing himself to save Arya’s humanity, going to a fight he knows he’s going to lose to give a traumatized child soldier an object lesson of what will happen if she keeps on her course, was pure fucking gold.  Great acting by Williams and McCann.  Cleganebowl itself had some bland choreography but I still cried.  Good work there.  

I really don’t get why people are surprised by Daenerys going nuts.  She’s always been extremely brutal to her enemies, burning and crucifying them, even had her own brother’s brain cooked.  She’s a teenager with WMDs who thinks she’s a messianic hero and is obsessed with “reclaiming” her “birthright” of an entire continent of people to be quasidivine absolute ruler of.  No WONDER she snapped!  She’s so used to being adored and sucked up to that she can’t handle people who don’t immediately do that.  

I think the lead-up to Daenerys flipping was clumsy and poorly handled both in previous seasons and in this one, and a lot of characters like Tyrion and Varys are way the hell out of character this season, but Emilia Clarke used her sparse material well and the cinematography on the shots of “insane teenager uses WMDs on populated city” was solid stuff.  

 

Overall, the plot was meh but the character work was better in the second half of the episode (where it counted).  I’m genuinely surprised that so many people seem to have been sucked into Dany’s messiah cult, though.  It’s pretty obvious in the books that all she actually does is swan into a place, break shit and kill people, declare herself Supreme Leader, overthrow the existing society, and torch anyone who disagrees.  Over and over again.  And she never fucking learns.  

We didn’t mind when it was just slavers that she was torturing and slaughtering.  But to her?  The citizens of King’s Landing are just the same as those slavers.  Because they didn’t bend the knee to their rightful Queen.  

Avatar
6 years ago

@80: Dude, there’s even memes of how often her response to everything is “Bend The Knee or Die.” The woman expects and demands people to submit to her and has killed a lot of people for not doing so. As for doing whatever Tyrion and Varys told her to do, throughout the show she disregards her advisors’ counsel or exiles them or kills them often enough that you can’t honestly claim that it’s not a trend.

And as for asking Varys and Tyrion to be straight with her, she underscored those conversations with an “or I’ll burn you to death” and when they actually made good on their agreement and told her to her face she was wrong, she disregarded their opinions or agreed with them at the time but did the opposite later.

Was her slide into full villiany well-done? Not by a long shot. It’s just funny that a lot of people keep defending the character based on things she or other characters have said on the show about how good she is, but those are things her own actions on the show consistently contradict. Hell, there’s someone here nitpicking that “except for a Tarly or two” she’s hardly ever killed any innocents.

The show has made Jon Snow a bigger idiot than he is in the books, but at least he has never been a malicious or petty idiot, unlike Danaerys. When Sam told him about his real parents, he literally said to him that Jon had renounced his crown as King in the North for the good of the people and asked him if he thought Danaerys was willing to do the same once she knew he had the better claim to the Iron Throne. Even before she made her daddy proud and burned King’s Landing to the ground, after threatening to kill innocents for the good of future generations who would accodring to her flourish under her rule, I think nobody was under the mistaken impression that she was willing to make any decision based on the good of the common folk of Westeros, especially if said decision went against her gods-given destiny of sitting on the Iron Throne and killing anyone who opposes her.

@95:

I’m genuinely surprised that so many people seem to have been sucked into Dany’s messiah cult, though.  It’s pretty obvious in the books that all she actually does is swan into a place, break shit and kill people, declare herself Supreme Leader, overthrow the existing society, and torch anyone who disagrees.  Over and over again.  And she never fucking learns.  

 

I feel you, that’s exactly how I’ve felt for years after reading the books that were released at the time, before the TV show came out, and then up to now after the release of the latest book and the 7 seasons of the show. I never could understand why people thought she was a hero. To me she was always a kind of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader character. We followed her throughout a horrible youth full of abuse in order to understand why she became a villain deluded into thinking that she is a hero, we were never supposed to agree with her dumb rationalizations of why she’s in the right. Hell, Cersei and her are pretty similar down to her motivations, only Cersei is explicitily a villain because she doesn’t lie to herself or others about the virtue of her motivations. She owns her selfishness and doesn’t try to justify her actions with virtuous intentions or rationalizations.

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

She pulled back from Jon first. 

Maybe. She pulled back when he foolishly insisted that he had to tell his secret to Sansa and Arya. So yes and no, I guess.

Really, because the last thing we saw Jaime do was burn Cersei’s request to come save her.

I don’t see that as part of a redemption arc. For me, at best, it’s a sign that he’s thinking about whether redemption is possible for him, something which he’s been doing since at least his time in the bath with Brienne. After all, he continued to be the commander of the Lannister armies after he sent that letter, and I can’t see that as redemptive because it’s in service of Lannister (that is, Cersei) rule.

Avatar
6 years ago

@85 – If you want to make Dany bad, sell me on Jon Snow being better. Why is he better? Because Varys and Sansa say so?

No, because Jon builds bridges rather than relying on brute force to rule, doesn’t have a sense of manifest destiny, doesn’t want power and isn’t cruel. He’s too emotional to be a good politician or battle commander, and not particularly intelligent, but he’s decent.

Dany, on the other hand – never trust someone who think’s they’re a messiah or who enjoys killing their enemies.

But they really have a special way of patting themselves on the back for Strong Female Characters, then to turn them into little pawns for men’s stories.

What do you mean by men’s stories? Arya’s story is one of the best and most important in the show. And so is Dany’s – it’s just that it’s a tragedy.

@86  well said

Final random thought – they really did blow the character of Euron. He was quite fun at times, but never terrifying as in the books. And his ending was just pointless. He was a plot device more than anything.

Avatar
Worffan101
6 years ago

@90 has a good point, though I would add that Daenerys’s descent into open madness has been heavily foreshadowed in the books.  I’m not sure what the technical term is, but she has an unshakeable high opinion of herself as The Heroine, and doesn’t have the capacity, for whatever reason, to self-analyze her fundamental perceptions and understandings of the world.  

Also, given that she has 2 parents, 2 grandparents, and IIRC 2 great-grandparents…and her great-grandfather’s older brother was stark raving nuts to the point he drank wildfire trying to turn into a dragon…and her older brothers were both mentally ill, one obsessive well beyond even the OCD that I suffer from and the other basically being Platinum-Blond Puyi…and her father was a psychopathic sadist…and her grandfather in the books, Jaeherys II, suffered from apparent inbreeding-related genetic issues…and her great-grandfather’s grandfather was the worst King in Westerosi history due to his megalomania and sadism…and that guy was one of the more sane Targaryens…and Maegor the Cruel, Rhaenyra, Aegon II, Aemond Kinslayer, Bittersteel, Maelys the literally physically deformed Blackfyre…

look, House Targaryen makes the Spanish Habsburgs look downright genetically diverse.  It’s frankly a miracle that Daenerys was even able to get pregnant and wasn’t born with severe physical abnormalities.  

All things considered, self-obsession and a messiah complex aren’t even that serious issues with that family history.  But when the person with those issues has WMDs and is a teenager surrounded by sycophants…things can get VERY bad very fast.  

twels
6 years ago

Dany’s Turn was definitely something that was shocking in the moment and predictable with the benefit of hindsight. All those names “Breaker of Chains,” etc., don’t include “peacemaker” among them. All of Dany’s successes have been through the use of overwhelming force or the threat thereof. Her worst impulses have always been held at bay by her advisors. And frankly, when they weren’t (the burning of the khals comes to mind) they were presented as hero moments on the show. 

Of course Jon would be a “better” king. Frankly, he’d also be one who could possibly produce an heir – which we know Dany cannot. But it’s exactly what made him better for the throne that keeps him from betraying Dany. 

My forecast for the end is that neither Jon nor Dany sit upon the Iron Throne. I suspect that in the end, it’ll be Tyrion and Sansa on the throne, with Jon and Dany both dead. 

Avatar
Seamus1603
6 years ago

I have to say that I mostly liked this episode.  However, it all hinged on Dany’s turn and I didn’t like that particular moment.

I’ve always questioned whether Dany would go Mad Queen (it’s literally a comment I’ve made out loud while watching during previous seasons), but the moment in this episode lacked something.  It didn’t even need to be much (two options that come to mind: 1)that could have been the moment Rhaegal dies by a lucky shot or 2)some KL citizens are trying to hit her with a bow from their windows as she’s sitting there).  Just a little more so that when she first unleashes on the city I’m not asking “What? Why?”.  The broad strokes of her turn work for me, but the specifics fall short.

I also wished we had gotten something from her after her turn.  Emilia Clarke acted the hell out of not much.  What did work with her turn in the moment was solely due to her acting.  I’d have liked the episode to end on her face and see what that looked like. Thing I’m most looking forward to next week is how she’s plays it in the aftermath (really kinda hoping she leans HARD into it and pretty much puts everyone including the audience on blast for calling her Mad Queen when they named Aegon ‘the Conqueror’ for doing the same and more and were cool bowing to Bobbie B after the Sack of KL and called Stannis ‘the Mannis’ after he had been burning people alive and killing with blood magic).

I’m surprised so many people didn’t like the Arya/Hound moment.  In that moment, and especially in a KL courtyard like that, I immediately thought ‘Not today’ as she made her decision to not follow.  Totally seemed in character for me.  She’s an assassin, yes, but she was always a survivor first.

Cersei’s death was strangely fitting, for me.  I think I like it more and more as I think about it.

I’ve seen lots of folks thinking that Jon’s going to be all sheepish going back to Sansa with a ‘You told me so’.  I don’t see it that.  I really think that Jon’s going to place a lot of blame on Sansa for this happening – betraying his secret that she swore to keep and pushing Dany further away.

Favorite moments: Golden Company goes out in less than 10 sec and Harry Strickland gets the Jon Snow treatment – before turning tail and running away; Qyburn dying so quickly that I literally turned away from the screen for a second and missed it – had to rewind.

Avatar
6 years ago

The problem I see with these justifications for Dany’s acts is they rely on what she has done to  a) her enemies and b) bad people.  But:

The innocents of King’s Landing are not her enemies, have not actively defied her, have not been given the chance to accept her (i.e. bend the knee).  Sure, in dim light if one squints real hard, cocks the head, and wholly abstracts them you can kinda sorta make them “enemies,” but that’s not been necessary before when she kills or does appalling things. Her brother treated her brutally, Sam’s father refused to bend the knee, the slavers crucified children (even her appalling act was “restrained” by being  “equal” to the number of children killed)
The innocents of King’s Landing are not “bad people.” Yes, people are more willing to accept Dany killing slavers who torture and murder children. But that’s because they are, well, slavers who torture and murder children. The distinction between brutal judgment upon adults who have committed horrific crimes and the brutal slaughter of innocent children matters (saying this as someone opposed to the death penalty in all matters).

None of that is defending her character or buying into her alleged “virtues” as queen. I’ve thought she’s been horrible since the start (starting out with “I deserve to be ruler” is the first mark against anyone I think). It’s just pointing out that what she does here is not what she does earlier. Past motivations just don’t fit this situation. Vengeance?  These people did nothing to her. Same for anger. Tyranny? They’ve not disobeyed her or showed disloyalty to her as queen because they’ve not had the chance.  Needing to take land by force? She’s already done that—the city surrendered, the land is already hers. She’s not conquering; she’s slaughtering.  She gets brutally tough post-rule with civil disobedience? Sure, I’ll buy that. She kills everyone who worked directly with Cercei? Sure, why not. Heck, I would have taken a scene where she flies down to protect a group of citizens from her own army and then gets pelted with dung by same citizens and that’s what makes her flame a bunch of them.  But this just didn’t feel earned.

@90
My problem isn’t believing she could go mad based on a family history. As you say, they’ve set that up and of course there’s a genetic basis. My problem is it’s just the dullest form of characterization/motivation.  Why does she do stuff? Cause she’s crazy. Why is she crazy? Genes.  Nothing to see or do here folks. People who do terrible things without being “crazy” are,  I’d argue, far more interesting. 

What fascinates as it horrifies about, say, the My Lai massacre or the like is not that “crazy people” did it, but that everyday soldiers, someone’s son, someone’s brother, someone’s dad, did those things.  Good writing could have gotten us to Dany doing what she does in this episode without lazily relying on family madness and it would have been more chilling I think.

Avatar
6 years ago

I went HOORAY!  when Dany burned thru the gates after burning the anti-drogon scorpion weapons. I was hoo-ray! when the North rushed in thru the gates, having most of the Gold Company slayed. The Good Guys will win!

Then I turned to disbelief after a few moments of the city burning seeing that the WHOLE CITY was being laid waste before she got to the Red Keep.  I was in disbelief.  All other plot points I give to the writers’ discretion

 

The episode had me on the edge of my seat mostly in shock & horror with the innocents being wasted without end.

 

…so in the end, it’s just gonna be Jon, Arya, Sansa, Tyrion, Bronn, the 3ER, Sam, and Gendry. It’s been a FUN ride, thanks for the adult entertainment!

Avatar
6 years ago

Holy crap, this has exploded. I’ll try to joy my mostly un-tainted (by others) thoughts and then come back later –

Overall it was kind of a fun episode to watch and yell at the screen and guess what happened, but unsatisfying in so many ways.

Dany – sigh.  Now, of all the complaints this is my least complaint only becuase I never was totally buying into her ‘I’m destined to rule Westeros’ thing in the first place. Yes, I definitely empathize with seeing another hard working woman etc get shoved aside in the narrative for a medicore man, but I was just never that on board with her justifications in the first place, and I think they have been playing up her madness for awhile yet. That said, just becuase they were playing it up didn’t mean they had to go that way – it would have been more shocking if she just flat out had resisted that madness, and to me far more satisfying.  It just kind of feels like they had a plot checkbox that said ‘Dany burns down the city’ but didn’t really care about how they got there.  ETA: I’ll just say that I totally agree that her descent into madness was really rushed, and really extreme and while they were foreshadowing that she was mad, the WAY she went mad and the full scale target of innocents at the provocation of…surrender…just didn’t really match up with her craziness to date.   Like, why the bells, specifically?

Jaime is what pisses me off the most – after so much development and starts/stops and foreshadowing regarding him and Cersei (not to mention he killed Aerys for basically the same thing Cersei ended up actually doing), this movie basically just chucks it out the window in favor of a ‘you can never escape who you are/who your family is’ thing.  Just…arrrgh.  And while at the time I hadn’t been that upset about the Brienne thing, if that ends up being Brienne’s last scene I will DEFINITELY be upset.  

Cersei’s death was rather unsatisfying, but I did at least kind of appreciate the poetry of it -in a way that she died in such a mundane way, realizing how much she failed, and with the person she came into it with (although I wish there had actually been a twist there with that).

I never cared about Cleganebowl, and in a way, showing Sandor STILL be focused on all that is another bit of character regression after what he went through with the rogue Brotherhood. Another case of ‘you can’t escape your family destiny’ kind of thing.  I appreciated the message to Arya, but man, so many people on this show seem so hopelessly resigned to making horrible decisions.  I guess maybe I should be glad Theon ended up being the one character who didn’t :P

Qyburn’s death was actually the one true shocking moment for me, ha.  I mean, in the way it happened, not that he died, per se. I really like the actor so I was actually a bit sad about it!

Jon is basically good for standing around and looking sad all the time. Geez.  Is it bad I kind of hope Dany kills him, and then Arya ices Dany and we get somebody else on the throne?

Tyrion also keeps being DUMB and way too slavishly devoted to making bad decisions for his family.  Funny thing is his plan almost worked but had nothing to do with Jaime at all since as far as I can tell, Jaime had nothing at all to do with the surrender or ringing the bells. So why were they even there? Argh, so unsatisfying!

Euron, whatever.  He died as he lived, I suppose.  But I love how suddenly it’s SO SUPER EASY to take down his fleet when the plot demands.

I actually did kind of LOL at the Golden Company being totally worthless. Guess they should have brought those elephants! I was kind of hoping for a secret Targaryen loyalist reversal, but alas.

Arya’s bit was good, I guess, but it seems like she’s already learned this lesson before, so…yeah.  That said, it’s still beyond dumb that this wasn’t the original plan to start with. Not out of revenge but because, if their goal really is to take down Cersei without wrecking the city USE YOUR SUPER SECRET NINJA ASSASSIN!  In some ways I understand people don’t always progress on a linear path, so I can see Arya having some stops and starts on her path, so this one isn’t quite as egregious to me as it may be to others. But really it just seems like they need her in KL, probably so she can kill Dany later on.

Varys is the dumbest spymaster ever in this season – why would he be talking so openly about his doubts to Tyrion in the first place? (And why would Tyrion, who is supposedly so clever, be telling VARYS of all people????).

Avatar
6 years ago

, throughout the show she disregards her advisors’ counsel or exiles them or kills them often enough that you can’t honestly claim that it’s not a trend.i

If it’s so common, name them. Which advisor did she murder or exile?   The ones in league with Masters of Mereen? Because, that’s it, the ones she took into the dragon’s dungeons. 

Daario, he survived and is ruling Mereen.  Barristan Selmy was killed by the masters, not Dany.  Yara is still kicking it, having disobeyed Dany’s direct orders for ones she felt served Dany better, and she’s fine.  It’s not a trend if it only exists in fantasy.  

And she says “Bend the knee or die” to her enemies.  Which the residents of King’s Landing were not.  At least not until she murdered their friends and family.  Cersei baited her into proving she was no better than her father, and Dany did it.  Cersei is the ultimate victor here, because while she may no longer have the throne, by pulling the people into the Keep(which is why I don’t get people saying she should have just attacked the keep, as if it too wasn’t full of human shields) and baiting Dany into attacking her, she has ensured Dany will never have the throne.  

she disregarded their opinions or agreed with them at the time but did the opposite later.

Again, if this happened so commonly it should count as character development, name them. 

@9 She pulled back when he foolishly insisted that he had to tell his secret to Sansa and Arya. 

The sequence of events was, Jon told Dany, they fight the war, Dany sees Jon’s devoted troops love him, she approaches him in his room, asks if he’s too drunk, makes a move, then backs off, asking him to not tell Sansa.  Her backing off from Jon, came prior to their disagreement over Sansa, as a matter of fact, when you see how it’s laid out like I just did, it comes across more as a manipulation tactic.  So I can’t agree that there is a “maybe” on this.  She isolated herself from Jon.

I don’t see that as part of a redemption arc. For me, at best, it’s a sign that he’s thinking about whether redemption is possible for him, something which he’s been doing since at least his time in the bath with Brienne. After all, he continued to be the commander of the Lannister armies after he sent that letter, and I can’t see that as redemptive because it’s in service of Lannister (that is, Cersei) rule.

Well agree to disagree then, but his POV in the Riverlands is very clear he’s doing this for Tommen, not Cersei.  And the very thing that puts Cersei at the Faith’s mercy, is her inability to reconcile to the fact that she losing control of Tommen. 

I can’t put the fact that Jaime still maintains loyalty to family, while being split on Cersei, as anything but redemptive, considering he was perfecting willing to kill his own family to get back to Cersei.  We just disagree whether these acts count as movement for Jaime. 

@100, Frankly, he’d also be one who could possibly produce an heir

Considering he’s a literal dead man walking, there isn’t any proof of that.

@101 In that moment, and especially in a KL courtyard like that, I immediately thought ‘Not today’ as she made her decision to not follow.  Totally seemed in character for me. 

It wasn’t the walking away that bothers me, personally, it’s that she was even there, after having “walked away” multiple times already.  The showrunners don’t know how to make character development stick.

Avatar
6 years ago

Jaime is what pisses me off the most 

WHOO BOY that whole line from Jaime about having never cared about the innocent.  In complete and total contradiction to what he told Brienne about what drove him to kill Aerys.  I mean, it sounded just like Season one Jaime, but that’s why it’s SO AGGRAVATING. 

UGH

Tyrion, in regards to Jaime, didn’t bother me.  If Cersei’d been captured, he’d have done nothing.  But the extent of the relationship with Jaime was such that he was compelled to do what he did, and it was a beautiful character moment.

Varys is the dumbest spymaster ever in this season 

Okay, so someone else brought it up, and now I think it’s right.  The little girl Varys talked to in the opener, she was trying to poison Dany on his orders, right?

 

Avatar
Wimsey
6 years ago

I read someone saying that you could only believe in Dany if you only took into account what he said, because what he did since season 1 was truly appalling. How many innocent people has she killed? Sam’s brother? The witch in S1? Since the beginning it was clear she would do anything and kill anyone to get the throne.

Avatar
littlebit_liz
6 years ago

Re: Tyrion acting dumb – I don’t agree that Tyrion’s arc doesn’t make sense this season. I thought his character last season was treated pretty poorly. He was suddenly an idiot when it came to strategy, for no apparent reason (obviously the reason was because that was the only way they could make Cersei and Euron a credible threat). So that was frustrating.

This season, though, I understand why he’s clinging to his faith in Dany. It’s all he has, or all he thinks he has. He spent three seasons trying to save and help the people of King’s Landing, and still got spat on for it. His father tried to have him executed, Shae betrayed him and then he murdered her. Dude didn’t care about or believe in anything anymore, he ready to just drink himself to death. But then Varys offered him hope in the form of Danaerys, and he went all in. When he told Varys last week that at some point you pick someone to be loyal to and stick with that person, that was the talk of a desperate man, trying to justify his faith against the evidence that maybe his faith is misplaced.

Now, could the show has executed all this better? Would it not have been amazing to delve a little deeper into this aspect of Tyrion’s character? Definitely, but unfortunately, that’s what the show is like these days. They rush everything. IMO, it’s not just this season that has been rushed, but the previous two seasons as well. 

@62 It’s definitely always been my understanding that the showrunners determined how many episodes they wanted to wrap it up in, not HBO. HBO probably would have been happy to greenlight another five, ten-episode seasons. It’s just more money for them. I’ve definitely had the impression that Benioff and Weiss were ready to be done with the show, and that laziness is showing.

@69 I hope you’re right about these two storylines basically getting switched around – therefore ending Dany’s arc as one of redemption – because that’s more what I envisioned for the end of the series. I find her losing it and burning King’s Landing to be believable, but I didn’t think she would just go out as a villain. I thought she would go out fighting back the White Walkers in the North. 

 

Avatar
littlebit_liz
6 years ago

@106 Ohhhhh Varys trying to poison Dany makes SO MUCH sense. When my mom and I rewatched the episode (we always rewatch when they reshow it an hour and a half later lol) she seemed confused about what the little girl was doing, and I was like, uh, spying on Dany, I guess? But that didn’t really jive with how worried she was about Dany’s soldiers watching her. That totally makes sense. 

And yeah, that line from Jaime pissed me off too. I was like, that is such a lie! Obviously he cares about the innocent of KL; that’s why he killed the Mad King!

Avatar
Dr. Thanatos
6 years ago

@79

I agree, Dr. Coyote is the supreme genius of the Southwest (if not the entire country). He is, however, quite modest, as we know from his business card that he gave to Mr. B. Bunny in one of his earlier films, that introduced himself merely as “Genius.”

Avatar
6 years ago

@105: Fine, I deserve the “name me the exact times she’s done x and y” treatment for being hyperbolic. I stand corrected. She doesn’t murder her advisors. She only exiles them to die of Greyscale like Jorah Mormont, and threatens them with death for potential betrayals or even making mistakes, like Tyrion or Varys.

Thing is, if, as you say, she only threatens her enemies with the choice of submission or death by dragon fire, then “enemy” must mean anyone who doesn’t recognize her deluded gods-given right to rule by default and immediately, because she has threatened most characters who’ve interacted with her explicitly or implicitly by now. And she’s made it pretty clear that she considers anyone in Westeros who doesn’t recognize her right to rule an enemy.

You are allowed to love the characer. Both GRRM and Emilia Clarke did a great job with it. But I’m sorry to say that heroes do not demand blind obedience or loyalty from their followers upon pain of death, nor attempt to justify mass murder by claiming it’s for the greater good and for future generations.

I guess you feel the exact opposite way that I feel. You think the “good things” she’s done outweigh the “bad things,” while I just don’t. Even the good things she’s done have been pretty questionable and involve a lot of violence and bloodshed.

You can try to convince me that it was poorly handled, and as I said before, you don’t even need to because I agree. But to claim that it hasn’t been foreshadowed by her own words and actions for the whole series just because you don’t like the way they took the character is another thing and, to use the same term to threw at me, it only exists in fantasy.

Avatar
6 years ago

@106 oooooooh I have to admit I did not think about that. I knew she was one of his little birds, obviously, and maybe passing his secret messages around, but since she works in the kitchen…hmmmmm.

Maybe this will actually come to pass in the last episode, especially if it’s a slow acting poison.  I was also wondering what was in those rings he was taking off when they came for him.  A seal? Poison? 

Then again, maybe I’m having too high hopes, lol.

Avatar
Croaker
6 years ago

One final note. If the author ever finds time to end this series I pray that he leaves John Snow dead. That guy is as dumb as a post, and Westeros is better off without him.

Avatar
6 years ago

@107

How many innocent people has she killed? Sam’s brother? The witch in S1?

Ok, Dickon had a chance to save himself, she was willing to let those who surrendered live.  And he took up arms against her, for a liege his father considered unworthy.  And what about the fact that Sam’s father could have bargained for his life, asked his son to bend the knee to spare himself.  The fact that Dickon chose the “noble death of honor” over serving Dany is on him.  

And Mirri Maaz Durr was not innocent.  So the number of innocent people she intentionally killed, prior to King’s Landing, can be counted on one hand.

Since the beginning it was clear she would do anything and kill anyone to get the throne.

She wouldn’t kill the children of Mereen, or the surrounding countryside.  That’s why she locked her dragons up, because one innocent person was inadvertently killed by her dragon.

When you make statements like that, that do not take in the totality of Dany’s character, and instead only point out the things that support your point, while ignoring the parts that don’t, it makes it hard to consider your arguments seriously. 

No one who is arguing that this heel turn is preposterous is arguing that Dany hasn’t done brutal horrific things.  It’s just that until this episode she directed those brutal horrific things to people who were a threat to her.

And the excuse that “Westeros doesn’t love me” doesn’t work either, because not one season ago, Dany had the entirety of Westeros nobility allied with her, aside from the Tarlys, the Lannisters, and the North. Dorne was on her side, Highgarden was on her side. 

It’s like the showrunners forgot Dany knew that, just like they forgot in the previous episode, when they blamed Dany getting ambushed on her forgetting about the Iron Fleet, when their own writing and editing had her being reminded about the Iron Fleet in the previous scene.

Avatar
6 years ago

@108 When he told Varys last week that at some point you pick someone to be loyal to and stick with that person, that was the talk of a desperate man, trying to justify his faith against the evidence that maybe his faith is misplaced.

I agree, but the problem with that, is there is no evidence at that time, that his faith is misplaced.  The whole “Maybe Dany Be CRAY CRAY” plot comes from nowhere.  One of my sticking points with this, is that she’s doing everything her advisors tell her, they have no excuse to go behind her back like this.  It only becomes a problem for Varys, when someone more malleable becomes eligible for the throne, which means its bullshit.

I get that’s what they intended with that line(and great work by Dinklage on it) but it doesn’t pay off, because they don’t have any evidence yet that Dany will be a terrible ruler(aside from everything that was already true about her when they signed on with her).

Avatar
jude
6 years ago

@102 I think there is pretty solid evidence that in a lot of cases it’s genes alone that result in an illness. However this isn’t so in Dany’s case. Other factors include:-

* A Massively traumatic infanthood, and early childhood with multiple abandonments, an o0lder brother who likes to terrorise and torture her, multiple temporary homes – the whole package of a infant and then child refugee.

* A very problematic sexuality. As soon as her first menstrual period happens (in the books iirc around 11 to 12, 13 or so in the TV series) she’s been sold as what is basically a sex slave. This is followed by multiple rapes and other forms of physical and psychological abuse. But somehow she comes to see her abuser as her hero, and the object of an incredibly intense and extreme form of romantic love.

* Throughout her entire childhood she has been told that being a Targaryan makes her automatically much better than everyone else, and that everyone will love her. This has steadily fed into a megalomania that has become a bone deep part of her personality. This makes it hard for others to spot the growing true mania of mental illness when she starts to completely lose touch with what is and isn’t real.

* Although it contradicts the “everyone will love you” message she has also grown up being told over and over by words and by experience that “they” are out to get her. So as well as her megalomania she develops a paranoid personality which gradually slides into a paranoid aspect of her mental illness.

* In her teenage years she has had an incredible series of losses and traumas. She would have had a very difficult time learning to control her roller coaster emotions even without a mental illness as well.

It’s all these factors that made her damaged, made it hard for her to have healthy friendships and healthy romantic relationships. Top be honest it is probably this level of damage that made her dangerous. By far the vast majority of people who have the appallingly bad luck to have a mental illness are not dangerous to other people … just to themselves. Sadly poor Dany has had so many things in her life that are risk factors for dangerousness. And of course the biggest predictor for violent behavious is a history of violence, and Dany has been very violent.

Avatar
nessy
6 years ago

I’m torn. On on hand, I was all good with Dany turning tyrant. There are precious few good rulers in GoT after all. Power corrupts and kings have to be ruthless, or else they wouldn’t stay kings for long. (Speaking of which, I think Jon would be an absolute crapshoot as a king in this particular setting. He’d be eaten alive and his people sacked and looted yet again.)

Anyway. I would have been totally on board with Dany getting mad revenge on those she thinks wronged her, maybe concocting a horrifying personal punishment in the style Aerys. She could’ve torched Jon, Tyrion and the rest and I’d say alright, fits her character.

However, her torching innocent kids just for the lulz doesn’t fly with her particular brand of ruthlessness. It’s a total character derailment and against everything we’ve seen her do in the series. She treats people she perceives as her enemies horribly, true – but she’s not an insane mass murderer just because she felt peeved this morning. The writers really wasted a good believable heel turn here.

But the stupidest, most inconsistent character arc must be Jaime’s. Jesus Christ. It’s like they couldn’t decide what they wanted to do with the character and so decided to DO ALL THE THINGS!!!

Avatar
littlebit_liz
6 years ago

@115 I can certainly concede that they had no good reason, at that point, to begin plotting behind her back. I was relieved when Sansa told Tyrion, but that was because I thought he would actually go talk to Danaerys about it. Telling Varys, okay, sure, but I agree that they both then should have attempted to talk to her about it and see what she had to say. That they didn’t even try and Varys subsequently started planning to kill her was a disappointing and annoying move.

Overall, while there are aspects of the “Dany’s gone mad” storyline that I’ve enjoyed, I certainly agree that it’s been rushed.

Avatar
Worffan101
6 years ago

@116 Wonderful summary, thank you very much!  

I will also note as someone with obsessive-compulsive disorder that even by my standards, Dany’s older brother Rhaegar Targaryen was unusually obsessive and unwilling to consider the consequences of his actions.  So much so that I don’t think he had OCD, but rather some sort of more serious personality disorder.  Call it sociopathy, megalomania, whatever, but (in the books, at least; the show portrayed it very differently and IMO far more problematically) Rhaegar Targaryen was single-handedly obsessed with being the center of a magic prophecy as the father of the savior of the world, to the point that he raped Lyanna Stark in a tower and set off a war that destroyed his entire family and a bunch of innocent people including (although this wasn’t his intent) his own children, in his obsessive desire for a second daughter to marry his son.  (yes, Jon was supposed to be a Visenya.  I don’t know where the show got “Aegon” from because Prince Aegon was the kid that Gregor Clegane smashed on the stone floor of the Red Keep until his head cracked open)

Even leaving aside that her father was starkers and tried to burn down his own capital in a suicidal temper tantrum before Jaime Lannister iced him, there was already a very clear roadmap for how Dany’s obsession and megalomania would go in the series, and boy howdy did it go badly.  

Avatar
6 years ago

@111 She only exiles them to die of Greyscale like Jorah Mormont, and threatens them with death for potential betrayals or even making mistakes, like Tyrion or Varys.

Jorah was exiled for spying for Robert Baratheon, which was a fitting punishment. He should have come clean about why he had been with her since the wedding after the assassination attempt.  He was then sent away to find a cure for greyscale, which was extremely contagious.  Good lord, they even pointed how he was risking exposing her in the arena scene, when he grabbed her arm and the camera lingered.  If she had truly “exiled him for having greyscale” she wouldn’t have welcomed him back with open arms.  You are conflating two different instances into one instance.

And her exact convo with Varys was “Why’d you betray my father” “He was CRAY CRAY”  “If I ever go CRAY CRAY you better betray me too”  There was no threatening there.  And the same thing with Tyrion. The ONLY reason Tyrion allied with her was because he believed in her merciful nature, that she wasn’t going to keep the cycle of retribution based on whose name you have going, she was going to break the wheel.  

I can’t even recall her threatening them with death.  Tyrion she threatened to replace with Jorah, not kill him.  The killing of Varys, this episode, when he was doing the thing she made him promise to do, is the very first instance of this thing you insist has always been a part of her character.  

then “enemy” must mean anyone who doesn’t recognize her deluded gods-given right to rule by default and immediately, because she has threatened most characters who’ve interacted with her explicitly or implicitly by now.

No, enemy means someone who is a threat to her.  Most of the characters she’s interacted with have been a threat to her.  Sansa, has a loyal nation at her beckon call.  She’s a threat.   Cersei, Yara, all the nobles, they can be considered a threat, because of their societal status.  It’s the nature of the show that the majority of the people Dany has interacted with have been people capable of threatening her, because fantasy stories of this magnitude can’t be confined to the lower classes, or we’d not get to see the machinations.  

The poor guy sheltering in his home on the outskirts of King’s Landing from two queens battling it out?  They aren’t a threat, and it’s this attack that breaks Dany’s character.  Over and over, we’ve been shown the lengths Dany will go to to protect the powerless, in direct contradiction to how she treats those with power.  It’s never been “do you kneel for me” that has defined her enemies, it’s “do you have power and how do you wield it”.  This distinction is now gone, with absolutely no character development aside from “the people of King’s Landing aren’t revolting, thus they are complicit” which is some bullshit.

But I’m sorry to say that heroes do not demand blind obedience or loyalty from their followers upon pain of death, nor attempt to justify mass murder by claiming it’s for the greater good and for future generations.

I agree, you seem to think I am making excuses for Dany, when what I’m saying is she’s not YET the character who does this, based on her behavior just 3 episodes ago, and the lack of development to get here is the problem, not that we got here at all.

Even the good things she’s done have been pretty questionable and involve a lot of violence and bloodshed.

Name one character that this is not true for, and point me towards their character assassination in these past few episodes(aside from Jaime, as we’re already talking about that), and I’ll quit being pissed about it.

Jon and Sansa took the North back, and it was a lot of violence and bloodshed, and got their brother killed, and they got rewarded for it.  The Night’s Watch fought to keep the Wildlings North of the wall, which would have exterminated them, but Jon’s a hero for fighting in that war.  Everything every character does in this book involves a lot of violence and bloodshed, and Dany is not an exceptionally worse example of this, to be treated as she has been by this narrative.

But to claim that it hasn’t been foreshadowed by her own words and actions for the whole series just because you don’t like the way they took the character is another thing and, to use the same term to threw at me, it only exists in fantasy.

I have never once disagreed that this wasn’t foreshadowed.  My first comment is that Dany always had the capacity to be this person, but that her brutal impulses have ALWAYS been directed towards those with power, and that if we are to believe she has now disregarded her commitment to protecting the powerless, we need more development.  Need I point out to you that a LOT of the things you are claiming qualify as “foreshadowing” you are misconstruing, and completely disregarding the power dynamics at play for whom Dany chooses to direct violence towards. 

Avatar
6 years ago

@119, Except he didn’t rape Lyanna Stark, and people assume his name was intended to be Aegon, because it looks like Jon

Which doesn’t make sense, Jon is obviously named for the man who fostered Ned, Jon Arryn.  Who knows what his Targaryen name would be, nor why Ned would pick one close to it if he was trying to disassociate his bastard son with a hidden Targaryen heir.

Mainly they got it because it’s what the fans went with on the theories boards, despite D&D’s claims to not care what the fans think. 

Avatar
Damien
6 years ago

@58: “Second thing she does? Go to another person in her hit list (like Cersei)? No, go visit her family.”

That’s not inconsistent at all.  She focused on revenge when cut off from her family, half of which had been murdered in front of her and the rest lost. When Hot Pie told her Sansa lived and was free in Winterfell, she went home.  There she found a rat, whom she executed with Bran and Sansa’s approval.

@59: “That Dany will be a benevolent well-loved Queen merely because she freed a fee slaves”  She freed a lot of slaves, and before that she tried to get the Dothraki to stop raping their captives.  Caring about the ‘smallfolk’ has been a consistent part of her story.  Flaming the Red Keep would have made sense, flaming the civilians of KL doesn’t.

She could have been portrayed as a villain, bent on conquest, without turning her into a full-fledged war criminal like this.

“they only had 6 episodes to finish the series” — by their choice.  HBO would be happy to let the show keep making them money, it was D&D who said they could do the last two seasons in only 13 episodes.  So that’s no excuse.

Avatar
Worffan101
6 years ago

@121: Explain to me how a grown man who already has a wife and 2 kids locking a 14-year-old girl away in a tower for a year so she can have his baby (who’s only conceived about 3 months into the whole guarded in a tower and not allowed out thing) ISN’T rape?  Look, the most logical conclusion from the evidence the books have given is that Lyanna was 14 and rebellious, she ran away with the pretty boy because she quite reasonably didn’t like the Westerosi tradition of arranged marriages, and Rhaegar took advantage of her, kidnapped her, and raped her until she got pregnant with his magic prophecy baby.  

Then, being 14 years old and on her first pregnancy with insufficient medical care even by Westeros’s low standards, Lyanna died in childbirth, while Rhaegar and his minions were killed in battle, leaving Ned Stark the only guy who knew the truth and now he’s dead.  

As for Jon’s name, he was almost certainly named by Ned Stark after Lyanna’s death.  His INTENDED name is pretty damn clearly supposed to have been Visenya–Rhaegar wanted a daughter to be the second bride for his magic prophecy baby.  Given that Jon came out a boy, well, let’s just say that Rhaegar probably would’ve started attempts to make a Visenya again immediately and had the surplus baby dealt with by one of his mooks.  

Avatar
John
6 years ago

@123  You have a very Robert Baratheon view of Rhaegar.

Avatar
Damien
6 years ago

“a 14-year-old girl away”

The book wiki has her dying at 17, so she would have been 16.  Ser Barristan thinks Rhaegar loved her, which is supported by one of Dany’s visions. Less data on what she thought, but ‘rape’ can hardly be taken as proven fact.

Avatar
Worffan101
6 years ago

@124: I don’t have to have a pathological hatred of the man who ruined my life (as Robert does) to find it really skeevy that a man in his mid-late ’20s ran off with a 14-year-old, which the man should have known would immediately start a war due to her public betrothal and status as a major link in a huge political alliance, and locked her in a tower to have his prophecy baby.  

and sure, this is a world where guys like Khal Drogo, who is a fairly average guy morally speaking by steppe nomad standards, see nothing wrong with screwing an underage girl because “she can get pregnant, it’s OK”, but by our modern standards of requiring an age of more mental maturity to consent to sex, what Rhaegar did was statutory rape at best.  And given that Lyanna never came north after her brother and father were murdered and a war started that her family was on one side of, it’s pretty heavily implied that she wasn’t allowed to leave the tower and/or was denied information.  In the MOST generous possible treatment of Rhaegar, Lyanna is a cold uncaring selfish jerk and Rhaegar is an idiot.  In the second-most-generous possible treatment, Rhaegar is an emotionally abusive and manipulative statutory rapist.  

In what IMO is the most likely interpretation, Rhaegar was an obsessed man who raped a teenage girl to have his prophecy baby.  

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

The sequence of events was, Jon told Dany, they fight the war, Dany sees Jon’s devoted troops love him, she approaches him in his room, asks if he’s too drunk, makes a move, then backs off, asking him to not tell Sansa. 

If you’re right about the sequence, then I agree. I remembered it as Jon insisting on telling his siblings first, then her backing off. In my memory, she pulled back first to ask him about it, which I saw as conditional. Only when he insisted did she consider that he’d betrayed her.

I can’t put the fact that Jaime still maintains loyalty to family, while being split on Cersei, as anything but redemptive

I see it the opposite way — as long as he was fighting for the Lannisters, he couldn’t be redeemed. For me, this is especially true when it comes to Tommen, who is the fruit of his misdeeds.

Avatar
Aaron Barlow
6 years ago

I’m definitely in the camp that expected Dany to become a villain by the end of the series, though I was not expecting her to do so in quite so spectacular of fashion. It’s actually quite the narrative feat to pull of… start with a sympathetic character and turn her into a monster so gradually that the reader/audience doesn’t notice until it hits you in the face. I feel that the books have, thus far, been more successful at this, whereas the show has been more… rushed, though a lot of the signs have been there. GRRM has spent this whole series deconstructing narrative tropes, and he had obviously picked Dany early on to subvert the heroic savior narrative.

In terms of the Iron Throne itself, I think honestly there’s a fairly obvious conclusion that should be drawn from all of this: Nobody should sit on it. The Seven Kingdoms, as a political entity, is an abysmal failure in basically every possible way, and there is no reason that anyone should attempt to, or desire to, keep it intact. Let it die, create something new. I will honestly be disappointed if this ends with somebody on the Iron Throne.

I thought this was arguably one of the best episodes, in terms of design, pacing, and plot, of the last few seasons.

 

Avatar
Thomas
6 years ago

“If I ever go CRAY CRAY you better betray me too” 

I suspect that most people who say that don’t actually want to be betrayed — they are overconfident and think they are so superior to the previous case that they will never be called out on it, not that they really think there is a chance they will end up evil and want to be stopped.

Avatar
6 years ago

@123, I think you are pulling a lot of stuff from theories, because how did Rhaegar expect his and Lyanna’s child,  a “song of Ice and Fire”, to be the bride to his son, and not the major player? 

I’d also like to know where you’re getting these ages from, because Lyanna was big and strong enough to joust, and WIN, prior to being locked away in a tower, and I just don’t see a 14 year old girl doing that, no matter how skilled.

By all intents and purposes, Lyanna consented to be with Rhaegar, and the Knight of the Laughing Tree certainly wasn’t going to be held captive against her wishes(what was the KG gonna do, hurt her as she fought to escape, and risk the heir they were protecting in the first fucking place?).  If she stayed at the tower of Joy, it was because she agreed with Rhaegar that’s where she should be. 

And that brings us to the KG, if Lyanna’s child was only intended to be the bride of Aegon, why KG protection at the tower?  That left Aerys, the actual king, and the heir Rhaegar was allegedly doing this for with only Jaime Lannister for protection.

Again, I think you’ve pulled this together with some extraneous lore Martin has purposely put out to misdirect the audience.

Avatar
6 years ago

For me, this is especially true when it comes to Tommen, who is the fruit of his misdeeds.

Yeah, so is my daughter, and yet, I would do anything for her.

That sentence is kinda scary actually.  Like the fact that Jaime is trying to make up for his fuck ups by finally doing what’s right for his kids, is a bad thing??? 

I mean, sure “the right and moral thing” would be to take the kids and run to Pentos, knowing they have no legit claim to the throne.  But at this point, that just means him and the kids die now or later.  That’s not “doing right by them”.  At this point, if they don’t hold the throne, the kids are all dead.  So keeping his family safe, while not bowing to Cersei’s demand for personal salvation, is totally an evolution in character for Jaime.

Avatar
6 years ago

@116. jude

Yeah, I certainly oversimplified–sorry about that. But for me, even given the effect of her upbringing etc. it remains an uninteresting motivation because it still relies heavily on family history and being “broken” (broken from the start, then broken more by upbringing) as the rationalization for all-out slaughter of innocents.

I certainly don’t mind exploring how her broken nature infects relationships, politics, and the like. That I would (and have) found interesting. Watching the tension ratchet up and seeing her grow more paranoid and grim with Jon’s lineage hanging around for a few episodes and as Varys whispers and Tyrion tries to find a middle ground and and and—I’d have loved those several episodes.  But crazy girl gotta slaughter after achieving her goal was just a step too far for me.  Appreciate your detailed breakdown though, which is pretty spot on.

Avatar
6 years ago

@129, Well sure, Dany was confident that she wouldn’t go down that path.  But, in her defense, she hadn’t yet gone down that path when Varys betrayed her.

Avatar
Damien
6 years ago

“guys like Khal Drogo, who is a fairly average guy morally speaking by steppe nomad standards, see nothing wrong with screwing an underage girl”

Ned Stark betrothed his 11 year old Sansa to Joffrey Baratheon.

For that matter, the 16yo girl you keep insisting is 14 had been betrothed to Robert.

Catelyn Tully was 17 or 18 but had never met Ned before their wedding; she’d been betrothed to Brandon Stark at 12.

Avatar
Jude
6 years ago

@132 Thanks for that Billcap. I suppose with my background in Forensic Psyche I am really interested in what makes someone dangerous, and this filters what I take from what I see. But broken is a good word for Dany. I can see how she ends up a mass murderer, but I can still feel very sad that anyone has to go what she went through. I think broken is a good concept for Martin’s series and grimdark in general – using fantasy/sci fi to explore how awful things can break and remould people, and how people end up doing these awful things.

On a completely different note we have to remember to judge these people in context. The culture the Targaryans come from and carry with them doesn’t see incest and inbreeding as a bad thing. Like the Egyptian Pharaohs they see it as something good – keeping the special nature of their blood and not watering it down. So in that context Jamie and Cersei can be seen as a bittersweet romance just slightly out of place and Jon/Dany as the obvious thing to do.

Another bit of important context – medieval and ancient cultures didn’t usually have a period of adolescence/ young adulthood/ teenage as the tail end of childhood. Once you hit puberty you were an adult. Usually they waited till the girl’s menstrual cycle had settled down to be a bit regular – perhaps because getting pregnant too early on was not only unusual (as the girl ain’t producing eggs yet) but dangerous as the pelvis is still too small. However girls could hit puberty early – even as young as 10 or 11. So marryinjg a 14 year old wasn’t disgraceful or statutory rape – it was ordinary normal behaviour. If the 14 year old had no say at all then that’s another story.

Avatar
Foxessa
6 years ago

So. Bronn keeping his a$$ safely far far far FAR away from the hell, catastrophe and madness, proves he’s the smartest fellow in the realm.  Clearly the one who gets to keep the castle that dead people (well, Tyrion isn’t dead … yet) who had no right to do so, gave him last week.  Maybe he’s even smart enough to ascend to the newly forged crown, throne, whatever and rebuilt KL  After all, how different would that be from Robert Baratheon’s ascension — King Robert, who was the last monarch to hold the 7 kingdoms together.  When he waz murdered it all went to hell. Maybe Robert was even right about wanting to get rid of the little blonde girly as a huge threat . . . .

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

@131: Permit me to doubt that any of your sins approach Jaime’s.

I get the emotional pull of “for my children”, but in Jaime’s particular case it’s pretty hard to separate that from Cersei. And I’m dubious of Jaime’s apparent rationale that “it’s ok for me to kill lots of people and to force submission to the Throne (read Cersei) in order to protect the result of my incestuous and treasonous relationship with the principal beneficiary of what I do”. I thought Bran was full of shit when he said that too, though I doubt Bran’s sincerity in many things these days.

For me, an actual redemption arc for Jaime would have required leaving Cersei forever — which he never did in the show; we’ll see in the books (maybe) — and doing actual good deeds for others outside of his family. He can’t be like Spike in Triangle, refusing to feed off of bleeding disaster victims simply in order to impress the one he loves. There has to be more to it.

Avatar
Seamus1603
6 years ago

Some thoughts that came up reading this thread:

-Dany doesn’t have ‘love’ on this side of the ocean, but her actions in this episode will make those that already love her just love her more, right?  The remaining Dothraki (who have apparently been fast-breeding since charging down TOD) and Unsullied are going to be completely down with Dany’s actions, right?  Assuming she gets killed in E6, I’m really curious about those guys and Drogon.

-Mirri Maz Duur was referenced earlier in the thread as both an innocent/not innocent victim of Dany’s.  Thinking back on that, she was a rape victim who killed her rapist and his unborn son who was prophesied to rape the world, essentially.  If MMD is our viewpoint character, she’s totally the good guy and Dany’s the tyrant, right?

-People keep trying to tie Dany to previous threats against ‘innocents’ or similar.  I don’t think those are the moments I really though of when ‘uh oh, Mad Queen?” came to mind.  The ones that I remember viscerally – Dany eating the horse heart and embracing the prophecy of her son conquering and raping the world; Dany staring dispassionately as her brother is crowned; burning MMD (and walking into the flames! seriously craziest things she’s ever done); Dany’s strong self-determination in the Red Waste that comes to manifest as a conquering destiny by the time she reaches Qarth; Dany threating to burn Qarth to the ground for having the temerity of not letting her in; Dany’s hugely successful attack of Astapor (the shot of the city burning behind her as she looks content, especially; also, if you think no innocents died that day, I think you’re naive); Dany leaving Astapor behind after killing the ruling class and taking all the soldiers (is sacking a city on accident better than doing so on purpose?); Same for Yunkai (how many innocents died in the aftermath of Dany’s attack of those two cities?); Dany deciding to crucify 163 masters (and doesn’t Hizdar’s claims about his father warrant revisiting now?); Dany locking up her dragons (ok, not Mad Queen, just bad pet parent that in retrospect appears to have essentially killed them); Dany deciding to burn the masters alive when they were *possibly* working with the Harpies; Dany deciding to kill all the Khals (I can, so I will); Dany executing the Tarly’s for surrendering but not bending the knee; Dany’s whole initial speech and presentation to Jon in 703

There are probably more, but my point is that most of these are elements that I was CHEERING at the time.  I was thinking ‘Dany’s awesome, but maybe she’s also going to be a Mad Queen.”  It’s turning those Moment of Awesome on their head that I like here.

BUT, Dany’s decision to start killing innocents directly still needed a more immediate trigger.  Even if she just held onto Missy’ collar and was fingering it while sitting on Drogon waiting, that would tie some more direct anger/grief.  I did feel like the story of Dany descending into grief was there to be told, but was ultimately left to Emilia to just act out, which was not enough.

Avatar
6 years ago

Fie on poetic justice!  There is no poetic justice in history.  Cersi deserved to die alone in the dark. She was lucky the writers gave her Jamie. 

I am hoping that Dany isn’t mad, but shrewd. I saw no rage on her face, only determination. Like Queen Elizabeth, she has asserted strength and power. And isn’t it typical to assume that an assertive, effective woman is mad? I will be disappointed if the show defaults to that.  

Avatar
Damien
6 years ago

“If MMD is our viewpoint character, she’s totally the good guy and Dany’s the tyrant, right?”

Yes, from a global POV. But we can understand Dany, a teenager married into a foreign culture, who’d fallen in some sort of love with Drogo and was completely dependent on him for her status, feeling betrayed/angry/scared.

“Dany locking up her dragons (ok, not Mad Queen, just bad pet parent that in retrospect appears to have essentially killed them)” — that seems a damned if you do/don’t.  Lock them up, bad pet parent; don’t lock them up, let them kill more children. I can’t criticize her choice there, she chose human life over magical animals.

Avatar
Ellie
6 years ago

Just for consideration, does anyone remember the look of triumph on Dany’s face when Drogo declared he would murder the sons and rape the women of Westeros, carry them off into slavery, and declare his son the “Stallion who mounts the world” alllll the way back in S1? Nothing about her return to Westeros has ever been couched in peace or benevolence.

Landstander
6 years ago

The worst part about this episode is that it kinda proves Sansa was right all along.

I’m not a Sansa hater, but it bothers me that her motivations were retroactively justified. She was hostile towards Dany ever since the two met. Before that, even. Yet, at the time, there was little to no reason for that mistrust. In fact, it made no sense that someone would be hostile towards a leader who came to help defend their home.

Now everyone who believed in Dany comes off as an idiot, while Sansa really was the “smartest person” after all. Apparently.

Avatar
6 years ago

I wanted BOTH Cersi and Euron to BURN!!!!! She needed to suffer so much more than she did. And Jamie, dude was stuck in the kidney with a sword and he kept on going.

I really truely thought that when Dany was gazing at the Red Keep she would head straight there and burn through the window to get Cersi. I hated that she deliberately criss-crossed the town to kill as many as possible. I can absolutely see her treat a true enemy that way but not the town’s people. This was NOT in character.

I was also put off by the way Dany suddenly knew how to avoid and destroy all the Scorpions.

I do have to admit, I loved her blowing through the wall and smashing the Golden Company.

 

Avatar
jules
6 years ago

My theory:

1) Cersei hunkered down inside a dragon skull and will come crawling out of the rubble to slink off to who knows where

2) Nobody gets the Iron Throne, whether Dany dies or not. The Seven Kingdoms go back to being seven kingdoms and each is ruled separately, with a sort of confederacy/council that meets occasionally to discuss common issues and alliances

The only (not super-obvious) way I see this show ending that makes any sort of sense: nobody wins, but everyone doesn’t have to die

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

I was also put off by the way Dany suddenly knew how to avoid and destroy all the Scorpions.

Wait a minute. Last week the criticism was that she failed to spot the attack and reacted foolishly to it. This week she gets criticized for attacking intelligently? That seems like a can’t-win situation.

Avatar
6 years ago

@145: It’s because of how poorly this season has been written. By now, no matter what happens, it seems stupid based on something that happened before because there has been little consistency.

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

I don’t see this as a case of consistency. I see Dany’s changed tactics as evidence that she *learned*. 

Personally, I don’t agree that the show this season is badly written. 

Avatar
6 years ago

And I’m dubious of Jaime’s apparent rationale that “it’s ok for me to kill lots of people and to force submission to the Throne (read Cersei) in order to protect the result of my incestuous and treasonous relationship with the principal beneficiary of what I do”.

I mean, sure, but at the same time, a life is a life.  Tommen himself was just an innocent kid way out of his depth.  They live in the world the story is set in, and those are the choices you have.  Project strength and live, or be seen as weak and become a target.  And, myself, my guess is that Cersei is not long for the story at this point in the books.  I can see why the show kept her around, but in the books a greater test to Dany is closer to taking the throne than she is, and I think Dany’s first enemy in Westeros will be another Targaryen.  And it’s very likely the Dornish can take out Cersei first. 

So I can see Jaime’s path separating from Cersei’s, based on how her trial and other machinations play out, and whether his abandonment is critical to her fall.  Of course part of the reason I think he has made this choice, is that a greater threat to Jaime awaits him, and it would of course be poetic injustice for him to finally pay for his crimes when he’s in a position to some good and atone for his actions, which is entirely possible. 

I think the “star crossed lovers” story is a wholly show invention, in the books Jaime and Cersei quite despise one another, but the toxicity of their dependency on one another keeps them from truly seeing.    They fight over everything, they share no moments of mutual levity(only Tyrion gets that from either of them), they are both victims of the other’s abuse and like abuse victims, I can’t hold either of them wholly responsible for not being able to see it, and escape.  But I don’t see it surviving the rising stakes of the books. 

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

Yeah, that’s still open in the books and if you’re right then there’s still a chance for him. That doesn’t mean I think he’s actually on a redemptive path yet in the books, but that he could be on one soon.

Avatar
6 years ago

@Seamus1603

Thinking back on that, she was a rape victim who killed her rapist and his unborn son who was prophesied to rape the world, essentially.

I mean, it’s the “is it OK to kill baby Hitler” question.  I still fall on the side of No.  You raise Hitler to be better, I don’t believe anyone’s nature is set in stone, fantasy story or not, which is why the whole “She’s a Targaryen, of course she’s violently crazy” argument tires me.   

If Mirri Maaz Durr was interested in aught by vengeance, she would see her actions were wrong.  She would have befriended Dany and helped her exercise the desire for a less brutal life among the Dothraki.  She’d have helped cure Drogo, so Dany had a leader with strength by her side, and helped Dany raise her child in justice and kindness.  She could have worked for a better world, which is all Dany’s sought to do with her power, til she got to Westeros. 

So yes, MMD is a victim of the Dothraki, but not have Dany, and that doesn’t excuse her actions towards Dany. 

Dany eating the horse heart and embracing the prophecy of her son conquering and raping the world;

I mean, I guess I get it, but that’s a thing that was literally designed to provoke a visceral horror to a suburban American audience that is very separated from how it’s food is made.  Like, if you actually read about how nomadic tribes live, eating organs like that isn’t “inherently disgusting” if you live among them.  If you were grossed out about that and hold that against her character, the story is saying more about you than her. 

Dany staring dispassionately as her brother is crowned;

He’d literally broken the sacred law of the Dothraki by drawing a sword(which is why Drogo couldn’t use a blade to kill him), and more importantly, he was holding that sword on Dany.  How exactly is she supposed to react that her long time abuser has finally been dealt with?

burning MMD (and walking into the flames! seriously craziest things she’s ever done);

I already explained by Mirri Maaz Duur is no victim of Dany.  She acted out of vengeance. 

Dany’s strong self-determination in the Red Waste that comes to manifest as a conquering destiny by the time she reaches Qarth;

She is a young girl with dreams of a destiny.  And it helps her, and the people who were left behind with her, alive.  Do you really begrudge them that?

Dany threating to burn Qarth to the ground for having the temerity of not letting her in;

To protect her people from certain death.  Again, she is a young girl. And in the books, she doesn’t do that.  She actually finds a home in the desert that sustains her tribe, and Qarth comes and invites her to come(because they want to steal her dragons). 

Dany’s hugely successful attack of Astapor 

This was to free slaves, and deal what she thought was a blow to the slave trade.  Again, she is a naive young girl.

This is not to excuse her actions, but it does demonstrate that she doesn’t act out of malicious vengeance.  She didn’t burn MMD out of vengeance, but to fuel magic.  That doesn’t make it better, but it says something about who Dany is, and what motivates her.  She will harm those can give her power, but she desires that power out of a desire for safety, for herself and others, because she highly identifies with slaves.  Her initial desire to conquer Westeros led her to believe she should grasp power, but once she did, she got side tracked by her desire to help people, more than she wanted to conquer her homeland who are people she doesn’t identify with.  And that could lead her to the type of disassociation that makes it possible to commit atrocities like she just did, but that takes time and development.  A good comment I saw on twitter, pointed out that foreshadowing does not a story make.  Merely hinting that things could happen doesn’t mean you get to skip the hard work of making it happen organically in the story. 

But that she would rather free slaves than conquer Westeros says something about what drives her still, and it’s not a motivation that leads to burning innocents in the street. 

This week she gets criticized for attacking intelligently? 

I don’t have a problem that she attacked with intelligence, it’s just based on how well Euron’s scorpions worked last time, it’s now improbable for them to have failed so badly this time.  I kept waiting all episode for them to reveal they made Drogon armor or something(I am never going to give up my desire to treat the dragons like war mounts, dammit), because they were so confident that Dany and Drogon would be able to overpower the defenses,(and of course they were, they all knew the story required Dany to burn the city from dragonback), that I was really let down that now, the thing that defeats these overwhelming weapons, is Dany(not the dragon) leaning to the left.   I feel like Drogon should have gotten grazed or something, or a wing punctured, but still left him capable of flight, than escaping without a scratch.  Or armor, or a saddle, letting him be capable of doing barrel rolls without throwing her off.  Just something other than “Dany thought to dodge!”  Especially because only Dany was dodging in the camera shots we’re given.

 

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

Depends on whether you think the shots that brought down Rhaegal were good shooting or good luck. I view them as luck, that the improbability was the success last time rather than the failure this time. This time, Dany did at least 3 clever things: she made her initial attack out of the sun so that they couldn’t see to aim well; she kept moving up and down, which forced them to constantly change the elevation of the ballistae; and she approached the fixed ones from the flank, forcing a swivel which delayed the chance to get off a shot. 

Avatar
Abby Goldsmith
6 years ago

Yup, this article sums it up well. 

It’s as if Prince Joffrey wrote the last handful of episodes. All cleverness and nuance and character development is gone. The long, slow-mo shots … the nonsensical character inconsistencies … Shadowfax showing up at the end … it’s like an incompetent art house student got to wrap up the show. 

Avatar
6 years ago

@152, that’s it! Someone raised Joffrey from the dead! This episode is his really bad fan fic revenge!

Avatar
6 years ago

Practically everything has already been said (and multiple times over). What I found myself thinking (in addition to a lot of what has been written above) is that in the recent “Oathbringer” reread discussions, many parallels have been drawn between GoT and SA. I’d draw one back (SA to GoT) and say that for me, what Dany did seems even worse than Rathalas.

Avatar
6 years ago

@154 Celebrinnen May I ask why you think so? In both cases many innocents died alive due to bad decisions of their rulers and the ruthlessness of the attackers. True, Dany attacked the city even after she won, but Dalinar (or more precisely Sadeas) made sure that every single Rathalan citizen burned and no one escapes. Both parties did not act in cold blood. Dany is in a very difficult emotional state. The people involved in the Rathalas attack were under the influence of a magical being that enhances violent feelings. I’d say, both cases are about equally evil. Though I can understand the circumstances that lead to Rathalas better than Dany’s motivation to burn innocents. But that is due to Brandon Sanderson’s fantastic writing…

Avatar
6 years ago

My word for last week was RUSHED.

 

My word for this week is lazy.

 

Lazy, lazy, LAZY!

 

The books and then the show have both spent a lot of time developing complex characters with motivations and past life experiences that underpin multiple, and shifting, shades of grey.  Now, they seem hell-bent on discarding all of that in favour of pulling everything back to black and white.  Never mind the characters or the story, just look at the fight / zombies / fireball / exploding masonry / impossible dragon-killing super-missile / impossible missile-avoiding super-dragon / impossible stone exploding dragon-fire…

 

Before this season began, my wife commented that she had a horrible feeling they were going to miss the opportunity to be very, very clever with tying up the various character and narrative loose-ends, and that the whole thing would end up as an overblown anticlimax because all the signs in the last season were that they were starting to lack imagination and dumb stuff down, going for easy-sell lowest-common-denominator plotting.  It was also painfully obvious that six episodes (unless they were all going to be 90-ish minutes…!) was simply not enough time and that lots of things would end up being hacked out or over-simplified.

 

Condensing several of last week’s comments, I absolutely agree that (a) GRRM allowed his story to become too complex has long since lost his way; (b) the show runners have become progressively more lost the further that they have moved from adapting the established original source material, especially now that they are pretty much out on their own; (c) they now seem to be capable of only superficial story-telling with the sole aim of getting from A to B in the most direct way possible and anything that happens along the way, however nonsensical or unexplained, is “because plot…” and (d) there are many of the fan theories and speculations that are now far better than what we are being presented; the plotting and twining of stands is far more clever; the details are more carefully drawn from established internal continuity, both from world-building and from character arc.

 

We all KNOW that this is GoT / ASoIaF; we don’t expect a fairytale happy ending, we don’t even expect that all (or even many) of our favourite characters will survive. How we reach that ending, however, does at least need to make sense — and good storytelling, whether on page or screen, does need to carry with it the emotional investment of the reader or viewer.  It doesn’t have to be delightful, it could well be unexpected, it may even be global tragedy but it needs to carry us with it and, right now, in so many ways, it just isn’t.

 

Willing suspension of disbelief is the unspoken compact between fantasy writers and film-makers and their readers and audiences.  Too many jarring shortcuts pull the audience right out of the moment and once that happens it’s all too easy to become a disinterested spectator.

 

I will watch the final episode but at this point it’s more out of morbid curiosity than any real belief that they’ll do anything vaguely interesting or clever with the characters and situations that they have been building.  I now expect lots of superficial spectacle but no depth.

 

Ho hum.  Whatever…

Avatar
6 years ago

I don’t really understand why everyone is calling the Dany from before this episode just, fair, kind, etc…. I never saw her that way. All the way from the beginning, she’s been ruthless and has shown no mercy even to those who came round to her side.

Yesterday I read a good analysis from someone who managed to put this into words better than I could. She was kind to the slaves and freed them, seeing they had no choice but to serve the masters because they were forced to. But anyone who, according to her, had a choice but chose to serve someone else than the rightful queen, apparently deserved to die. She’s been able to kill people who were in her way without flinching ever since the beginning.

And the people of King’s Landing were not slaves, so they had a free choice, and they chose to follow Cersei (at least in Dany’s mind). So they are her enemies…

Again, I never saw her as benevolent or kind, she’s always been ruthless. She’s always been saying that she would do anything to get the loyalty of the people of Westeros, and guess what… She did.

I wasn’t shocked, did not see her snapping as out of character. Of course it was extreme, but it’s been building ever since the first season.

was slightly disappointed with Jaime’s storyline. I fully expected him to try and kill Cersei, but well… I do think he grew as a person over the course of the series, and that he is in essence a good man. He just has one giant weakness and that is Cersei. He know’s she’s evil and I’m sure he wishes she wasn’t, I mean, he wanted to start a simple new life with her if he could, he didn’t want power. Just a normal life with the woman he loved. I think he deserved better than Cersei, but we don’t choose who we love, unfortunately for him (and Brienne)…

The thing I am most disappointed with this season is the fact that everyone online is picking every episode apart for every single mistake (or perceived mistake) they can find. I also think the show would have benefited from a few more episodes this season to work things out a bit more. It does feel rushed, but does that mean we’re not allowed to enjoy any of it? It’s all a matter of interpretation… It would be nice to find at least ONE place on the internet where the show is discussed in a less negative manner.

Avatar
6 years ago

@155 bird, as pointed out, both are awful, extremely awful, as so many innocent people died. But I think for me this beats Rathalas (though not by much) mainly because of I can somehow explain Dalinar’s behaviour for myself. He had just been hurtfully betrayed after offering a peaceful way out that would not have cost any lives, he had just almost been killed by the result of that betrayal (he calls himself an animal, and even humans, not merely animals can go blind and abandon reason when hurt and tired), and he was under serious influence of the Thrill. So he torched the city that was still resisting (and I agree that it was awful of him). Halfway (before he learns about Evi), he understands he has gone too far and he wants to give the rest of the survivors a chance to escape, to spare them, but it is too late due to the actions Sadeas took (and I always read it as that Sadeas used Dalinar’s words gleefully to justify his own view that nobody should survive). However, with Dany, yes, she in a terrible emotional state, but I cannot see any magical influence behind it, just feelings of hurt and betrayal. As it appeared to me, the city was surrendering and she could have just flown to the Red Keep and level it, or better yet, just the room with Cersei while accepting the surrender of everybody else. Instead, what I saw was her deliberately choosing to level the whole city after they surrendered, flying Drogon over KL again and again and again and having him torch it while she had to see clearly that these were just civilians (with children) trying to flee. In my book, this seems worse. (I would actually but the biggest blame on Tanalan and Cersei. For the first, you plan going against the Blackthorn and you are so sure of yourself that you do not send innocent people to safety? Okay, I can understand if there was no safer place for them to go as then Gavilar’s forces might have capture them and use as leverage. And Cersei deliberately collected the people inside the city to be used as buffer/proof that Dany is awful. That’s on her, foremost.)

At least, that’s my take on it, but I know opinions (and feelings) differ.

twels
6 years ago

I was talking with someone about the online fervor over Dany’s actions in this episode yesterday and I think she summed it up best when she said: 

“It’s hard to believe people are all that shocked that the person whose go-to solution to every problem she’s encountered is ‘Let’s burn the city to the ground and kill everyone’ finally did just that.”

Keep in mind that every time Dany picked a less violent or abhorrent solution to one of those past problems, it was at the behest of her advisors and she usually had to be dragged kicking and screaming to it. 

The disappointment here is that Dany is what she is – and always has been: a ruthless conqueror – rather than the “breaker of chains” that she claims to be – and that many in the audience believed or hoped she was. 

Avatar
Sophist
6 years ago

I very much agree with the last paragraph of 157. All the moreso because I think a lot of the criticism is unfair, but 157 would express my view even if I didn’t think that. As I see it, there’s a distinction between thoughtful criticism of a show (good!) and outraged bashing (bad). It’s the latter I’ve seen far too much of.

Avatar
5 years ago

@158: Dany’s most trusted advisor and friend Missandei was cold-bloodily murdered in front of her own eyes by Cersei without any hope of negotiating her release.

Dany toches a city which had surrendered. Dalinar did not even ask the city to surrender, he meant to kill every living soul for their Highprince’s betrayal. Surrendering was not even in the question, Dany actually considered it, nearly accepted it, but couldn’t let go of her need to assert her powers through the only means she ever known: burning.

I rank both events as equally horrifying though made out of different circumstances. Dalinar had the influence of the Thrill, but Dany had the influence of life-long of abuse, mistreatment and raping. She was essentially raised by a bully, then sold to another bully to be used as his sex toy. She empowers herself by developing a twisted sort of love for her torturer and ultimately ends up reproducing with others the patterns she has learned as a child: to be powerful and not to hurt, you need to stampede on all opposition, you need to assert yourself as the ultimate threat.

Dany always wanted to do good but her behavorial patterns have been screwed from the start. She never was selfish, but she grew entitled to her throne through a life-long of people trying to either assassinate her for her “claim” or trying to manipulate her to garner favors once she reclaims her “claim”. She was basically told all her life what has been done to her family was an injustice needing to be rectified. She was raised being told over and over again her sole purpose in life was to help her brother regain his throne (hence why she is sold to rapists) and once he dies, she made this goal hers.

Dalinar was just a selfish loot who enjoyed winning for the sake of winning with no valid excuses for his lack of empathy and compassion other than he didn’t want to bother himself with either. He wasn’t trying to rectify what he saw as an injustice nor trying to win back what he believed was taken from him. He isn’t going out of a life-long of abuse nor was it ever harmered into his head he had to conquer those people to rectify a wrong. He was merely faced with a small-scaled rebellion which he could have crushed through other means. He never needed to win those people’s loyalty so he couldn’t have develop Dany’s twisted perception those people needed to be replace buy people who’d see her as their savior. Dalinar has no savior complex nor does he think he is the messiah.

In other words, Dalinar is just a mindless beast seeking to kill as many as possible in blind revenge up until he kills one person too many whereas Dany is a terribly complex character who’s actions came after a life-long of triggers all set in motion to push towards this one act of cruelty.

And Dany isn’t going to get redeeemed. She isn’t going to have a magical entity erase the burning of King’s Landing from her mind just so she could go one and become a decent Queen while not remembering what she has done to secure her throne. She also will not be given an ancient form of magic and elevated to the status of the world most amazing women to have ever draw breath.

Dany will live with the consequences of her actions and she will pay the price for them. No amount of regret nor self-pitying nor drinking is ever going to be enough to erase what she did to the eyes of the other in-world characters whereas Dalinar gets complete absolution from everyone he knows and loves. Dany has burned all bridges and those who once loved her, love her no longer. Dalinar is revere by all close to him, his past forgotten and deemed inconsequential.

The same will not happen to Dany. Either she takes herself out or someone else does.

twels
5 years ago

Also – not to be that guy, but …

One has to wonder about the fact that when we’ve seen Dany be that ruthless before, it was against people who lived in pyramids and cross-crossed the desert living in tents, and lots of us called it “badass” and “empowering,” whereas when she’s done it against people who live in castles and houses, it’s “madness” and “barbarism.”

Avatar
Austin
5 years ago

Guys, it’s obvious that Dany was not herself. Clearly, Bran warged into her and exacted retribution on the city that cheered his father’s death :)

Avatar
5 years ago

Or maybe that kitchen kid Vary’s was talking to at the beginning of the episode was slipping some fantasy LSD into Dany’s lunch.  She didn’t mean to burn all those civilians. She was just having a bad trip.

Avatar
5 years ago

I’m sorry, y’all, but –what are you arguing over? GoT just went to pieces.

D&D suddenly chose to go plot over character, and they have managed to destroy seven seasons of build-up with a single stupid stroke. Apart from the actors (wonderful as always), there was nothing remotely credible or watchable about this episode. They even recycled a couple of shots of burning soldiers like three times.

Everyone (myself included) felt that the whole Arya coming out of nowhere and the Army of the Dead deflating in seconds thing was… OK, not fully unsatisfying. And now we have Well-Done Varys, Cray Cray Dany, Ragdoll Qyburn (not even a close-up?), and Tristan and Isolde in the Vaults. There is nothing left here that can be taken seriously anymore.

I threw up my hands already. I’m pretty sure the finale is going to make even LESS sense, and, you know what? I don’t care anymore. ASOIAF already wasted half a century of my life. I’m unwilling to give it another second of my precious time, beyond reading the episode recaps next Monday. I’m done.

rowanblaze
5 years ago

Practically from the start of the series, Danaerys has been caught up in her own mythology, along with many in the audience, and quick to turn to murderous rage when she felt wronged. Like Stannis Baratheon, she is sure of her rightful place on the Iron Throne, and she has always assumed the general populace of Westeros was happy to see her family go the way of the dodo. Therefore, the whole country was the enemy. Because she gets sidetracked in a quest to end slavery in Essos (noble though that may be), we want her to be a hero. Generally, we the audience have justified her actions because they were done to bad people like slavers. But there are no legal slavers in Westeros, Jorah was exiled as a result of selling slaves.

Like Stannis, her claim to the Iron Throne is tenuous at best. But Dany’s reaction to being defied and challenged, throughout the series, has been to dole out horrific deaths on those responsible, and even just those associated with them, generally involving fire.

-She has repeatedly promised to rain fire and destruction on her enemies on both sides of the sea.

-She reveled in Khal Drogo’s promises of raping and enslaving people (in Westeros) for her.

-When she discovered that one of her servants helped someone steal her dragons, she condemned the woman to a slow, painful death, locked in utter darkness without food or water.

-Against the pleas of her advisers, she crucified 163 of her subjects as revenge for prior cruelties members of their class carried out earlier.

-She burned other members of the same class alive to send a message to the “Sons of the Harpy”–without any proof those individuals were even involved. Her actions lead to riots in the city she supposedly had liberated, and to the death of at least one advisor/protector, Ser Barristan Selmy.

-In the process of freeing the Unsullied, she burned the salesman/owner alive for insulting her.

-When one of the victims of her husband’s rape and pillage raids infects his wound to save the lives of countless future victims, Dany’s response was to burn her alive.

-She burned all the Dothraki Khals alive, mostly for choosing not to follow her on her conquest of Westeros.

-She burned Samwell’s father and brother alive after they had surrendered, for being too proud to bend the knee to a foreign conqueror.

For months before she attacked King’s Landing, she’d been barely held in check by Tyrion and the others, who urged patience while she thirsted to bring fire and blood to her enemies. She did not give her troops time to recuperate from a battle which decimated their ranks before insisting that they march South to take Kings Landing.

The burning of Kings Landing was horrific and shocking, and we the audience are right to feel shocked and horrified. But there is no reason to be surprised or see it as an assassination of Dany’s character when she has shown the capacity for vengeful cruelty almost from the beginning.

Avatar
Dan Richman
5 years ago

After the coffee cup incident it’s a good thing they did not show the step ladder Arya needed to get on the white horse.

Avatar
Ken Fiscarelli
5 years ago

Everyone knows dragons can’t spit that much fire, whats wrong with the writers?

Bast outcome I have read above, Danny and Jon get killed, Tyrion and Sansa rule the world!!!

 

Avatar
5 years ago

@166 — nice summary Rowan. Wow.

Again, the harshest, most angry criticisms of the show here on comments page is fairly bewildering. This is 8th and final season, all plot condensed.  I love it despite some of the stupid blunder and battle tactics displayed.

 

No one person has gone against his or her character.  I only wish Sansa and Dany (esp. Sansa) could’ve figured out a way to like each other.  Cheers!  Heres to the GoT finale this Sunday! May you imbibe like Giantsbane!

 

 

Avatar
5 years ago

@162, Except the problem is, we didn’t cheer Dany on in those contexts because of where they lived, but because of what they’d done. 

The Dothraki wanted to imprison Dany in the sacred home, where the widows of all Khals are forced to live.  We cheered her on because they wanted to enslave her again.

The Masters of Mereen were slavers, again it was their actions that brought Dany’s wrath upon them.

The same can not be said for the residents of King’s Landing, which is the distinction many of us are making when we say that the character we’ve seen for 8 seasons would not do this.  Not that she couldn’t do this, but that not enough development to make her the person who would hasn’t been accomplished.

Someone made a point above, and I’ve made it myself, about how Dany cared about the slaves more than the free people of Westeros.  And there is a HUGE point here, because Dany, having been enslaved, identifies with the slaves in a way she doesn’t with the Westerosi.  That disassociation will likely play a huge role in the books, in driving Dany to do this.

But in the show we got ONE throw away line about how she doesn’t have that compassion for the Westerosi, because they didn’t do what the slaves did when they learned she’d come to free them, which was revolt. The fact that the Westerosi don’t revolt in support of her likely leads her to this point.  But that will take time, not just one line mentioned in the same episode she actually does it. 

Avatar
5 years ago

@166 she has always assumed the general populace of Westeros was happy to see her family go the way of the dodo. 

Except that’s not true, you’ve been listening to the showrunners.  She’s constantly told by people that her family is loved, that they sew Targaryen banners in secret, and make secret toasts to her, and that the populace is lying in wait for her to arrive to overthrow the Usurper.

Believing that, and then arriving to find your family is despised would have been a better play to make her angry.  But the show didn’t do that either.  The Targaryen lords who’d been loyal prior to Rhaegar’s defeat* rallied to her cause when she landed(that they’d tired of Cersei is primary to this, but still, they rallied to Dany’s claim and not the North). 

*Which is another grating thing about the Tarly’s mess, because in the books they are loyal Targaryen supporters even after Rhaegar died, IIRC.  The idea that they wouldn’t jump from Cersei to the person they long since viewed as the rightful ruler is asinine.

She reveled in Khal Drogo’s promises of raping and enslaving people (in Westeros) for her.

Except she didn’t, which is why in the next episode she’s begging Drogo to help her put a stop to it.   

When she discovered that one of her servants helped someone steal her dragons, she condemned the woman to a slow, painful death, locked in utter darkness without food or water.

I don’t have a problem with this, that girl tried to have her killed(also not what happened in the books).

-In the process of freeing the Unsullied, she burned the salesman/owner alive for insulting her.

Ok, it is impossible to refute an inaccurate argument.  And this is inaccurate as hell.  She didn’t burn the Master alive because he insulted her.  She did it because that was always her plan to get the Unsullied, or do you REALLY THINK she was actually going to trade Drogon for them, and then just on girlish whim changed her mind?  The theft and freeing of the Unsullied was a calculated plot by Danaerys, cold as fuck, and I don’t have a problem with ANY OF IT.  Fuck some slavers, man.

When one of the victims of her husband’s rape and pillage raids infects his wound to save the lives of countless future victims, Dany’s response was to burn her alive.

I’ve addressed this.  MMD actions are not right here(she also didn’t infect the wound, he attained it trying to enforce Dany’s command to stop raping, she failed to heal the wound, after promising Dany she would, and used Dany’s trust in her to force Dany to miscarry her child instead).  If she was truly trying to save future victims, instead of acting out of vengeance(and remember the person she enacted vengeance upon was Dany who had done nothing to her, not Drogo), she would have acted differently.  Perpetuating injustice never leads to justice, and MMD knew that when she did what she did. 

-She burned all the Dothraki Khals alive, mostly for choosing not to follow her on her conquest of Westeros.

Except, that’s not why. They were never going to let her leave Vaes Dothrak, because that’s what Dothraki do to Khaleesis when their Khals die, force them to remain in Vaes Dothrak until they die.  She had to demonstrate her strength over them, so she can be named their leader, or be imprisoned for the rest of her life.

-She burned Samwell’s father and brother alive after they had surrendered, for being too proud to bend the knee to a foreign conqueror.

Which Robb had done, which Ned had done, which Robert had done, which Aegon the First had done.  You submit to your conqueror, or you die.  That is the nature of this world, and Dany living in it and acting as everyone else does, does not make her “exceptionally evil” as her actions in this past episode were.   Dany had already tried mercy for the conquered once too, for all that you keep bringing up how badly she treated the Masters, she tried to be merciful with them, agreed to marry one to allow them to share power with her, and they tried to kill her despite her efforts at mercy, which then led her to be more brutal in retaliation.

But there is no reason to be surprised or see it as an assassination of Dany’s character when she has shown the capacity for vengeful cruelty almost from the beginning.

Except she hasn’t shown that.  Her first instincts are always towards mercy and charity.  It is only when that mercy and charity are rebuffed that she turns to cruelty. 

She tries to give Viserys some better clothes to wear, he throws them in her face and hurts her. so she has him unhorsed. 

She tries to give the remaining Masters a chance to work with her, even compensates them for their lost slaves, IIRC, and they work to overthrow her, so she executes them. 

She pleads with Cersei to surrender, Cersei executes her best friend. 

She makes peaceful overtures, again and again, sometimes at her own behest, sometimes because of Tyrion, but has learned from all the times that blew up in her face, that it doesn’t work. 

And even then, that has NEVER led to her to unduly cruel to the powerless, only the powerful.  And the people of King’s Landing were powerless in this scenario, which is why it doesn’t work. 

Avatar
5 years ago

The difference between Dany and Dalinar is that we understand why Dalinar did what he did. That’s not a justification or a rationalization. It was a horrible, monstrous act but it didn’t come out of the blue. It didn’t run counter to his past actions or established character. 

What everyone’s saying about Dany is that they didn’t get that. Yes, there are things in Dany’s past that show she could go here, but we needed to be shown that change. We needed to see her descent.  We could still be shocked when it came, but it could have been the kind of shock where you realize you should have seen this coming.

Arya felt a bit more like a good idea they couldn’t let go of even though she’d already dealt with her revenge issues (more or less). This required us to ignore who she’d become and was also resolved too quickly. It didn’t fit emotionally or timewise, but they had to shoe-horn it in.

It’s the same with Jaime. Jaime facing his sister and trying to get her to surrender and save thousands of lives? Believable. Jaime going back because she’s his number one love and always will be? Not so much.

Sure, maybe that regression was meant to be part of his character arc. But, if so, we didn’t see it. We didn’t share the emotions that would have made us be upset but accept that Jaime gave up the chance to break with his past and be a better man.

All three were things we might accept, done right. But, they weren’t done right.

Avatar
5 years ago

we do seem to be traveling over the same ground here, but I’m really trying to understand how people are viewing KL as the same thing as Dany has always done. All the examples given of her willingness to kill are of people who have actually, actively done something — to Dany, to someone she cared about, to innocents — or they were actively standing in her way of ruling.  They hurt her, they enslaved her, they fought her, they defied her rule, they tried to convince others not to fight with her or to fight against her, they killed someone she loved, they tortured and killed children, they showed they would continue to take up arms against her, etc.  I’m just not clear how people view the victims of KL in that same light.

Even in that long excellent summary @166, nearly every item comes with a note of what Dany was responding to and then calls her acts “vengeful cruelty” (I’d agree). But “vengeance” requires a prior act — you take vengeance against something. One can disagree on if those prior actions listed earned those responses. But there was a prior action in those cases, a precipitating action. There simply isn’t one here. And that’s the distinction many of us are making and why we think it makes little sense. It isn’t that we think it’s impossible to imagine her doing such a thing and so the authors couldn’t have created a plausible precipitating action.  We’re criticizing them because we wish they had.

Avatar
littlebit_liz
5 years ago

@165 – Not everyone agree that GoT “went to pieces.” I don’t think the show has been well-executed this last season, but I’ve enjoyed a lot of it. I respect your opinion and I respect that you’re done with the show, but I don’t really understand why you’re coming into this thread just to rebuke the rest of us for still discussing it. It seems like some people are so upset and disappointed by this episode that they’re determined to make everyone else as upset and disappointed as they are. I really am sorry that this story has let you down, because I know what that feels like, but not everyone is going to feel the same way. Just my two cents there.

rowanblaze
5 years ago

@171 Aeryl: Which Robb had done, which Ned had done, which Robert had done, which Aegon the First had done.

I thought Dany was supposed to be different. Merciful.

You and I have been watching a very different show. I stand by everything I have written, not the least of which because being burned alive is just about the worst way to go. And the Unburnt has used it as her preferred means of execution almost without fail, the one really notable exception being the crucifixion of the Masters of Mereen. She has always been fanatical about her own destiny, and she clearly has fanatical followers both in universe and in the audience.

You’re clearly a Khaleesi fan, and no one in this thread will convince you, despite you yourself saying further up in the thread that she’s had the capacity for this for quite some time. Just because your favorite turned out to be the villain that so many others have seen coming for seasons now doesn’t mean that the character was ruined. If so, she was ruined a long time ago.

Honestly, I think Daenerys is a great character, and a great villain. Villains like Cersei are easy. She’s practically being evil just for the luls. Daenerys, frankly, is much more interesting, because she’s a villain who thinks she is right, and probably will continue to think so right to the end.

Avatar
5 years ago

I thought Dany was supposed to be different. Merciful.

She is, as I’ve said, evidence throughout her story demonstrates her instincts are towards this.  But, when pushed, she acts in a manner no different than any of the male conquerors in this series, so I have no patience for sexist double standards.

You’re clearly a Khaleesi fan, and no one in this thread will convince you, despite you yourself saying further up in the thread that she’s had the capacity for this for quite some time. 

Way to completely misconstrue my argument(with a load of “clearly” unnecessary condescension).  I’ve never once said Dany could not do this, I’ve always maintained, that Dany, as the character we’ve been shown in the show would not do this, despite her history, because she’s never directed her anger at those without power. 

Y’all want to completely ignore the power dynamics at play in her actions, who she harms, and who she doesn’t, because that makes it easier to not question whether or not her character makes sense. 

 

Just because your favorite turned out to be the villain that so many others have seen coming for seasons now doesn’t mean that the character was ruined.

Please show me where I ever said Dany was my “fave” or that the character was ruined.  Or, conversely, stop attributing arguments I am not making, and condescending motives I don’t have,  to me. 

I’ve said repeatedly, Dany could absolutely do what she’s done, the show has just failed to make her the person who would.   I’ve pointed out many ways in which the show could have done this work, with her lack of personal identification with the Westerosi peasants.  So don’t come at me like I’m some lost little fangirl pouting, I’ve expressed my skepticism over Dany and her arc multiple times over the course of the series.  D&D didn’t do the work, they don’t get the credit. Dany just three episodes was risking everything to save ALL the Westerosi peasants, today she wants to burn them all.  It’s bullshit. 

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

Aeryl has made it clear that she’s not a Dany “stan”. Her view is that the show failed to show the progression of Dany’s decline, not that the decline happened.

To throw some more wood on the fire, and probably to violate etiquette as well, here’s an essay justifying Dany’s actions as entirely rational within the confines of Westeros. Some of the commentary is worthwhile too, with one of the commenters putting up a tweet thread here

Avatar
5 years ago

@177 that essay is remarkable, logical, and extremey well written.

To briefly quote some of it, 

“…Who are Daenerys’ enemies? The answer is incredibly easy, despite Tyrion’s soft-hearted words about hostages and enemies: anyone who opposes her is an enemy, anyone who does not bend the knee. She kills enemies, allies, and bystanders when they refuse to bend the knee; this has been true of her for a long time and has continued to be true. When Varys betrays her, he becomes her enemy and she kills him; when the people of King’s Landing fail to reject Cersei and bend the knee to Daenerys, they become her enemies and she kills them; when Sansa, Arya, Jon, and Tyrion betrayed her, they became her enemies and she will kill them, or try.”

Dany acting totally in character in this GoT world.

Avatar
5 years ago

I can see that Dany becoming mad and burning King’s Landing would be one of the “three wow” moments GRRM told D&D about, when outlining the end of the series. The others would’ve been Stannis sacrificing Shireen and Hodor’s origin story.

 

https://ew.com/article/2016/05/24/george-rr-martin-3-twists-game-thrones/

 

I think D&D’s execution of these moments to be sorely lacking.  They didn’t do Dany’s descent into madness right, just as they didn’t do Stannis character right. The descent into madness was way too quick, and communicated mostly through tired tropes (like the tired look Dany had at the beginning of the episode).

 

In the books it’s possible to see that Dany is kind of becoming insane already. At the end of ADWD she tries to remember the name of the Meerenese kid her dragon killed and can’t, and she cries, and then she hears the Dothraki grass telling her to burn her enemies. She’s malnourished and all, but it’s a sign her head isn’t all OK anymore. Her meerenese journey was, at first, about learning to rule instead of just conquering. Then she discovers ruling is terribly difficult, especially ruling during a revolutionary period as post-slavery Meereen. She flies off with Drogon and it kind of seems she has had enough of compromises, which is the crux of ruling well (making compromises that satisfy your opposition but lean more towards what you want), and instead is leaning towards killing her enemies outright.

 

This is also why in the books you needed fake Aegon and Quentyn. When Quentyn arrives in her Merenese court, he offers her an alliance to take over Westeros. She dismisses it, she cares more about ruling Meereen well. Notice how different that is from show Dany, who always talks about her “birthright” and so on. Show Dany set off from Meereen to take over Westeros, leaving Mereen kind of in a good state, because she cares so much about “birthright” and so on. It’s not written yet, but I think book Dany will try to conquer Westeros because she’s good at this conquering stuff and bad at this ruling stuff, and will dislike ruling Meereen so much she’ll kind of leave it unfinished and try to take over another country to get her “savior” rush she got from freeing the slaves.

 

And then enters fake Aegon. Again, it’s not written, but I think fake Aegon takes over King’s Landing before Dany arrives. The general populace will probably welcome him, due to the distaste of having been ruled by Cersei. And then, after he’s settled in as ruler of KL and most of the South, Dany arrives. I don’t know how she’ll take the fact that someone else with a better claim arrived and did her work before her. Maybe well, maybe not. But I know how she’ll react to finding out this Aegon is a fake. She’ll try to destroy him and those that follow him. And that’s the important stuff: the KL people don’t care that Aegon is fake, they care about peace and having a good ruler, and Aegon probably is OK. They don’t want another war. War sucks. This is the main theme of ASOIAF. But Dany is the “slayer of lies”, killer of the “mummer’s dragon” according to prophecy, and so destroys him and those that follow him, probably including a good chunk of KL’s general populace. 

And there you’ll have it,  Daenerys, the crazy war criminal.

 

I agree with someone who said, I think in another thread, that the order that the books will take regarding KL and the final battle against the Others will be inverted. Dany probably burns KL first, feels guilty about it, goes North, discovers there are Others, and then thinks her life’s destiny is destroying the Others (she has dragons after all). Probably dies fighting them.

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

That wasn’t a “tired look” Dany had. She wasn’t eating because she realized someone (Varys) was trying to poison her. For all we know, she may even have ingested some of the poison, though not enough to kill her.

Avatar
Damien
5 years ago

> To throw some more wood on the fire, and probably to violate etiquette as well, here’s an essay justifying Dany’s actions as entirely rational within the confines of Westeros

It’s wrong.

“If Daenerys wants the Iron Throne — and she does want it, it’s the only thing she wants” — completely false.  She has some moral sense and imagination, as shown by her stopping rape and slavery, neither of which advanced her to the Throne. She wants love, as shown by her various relationships.

“Is anyone really going to fuck with her? After that?” — well, yeah, Arya will probably gank her if no one else does.  If she has a dragon, other people have magical assassins.

Ruthless ‘rationality’ has never been the obvious right answer in this franchise, any more than high morality.  Tywin tried it and got shot on the pot by his son, and most of his house are dead.  The Freys tried it, and are anathema in the books and dead on the show.  Cersei tried it and is crushed under falling rocks.  The Tyrells tried it with cause, and they’re dead too.

And even if the author were right about the ‘rationality’ of conquest, Dany’s always been someone with moral concern and compassion as well as the ruthless burn-them streak.  It’s possible to imagine her turning into someone who would murder thousands of civilians, but the show didn’t do the work to make that happen naturally.

Avatar
5 years ago

(like the tired look Dany had at the beginning of the episode).

Yes, I actually yelled at my TV over the fact that they were using her mussed hairstyle to telegraph her state of mind.  I’d hate to imagine what D&D think I’m ready to do on a weekend!   I just throw my hair in a messy bun, and I never wear makeup, I bet they’d run from me like the plague before I breathed fire.

And there you’ll have it,  Daenerys, the crazy war criminal.

EXACTLY!!!!  It will come after months of loss and rejection, not on the heels of your greatest victory and consolidation of power.

And the shows refusal to allow either Dany or Jon to accept marriage as a potential solution.  Book Dany married to try and bring peace to Mereen, and totally recognizes she’ll need to marry to ally to a noble house in Westeros.  Why does show Dany refuse this route?? 

It’s just so contrived to put Dany in a position where her heel turn looks on the surface to have been built up, but the slightest examination belies that depth.

then thinks her life’s destiny is destroying the Others (she has dragons after all)

And based within the framework, it probably IS her destiny.  I’m fairly confident the books end with the death of dragons, walkers and magic, and that this has been the endpoint for whatever external forces are driving these prophecies and whatnot.  The reason she could birth the dragons is probably because of the increase in magic because the Walkers are on the move again.  So all these people who think the fact that a young girl, who does something unheard of for three centuries, buys into her own hype about destiny(that she certainly does HAVE even if she misunderstands what it is) is supposed to be a mark against her, is boggling to me.

Like what was her character supposed to have done, just gone on and on about how very lucky she is to have birthed priceless dragons, and not ever once considered that it happened for a reason?  That would have been shit reading, for sure.

And the idea that Dany, sitting in the ashes of King’s Landing, absolutely despondent at what she’s done, then hears about the Walkers, and learns, THIS, THIS MOMENT, is what she came for.  To look back at her own life and choices, to realize she was never to sit on the throne(that’s why no babies), that she was selfish and shortsighted to thinks creatures such as dragons were returned to this world to serve her own petty ends, instead of the needs of the world.

That will be an incredible moment to read. 

 

Avatar
5 years ago

@176 & 177: I agree that Aeryl’s views are being misunderstood, since it happened to me too and only really got what their arguments were once I read the rest of their comments in response to other posts. I guess the main point of contention in this is whether or not Dany’s losing it is consistent with the way she’s acted up to now. Some think it’s not, and others think it is. Regarding the “Anyone who doesn’t submit to Dany is her enemy,” I already made that argument but I was told that I’m completely wrong and that I’m misconstruing the things that happened in the show, so again, I’d say it depends on as Obi-Wan would say, a certain point of view.

The show I watched had the Targaryen queen threaten a lot of people with submission or death by dragon-fire often enough that it became a meme, so I agree that her insane rampage from last Sunday was poorly set-up, but not that it’s not something she’d do, especially if the argument is “Well, she has threatened to do it a couple of times but those are just words” or “every previous time she’s been in this situation she has chosen the other option.” As I said, she’s kind of a Darth Vader character and we were along for the ride that explains her fall from grace for almost a decade. The problem is, they did such a great job in having the audience empathize with her awful journey, that now some don’t feel her fall makes enough sense, and some even feel it doesn’t make any sense at all.

Hell, there’s comments here claiming that no-one has acted out of character during the season, or that it’s not poorly written. What can one say against that? To each their own, I guess.

 Edit: Sorry for the Star Wars analogies, I only realized I’m a bigger nerd than I thought and used two of them in the same post.

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

As one of the “it’s not poorly written” crowd, I should explain that. When I think of the writing, I don’t really include the plotting (including the rushed events). That’s set AFAICT by the showrunners. And B&B don’t write the episodes. The writers (at least on this show) simply carry out the instructions they get on how to make the characters get from A to B.

If we just focus on the dialogue in the episodes, which is what I mean by “the writing”, it’s pretty good. Ep1 was solid. Ep 2 the writing was outstanding; it and the actors made the episode. Ep 3 has very little dialogue, so the action scenes and the actors carry the episode, but the small bits of dialogue we did get — basically Sansa and Tyrion — were excellent. Ep 4 was kind of blah, but not terrible. Ep 5 again had less dialogue but what we did get was mostly pretty good (I pity anyone who had to write Euron).

Avatar
5 years ago

@184, The first two episodes are excellent, and that’s because they are devoted to character conclusions.  We’ve all been waiting for the moment for all these disparate characters to come together in one place, and see how they interact with one another.  That was satisfying.

The last 3 have all been about plot conclusions, and that’s where it’s unsatisfying.  Because the character moments were true to character, and the plot moments kinda aren’t. 

One other quibble I have with how this episode wants me to judge Dany for what she’s done, is the fact is that since the death of Ros, the show hasn’t given a fuck about the small folk of King’s Landing, so what are we supposed to be outraged about?  That the lives the show has ignored, are also being ignored by Dany?  Or do the small folk only matter, when they are being harmed.

I have pointed out that I appreciate the perspective Arya supplied by being in King’s Landing. BUT, it wouldn’t have been necessary if Ros hadn’t been killed off, or another character had taken her place. 

So yes, I am going to spend this eve of the finale GOING OFF about Ros.  I am pretty sure that my conclusion about D&D was formed the night she was callously murdered(and calcified when they sent Sansa to Ramsay). 

Ros is a character that can’t exist in the books, because her ability to influence the plot is limited, and we already have pre-Eyrie Sansa for that.  But she was so important to the show, providing us the King’s Landing ground level perspective of the impacts of what was happening in the Red Keep.  She began to move through the corridors of power, and she could have easily been kept on, but instead she was gratuitously killed, and for what?  To show us how the depths of horror Joffrey could achieve?  We knew that already.  It didn’t develop anything. 

And she was their creation.  A non existing character from the book, that added so much to the show, something the books tried at getting to with it’s dedication to having its POV characters experience life of the smallfolk, but at the end, they are all noble born, educated privileged people, even Dany. 

Ros, wasn’t.  But she could have continued to play an important role.  Instead of sacrificing her to Joffrey, LF could have taken her from Varys’ grasp by sending her in advance to the Vale, prior to the Purple Wedding.  She could have then acted as Sansa’s “lady in waiting”, giving her a different kind of education, for Ros had her own wisdom.  Imagine Sansa at Winterfell after having grown wise from a woman like Ros.  Imagine if Ros had remained with her, through all her struggles, gave Sansa a confidante, someone who could have seen a different side to Dany and counseled her to compromise and peace, instead of antagonism.

Sure, it’s perfectly “believable” for Ros to have died as she did.  But it’s been perfectly believable for Dany to stay imprisoned by Dothraki, but she doesn’t.  It’s perfectly believable for Arya to have died at the hands of the Waif.  It’s perfectly believable for Jon to stay dead at the bottom of that post marked Traitor. 

They don’t, because the story recognizes they still have a valuable perspective, and so they inexplicably survive. 

And Ros could have survived.  But Weiss and Benioff don’t agree with me.  And that’s pretty much when I knew we never would agree. 

Avatar
Just asking
5 years ago

 

Consider this; Dany Heartily consumes Varis’ poisoned food prior to heading out to battle. Feeling the effects of the poison, she’s clings to the dragon, not fully conscious or aware as Drogon torches KL.

Plausible? 

 

Avatar
steve
5 years ago

At this point the show is simply an exercise in how masochistic one can be to continue to watch what appears to be some of the most intentionally bad writing on television.

Landstander
5 years ago

@177: I loved reading that review!

I disagree with most of it, but it was very well written. This is exactly the kind of discourse I seek from enjoying Game of Thrones. People who find ways to come up with an even better explanation than what the showrunners themselves had in mind when they made it.

If that isn’t the best argument for Death of the Author, I don’t know what is. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter what D&D were thinking. Bashing them or whoever else doesn’t really provide for much of an intelligent discussion.

These characters became alive when GRRM published the first book, then became popular when HBO aired the first episode. Now it’s up to each and every viewer to interpret them. Of course, we’re somewhat limited to what happens on screen (and much MUCH later, on page), but there’s almost no limit to how we can justify anything.

Avatar
Jas
5 years ago

This whole season is so disappointing. I dont know what I waited for. They made such a big deal out of this including actors giving pre-interviews and being all excited about whats coming. I believe they all were paid to say good things about the show just to fool people. Everything was to be expected and arya is magic, jon does nothing and a stone kills cercei. WTF. I regret the time I invested in watching and waiting.

Avatar
5 years ago

@185. I never much cared for Ros. She seemed to exist purely for sexposition and with the show. having so many characters, you didn’t need another one unless they were driving the plot forward. I also don’t remember her having much of a personality beyond being playful. To be fair, she might have done more in the middle seasons that I don’t remember – I didn’t watch all of those episodes.

I have no problem feeling for the common folk of King’s Landing without a named character to care about. I thought what happened to them was utterly harrowing.

Back to Dany, I did think the show should have taken more time and thrown out more hints or justification for her directly attacking civilians. Dany killing many in collateral damage as she say, attacked the Red Keep, would have been more believable. However, on reflection, I think this went down as D&D intended. We’re like Tyrion here. There were lots of signs Dany wasn’t the hero we hoped she would be and her state of mind was getting worse, but what she did was supposed to be shocking – and if it was too clearly telegraphed, it wouldn’t have been a shock.

Looking back, I don’t think raining down fire is is too big a leap for someone who’s traumatised, isolated, angry, cruel to her enemies, power-obsessed, has threatened to burn cities down, has a personal weapon of mass destruction, has a family history of sociopathy and talked about ruling by fear if she couldn’t rule by love.

Having said that, Dany’s not a monster and has done a lot of wonderful things. If we don’t seen some conscience when she gets to ground level and sees the toll of her attack I’ll be disappointed.

The point I started disliking tv Dany (still a big fan of book Dany) was at the end of season 2 when she locks Doreah and Xaro in the vault. That’s a horrific way to die. She had no proof Doreah was guilty (she could have been captured and slept with Xaro to keep herself alive). Even if she did, she could have been merciful and given her a quick death.

You said you were fine with this. I’m not. Dany takes a cold satisfaction in her enemies’ brutal demises that was always troubling. In hindsight, she was on a slippery slope. There were people stopping her from sliding, but with them gone – or seen as betrayers – down she fell.

Avatar
5 years ago

Arya and Sandor’s conversation in the red keep makes perfect sense. Arya was there to kill Cersei to stop the war. Obviously, she’s too late, right? So there’s no point in sacrificing herself to kill Cersei. Sandor is there to kill Gregor no matter what. It makes perfect sense for her to go and him to stay. For all those saying they should have had that conversation outside Winterfell – at that point it still seemed as if the war could be prevented by killing Cersei.

@81. Kate
87. Aeryl
Jaime and Cersei’s deaths echoed the poem about the Doom of Valyria which Jorah quoted on the Rhoyne:

“They held each other close and turned their backs upon the end.
The hills that split asunder and the black that ate the skies;
The flames that shot so high and hot that even dragons burned;
Would never be the final sights that fell upon their eyes.
A fly upon a wall, the waves the sea wind whipped and churned —
The city of a thousand years, and all that men had learned;
The Doom consumed it all alike, and neither of them turned”

@58. Ryamano
Yeah, they kept forgetting that she’s on a character arc which brings her back from psychopathy, and then suddenly remembering again.

86. Gepeto
Well said re: Dany.

114. Aeryl

It seems to me that what is meant to break Dany is the fact that she is now alone. Jorah dies, Missandei is murdered in front of her and she is helpless to stop it, Rhaegal dies, Jon Snow betrays (in her mind) and no longer desires her. She gets a taste for vengeance, and wants to make Cersei suffer by feeling her own helplessness as her city is burned around her. Given 10 episodes, it could have been done quite convincingly.

she’s doing everything her advisors tell her

Tyrion advised her not to burn the Tarlys alive. She didn’t listen that time.

150. Aeryl

how well Euron’s scorpions worked last time, it’s now improbable for them to have failed so badly this time

Yeah, the problem was that last episode Euron’s scorpions were actually navally-mounted Krupp 88mm anti-aircraft guns, no longer required by Weimar Germany since Baby Hitler was accidentally run over by Bran’s wheelchair during one of his visions.

I like to pretend that in Episode 4, Euron executed a carefully-prepared naval ambush, using a fleeing scoutship as bait, catching an overconfident Daenerys unprepared.

182. Aeryl

And the shows refusal to allow either Dany or Jon to accept marriage as a potential solution.

Yeah, this was the most jarring failure of the show in this regard. Euron deserves his own category.

Re: Arya
I’m pretty sure she’s going for Dany next episode, and I’m hoping she’ll do it wearing Grey Worm’s face.

Irrespective of that, a particular scene struck me – when she was trying to save the civilians in the cellar. Forget the question of whether it was smart or stupid to leave the shelter. I recalled the origin story of the faceless assassins – in the slave mines of the Valyrians, helping the slaves deal with their masters’ cruelty.

Re: Tyrion
As a character, Tyrion is now in a very interesting position, the kind you’d expect GRRM to create for his characters, not D&D. Since his success as Hand in King’s Landing, all he wanted to do was go east and be Daenerys’ hand. And, as is typical of GRRM, his characters get what they want, and then regret it. As her Hand, he is ineffective. His policies fail, his advice proves poor. He winds up fighting his own family. His queen captures his home castle, and burns his family’s army. He is manipulated by Sansa. He turns in his friend Varys, and watches him burn. His queen turns out to be another Aerys. If he survives the next episode, what’s he got left? He will be the most hated man in Westeros, the man who tried so hard to do good. King’s Landing will hate him. The north mistrusts him. The West will hate him for betraying Tywin and the Lannisters. His political power will be gone, and he will just be another dwarf, utterly alone. Maybe Sansa will take him as a lover.

Avatar
5 years ago

, you didn’t need another one unless they were driving the plot forward. 

I heartily disagree.  Whose stories an author decides are worth telling means a great deal to me, and a thing that has always bugged me about the books, is only people of the “best bloodlines” stories are worth being told by Martin, and the show subverted that by saying Ros’ point of view was important too.  Her scenes stopped being “sexposition about the time Joffrey had her beat that other prostitute to death, instead she began working for Littlefinger in other capacities, helped him try to get Sansa away from KL, and then was approached by Varys to spy on Littlefinger for him.  She was then sent to Joffrey to be murdered. 

But imagine this episode, but instead of Arya we’re following, it’s Cersei’s cupbearer, who we’d been following since the death of Joffrey.  She’s been on the outskirts of scenes as Cersei’s done stuff, is constantly approached by people trying to get her to poison Cersei, or spy on her, but all she wants is to keep her head down and provide for her family. 

And she flees the Red Keep when the armies come, thinking her family in the city proper will be safe, because the rumors are the Dragon Queen is merciful and won’t burn the city, and knows Cersei is spreading rumors to say otherwise, and bringing people into the Keep to be human shields.  And then instead of Arya, you get her, and her children as she tries to navigate the fiery bloody streets of King’s Landing. 

That would have made the scene where Dany attacked more impactful, to have built a audience connection to the actual people being threatened by her act. 

I have no problem feeling for the common folk of King’s Landing without a named character to care about.

Yeah, I don’t either.  I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of the writers not giving a fuck about the common folk for 4 seasons, only to use their deaths to sell their inability to write Dany’s descent properly.   But having an established POV character who didn’t have to get teleported down there in an OOC way, would have made the audience care more about what she was doing. 

@191 Arya was there to kill Cersei to stop the war. 

Pretty sure she’s just there to kill Cersei, stopping the war is an afterthought, IMO.  But again, I’m of the camp that Arya had already turned from vengeance, and shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

Why was it “supposed to be shocking”?  Because the writers believe shocks are the only value stories have.  And that’s bullshit.  Like the Star Wars prequels, for all their problems, all through RotS you can see Anakin’s descent, and it’s tragic and heartbreaking.  It doesn’t HAVE to be shocking, to be a good story.  That’s the problem with D&D’s writing.  They don’t do inevitable tragedy. 

There were people stopping her from sliding, ‘

See, I hate this argument.  Who were these upstanding people who were “stopping her from sliding”  Jorah the slaver?  Tyrion the drunken whoremonger, who freed Dany’s dragons to rampage and burn a city?  Varys, who uses and abuses children to serve his own ends? 

Over and over people have tried to justify the descent here with multiple examples of “But Dany SAID she’d do this”.  Talk is cheap folks, what matters is actions.  And Dany violent actions have always been directed at the powerful, not the powerless. 

It seems to me that what is meant to break Dany is the fact that she is now alone.

I mean our go-to reference for what qualifies as crazy in this world is Aerys, Dany’s father, and it’s completely ignored that it took him years to go mad, after he was literally held in solitary confinement for a like a year.  Being alone didn’t break him that fast, it shouldn’t have broken Dany.

Avatar
5 years ago

@192: I honestly do not see how following Ros would have improved the episode we watched. As a reader/viewer, I do not care about Ros, worst, I don’t even remember who Ros is, I had to check it out. Hence, if it were her we were following, I wouldn’t have been able to tie the links until after the episode was over as her character never were important enough for the casual viewer to remember her. I watched all episodes, I read all of the books and yet up until this thread, I couldn’t remember who Ros was. I doubt I am the exception. Sure, I haven’t spent years dwelling within the GoT fandom theorizing on what may happen next, so this may be why, but a majority of the viewership actually are within a similar position.

I however care about Arya. I care about Arya gaining back her humanity and choosing to live. I have never meet the mother and her daughter before, but following them as refuges, running for their life, being benevolent towards Arya, a girl who hasn’t seen a lot of good in her recent life, then ultimately succumbing to the fire was considerably more poignant than anything the random character named Ros, who we haven’t seen since season 3, could have provided. Googling, yeah, I remember the character, but had I seen her within the episode, I wouldn’t have even recognize her nor been able to say who she was. I doubt I am the only one.

Also, the mother trying to save her child, the child running for her mother, the burned down horse toy provide imagery which is stronger and are able to hit viewers sensitive cords within a few scenes. We all sympathise for the mother trying to save her child, we all want them to survive and we all cry with Arya at falling to protect them, knowing maybe we push them to their death when all we wanted was to save those kind people who stopped in a mayhem to help an unknown girl.

I must thus respectfully disagree. Following Arya and the family was a choice I approve of. The scenes were gripping and definitely served to show the chaos, the desperation and the horror of being trapped into King’s Landing. They worked perfectly well for me.

I agree with @191. If they had highlighted Dany’s dangerous slip within bold letters, then her actions wouldn’t have been shocking. It was the knowledge this could get ugly which created the tension, hearing Missandei say “Dracarys”, knowing deep down it may turn bad, but hoping it will not which rendered the whole episode effective. Hence, for me, it was effective. It could have used a bit more time, always more episodes, some additional clues, but that’s the thing with foreshadowing… you don’t know it is foreshadowing until the event hits you in the face. At least, that how I see it, but YMMV.

Avatar
5 years ago

@192

 

You’re forgetting about Davos. He’s lowly born, from Flea Bottom. His would be a good POV to see the Dany carnage from, since he knows KL. He’s a lord now, but basically only Stannis treats him as so, all the other lords look down on him.

Avatar
5 years ago

You know, knowing now that Dany’s arc is basically how can a good character become a villain (the reverse of Jaime’s arc), I would like one day to see a Vince Gilligan version of Game of Thrones. He has some experience doing that story arc, and I loved his shows. 

 

Of course, that’s an impossibility. D&D own the  TV/movie rights to the ASOIAF books, and I don’t see them giving up them so quickly, especially for a rival version of their story. Also it’ll take time for the public to want it. With Batman it was at least 10 years, with this story I bet it’s going to take as much time as Lord of the Rings or Dune, so like 20-30 years. Vince probably is not going to be working then.

 

And that’s one answer I have to people saying I, or others, are too negative about the show. The story is awesome, the way the showrunners are telling the story is not good. Just imagine another person leading this project: Vince Gilligan, Cary Fukunaga, David Simon, Kevin Feige, Steven Spielberg, Guilhermo del Toro, etc. I’d like these projects more than I like what D&D’ve given. Some of their ideas are good (I like what they did with Theon mostly), others, not so much.

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

Pretty sure she’s just there to kill Cersei, stopping the war is an afterthought, IMO.  But again, I’m of the camp that Arya had already turned from vengeance, and shouldn’t have been there in the first place.

I saw it more as that the decision in Ep 4 to confront Cersei made Arya decide that she was personally responsible for that, having turned away from it after her conversation with HotPie. Part vengeance, part stopping the war. That’s why I didn’t have a problem with the timing of her conversation with Sandor — it came when she could no longer stop any part of the war and Cersei’s death was certain.

I however care about Arya. I care about Arya gaining back her humanity and choosing to live. I have never meet the mother and her daughter before, but following them as refuges, running for their life, being benevolent towards Arya, a girl who hasn’t seen a lot of good in her recent life, then ultimately succumbing to the fire was considerably more poignant than anything the random character named Ros, who we haven’t seen since season 3, could have provided. Googling, yeah, I remember the character, but had I seen her within the episode, I wouldn’t have even recognize her nor been able to say who she was. I doubt I am the only one.

Also, the mother trying to save her child, the child running for her mother, the burned down horse toy provide imagery which is stronger and are able to hit viewers sensitive cords within a few scenes. We all sympathise for the mother trying to save her child, we all want them to survive and we all cry with Arya at falling to protect them, knowing maybe we push them to their death when all we wanted was to save those kind people who stopped in a mayhem to help an unknown girl.

I think Aeryl’s saying the could have been shown something similar through the eyes of another character. It’s hard to argue with that; of course we could have. But the scenes worked for me, all the more because Arya’s my favorite character. (NB: In discussions with a friend, she pointed out that one’s favorite character coming in to S8 seems to have had a significant impact on how one views the season. I think that’s right.)

Avatar
5 years ago

@196: I understood that, I just do not understand how a minor character from the early season we haven’t seen for years might have done a better job at portraying the horrors of burning King’s Landing than the chosen ones did. The problem with minor characters such as Ros is if you don’t find a way to keep them inside the narrative, the viewers will forget everything about them. Hence, plucking out one minor character who hasn’t gotten any focus nor screen times within recent seasons and use this character to lead a focus would be, IMHO, a bad choice and a bad decision. How many viewers even remember Ros? I am sure I am far from the only one to have thought: “Ros who?”.

On the other hand, Arya is an established well-loved character. She is around. Her escape ties in with her narrative arc of leaving vengeance behind and seeking life. I can’t think of how Ros or even Davos couls have accomplished this dual goal with the same effectiveness as Arya did.

I guess, they could have paired Ros with Arya, but I find having a mother and her child provided a much stronger narrative than a former prostitute turned spy I am willing to bet a majority of viewers forgot all about. Bringing her in would have required them spending time to re-established Ros, to show flashbacks from Ros, to have a few scenes showing what Ros is doing now… What this really relevant? Or even important?

Maybe I am not unsatisfied because I came into the season not really having a favorite character… I love them all! I mean, sure, things could have always been done better, more episodes would have been welcomed, a more crafted out arc for Dany, but I have loved every episodes so far. I guess if I had been heavily rooting for Dany, if I had spend years discussing Dany, analysing her character and theorizing on her future arcs, I’d be heavily disappointed, but that’s what happen with most fandoms. You talk and talk and talk and once you finally get the final product, it doesn’t *quite* explore the layers you wish it did. 

It happened to me within another fandom, so I sympathise with the feeling, I sympathise with finding a given character arc wasn’t well-explored, but I can’t denied it worked for me.

talos
5 years ago

I would like to account what we saw on the latest episode related to Cersei, as a comment related to what I have read over the internet that people are not happy with the way Cersei dies in the series and that they wanted something more (torturous death maybe??)…

Cersei dies with a baby in her womb, leaving no descendants.., realizing she’s so small against dragon ‘bearing’ Targaryen’s, bitter ’cause she thought she evened the odds after killing a dragon, believing she would win the King’s Landing war, buried under rocks while hoping she would get away and understanding it was all for nothing.
What more do you want?
Death is death.

Avatar
5 years ago

Well, presumably the idea is that Ros would have been kept around and occasionally returned to throughout the series.

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

Just to add to 199, I assume Aeryl’s head canon includes keeping contact with Ros and fleshing out (sorry) her character between S4 and now. It could have worked, even as hypothetical as I’ve made it. But I’m with 197 basically — the scenes were prefect for me.

Avatar
5 years ago

@198: In the end, Cersei did not even matter enough to get a grand death nor a public execution. She just died forgotten and ignored by all. Insignificant. Useless. All her plans for nothing. And she has this one small redeeming scene where she cries over her unborn child which I felt was just the right touch of humanity to make her death impactful.

No one is ever all black nor all white. Yes, Cersei was a bad person, but she loved her children.

@199: But why? It is much harder to keep minor characters around within TV series than it is within books, each scene demands time, it wouldn’t have made sense, at least to me, to keep Ros around just to use her within the one final scene when Arya is available, when the mother/child do bring about more horrifying feelings. Even if Ros had been kept around, she still wouldn’t have garner the same emotional attachment Arya has with the viewers nor would have she been able to portray the mother trying to protect her child.

I personally find Arya and the mother/child were the right choice for the scene.

Avatar
5 years ago

@193,

I however care about Arya. I care about Arya gaining back her humanity and choosing to live.

I mean, I do too.  Which is why her character should never have been there, because she’d already done that she didn’t need to be told to do by Sandor.

We all sympathise for the mother trying to save her child, 

And how much more would you have cared for that woman, and her child, if you knew her name? 

Of course you don’t remember Ros NOW, my entire point was about if a character from her perspective had been maintained throughout the entire series, instead of treated as disposable, and we’d seen this battle with them.  Then, D&D’s usage of their innocent lives to tell a story about Dany wouldn’t feel so cheap, we wouldn’t have to get Arya acting all OOC to get there, and we’d have had a richer more interesting story over the past few seasons. 

Y’all are willing to settle for scraps.

@194 You’re forgetting about Davos.

I am no forgetting Davos, he’s a dude, his perspective is different than a woman’s and he’s in the books. And his perspective isn’t of the lower classes, for all that he is from there.  He isn’t living that life. He’s a viewpoint of a small folk watching the “big folk”.  Arya and Brienne’s POV are of the big folk watching the small folk.  There is no perspective in the books of the smallfolk watching the small folk, and it added something when they put it in the show, that the books lack. 

@197. Well again, the idea is that we would have maintained a narrative with her character to make this work.  I literally pointed out her loss to the narrative is when the show literally started going off the rails for me, because they didn’t see her value, and enumerated at length the ways she could have been kept in the show.  So I don’t understand how you don’t get what I was saying. 

On the other hand, Arya is an established well-loved character.

And if Ros had been kept on the show, she would have been as well.  *insert The Point gif here)

Bringing her in would have required them spending time to re-established Ros,

Well, the couldn’t have “brought her in” because she’s dead.  Which I pointed out in my comment.  Did you actually read it?

@201, But why?

Because she had value.  The fact that you don’t recognize this is why we can’t agree, because we have differing perspectives on what matters. The perspective of a poor sex worker who comes to the big city to “make it” is used and abused by those in power, carves our a niche for herself regardless, and then thrives in an environment where she believably shouldn’t is a powerful one for me, and it literally makes me weep to see people so dismissive of that, and for what?  So we could get more scenes of a smirking Ramsay making cock jokes?  Really, that’s what you value more than the story of a woman who thrives in a world that wants to destroy her.  You don’t see how people, but especially women, crave that type of story for women, and can’t understand why we’re so upset we didn’t get that?? 

I put my heart and soul and opened up my pain over how much a character meant to me, and the value she added to the story, and your response is(after failing to grasp anything in my comment) “Who remembers that whore?” and you can’t get why I’m not satisfied with what you’re satisfied with?  Yes, it works for you.  It’s easy to do that when it’s written FOR YOU.  D&D are not writing for me.  I’ve made my peace with that.  I’ve watched this show since season four with the understanding that I’m here for the characters, because they are so well drawn D&D can’t fuck them up, except by putting them in ridiculous plot created boxes, as they did here. 

I personally find Arya and the mother/child were the right choice for the scene.

They were the ONLY choice for the scene, because D&D didn’t do the narrative work necessary to give you a better scene.  You’re fine with that, I’m not.

Avatar
5 years ago

@202: I thought Sandor telling Arya to not seek to die in revenge was not just meant for Arya’s character development, but also for Sandor. He is a man having defined his entire sense of self around the need to avenge himself from a despotic brother. All his life has been orchestrated towards this one moment where he knows he will not survive. There never were no happily ever after for Sandor, he never even entertained the possibility there might be one, but when he meets Arya, it forces him to stare at himself in the eyes. He sees this young girl going down the same path he has chosen to go down onto years age. He knows all that awaits her is death and… he doesn’t want her to go down this way.

Sandor gives Arya the happily ever after (he hopes, this is GoT after all) he never allowed himself to yearn for. The scene wasn’t just meant for Arya to choose life, it was also meant for Sandor to give it to her within a scene which would be meaningful to both of them.

In other words, Arya represents the future Sandor will never have. It tied in their joined arcs in a beautiful manner, I thought, but I guess everyone has their own interpretation.

Had it happen at Wintefell, the emotional impact of the exchange would have been lost as we wouldn’t have seen Sandor climb to meet death, we wouldn’t have seen Arya’s choice turning into this metaphor where she tries to escape the inferno, trying to save this one kind family. Doing what she hasn’t allowed herself to do for years: to care for others.

I am sorry I didn’t think it were scraps. Even if Ros had been kept around for years, she still wouldn’t have carried around the mother and her child’s narrative. Also, IMHO, the purpose of the scene wasn’t to follow named characters and watch them cruelly died, it was to show the causalities of Dany’s wrath. Each time there is a siege, a battle, a carnage, war crimes, the victims are the unknown citizens, the innocent families: we never get to see them. Books cannot show what this episode did because books cannot randomly follow random new characters without establishing them, but a TV series can, within a few images and no words, show a mother, her daughter, trying to find refuge only to horribly die while having an established character trying to save them. The relationship in between mother and daughter needs not being established, it requires literally no screen time for the viewers to feel the angst when the mother is hurt, to feel the pain when she pleads for Arya to save her daughter and to cry with the child running back to her mother: those scenes were, IMHO, amazing and not scraps at all.

Hence, I must respectfully disagree, I do not believe Ros or any other minor characters kept around for this sole purpose would have successfully drawn out of me the same emotions I had while watching a crying child refusing to leaver her mother to die only to die herself. Those two nameless characters stood in for the numerous victims of Dany’s action: a more established characters would have ruined the purpose which I think was, again, to show the horror as seen from the eyes of the unknown civilians.

It was a pure moment of gold where the ones who mattered the most were the people, the people Tyrion tried to save and not the handful of privileged few we call protagonists.

And well I was writing as I was reading the post, so I got to the end and well, huh, sorry. I guess that I am sorry the producers didn’t see fit to give a stronger narrative to a minor character from the early seasons you seem to have latched on. I had no idea Ros was actually popular or anything. As I said, I didn’t find she was memorable nor important enough to need an on-going narrative for 8 seasons, but to each our own.

Also, as I said, I do not believe any scene with Ros would have been better because Ros would have never been able to bring about the mother and child bond. It is as simple as that: people empathize immediately with a mother and her child. I must thus sincerely disagree another scene featuring a minor character kept around for reasons I fail to understand would have provided a stronger moment than the one we got with Arya and the family.

So I must respectfully agree to disagree with you. I just do not see how what you propose would have been better nor why I am settling for craps because I actually liked it. As I also said, to each our own.

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

@150 – Aeryl

I mean, it’s the “is it OK to kill baby Hitler” question.  I still fall on the side of No.  You raise Hitler to be better, I don’t believe anyone’s nature is set in stone, fantasy story or not

It’s more than just ‘OK to kill baby Hitler’, though, isn’t it?  This isn’t a single ruler who took a society to a dark place.  This is a culture defined by being in that dark place. If we had been told a story of that village where the khalasar comes and rapes and pillages, why would Dany’s protestations ring true at all? Even when Dany stops the raping, has she turned away from her entire culture promising to rape and pillage the entire world?

And I’m not saying it’s OK to kill the baby, either. I’m only pointing out that there is a telling of the story of MMD that is entirely within the text and also paints Dany as the tyrant.  Did Dany burn any of the rapists alive?  Or just the rape victim?

MMD is a victim of the Dothraki, but not of Dany, and that doesn’t excuse her actions towards Dany

She killed the Dothraki khal and the next khal.  Both Dothraki.  She did not kill Dany. And her actions still aren’t excused.  Not at all what I’m doing. I’m just also saying that Dany’s actions are at least questionable, from a certain point of view.

If you were grossed out about [Dany eating the horse heart] and hold that against her character, the story is saying more about you than her

I didn’t say I was grossed out. I wasn’t. I was somewhat disturbed by her embrace of the Stalion that Mounts the World prophecy, which is delivered/confirmed with the eating of the horse heart.  As I stated later in my post, all these moments made me cheer when they happened.  Same here.  Dany finishing the heart was epic. And her embrace of the prophecy was disturbing in a way that made me think “uh oh, Mad Queen?” even as I cheered her on.

How exactly is she supposed to react that her long time abuser has finally been dealt with?

This is almost exactly my point.  She should react that way it’s appropriate and good at the time.  And yet… if I saw someone completely dispassionately regard someone dying the way V died, I’d be worried (I won’t pretend that my own modern thinking of ‘cruel and unusual’ doesn’t impact this – I find a death by burning to be worse than a quick death and not morally equitable as means of execution).  When I saw her do it, I thought, “uh oh, Mad Queen?” even as I cheered V’s death and her strength in finally standing against him. The fact that she’s a trauma victim doesn’t change that! It makes it deeper and more meaningful, especially considering what her mindset might be if she’s forced to endure more traumas (like losing her closest and oldest advisor, then another child, then her best friend all within the span of a month).

I already explained Mirri Maaz Duur is no victim of Dany. She acted out of vengeance. 

MMD did act out of a vengeance that could be perceived as righteous within the text.  And Dany also acted out of vengeance in burning MMD alive.  Again, if I’m Dany, MMD does need to die.  The way she did it was not a simple execution, though, and gave me enough pause to think of now even though I cheered at the time.

She is a young girl with dreams of a destiny.  And it helps her, and the people who were left behind with her, alive.  Do you really begrudge them that?

No, I don’t. It totally was important to who she became and much of her strength moving forward. But, a young person (girl or boy) with dreams of destiny and dragons – and that destiny is conquering – should give everyone pause, IMO.

To protect her people from certain death.  Again, she is a young girl.

This isn’t a duality where it’s either 1) give up or 2) threaten to burn cities. There are different elements and stages of diplomacy that can be engaged.  I don’t really care to bring the books into this discussion, but I’ll also point out that the book story of Qarth inviting her in demonstrates even more that threatening to burn the city wasn’t the only option. She did protect her people and I cheered. But I also could not forget that her immediate response to diplomatic failure is “I’ll burn this city to the ground.”

A good comment I saw on twitter, pointed out that foreshadowing does not a story make.  Merely hinting that things could happen doesn’t mean you get to skip the hard work of making it happen organically in the story. 

I agree. I do think there’s more than pure foreshadowing, but I also think that they didn’t connect the most important dots for this story. In my mind, Dany needed some sort of trigger in the moment that she turned and they didn’t even try to give us that.  So, for all my talk about thinking “uh oh, Mad Queen?” throughout the series, I still thought “What? Why?” as she started in on the city.  My biggest frustration, and I think where we differ most, is that I don’t think they even needed that much more. I’ve thought up multiple different quick scenes in the past couple of days that could have made that work for me and it’s astonishing that they didn’t try anything really. Emilia acted the hell out of it, though. She did her absolute best to make me believe even if the script didn’t support her.

Avatar
5 years ago

This isn’t a single ruler who took a society to a dark place. 

I mean Hitler wasn’t solely responsible for the Third Reich.  A life is still a life and still has value, regardless of a prophecy. No one’s nature is set in stone.  As I said, MMDs intentions can’t be read in any context, as trying to bring peace, because you don’t bring peace with violence, you don’t bring justice with injustice.  They were all about her own personal drive to avenge herself.

next khal

Rhaego was not the next khal, because they aren’t hereditary titles.

When I saw her do it, I thought, “uh oh, Mad Queen?”

I feel like that assumption comes from sexism.  That stoicism in women, along with being emotional, always indicates an imbalanced mind.  It’s nice how we can’t win, huh?

Again, if I’m Dany, MMD does need to die.  The way she did it was not a simple execution, though, and gave me enough pause to think of now even though I cheered at the time.

I mean, do you think Dany put the eggs in the fire because she wanted to eat them?   Dany was working magic, and she knew that in advance.  She wasn’t acting out of solely vengeance. 

and that destiny is conquering – should give everyone pause, IMO.

But she questions that destiny constantly.  Longs for the simple childhood desire of a home with a red door.  Plans to camp out in the desert forever.  Decides to conquer the slave cities and free the slave cities instead of returning to Westeros.

You are trying to portray Dany as solely maniacal, when she’s always been dichotomous, pulled between her empathy that drives her to mercy, and her desire to be strong enough to be safe, that pushes her to violence.  It does the story a disservice to act as if Dany has always been one way, when the thing that’s made her such an interesting character is her own inner turmoil over how to act. 

My biggest frustration, and I think where we differ most, is that I don’t think they even needed that much more. I’ve thought up multiple different quick scenes in the past couple of days that could have made that work for me and it’s astonishing that they didn’t try anything really. 

Then we don’t differ at all, because I myself have done the same thing.  All my ire is directed at the people who make this show.

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

I feel like that assumption comes from sexism.  That stoicism in women, along with being emotional, always indicates an imbalanced mind.  It’s nice how we can’t win, huh?

I thought the exact same thing when Stannis was doing it in S2, so I disagree that it comes from sexism.

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

I mean, do you think Dany put the eggs in the fire because she wanted to eat them?   Dany was working magic, and she knew that in advance.  She wasn’t acting out of solely vengeance. 

Is burning someone alive OK just because it’s done in service of magic?

But she questions that destiny constantly.  Longs for the simple childhood desire of a home with a red door.  Plans to camp out in the desert forever.  Decides to conquer the slave cities and free the slave cities instead of returning to Westeros.

This seems to be bringing some book items into this analysis.  Dany never planned to camp out in the desert forever. She might have mentioned the red door, but that’s almost all internal and in the books, not the show.  And how does conquering prove that she’s questioning her destiny to conquer?

You are trying to portray Dany as solely maniacal, when she’s always been dichotomous, pulled between her empathy that drives her to mercy, and her desire to be strong enough to be safe, that pushes her to violence.  It does the story a disservice to act as if Dany has always been one way, when the thing that’s made her such an interesting character is her own inner turmoil over how to act.

I don’t think this is in any way an accurate reflection of the ideas I’ve put out there. I’m not presenting Dany as solely maniacal. I’m pointing out the opposite side of the same coin you’re looking at. She has always been dichotomous. You list her empathy and desire to be strong and safe being what pushes her to violence.  Good observation and (partly) true of her character. I’m pointing out that, in addition to those motivations, Dany has also always been at least partially motivated by a desire to conquer and rule and to manifest her wrath via burning people alive. I LOVE that the same moments can be used to defend her goodness and ultimately, her tragedy precisely because it further illustrates the dichotomy of her character.

All my ire is directed at the people who make this show.

I can’t direct my frustration only at them. They were great at adapting this story, but they were never the author. Seems clear to me now that this very issue we’re discussing (how to portray and plot Dany’s tragic turn) could be a part of the corner that GRRM’s written himself into and can’t get out of.

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

Aeryl, I apologize for spreading this across three replies.

As I said, MMDs intentions can’t be read in any context, as trying to bring peace, because you don’t bring peace with violence, you don’t bring justice with injustice.

Not saying she was trying to bring peace, just that she was the hero of her own story from a certain point of view.

I have doubts that even you believe the logic you’ve laid out here (that using violence means that intentions can’t be read in any context as bringing peace) and I know that I fully disagree with it. If intentions can’t be read as trying to bring peace specifically because you don’t bring peace with violence, then why are you giving Dany a pass for seeking peace with violence in Astapor, Yunkai, Meereen, and Westeros?

But I don’t even accept the premise that seeking violence negates any intentions towards peace. The tyranny of the Third Reich was ended by violence. Slavery is something people will often only surrender in the face of violence (as Dany knows full well). I believe that violence is often regrettable but sometimes necessary to address the problems we create. Which is why I don’t condemn Dany for sacking Astapor and using violence to achieve the laudable end of getting these people out of slavery.  But I do note the look on her face as her dragons burn people. It’s that knife edge between using violence to serve laudable goals and falling prey to violence begetting more violence, and I dig that.

Avatar
5 years ago

I thought the exact same thing when Stannis was doing it in S2,

I wasn’t referring to her embrace of prophecy, I was referring to her stone face during Viserys execution.  If she’d been emotional, people’d be out making the same argument that how she acted at the point was a hint that this was going to happen. 

That’s what I’m getting at.  That no matter what a woman does, as a character, or in real life, people will say she should have done it different, and she will be criticized for doing it wrong, no matter what it is she does.

Dany cries when he gets his crown, Mad Queen!

Dany smiles when he gets his crown, Mad Queen!

Dany makes no face when gets his crown, Mad Queen! 

There will always be people willing to interpret a woman’s actions in the worst light, which is part of why this discussion is so fraught for many of us.  It’s not only the hope of subversion we had in Dany’s character, it’s touching on a true experience for a majority of women, that society won’t let us win this game, because the rules are never the same. 

We are seeing Dany’s actions, while perfectly acceptable actions within the realm of the show, and even actions undertaken by male characters, cast in a harsher light to explain this plot.   We are seeing how she weighs power dynamics in her actions dismissed as unimportant, while the male characters are given major allowances for fucking up.

We are seeing Dany torn down, to build Sansa up, and as a woman who keenly sees the ways in which women are encouraged to tear each other down instead of empowering each other, that is especially irking. 

How people are reacting to what’s happened, is very much a reflection on what women are feeling in our world right now, and people would do well to listen to what we’re saying.

Is burning someone alive OK just because it’s done in service of magic?

No, but it makes her motivations different, as I’ve explained like 10 times now.  The intent of her act makes no difference to the outcome, but it gives you a look at why she does what she does, which is why burning MMD =/= burning King’s Landing.  There is no greater goal in mind to be achieved, there is no personal vendetta.  People want to ignore why Dany does thing to make this make sense, and it’s a betrayal of the characters to do that.

This seems to be bringing some book items into this analysis.

The books have been a part of this analysis from the beginning, because they paint a clearer picture of Dany.  The show kept in a lot of book specific stuff, that they later disregarded, like Quaithe’s prophecy, but the brought that stuff in and it remains relevant.

I’m pointing out the opposite side of the same coin you’re looking at

Except I am looking at both sides of the coin, you admit that you are only looking at one.  If you read through my comments here, I explain multiple times how the show could have sold this. All I am saying is that these examples from her past people bring up, are either being misconstrued by deliberately ignoring her motives, or that the ones that aren’t being misconstrued aren’t sufficient to explain how Dany got here.

Dany has also always been at least partially motivated by a desire to conquer and rule and to manifest her wrath via burning people alive

Except I think you are wrong.  Dany desires to be strong enough to be safe, and the only way she’s ever seen to demonstrate strength are to “conquer, rule and manifest her wrath”.  She resorts to burning people alive because it’s the tool she has.(If all you have is a hammer, etc etc).  You think Dany is inherently a conqueror, whereas I see her as driven to conquer because it’s the only way she can be safe.  She doesn’t want to rule at all, (it’s why she, like Jon, is so bad at it).  She just wants to be safe, and the only way she can do that, to her mind, is to be the strongest of them all.

could be a part of the corner that GRRM’s written himself into and can’t get out of.

I don’t think that’s it, it’s just having Dany abandon Mereen at this point would conclude her heel turn to soon in the story, and he’s waiting for another upcoming trial for that. 

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

I wasn’t referring to her embrace of prophecy, I was referring to her stone face during Viserys execution.

And I was referring to Stannis’ stone face while burning Axell Florent and Mance Rayder.

Dany cries when he gets his crown, Mad Queen!

Dany smiles when he gets his crown, Mad Queen!

Dany makes no face when gets his crown, Mad Queen! 

Dany being disturbed by seeing someone burn alive (not burn, I just don’t have a term for it) wouldn’t make me think “uh oh, Mad Queen?” (note I’ve never said I thought “Mad Queen!” at any point about any of this ever). She hardened herself to the point where she didn’t appear disturbed.  I don’t think me noting that means you can assume I would take every reaction as such.

We are seeing Dany’s actions, while perfectly acceptable actions within the realm of the show, and even actions undertaken by male characters, cast in a harsher light to explain this plot.

How is it casting it in a harsher light now to explain what I was feeling when I first watched it?

We are seeing how she weighs power dynamics in her actions dismissed as unimportant

I agree and that is the crux of my frustration with this episode.  There’s no trigger that would inspire her to fall off what I see as a well developed knife edge.

We are seeing Dany torn down, to build Sansa up, and as a woman who keenly sees the ways in which women are encouraged to tear each other down instead of empowering each other, that is especially irking.

Agreed.

No, but it makes her motivations different, as I’ve explained like 10 times now.  The intent of her act makes no difference to the outcome, but it gives you a look at why she does what she does, which is why burning MMD =/= burning King’s Landing

I have not said that burning MMD = burning KL. I’ve said that burning MMD gave me a moment of pause and that the final decision to burn KL still didn’t have enough support to make sense.

The books have been a part of this analysis from the beginning, because they paint a clearer picture of Dany.  The show kept in a lot of book specific stuff, that they later disregarded, like Quaithe’s prophecy, but the brought that stuff in and it remains relevant.

You brought up book plot points that specifically did not happen or happened in another way on the show. In the end, they will be at least slightly different characters. I can’t find any relevancy to ‘Dany was OK camping forever in the RW’ as part of argument regarding the show when she didn’t do that at all on the show.

Except I am looking at both sides of the coin, you admit that you are only looking at one.

I say I’m pointing out one side – I’m still looking at each.

All I am saying is that these examples from her past people bring up, are either being misconstrued by deliberately ignoring her motives, or that the ones that aren’t being misconstrued aren’t sufficient to explain how Dany got here.

You say ‘misconstrued’, but I’m sharing my experience as I watched (and if we’re going to discuss it, read) the story. I’m not trying to retcon my reactions, I’m saying that I was the perfect fodder for the show to sell on this turn, and they still didn’t land it. I originally posted because people kept bringing up stuff that didn’t really factor much for my original analysis (i.e. the Tarlys) while leaving out the moments that impacted me.

I don’t think it’s ‘misconstruing’ to reflect on actions from another point of view or another frame of thought.  I don’t think it’s deliberately ignoring her motives to take pause despite her motives due to the nature of her actions. I DO think that the actions/reasons/plot given are not sufficient to explain Dany burning KL.

She resorts to burning people alive because it’s the tool she has.(If all you have is a hammer, etc etc).

I find this to be a large part of the tragedy for her – her strongest weapon has an inherent flaw (burning people alive sucks a lot).

You think Dany is inherently a conqueror, whereas I see her as driven to conquer because it’s the only way she can be safe… She just wants to be safe, and the only way she can do that, to her mind, is to be the strongest of them all.

I see a large difference between ‘partially motivated to conquer and rule’ and ‘inherently a conqueror’. Even so, you’re making that argument that, for Dany, safety=conquering and that safety=prime directive while also trying to argue that conquering=/=prime directive and that is not an argument that I find internally consistent or convincing. I don’t believe that Dany’s prime directive is to conquer, just that that is part of her motivation. If you think her desire to conquer is born out of the idea that only be conquering can she be safe, I don’t think that invalidates the statement that she is partially motivated to conquer and rule.

Thank you for the replies.  I’ve quite enjoyed this discussion.

Avatar
5 years ago

Dany being disturbed by seeing someone burn alive (not burn, I just don’t have a term for it) wouldn’t make me think “uh oh, Mad Queen?”

I’m not talking about just you.  Do you have any idea how many times I’ve seen all three arguments?  I’m talking about the entire discourse here, and how other people use an argument to make a crappy point, devalues that argument.  You want to argue that you are nuanced, and you’re argument isn’t based in biased assumptions, but I don’t have anything other than your word that it’s true, because I don’t know you. 

You are correct that Stannis demonstrates a lot of traits Dany shares, as people insecure of the power and prone to over-demonstrating that they have it.  Stannis also suffered from the same lack of proper character devolution.  That Stannis would fanatically seek power by sacrificing his own daughter is definitely foreshadowed, but it certainly wasn’t brought about well, just like Dany.  Yet, most people considered this outright slander of Stannis, refusing to accept that Martin intended Stannis to get here until Martin himself had to address, IIRC.  

You don’t see that happening with Dany, instead the discourse has in some sense been “yup women be crazy” even amongst the show’s dedicated feminist fan base.  

Which I think goes to show, despite your own personal protestation that you saw it coming with Stannis, most people didn’t, and the fact that they did with Dany says a lot about sexism in society.  And I think that has to be a consideration when you make an argument.  

The baseline for making a sexist argument isn’t always whether you intend to make one, or whether you would say the same thing about a man.  Because sexism is a system, you have to consider the system as a whole.  A arguments that are based that a person expressed “improper emotions” have more impact against women, and are commonly deployed unfairly, while men are given a pass.

I’m asking you be mindful of that. 

I mean, to me personally Stannis’ stoicism in the face of his own terrible acts isn’t noteworthy, because Stannis never made a different face. 

Cersei has her smirk.  When she does something terrible, she revels in it.

Jon, when he’s pushed into doing something his moral center says is wrong, you see it on his face.  (Kit Harrington does great “what smells” face). 

Dany instead schools her face to a mask, a tactic she learned young, so as not to further provoke Viserys in his anger.  So as to not wake the dragon. (Sansa learned this at Joffrey’s hands)

Knowing this about her, the fact that she wears a mask in the face of horror doesn’t make me see anything except her strength, that she needed to endure the abuse of her childhood. 

But that’s a tactic a lot of women learn, so some of see that differently.  Something else to consider.

I don’t think that invalidates the statement that she is partially motivated to conquer and rule.

It doesn’t but it adds a dimension.  Again, with this turn the thing we’re being asked to consider is her state of mind, so understanding her motives is crucial to doing that.  It has no bearing on the impact of her actions, and I think some people feel that by focusing on her motives, I am eliding the harm she’s done, or excusing it, but I’m not.

Dany is done as a heroic character, or a Queen, in this story.  Even if she does it at an earlier point in the books, but saves the world with her dragons, it will not make up for this.  Whatever happens, a person who burns cities like this can not be accepted as a ruler as a conclusion this story in a just way.  There can never be an acceptable justification for this, no matter how it’s been accepted in the past in this story.

But I again disagree with the “rule” part.  Again, like Jon, she’s terrible at it.  But Jon isn’t driven to attain power for safety, so he doesn’t seek to conquer to prove his strength.  And the conquer part, she sees it as the best way to demonstrate strength, and this is a direct result of her time in Qarth.  The threat of her dragons was not enough to keep them safe, she learned if she wasn’t willing to use her dragons, they would always be at risk of abduction(or another master willing to use them).  

When you say “an inherent desire to conquer and rule” I see people who seek power for it’s own sake, because they want to exert it over others.  Like the billionaire, he continues running an unethical business to make more billions.  He already has more money that he could spend, and he could actually help people with what he has acquired, but instead would rather continue to exploit the powerless.  And none of that describes Dany.  She wants power to provide safety for herself, and for others. 

I think at the end of the day, if she could have achieved the throne in the way she first imagined, demonstrate overwhelming strength, plus the “love for her” she’d always been told about, and the idea that Westeros would lightly resist, she’d have sat lightly on the throne.    She’d have instituted reforms.  It’s happened!  That nation of Bhutan had it’s democratic constitution instituted by their own monarch!  With no chance at having children, she’d have ended hereditary primogeniture. 

But that was never going to happen, because, as I said in another thread, you don’t end violence by perpetuating it, and Westeros was never going to “lightly resist” her invasion.   So her drive for safety leads her to become a bloodthirsty tyrant, but I think that makes it different from someone who wants to attain power to exert their rule over people, or exploit others for their own benefit. 

And another difference, is someone like Drogo, who I think of when you say “inherent drive to conquer and rule”.  He was always looking for the next big bad he could try his strength against.  Dany didn’t want that either, because that’s the opposite of the safety she seeks. 

So I can agree she’s driven to conquer and rule, I say I’d have to disagree with the “inherent” part, because it erases what is actually driving Dany.  Her drive to conquer and rule doesn’t come from something essential about herself, it’s completely driven by external factors.

Avatar
5 years ago

@202. Aeryl

Re: Maintaining Ros as a character for 4 more seasons and killing her in Episode 5.

I had a hard enough time waiting for Grey Worm and Missandei’s love scenes to be over (no pun intended, I swear!!!) and they’re well-established tertiary characters. Using 5 minutes every 3 episodes to maintain a thread for Ros would have been infuriating, and would have come at the expense of other characters and their threads. If they had done that, I would have whooped for joy when she got killed, simply because I’d been hoping they’d get rid of her for 3 seasons by that point.

In case I’m coming across as too contrarian, let me add that I’m enjoying the discussion your posts have sparked, and that I agree with you more often than my replies might imply.

That no matter what a woman does, as a character, or in real life, people will say she should have done it different, and she will be criticized for doing it wrong,

There’s an argument to be made there, but I’m afraid you did it wrong. If you had done it differently, you might have convinced me!

</huge-tongue-in-cheek>

But seriously. You seem to think that women are uniquely subject to criticism. This is, in fact, the experience of all humanity. In particular, this has been Jaime Lannister’s experience ever since he killed Aerys. If he was a woman, you’d quote this as another example, but he’s a man, so you ignore it. Ned, Tyrion, Theon, Jeor, Robb, all of them had their actions picked over and criticized, and they paid dearly for their follies. It is third-wave feminist ideology which encourages women to focus on the criticism they receive, and to ignore the criticism men receive, and to convince themselves that they are uniquely subject to criticism.

We are seeing Dany torn down, to build Sansa up and as a woman who keenly sees the ways in which women are encouraged to tear each other down

We are seeing Dany torn down to subvert the long-held expectation that she would triumph. Would you be happier if Sansa was a man? Then you would be complaining that all the women with political power were torn down because the writers are sexist. Would you be happier if Sansa and Daenerys came to an understanding? But their characters have opposite interests, should that be cast aside for the feminist sisterhood? Would you want Daenerys to simply triumph? After everything that happened to Ned/Robb/Theon/Jaime/Tyrion/Tywin/Littlefinger/Drogo/Viserys/Jorah, is that reasonable?

It’s almost like whatever the writers do, some people will say they should have done it different, and will be criticized for doing it wrong. I’m guessing D&D will soon start identifying as female.

If anything, the writers ought to be criticized for making the series anachronistically feminist. You have three politically powerful women going to war against each other (Dany, Cersei, Sansa, though her power is shared with Jon). You have to work really hard to find any example approaching this in the middle ages. Joan of Arc? She did not have a female opponent. Mary, Queen of Scots, and Elizabeth? Mary lost her political power early on in that struggle. Eleanor of Aquitaine? She had no female antagonists either, as far as I recall. Queen Maud? And that’s without mentioning the female ninja-assassin saving humanity.

Avatar
Plato
5 years ago

What all those who pity Denerys don’t get, and what the writers wanted to show BUT they failed because only Martin could do that with any success, is the old age truth that too much power corrupts its beholder. It changes its character and whatever good intentions there were at the beginning they fade when real frustrations comes and the beholder of power is not ready and too focused on herself to see the bigger picture. So Dany suffered exactly this.

Alongside with this, goes the truth which is known since the writings of Plato, that only those who do NOT want the power to rule are actually suitable to rule. And that’s why the two wise advisors Varys and Thyrion give a hind that Jon, who doesn’t actually care to rule, would be better instead of Dany. Dany is so eager and attached to the idea of ruling that she has stopped long ago seeing anything other than the throne and herself ruling. She has stopped caring about anything else long ago, and now that all things turn adverse to her she shows the dark side of her character. The human side which is fit for those who want to actually make a difference as kings or anything else. If she had retained her initial care about justice and all she should have been very happy when Jon told her his secret and she would have admitted to the just heir of the throne. When she instead tells him not to tell anyone, she shows her corruption of power. Her intentions have become selfish instead of communal.

Of course Martin would have showcased this change much more in detail and with greater skill, so that it would seem obvious that she has been corroded that much….

Avatar
5 years ago

had a hard enough time waiting for Grey Worm and Missandei’s love scenes

I think you’re revealing a lot by telling us which characters were a waste.  I mean, Grey Worm and Missandei were necessary to humanize the foreign armies that followed her.  The people of Westeros were always going to assume the worst about Dany’s “brown hordes” it is imperative the audience not do the same.  Again, it’s just very telling to hear people flat out admit which stories they think don’t have value.

You seem to think that women are uniquely subject to criticism.

No, I seem to think that women are more impacted by criticism based in sexism, which is a thing that’s true.  Criticisms based on a woman expressing the wrong emotions are nearly always based in sexism, and even when they’re not, the person making them is likely relying on sexism to make their case.

We are seeing Dany torn down to subvert the long-held expectation that she would triumph. 

Except, it’s perfectly possible to “tear Dany down” without making Sansa flawlessly right about everything. 

Would you be happier if Sansa was a man? 

I mean, criticism isn’t about what would make me happy, it’s about flaws in storytelling. But considering I’ve complained plenty about how Tyrion is being positioned as Dany’s moral guide, when she guided herself just fine for 5 seasons without him, this just sounds silly. The problem with this, is how Dany is being positioned as uniquely incompetent, and uniquely evil, with only people like Sansa and Tyrion knowing what she should do.  Yes, the context changes if it’s a man in Sansa’s position, but that doesn’t make the writing any better.  They would still be tearing Dany down to make that other character look better, and it’s still not right if it’s for a male character, it’s just especially galling(and relying on sexism to sell it) for the story to pit two women who are natural allies against one another for drama.

But their characters have opposite interests, 

Except they don’t.  They are both being written intractably.  They don’t have to be in 100% accord with one another, but neither is even attempting to compromise.  That’s just bad writing considering how both of them have been depicted. 

It’s almost like whatever the writers do, some people will say they should have done it different, and will be criticized for doing it wrong.

Yeah, but some people have a strong logical and critical basis for saying that and some people don’t.  It’s not my fault you can’t tell the difference, I guess?

If anything, the writers ought to be criticized for making the series anachronistically feminist. 

Yes, because that’s the problem with a story about dragons and ice wizards, too many women makes it too fantastical. 

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

I’m not sure Tyrion is positioned to be Dany’s moral guide. Not only has he made a lot of mistakes in his advice to her, and not only is his own moral guide quite suspect when it affects his family, but we should recall Olenna Tyrell’s advice to ignore Tyrion and all other “clever men”. And then she added, “The rulers of Westeros are sheep. Are you a sheep? Be a dragon.” (NB: I think this advice fits quite well with my point in the other thread about BookDany’s determination to rule with Fire and Blood.)

Of course Tyrion is right that she should not burn KL, and he gave her similar advice when they were attacked in Mereen. So on this particular point he’s a moral guide, but I don’t know that he is overall.

Avatar
5 years ago

Alongside with this, goes the truth which is known since the writings of Plato, that only those who do NOT want the power to rule are actually suitable to rule.

This is nonsense.  Those who don’t want to rule are least suited to it, because of the very fact they don’t want to rule.

Case in point: Robert Baratheon.  He didn’t defeat Rhaegar because he wanted the throne, but because he was pissed off Lyanna rejected him.  He was only given the throne because he was related to the Targaryens by marriage.  And he didn’t want it, he was terrible at it, he allowed all sorts of corruption to fester, drove the nation into debt.  That is what happens when you think those that want power least are most entitled to it.

You must be real fun during election season, because by the logic you’re expressing here, actually running for office means you shouldn’t get elected.

@215 I’m not sure Tyrion is positioned to be Dany’s moral guide. 

Regardless of whether he’s intentionally positioned to be, one of the most common arguments I get defending this writing is “But Tyrion’s had to talk her off the ledge” so the fans are perceiving him as such, and as I’ve pointed out, he’s the one who actually let the dragons loose in Mereen, so you know, he has no room to talk here.

we should recall Olenna Tyrell’s advice to ignore Tyrion

Yes, the woman with nothing left to live for but vengeance is who Dany should be listening to for ruler-ship advice. And, really, Dany disregarded her without Tyrion having to tell her to do it.   The show is really bad about doing these moments, and then calling it “foreshadowing”(they brought back Olenna’s dialog during the Previously On, with all the “fire and blood” advice ringing like a cacophony over Dany’s angry face), but it doesn’t actually pay off.  What does she immediately do after Olenna tells her this?  Go North to protect the sheep.

and he gave her similar advice when they were attacked in Mereen.

And then he let the dragons free. So I don’t care what Tyrion thinks she should do, he has no moral authority, but show and audience gives it to him anyway, because Peter Dinklage is amazing.     

Avatar
5 years ago

@212, If you are referring to the Empress Maud she did indeed have a female opponent, Queen Matilda King Stephen’s wife who led their armies after his capture and succeeded in driving Maud out of London. 

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

show and audience gives it to him anyway, because Peter Dinklage is amazing.

I didn’t realize that many people were viewing Tyrion as a moral authority. I certainly never have thought of him that way. He is, however, right about burning cities.

I’m not sure if Dany has taken Olenna’s advice, nor am I saying she should, but she’s certainly had good reason to ignore her advisors since that time. It’s not “foreshadowing”, but it might be operating in the back of Dany’s mind, reinforcing instincts otherwise there.

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

Aeryl’s point about bad rulers is obviously true. And the example given in 213 seems ill-chosen, since I very much doubt that Jon will end up on the throne. My money has always been on Sansa (even though I dislike that idea a LOT).

Avatar
5 years ago

He is, however, right about burning cities.

Well sure, but he’s also burned a city down…. and a fleet

Funny Davos was able to let that go

 

Avatar
Sophist
5 years ago

As with most moral systems, the Westerosi are pretty situational. Nobody objects to burning an attacking fleet. They don’t even object to burning cities in some cases (Tyrion’s father sacked KL too, after all, and I’m sure there was burning then).

Avatar
Seamus1603
5 years ago

I’m not talking about just you.  Do you have any idea how many times I’ve seen all three arguments?  I’m talking about the entire discourse here, and how other people use an argument to make a crappy point, devalues that argument.  You want to argue that you are nuanced, and you’re argument isn’t based in biased assumptions, but I don’t have anything other than your word that it’s true, because I don’t know you

The baseline for making a sexist argument isn’t always whether you intend to make one, or whether you would say the same thing about a man.  Because sexism is a system, you have to consider the system as a whole.  A arguments that are based that a person expressed “improper emotions” have more impact against women, and are commonly deployed unfairly, while men are given a pass.

I’m asking you be mindful of that. 

Fair enough. I came into this trying to give insight into my argument and viewpoint alone (and I would argue that I specifically tried to address the ‘men are given a pass’ by drawing a parallel to Stannis). However, I agree with your larger point that criticism of women often comes down to sexist tropes or stereotypes and will not argue against it.

You don’t see that happening with Dany, instead the discourse has in some sense been “yup women be crazy” even amongst the show’s dedicated feminist fan base. 

I’ll just have to say the YMMV on this one. The discourse I’ve heard this week has been almost entirely that Dany’s turn wasn’t earned, was slander, ignored her story arc, etc. From what I understand, this episode is, by far, the lowest rated episode of the series (with the possible exception of 8×4) from a fan perspective (per RT/IMDB). Seems like a lot of people are really pissed that they portrayed Dany this way (I’d argue more people than were pissed about Stannis burning Shireen).

When you say “an inherent desire to conquer and rule”

So I can agree she’s driven to conquer and rule, I say I’d have to disagree with the “inherent” part, because it erases what is actually driving Dany.

Semantics, I know, but you were the one who characterized my thoughts as “inherent desire to conquer” into this even though I had simply stated “partially motivated to conquer and rule”.

Thanks again for the discussion.

I’d also like to share a couple of thoughts about who ends up on the throne (whether related to the above or not).

I’ve never wanted Jon to be on the throne at the end (at least partially because I’ve never believed he would survive the series). If Jon does end up on the throne, that will piss me off (and it’s really looking likely, isn’t it?). I’ll admit that would disappoint me and infuriate more than Dany’s turn not having a trigger or direct textual support. I didn’t sign up for an “outcast boy rises to be the Chosen King” story (but again, I fear that’s all we have left now).

I also never wanted the series to end with Dany on the throne (everything already discussed re: Dany taken into account). I admit that I want Dany to end up on the throne more NOW than any time previously in the series. Even if it would be even more OOC for her, I have imagined a scenario where she just leans into this heel turn REALLY hard and comes out next episode saying, “Aegon burned more people and you revered him and called him King. Bobbie B and Tywin sacked the city and you gave them the crown. I’m just doing what all Kings always do. Get over it.  I’m the Queen now.” Not that I think that will happen. But it would be entertaining.

twels
5 years ago

I think one of the biggest problems with this season is that it is all-payoff-all-the-time for the story arcs of the series. A heel turn that’s been telegraphed throughout the series – but not In this particular season. The end of the battle between wights and men. The death of the Lannister twins. The installation of a new ruler that will carry us out of the show. All of those are payoffs that I think will work better when one is able to view the series as a whole rather than season-by-season with months/years-long breaks in between. 

Avatar
5 years ago

@72 – Yes – I picked up on her “Kneel Before Zod!” vibe long ago.  The books and shows get jumbled in my memory so I’m not completely sure if the show had many of those moments.  Martin sure doesn’t go in for personality cults. 

Avatar
5 years ago

– I agree completely.  Turn on the nightly news (which I stopped watching) and you’ll see a parade a politicians with an insatiable thirst for power.  All them have ego’s the size of Texas connected to tiny little brains.  Most are complete sociopaths who feign empathy for the benefit of potential voters and donors.  

I think Martin was writing about right now and the past century – when those monsters got loose and killed so many millions.  

Avatar
5 years ago

@222 Seamus1603

I agree with you on throne outcomes.  A split kingdom of regions that agreed to trade and nonaggression is about the best way I can articulate how I want to end the series.

I will say for a time, I wanted Dany on the throne, mainly because her lack of children gave Martin a way to bring an end to monarchy, which is what I really want, but I realized after Yunkai that wasn’t going to happen. 

That’s another thing that makes this moment difficult, is in the books Dany is still kinda questioning whether to come to Westeros, where for Dany in the show it was relatively easy to break away from Mereen.  And then when she got here, aside from the Loot train attack, and the Tarlys execution, her “invasion” has been downright restrained, her only real target was Casterly Rock.  So while it’s perfectly legit to point out that Dany showed homicidal tendencies that could eventually grow into genocidal ones, since she’s left Mereen she has behaved in a way that says she doesn’t want to brutally conquer anyone, and maintained that stance until two weeks after she literally saves the world. 

In regards to “inherent” you are absolutely right, I put that word in your mouth, I’m sorry. 

Sunspear
5 years ago

Increasingly, I’m seeing the overall story as a pox on allyour houses theme. And I’m thinking of Song of Ice and Fire more than the TV show. Martin may be going for a rejection of all entitled claims on the Iron Throne. The human, represented by Cersei; the environmental/supernatural ice magic of the Night King; and the fire magic of Dany and her Valyrian dragons.

Next episode will likely give us a melted Iron Throne and the Seven Kingdoms going back to self-rule. Dany and her conviction of absolute right to rule has to go down in flames, just as the NK had to be destroyed. Then Westeros starts over on a smaller scale with no megalomaniacal rulers in sight.

Sansa will rule the North, whoever this new Dornish prince is will rule the South, and Jon Snow will go north of the Wall to pet his damn wolf.

Avatar
5 years ago

@216 You must be real fun during election season, because by the logic you’re expressing here, actually running for office means you shouldn’t get elected.

Have you seen who we’ve elected of late?  That’s a pretty good argument for the premise that anyone running for office may very well be unfit to serve.  Reluctant rulers are often exactly who needs to rule, especially in troubled times.  Washington had no interest in being president, but reluctantly agreed to serve out of a sense of duty to the people, not himself.  People who thirst for power are often those who wish to rule for their own sake, not for the sake of those they rule.  

Jon Snow would be a boring ruler on the iron throne, and his reign would likely be uneventful and benign. And that’s exactly what Westeros needs right now.

Avatar
Dim4e
5 years ago

Is any of you people have watched the previous seasons or did you watched some other show that blonde spoiled kid who got dragons by chance was the same person she is now. Its just like varis  just cose  she enter the fire with 3 rooks and got out with 3 dragons, she thought she was destined to rules, and when she saw that her destiny is in her head only, the spoiled arrogant kid snaped. Simple as that.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined