There are several clichés at hand to tempt any critic who learns that a book was written in six weeks. If the book is earnest, angry, and topical, we might speak of the “rush of inspiration” that “propelled” the author’s pen or made his keyboard clatter. If it’s a first novel, we may express wonder at the “sudden” and “mysterious” “flowering” of the author’s imagination. If the book is a paperback original published under a pseudonym, we might sneer at “hackwork,” or, in a more generous mood, acclaim the “workmanship” of its “journeyman” author. Alas for the reviewer who comes to Michael Moorcock’s Gloriana, or, the Unfulfill’d Queen: Although Moorcock completed the book in just over a month, none of these standard remarks applies.
Gloriana was very far from being Moorcock’s first published book; although his bibliography is notoriously byzantine, full of revisions, retitling, and pseudonyms, a little research shows that he had published over forty individual works by the time Gloriana appeared in bookshops, a year before the end of his thirties. If anything, the book’s composition was remarkable for its relative slowness: he once completed a four-volume series in two weeks. It says a great deal of his talent that many of these books, rushed and uneven as some might be, remain in print.
Moorcock conceived of Gloriana as his last fantasy novel, which it wasn’t, and as a crucial turning point in his career, which it was. Spenser’s The Faerie Queene—that great Elizabethan allegory and a favorite, like Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, of Moorcock’s childhood—provides some of the names (e.g. Una, Duessa) and many of the visuals in Gloriana. Moorcock, who once sketched new worlds in a few paragraphs and then destroyed them in a sentence, here borrows many of the tricks of epic poetry: long catalogues of exotic names, exhaustive inventories of elaborate pageantry, fantastically exaggerated settings, and characters ludicrously exemplary of Vice or Virtue.
Of course Moorcock, an anti-imperialist and anti-monarchist writing nearly four hundred years after Spenser, during the reign of a second Queen Elizabeth, had very different political and aesthetic goals. Though Gloriana’s ascension to the throne of Albion has heralded a universally proclaimed, uncritically accepted, and always capitalized Golden Age, we quickly learn that the Gold is mere gilt. Lord Montfallcon, master of realpolitik and advisor to the queen, celebrates the abolishment of capital punishment, but maintains it through assassination; he proclaims the triumph of diplomacy, but doesn’t hesitate to have visiting heads of state kidnapped for political reasons. With the assistance of the louche and ruthless Captain Quire, a self-proclaimed aesthete of crime, Montfallcon ensures that Albion continues to function and that his queen remains ignorant of the crimes committed in her name. Yet even in the palace, the truth stirs: though Montfallcon claims the dark days of Gloriana’s father have vanished forever, still a hidden community of disgraced lords and exiled ladies lingers unrecognized in the tunnels beneath the palace.
After thirteen—note the ominous number—years of peace, Albion is due for an upheaval, and would be even if Gloriana were as inhumanly regal as she presents herself. In fact, the Queen spends her nights with an endless succession of lovers, men and women, old and young, fair or freakish, sick or healthy, but cannot find physical satisfaction. Gloriana has suppressed her personality so that she might become the incarnation of the beneficent state, and this exacts a price on queen and subjects alike. “Gloriana” is an unwieldy name more befitting an allegory than a flesh-and-blood person; hundred of pages pass before anyone thinks that she might go by just “Glory.” Mortals, after all, cannot be faerie queenes.
(I should, at this point, make some reference to the controversy surrounding the book’s central sexual allegory, the “unfulfill’d” queen. Moorcock’s books are full of symbolically charged sex acts, like the transgressive incest of the Cornelius books, the central encounter of Breakfast in the Ruins, or the fascist degradation of The Vengeance of Rome, and this tendency has occasionally landed him in trouble. As such, current editions of Gloriana feature a slightly rewritten ending. Several critics told Moorcock that the original ending, in which good arises from a profoundly evil act, could be misconstrued as justifying sexual violence. Rather than denouncing the critics as scolds, the author took a second look, reflected on likely misreadings, and changed the text. The revised ending, in my view, is not just less dangerous: it is also more believable and more aesthetically satisfying.)
Readers, particularly those with advanced English degrees, who focus on Gloriana’s Spenserian elements, miss an even more fundamental influence. Think of Gloriana’s underground community of tunnel dwellers, with its attendant vision of a palace so vast and elaborate that no one knows it whole, and so old that it is built atop older versions of itself. It’s an image straight out of Mervyn Peake’s Gormenghast novels. The young Moorcock knew the elderly Peake, and throughout his fifty-year career Moorcock has championed Peake as both a great artist and a kind friend; he has written forewords to Peake’s writings, composed a memoir of their acquaintance, and even helped arrange republication of his stories. Gloriana, it should come as no surprise, is dedicated to Peake’s memory.
In his afterword to the current edition, Moorcock states that, as he wrote Gloriana, he had already begun planning the Pyat books, two thousand pages of malign fantasy and rickety self-exculpation from a serial liar who has abused his own gifts of imagination. The artful villainy of a Captain Quire, who practices crime for crime’s sake, and the anguished compromises of Lord Montfallcon seem innocent indeed when placed before the crimes—lynchings and pogroms, total war and the Holocaust—contemplated in the Pyat books, yet you cannot deny the continuity between these two stories. There is, indeed, a brief mention of a Pyat in Gloriana; he seems an unsavory character, and it’s just as well we don’t meet him. What Gloriana shows discreetly clad in Romance and safely distant in far-off Albion, the Pyat books expose completely, obscenely bare and unbearably close—in our world and in the author’s own lifetime. Many of Moorcock’s future fantasy novels, like The War Hound and the World’s Pain, would share this pained forthrightness.
Though we know Gloriana was not Moorcock’s last fantasy, it’s easy to imagine how it might have been. Though different in form, pacing, prose, and ambition from Stormbringer or the Hawkmoon books, the tale of The Unfullfill’d Queen is shot full of allusions to past books, as if he had to grant a fond goodbye to each of the many worlds he’d already fashioned. The names of the unfeeling gods of the Eternal Champion novels—Xiombarg, Arioch, and their peers—survive in Gloriana as courtly expletives, and the figures of the commedia dell’arte that so enliven the Jerry Cornelius stories make an appearance, too. Though Moorcock admits that his first surviving novel embarrasses him today, Gloriana ends with the queen boarding the Golden Barge that gave that book its name. Perhaps, in looking back on his career thus far, Moorcock decided that life and art yet remained in it. Gloriana marked a change, but not an ending—and for that all fantasy readers should be grateful.
Matt Keeley reads too much and watches too many movies; he is helped in the former by his day job in the publishing industry. You can find him on Twitter at @mattkeeley.
I am happy to hear that he rewrote the ending. When I read _Gloriana_, shortly after it came out, I was offended beyond belief by the idea that “all she needed was to be raped by a sleaze” – especially after what had been, up to then, one of Moorcock’s finest “comedies.”
I will look up a more recent edition!
FWIW, Moorcock wrote all of The History of the Runestaff (4 books) in 3 days. http://www.multiverse.org/index.php?title=The_History_of_the_Runestaff#Mike_Says
I’m not sure why but I’ve never been particularly fond of this one: I preferred The War Hound and World’s Pain from a couple of years later.
@2: I think it was, as per this article and the third quote, three days for each book.
@3. That makes more sense (though I thought he said as much in the foreword to the White Wolf edition of Hawkmoon). Even in a fit of mania, I coudn’t do that, and I type as fast as I think. Sometimes faster. When I actually care about what I’m writing, I can do 2k an hour.
I too enjoyed The War Hound and the World’s Pain. The von Bek books are surprising, for they generally have little fantasy, but are so intriguing. War Hound has an amazing first chapter about German history. When I read it, I was like, “did I just read several pages about the Thirty Years’ War without losing interest for a second?”
This is one of his that I haven’t quite gotten around to; I should move it further up on my queue. I didn’t realize it was written when he was so young, relatively speaking.
I did read all four of the Pyat books back in 1993 or so — I was in grad school at UW-Madison and the main campus library had all four books (at least two of which I think had only been published in the UK at that point). They were … compelling but unpleasant. Or unpleasant but compelling. And my first real exposure to Moorcock operating outside of sword & sorcery or Jerry Cornelius mode.
I was disappointed to read that Michael Moorcock engaged in self-censorship. (Was this the only instance?) The first thing that sprang to my mind was Shostakovich’s groveling response to Stalin’s attack on his work, “A Soviet artist’s response to justified criticism”.
When Harlan Ellison was similarly attacked for “A Boy and His Dog”, at least he had the artistic integrity to put his groveling apology in a sequel!
Obviously, good things come from bad things every day; and books for grown-ups should reflect that.
Taras, seriously? It sounds like you haven’t read Moorcock. If you had, you might have realized that the bit he changed is far from the worst or most explicit thing in his work, and concluded that he wasn’t “self-censoring,” but instead “fixing something that didn’t work.” In fact, good things coming from bad things is a recurrent theme in his books, even the ones that aren’t (just) for adults, and the problem here is simply that this instance doesn’t work.
Or, I don’t know, maybe you think it’s “self-censorship” to learn and change.
Great article! I loved this book and its vision. The palace is a character in its own right. Cynical and epic :)
This is a very useful article on a challenging novel. I have just read an old edition. I’m glad Moorcock changed the ending. I don’t think the “unfulfilled queen” subtitle is particularly meaningful in terms of the novel – indeed it is the main aspect which dates it as a 70s piece. I was never a particular fan of the Elric stuff, and found Cornelius tedious and Pyat too nasty to be worth the effort. However “Mother London” and “King of the City” are fantastic novels. For me, “Gloriana” is a step on the way towards those books. Does anyone have recommendations of other Moorcock work which is on the level of those books?
@9. You might like The War Hound and the World’s Pain and The City in the Autumn Stars. They’re part of the von Bek series, and are possibly some of my favorite Moorcock novels.
Likewise, The Whispering Swarm is an interesting pseudoautobiography. Combined with the Maurice Lescoq (an author surrogate) prologue in The English Assassin (and his quotes throughout) make you really appreciate the humanity of Michael Moorcock.
Thanks aethercowboy, I will read them