Skip to content

How 1998’s Lost in Space Prepared Me for Hollywood’s Reboot Obsession

10
Share

How 1998’s Lost in Space Prepared Me for Hollywood’s Reboot Obsession

Home / How 1998’s Lost in Space Prepared Me for Hollywood’s Reboot Obsession
Movies & TV movies

How 1998’s Lost in Space Prepared Me for Hollywood’s Reboot Obsession

By

Published on December 1, 2017

10
Share
Lost in Space movie, 1998

Before you say anything—yes, I have watched the original Lost in Space television show. Yes, it is kinda weird because I was born decades after its premiere. Yes, I did enjoy it. Yes, I am obsessed with stories featuring kids who have friendships with robots, and queer codified villains. I also learned that John Williams had written the theme song, which was a very high recommendation in my kid playbook.

The 1998 reboot came along and also swept me off my feet for a brief period of time. (I was very young, shh.) But looking back on the film now—awkward as it was—it’s strange to realize how much I learned from it.

It’s important to note that Lost in Space was far from the first reboot the world had ever seen, but rather part of a quickly growing trend. That year it lost the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Remake or Sequel to a never-before-or-since-seen three way tie between Godzilla, the shot-for-shot remake of Psycho, and The Avengers. (The spies, not the superhero team. I watched that 1960s show, too, as a kid. I was weird.) Reboots and revivals have always been a thing, but the late 90s were absolutely filthy with them, in addition to a specific kind of pop sci-fi film—movies that were typically colorful and grungy, by turns both camp and incredibly grim.

Lost in Space movie, 1998
Don’t you just wanna squish him?

Many of these remakes and reboots heralded our new status quo, one which sees practically every blockbuster contender today as a reimagining or furthering of some familiar story that audiences once adored. The late 90s were the frontline of that soon-to-be all-encompassing MO, taking beloved properties of the 60s and dressing them up for modern Americans who wanted a bit more sex’n’explosions in their media. It was trashy, but also fun? And Lost in Space was a perfect sampling from that period. A textbook example, if you will.

Here is a film chock full of goodies for fans of the original. There were cameos by all of the original ladies in the Robinson family—June Lockhart, Angela Cartwright, and Marta Kristen—plus Mark Goddard, the original Major West. (Of course, there was the big missing cameo from Bill Mumy, who obviously should have played older Will Robinson, but was denied the role because the studio thought playing an older version of the character he originated would be “confusing.” Somehow. J.J. Abrams would later prove this utterly wrong when Leonard Nimoy showed up in 2009’s Star Trek.) Penelope’s old pet Debbie—now called Blarp—is given a brand new CGI treatment, the Robot is rebuilt into its signature look by Will, and the Jupiter 2’s original design is glimpsed as the launching ship that gets the updated Jupiter 2 into space. They’re fun bits that don’t overplay their hand or rely too much on the previous incarnation.

Lost in Space movie, 1998
At least we all know what hippie Jared Harris would look like now? That was a thing we needed, right?

While it’s full to the brim with action and bankable stars, Lost In Space is still not a good movie, but that is not entirely on its own head. Commentary tracks from its Blu Ray make clear that the film was grossly rushed and underfunded, making sense of the unfinished-looking special effects and the rough pacing. If the studio planned to make sequels—and the end of the film makes it clear that they were hoping for one—they had a funny way of showing it, cutting it off at the knees for vital resources. It seems to be a mistake that engendered some form of lesson, given the sky high budgets that blockbusters get these days. The film also suffers from certain 90s faux pas that date it in the most hilarious fashion… particularly the fully articulated rubbery body suits that the Jupiter 2 crew are meant to wear in cryosleep. They give Batman & Robin a run for their money, which should be impossible.

And even with all of that hindering it, there are plenty of ideas in this reimagining that are quite clever. The majority of the casting is sharp; William Hurt and Mimi Rodgers are perfect anchors as the Robinson family patriarch and matriarch. Gary Oldman is a dream as the conniving Doctor Smith, equal parts shifty exasperation and the nastiest sarcasm. In the most important get of the film, the Robot is voiced by his originator, Dick Tufeld, who sounds as though he never took a break from the part. Messing about with time travel is an interesting tack to take in a film about being lost out there in the universe, and though the execution falters, its oddness in such a seemingly straightforward tale is appealing.

Lost in Space movie, 1998
Can I have one of these?

The decision to make the Robinson family a less jovial unit only works to its advantage. (The previous iteration might as well have been marketed as “The Brady Bunch in Space” for all the tension between them.) Making a point of giving Will and Penny some pre-teen and teen angst is an excellent touch, particularly where Penny’s video diary chronicling her journey as a “daring space captive” is concerned; their lives are actually affected by this journey, and they don’t gloss over the fact that the change is not an easy one. And there are many more points where the film enjoys its premise and fiddles with its factory settings, as it were; before Will reprograms Robot to behave more as he did in the television show, the kid pilots it remotely to help his family explore a ship from the future—there’s nothing quite so hilarious as hearing Will’s lines issued in the Robot’s voice: “Mom says try it now!”

And then there are certain aspects of this film that are unforgivable, particularly when juxtaposed with its odd twinkles of promise. (As I said, it is a bad movie. Fun, but also bad.) The dialogue is trite, and often downright offensive in its badness. It gets particularly egregious where Matt LeBlanc’s Major West is concerned; he and his army pal utter lines like “This cold war just got hot!” and “Last one to kill a bad guy buys the beer,” and the film is clearly desperate to give West that Han Solo devil-may-care sheen, but it only ever makes him come off like a jerk. Such a jerk. He’s completely insufferable, it hurts. And if you’re not a fan of Friends—which I never was growing up—there’s no reason to enjoy him in the film at all. William Hurt gives a few of the worst line readings of his career here, and he’s a guy who usually knows what he’s doing in front of a camera.

Lost in Space movie, 1998
“This was a career mistake, wasn’t it?”

The plot is unnecessarily convoluted all because Will-from-the-future has to make it clear to Papa Robinson that he should tell his kids his loves them more often. That’s it. That’s the summation of the entire theme of the film, the reason for almost collapsing the universe with time travel shenanigans. It’s too simple a theme to create so much strife when the Robinson family seems relatively normal in their hiccups. In addition, the romantic subplot between Judy Robinson (played with careful blandness by Heather Graham) and Major West is gag-worthy for all the reasons mentioned above.

And then there’s the fact that Doctor Smith gets transformed by space spiders into a giant monster spider person who plans to birth a master race of more space spiders in the past via the time machine built by future-Will.

Yeah, you could say they bit off a little more than they could chew.

Lost in Space movie, 1998
Every child needs to watch an adult in their life turn into a hybrid spider monster. For character building.

It’s too bad because this film could have revived such a funny little patch of sci-fi history. If they had leaned a little harder on the dynamic between Will and Doctor Smith (who drove the show entirely back in the day), there would have been enough intrigue and comedy to keep audiences smiling. A little more funding and the movie could have been gorgeous. A little extra time on the script and some of those hideous one-liners could have been retracted, and the sci-fi elements of the plot rendered more lovingly.

This movie had an unexpected number of positives working in its favor, but at the end of the day, it was clear that it didn’t have any real zeal behind its reconstruction. No one loved it enough to give it a fair chance at life. It was a perfect harbinger of where Hollywood was headed in the long-term, with equal examples of what should and should never be done, especially with reboots and reconstructions of old favorites. Having seen it at a tender age, I was duly prepared for what the future of film was going to look like. And just like then, I am well aware of how ridiculous it all can be… and I love it just the same.

This article was originally published in March 2017.

Emmet Asher-Perrin is going to listen to that wild theme song remix from the credits now. No, but she actually likes that part. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ChristopherLBennett
7 years ago

The only thing that really worked about this movie, aside from some of the production design, was Lacey Chabert. She was incredibly charismatic and stole every scene she was in, even though her chipmunk voice at the time could be annoying.

Otherwise, it was a mess. They should’ve abandoned the whole time-travel element once they failed to get Mumy on board as older Will. It makes no sense to do a movie called Lost in Space and make it about being lost in time; they should’ve saved that for the sequel. The plot of the movie plays out more or less like the first 3 episodes of the TV series, and if they’d stuck more to that, it would’ve worked better. The original series started out as a fairly straight family drama about the struggle to survive in the harshness of space — it was literally a sci-fi pastiche of The Swiss Family Robinson — and there could’ve been plenty of story there without bringing incoherent time-travel weirdness into it.

I really disliked it that they made the family so dysfunctional. It’s a cliche to think that the only way to make characters interesting is to make them total jerks who are too emotionally stupid to get along. The family bond among the Robinsons was the greatest strength of early LiS, before it degenerated into The Dr. Smith Comedy Hour. There’s nothing wrong with adding legitimate conflict, but it’s the laziest form of writing to generate gratuitous conflict by making characters immature and dysfunctional. Good conflict arises for good reasons, and it’s more potent when it’s among characters who like and respect each other. For instance, one of the best conflicts in the original LiS was in “Welcome Stranger,” when the Robinsons had a chance to send Will and Penny home with a friendly astronaut, and John and Maureen had to wrestle with the painful choice between keeping the family together and sending the children to safety. That was a good conflict because it came from love and because there was no easy way to resolve it. And because you actually liked both characters and sympathized with both sides. In the movie, there was nobody to like, except Penny.

Avatar
LordVorless
7 years ago

I believe it was the director of Lost in Space that thought casting Bill Mumy would be a distraction, perhaps as a bit of stunt-casting.  I can’t say he would have been wrong.   I believe Jonathan Harris also wanted to return, but refused to take a walk-on part, so he was also excluded.

But man, that stillframe of Lacey Chabert?   How times have changed.

Avatar
7 years ago

As I recall, this movie prepared me for Hollywood’s reboot obsession by setting the bar really, really, really low.

I do remember at least one cool bit — when they throw the ship into hyperspace as it’s skimming the sun, and when they reemerge there are streamers of solar plasma that were dragged along with them.

Avatar
Lux
7 years ago

Needed carrot people.

ChristopherLBennett
7 years ago

@2/LordVorless: What I heard at the time was that the script had been written for Mumy (there’s no other sane reason to throw in that “future Will Robinson” angle) but he couldn’t get out of his commitments to Babylon 5, in which he played the recurring character of Lennier. But perhaps that’s been debunked in the years since.

As for Harris, you’re right. His ego wouldn’t let him settle for a cameo; he wanted to play Smith or nothing.

Avatar
LordVorless
7 years ago

5, Well, if nobody had heard the ballad of Will Robinson, I’d be surprised, but it isn’t like JMS couldn’t have written around Lennier’s disappearance.  

Avatar
7 years ago

The first half of the film was an excellent pilot episode for a revamped series, the second half an ungodly mess.  Had they adapted the original multi-episode initial story arc — the encounter with an alien derelict, the odyssey across their new home island in the sky with its weird life forms, mysterious ancient cities  and massive sudden climactic shifts — it might have been something quite fine, instead of a second exercise in blown potential.

Avatar
7 years ago
Avatar
7 years ago

It wasn’t bad, per se, but it was poorly paced with a first half that dragged and a closing act that felt like it was from a different franchise entirely. Most of those failed reboots suffered from the same old problems; an origin story nobody asked for, a mishmash of ingredients, “twisting” an aspect of it in a distasteful way to match either a production team member’s personal fanon (I call that Moffat-Chibnall syndrome) or importing from a script written for a different project, or saving the goodies for the second movie. That was the one trotted out multiple times during the Godzilla ’98 reboot, that they were saving the other Kaiju for the sequel; so everyone went “ah screw it, we’ll wait and catch the sequel” which meant there wasn’t one. The 2014 reboot had importing the director’s script for Monsters 2 onto a Godzilla Kaiju bash movie.

Avatar
Eduardo Jencarelli
7 years ago

@5: Well, Lost in Space was presumably filmed in 1997, and I don’t believe Mumy was that busy with Babylon 5 either. Season 5 took a while to come together due to complicated contract negotiations involving Straczynski and the WB. And even after it took off, season 5 wasn’t exactly a Lennier-heavy year. He was only in a handful of episodes, in a peripheral role as a Ranger. Nor was season 4, aside from some Minbar-heavy episodes early that year.

And TV commitments didn’t really keep Lacey Chabert or Matt LeBlanc from participating in the film. Granted, LeBlanc only filmed Friends on a single day each week (not counting script rehearsals), but Chabert was filming Party of Five, with a much more intensive schedule (which also had to account for child actor labor limitations). More likely, they shot the film during hiatus. Lennier would have had plenty of time for anything, even a cameo.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined