Welcome back to the Lovecraft reread, in which two modern Mythos writers get girl cooties all over old Howard’s original stories.
Today we’re looking at “The Curse of Yig,” a collaboration between Lovecraft and Zealia Bishop written in 1928, and first published in the November 1929 issue of Weird Tales. You can read it here.
Spoilers ahead!
“Audrey sat up in bed and watched the flare of the match grow into the steady glow of the lantern. Then, as their eyes began to take in the whole of the room, the crude rafters shook with the frenzy of their simultaneous shriek. For the flat, rocky floor, revealed in the new-born illumination, was one seething, brown-speckled mass of wriggling rattlesnakes, slithering toward the fire, and even now turning their loathsome heads to menace the fright-blasted lantern-bearer.”
Summary: Our ethnologist narrator travels to Oklahoma for evidence to back his theory that the benign snake-god Quetzalcoatl had a darker prototype. Yig, half-human father of serpents, is supposed to be well-disposed toward those who respect his children, venomously vindictive toward those who harm them. In autumn, when he grows ravenous, the Pawnee and Wichita and Caddo perform rites to drive him off, beating tom-toms for weeks on end.
Few will speak of Yig. Those who do direct our narrator to an asylum in Guthrie. There Dr. McNeill can show him a certain “very terrible relic.” There’s nothing supernatural about it, McNeill claims, only proof of the power belief exercises on susceptible minds. Even so, the thing makes him shiver at times.
He leads narrator to an isolated basement cell and lets him peer in through an observation panel. The dim-lit, malodorous den houses a roughly humaniform creature with flattened head, squamous and speckled hide, and beady black eyes. It wriggles belly-down. It hisses. It stares. Narrator reels and is guided away. Back in his private office, McNeill relates the history of the squirming horror.
In 1889, Walker and Audrey Davis left Arkansas to stake a claim in Oklahoma. Along with all his household goods and his ancient dog Wolf, Walker brought along a pathological dread of snakes. During their journey west, he tries to avoid ophidian encounters, but one evening Audrey finds a nest of four baby rattlesnakes near their camp. She bludgeons them to death. Coming up before she can hide the corpses, Walker’s horrified. He’s been listening with morbid fascination to tales of Yig; now he upbraids Audrey for killing the god’s children. Doesn’t she know Yig will exact vengeance by turning her into a spotted snake?
Walker keeps up his dire prophesizing the rest of the trip. They claim land and build their cabin on a convenient slab of stone. A new neighbor tells Audrey about a man bitten by so many rattlers that his body swelled to the point of popping. Audrey doesn’t repeat the anecdote to Walker. Bad enough he visits the nearby Wichita village, trading whiskey for charms to ward off the god’s wrath.
The dangerous time of corn harvest arrives hot, and the Wichita start in on the tom-toms. Dust and the weird rhythms prey on the settlers’ nerves, but they still celebrate their harvest. On Hallowe’en, the party’s at the Davis homestead. Much merry-making and dancing make Walker and Audrey sleep soundly afterwards, while old Wolf slumbers by the hearth on which the first fire of the year smolders – the unseasonably hot weather has suddenly turned cold.
Audrey wakes from nightmares of Yig. Already sitting up, Walker calls her attention to a strange buzzing and rustling. He lights a lantern and gets out of bed to investigate, and they see a horde of rattlers slithering across the stone floor toward the warm hearth!
Walker faints. The lantern goes out. In the dark Audrey cringes under blankets, sure the snakes have killed Walker and will now twine up the bedposts after her, bringing Yig’s revenge. The wait stretches on and on. When the distant tom-toms hush, she’s not relieved. A worse sound assaults her ears: the pop of splitting skin–just like in the neighbor’s story–followed by a poisoned stench. Audrey screams and screams.
Things get worse still. Against the star-lit square of window, she sees the silhouette of a gigantic head and shoulders. Yig has come! Mad with terror, Audrey grabs an ax and attacks the looming shadow.
The next morning a neighbor finds old Wolf dead on the hearth, his corpse burst from snake venom. Walker lies dead by the bed, free of snake bite, but hacked to death by an ax. And Audrey writhes flat on her belly, a “mute mad caricature.” Except she does hiss. And hiss. And hiss.
McNeill concludes the story while he and our narrator fortify themselves with nips from the doctor’s flask. He says Audrey was brought to the asylum, and was occasionally lucid enough to tell her tale. Then the lucid spells ceased, her hair fell out, her skin turned splotchy. When she died –
Wait, narrator says. She died? Then what was that in the cell?
That, McNeill says, is what was born to her nine months later, one of four offspring. It was the only “child” to survive.
What’s Cyclopean: Save for a single “squamous,” this story is remarkably free of Lovecraft’s adjectival fingerprints.
The Degenerate Dutch: Some mildly patronizing discussion of Indian customs, all fairly unhysterical and typical of the time. Notably Audrey’s mixed ancestry is mentioned without censure.
Mythos Making: Yig shows up in other Lovecraft-Bishop collaborations and is occasionally integrated into the pantheon elsewhere as well.
Libronomicon: This has to be good for an article in an ethnology journal, right?
Madness Takes Its Toll: Apparently being part snake-god is enough to get you stuck in an asylum. Yay ’20s psychology.
Anne’s Commentary
As far as I can make out, it’s unclear whether Lovecraft ghost-wrote “Yig” from Bishop’s idea and notes, or whether she took a more collaborative part in the writing itself. What’s certain (unless memory fails me) is that this is the only Lovecraft story in which a woman is a prominent point-of-view character. Her sister in the Mythos, as we’ll see, is Lavinia Whateley, but poor Lavinia gets no personal say in her story, whereas Audrey’s ordeal in the rattlesnake-invaded cabin is vividly rendered, down to her imagined sensation of things creeping among the blankets and her auditory torture via tom-toms and ticking alarm clock.
Prior to this rereading, I’d forgotten that Walker didn’t succumb to rattlesnake bites, that presumably the window-silhouetted shoulders and head Audrey saw were his, not Yig’s. I had the lingering impression that Yig really does make an appearance, rearing up outside the window before entering to do unspeakable things. Partial explanation: I want Yig to show up. One thing that always annoys me is when a good supernatural set-up is ruined by a natural explanation, a la Dr. McNeill’s lame “Oh, it was all in her head. Including her own somatic changes and what came out of her womb.”
So, yeah, my imagination went to a true manifestation of the god, and I bet my imagination has had lots of company over the years. Audrey killed four of Yig’s children, so she had to bear four of his children. And in order for her to do that, Yig had to impregnate her. No way Lovecraft was going to write a sex scene, be it rape or dubious consent or hell-yeah-let’s-go. Even in his most sexually fraught story, “The Thing on the Doorstep,” much may be implied (fairly distantly), little owned up to. In “Shadow Over Innsmouth,” for example, we hear that the Deep Ones hanker to “mix” with the townspeople, and that certain houses are obliged in the end to “entertain guests.” We all know what “entertaining guests” means.
Here Dr. McNeill does the Lovecraft shuffle for him. We can’t know whether Audrey ever told him all that happened that Hallowe’en night, or, if she did, whether he isn’t holding some back from narrator. I think he’s either heard more (and doesn’t want to state it), or he’s inferred more. Either way, he implies terrible, terrible things in that last revelation of his. It’s not Audrey in the basement cell. It’s her child, born three-quarters of a year after her ordeal. Three-quarters of a year is a sly, rather equivocating way of saying nine months, isn’t it? I’d say the good doctor is giving narrator a wink-wink-nudge-nudge by obliquely talking gestational period.
It’s possible that Audrey was already pregnant before Hallowe’en night, but sly as the doctor, Lovecraft may be steering us away from that solution by going on at interesting length about how vigorously the Davises danced at their party. Not that Audrey would have known she was pregnant yet, with nine full months to go. Not that she would necessarily have thought herself incapable of “great feats of saltatory grotesqueness” if she had known. Audrey was no hothouse flower. Nevertheless, there’s that little hint that she was “unencumbered” at the start of the night.
Another subtle hint – the number of children born. Quadruplets are rare in humans. And what a coincidence that four baby rattlers died, and four human-rattler hybrids replaced them. And the doctor is even sly or shy about saying “four.” He says “that” was born to Audrey, and there were three more of them. We can do the math.
Anyhow, I put “Yig” in the viscerally frightening sub-genre of obstetrical horror. “The Dunwich Horror” also has an obstetrical horror at its heart, and a sexual abnormality worse than the run-of-the-mill incests of the degraded town. I mean, Lavinia Whateley “entertains” Yog-Sothoth one way or another (tentacle porn, or congeries porn, even kinkier!) Then she has his twins after one hell of a labor from the screaming involved. And who can wonder, given Wilbur’s saurian hindquarters and the still greater Outer Godliness of his brother.
Ick, shudder. “Yig” (and “Dunwich”) can join the ranks of Rosemary’s Baby and It’s Alive and the dream maggot-birth in The Fly remake. Throw in the pseudo-pregnancies and shocking labors of Alien et alia. Not that Lovecraft would want to match any of those for graphicness. And I think it might have dropped his prominent jaw to his toes to read the most horrific of all obstetrical horrors, the Caesarean-by-vampire-teeth delivery in Breaking Dawn. I mean, whoa. I was forced to watch the movie just to see how they’d DO that on screen.
Mostly by implication, actually. Whew.
Ruthanna’s Commentary
Snakes. Why does it always have to be snakes?
In a universe of cosmic horror, where vast abysses team with incomprehensible life forms and mindless gods rule amid primal fires and monotonous flutes… why fall back on the simplicity of a relatively common human phobia?
There’s some controversy about whether fear of snakes may be partly instinctive—whether humans have a predisposition to it, so that an early bad experience with snakes will set off a phobia where an early bad experience with hedgehogs might not. If that’s the case, I’m not one of the people who hit that trigger. But we owned a boa constrictor for a while; when a whole wall of your living room is taken up by snake habitat, you learn just how common that phobia really is. So any story about snakes being freaky is sure of a large and sympathetic audience. But it seems rather unimaginative for a guy who came up with Cthulhu, or for a woman who only a year later would collaborate with Lovecraft on the over-the-top (under the top?) multi-layered horror of “The Mound.”
This story shares its Oklahoma setting with the frame story for “The Mound,” as well as an Indian ethnology narrator. Also like that story, the narrator reports from a considerable remove—he interviews a doctor who learned about the events after they took place. And like that story, I seriously side-eye the claims about how it was written. Every summary I’ve seen of the Lovecraft-Bishop collaborations reports that Howard basically ghost-wrote the stories from the roughest of outlines. Yet where his collaborations with Hazel Heald feel like his, and are full of references to the rest of the Mythos and enough Cyclopeans that it almost had to be intended as an in-joke, the Bishop stories feel distinctly different.
The racism in Yig is understated, completely non-visceral, and very much a product of the typical assumptions of 20s anthropology. After gritting my teeth through the New York stories, I can’t work up much shock over a couple of references to “big medicine,” especially not when placed alongside repeated reminders that hey, white people are just as superstitious and primitive in their own way. “Mound” gets a lot nastier, but the feel is still more academic than most of Lovecraft’s terror of the Other.
The language is pretty obviously not Lovecraft on one of his hyperactively adjectival days, but it’s also not even much like Lovecraft’s more constrained stories. Joshi likes to emphasize Howard’s stated intention to choose precisely the right word for each desired image and effect. I like to emphasize that while this may have been his intention, he was also utterly impervious to concerns about repetition, or about whether his audience might have a convenient dictionary sitting beside their copies of Weird Tales. It gives his language an impression that wavers between Shakespeare and found folk art, and there’s nothing else like it in American literature. The language in “Yig” isn’t much like either of his extremes, no matter how I squint.
In spite of my eye-rolling at the pedestrian fear at its center, I actually do like this story. The bit with Audrey lying in bed, sure of her husband’s death, is genuinely creepy, ranging all the way to terrifying if I imagine myself in that position. Unlike most things Lovecraft assumes will invoke instinctive terror, “my loved ones are hurt and there’s nothing I can do and I can’t see” probably manages the trick.
On the flip side of the story, Yig’s motivation is itself pretty sympathetic, even if not intended so. You hurt my children, I hurt you. Most people can probably get behind that, but the story tries to make something incomprehensible out of it.
Speaking of taking care of one’s children—poor baby snake thing, stuck in a tiny cell since birth for the crime of looking all snakey. Yig takes revenge on those who kill his kids, but apparently doesn’t pay much attention if they get locked up for life. Woe to whatever idiot tries to give that baby a “merciful release.” They’d do far better to let it out so it can crawl back to Daddy. Or find someone who likes boa constrictors to take it in and give it a proper, if belated, snake-godlet childhood.
Next week (and clearly not, as previously suggested in hideous whispered rumor, this week), we explore the terrifying nexus of old houses and cosmic chasms in “Dreams in the Witch House.”
Ruthanna Emrys’s neo-Lovecraftian novelette “The Litany of Earth” is available on Tor.com, along with the more recent but distinctly non-Lovecraftian “Seven Commentaries on an Imperfect Land and “The Deepest Rift.” Her work has also appeared at Strange Horizons and Analog. She can frequently be found online on Twitter and Livejournal. She lives in a large, chaotic household—mostly mammalian—outside Washington DC.
Anne M. Pillsworth’s short story “Geldman’s Pharmacy” received honorable mention in The Year’s Best Fantasy and Horror, Thirteenth Annual Collection. “The Madonna of the Abattoir” is published on Tor.com, and her first novel, Summoned, is available from Tor Teen. She currently lives in a Victorian trolley car suburb of Providence, Rhode Island.
“The Curse of Yig” is an effective horror story, easily the best Bishop revision even if, like me, you don’t have a phobia of slithering venomous reptiles.
Weird Tales: first in November 1929, alongside Clark Ashton Smith’s “The Nightmare Tarn”, the second part of Robert E. Howard’s “Skull-Face” and August Derleth’s “Scarlatti’s Bottle”. After an April 1931 reprint in Switch on the Light, it was the reprint for April 1939, which featured C. L. Moore’s last Jirel story “Hellsgarde”, Robert Bloch’s “The Red Swimmer”, Henry Kuttner’s “Hydra”, the final part of Manly Wade Wellman’s “Fearful Rock” and Lovecraft’s “The Evil Clergyman”.
Who Wrote What?: Lovecraft’s claims were recorded in a pair of letters:
To Clark Ashton Smith: http://www.eldritchdark.com/writings/correspondence/122/from-h.-p.-lovecraft-to-clark-ashton-smith-(1929-10-05)
and to August Derleth: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Wk5ixOCy4eMC&pg=PA26#v=onepage&q&f=false
There isn’t much information on Bishop out there: but I found reference to a couple of her essays concerning local history: http://www.kchistory.org/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/Local&CISOPTR=10970&CISOBOX=1&REC=1 and http://www.kchistory.org/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/Local&CISOPTR=13739&CISOBOX=1&REC=2
It is a decent little horror story of its era, and could even be updated into a pretty decent modern story. But it really doesn’t feel like Lovecraft at all. We should remember that Bishop was a much-published writer in her own regard, just not within this genre. It may be that she had a reasonably well fleshed out tale here (unlike with “The Mound”) and Howard just filled in some of the more graphic bits. I don’t know.
Like Anne, I thought Yig played a more active role in this story than he did. Maybe he does play a greater role in other post-HPL stories? Perhaps he had possessed Walker and impregnated Audrey before she took her axe and did him in. I’m not quite sure how the doctor got his tale out of Audrey if she was reduced to crawling and hissing by the very next morning. Who knows how much he edited it for unnamed narrator’s consumption. (Fun fact: rattlesnakes are ovoviviparous, meaning they give birth to live young.)
Tor web people: my comment @1 has been eaten because it contains links. It was not spam. Please restore it.
Anyway, self-published ebook covers are the best, aren’t they? “Ah, just put some kind of snake on it, no one will notice…”
@3 – Done. Our spam filter gets a bit over-excited when a post has several links in it!
@@.-@: Thankyou.
ETA: I just saw one of these coiled around a rock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grass_snake
ETA: The HPLHS are looking for several non-fantastic pulp stories by Bishop which Lovecraft may have worked on. Details here: http://www.pulpfest.com/tag/zealia-bishop/. They are also going to publish related correspondence.
There’s also Georgina Clarendon in “The Last Test,” though she’s not exactly POV (the story is in third-person).
I haven’t read “The Last Test” yet. Significantly, another collaboration rather than pure HPL. Though also third person through the Audrey section, the POV does shift deep into her mind in critical moments. Effective, but sloppy, since this is supposed to be Dr. McNeill telling the story framed by ethnologist narrator’s first person. Whatever Audrey might have whimpered out, post-hospitalization, I’m not convinced it would have been in such fine sensory detail.
Snakes! Venomous snakes! I love them, from a safe distance. Give me a king cobra and a black mamba and, oh, an eastern diamondback whom Yig had instructed not to bite me, their foster mom, and I’d be happy. Maybe Yig could teach me Parseltongue, too!
The overall structure and themes seem very much HPL. But, for both better and worse, definitely doesn’t read as if it was “well-nigh a piece of original composition” on HPL’s part. Less racism, fewer weird bibliographic references, more and more plausible mundane details, a dynamic female character – but also the odd phrase such as: “It was with the scent of a hound on the trail that…” (Alas, my best parse of that one is that the narrator smells of over-excited dog.)
There is no “obstetrical horror” page on TV Tropes. There should be. Waah.
Walker must’ve been really desperate for land, to settle in Oklahoma despite being terrified of snakes. I’m terrified of tornadoes, and have no intent of living in that part of the country.
Now I’m thinking nostalgically of the museum volunteer job where I got to show people the gentlest of corn snakes. Their shed skins were prismatic when viewed against light, and their bodies sometimes glinted iridescently. I heart snakes.
“”Entertaining guests””?
Wouldn’t any self-respecting Deep One have done it by inviting prominent comedians and comediens to tell stories? Or maybe get some buskers in?
The world does need more Mythosian stand-up comedians; I suspect that with the existing trade in Lovecraftian filk, buskers would not be hard to come by.
For a while one of my friends had a vet who was very good at de-venoming operations, and thus had a cobra and a rattlesnake. The cobra was sweet; the rattlesnake was fond of pointing out that, yes, freezing when you hear that sound is a gut-deep instinct even if you like snakes and know he’s in a cage.
Our hosts have noted more complexity and merit in “The Curse of Yig” than I noticed in my own read. In Lovecraft’s other stories, degenerate Northeasterners, Dutch, blacks, Yazidis, and all sorts of other “foreigners” are disparaged. Here, North American Indians come in for the primary share of disrespect–being called “redskins” by the ethnologist (!) narrator, conducting “orgies,” incessantly beating “ghastly” and “hellish” “tom-toms,” and when plied with whiskey, revealing their religious secrets to those who hold them in contempt as “fanciful inventions.”
“Yig” as a North American avatar of the Mesoamerican god Quetzalcoatl seems to be invented, having little in common with the “real” deity except for association with serpents. Outside of the interesting correspondence between the number of Yig’s offspring destroyed and the number of hybrids born to Audrey via Yig’s vengeance, the story reads as if dashed off with little research and thought applied. I am unable to find any backing for the idea that a human (or dog’s) whole body can burst open when bitten by enough rattlesnakes–that really smells of “rural legend.” Furthermore, it’s remarkable how much the story’s quaint dialect of homesteaders from the Arkansas Ozarks sounds like that of HPL’s New England rustics.
That said, I’m surprised that Lovecraft didn’t make more use of Mesoamerican deities in his horror stories. Aztec images of the bloodthirsty Huitzilopochtli and his cohorts are at least as horrific as Cthulhu–as are the massive human sacrifices made to them–and are ethnologically “genuine.” Yet if I recall correctly, the 1919 “Transition of Juan Romero” is HPL’s onlyother work based on this pantheon.
What about Poetry and the Gods and Man of Stone, both also collaborations with women writers?
My theory is that less-racist-than-usual thing can be related with the the fact racism here is directed towards Indians – the intensity and form of Lovecraft’s racism, after all, varied depending on what particular race or nationality was the target of it. I don’t remember him being particularly vicious, I mean, Lovecraft-style vicious, to Indians in his letters, unlike he was to Jewish or Italian people, for example. It’s usually just offhanded mentions of white people’s – often genocidal – interactions with them when he is writing about the history of New England. So maybe here his attitude just was less obsessive and coincided with more traditional racism of his days? He seems not to have seen many Indians in his life, it may be the reason why he didn’t care much for them either way.
I’m guessing, somewhat baselessly, that Lovecraft and his ilk felt less personally threatened by the dwindling and seemingly ‘defeated’ Native Americans than by the “foreigners” (including “mongrels,” and blacks who may have long North American ancestries) newly arriving and thriving in their own cities. In his work, as far as I’ve seen, Native Americans know about ancient malevolences of which a wise person would beware, and occasionally cast their own curses in the past. New races, with strong gods and strange rites, are invading the enclaves of the elite and who knows what ruin they may bring. *massive eyeroll*
It may be easier to read than the more noxiously bigoted writings, but I don’t know that it reflects a greater sympathy (though it might) or recognition of shared humanity.
As for the question of authorship – hmm. In her memoirs Bishop wrote that Lovecraft always made her feel like she was a bad writer, because anytime she sent him text for revision he revised everything. I think that if it’s true (and mind you, her memoires are full of doubtful claims like that HPL spoke Arabic, so she may be exaggerating here), it’s not very likely she contributed too much to their stories even if they weren’t 100% ghostwritten (though if it’s true, then it means that crapload of domestic stories he revised for her are written mostly by Lovecraft too? Oh, the possibilities.) And indeed, at least The Mound doesn’t strike me as not entirely Lovecraftian at all – I’m yet to reread the other two in English. Of course, such things as outline and characters are important too, so I guess it’s not fair to treat those stories as “99% Lovecraft’s” anyway. Curiously, my opinion on Heald collaborations is different – I think she may have contributed more significantly at least to The Man of Stone and The Horror in the Burying-Ground.
If you want some “suppressing woman writing” from Lovecraft… I noticed that many of his best and most characteristic revision works are those written with/for women (Bishop, Heald and maybe Greene; I think Jackson and Crofts ones were more straight-out collaborations), so I guess that’s because those stories were the closest to the pure ghostwriting, if to compare them with, say, Eddy or Castro collaborations. And that’s in spite the fact not all of his other co-authors were good writers (I mean, de Castro? HPL himself thought he was a hack). Yet his revisions for women writers are the most rewritten, as if he thought there was little material worth keeping there. That’s a bit suspicious.
Also, Bishop herself wanted to write romance/domestic stories, but Lovecraft urged her to write weird fiction (because, ofc, he liked weird fiction and loathed romance). Though at the end he did gave up and even gave her some advice on writing romance stories, so it may be a bit of stretch.
@13 Ruina and @14AeronaGreenjoy
Lovecraft’s racial views.Definitely had a “tiered” quality: Blacks were at the bottom and Nordic Whites were at the top.Indeed, so far as I know, Lovecraft only once engaged in an epistolary relationship with a Black person, and that was with William Stanley Braithwaite, the noted critic and editor (he was editor of the annual “Anthology of Magazine Verse” -1913-1929- and also literary editor of the “Boston Transcript”)Incidentally, Braithwaite was engaged in a long-term affair with a White woman, Winifred Virginia Jackson, who was also a friend of HPL’s.However, we can be quite certain that Lovecraft did not know about that.
Where non-Blacks were concerned, HPL could be surprisingly “tolerant” (loaded word, I know), at least when he did not feel threatened.Hence, in his letters you will find appreciative comments about Chinese civilization* and shockingly “race-neutral” (for HPL!) observations about the Japanese**.And, of course, despite his many anti-Jewish comments, he had a large circle of Jewish friends: Samuel Loveman, Robert Bloch, Henry Kuttner, Kenneth Sterling, etc
*HPL:”Only an ignorant dolt would attempt to call a Chinese gentleman—heir to one of the greatest artistic & philosophical traditions in the world—an “inferior” of any sort”
**HPL:”As a matter of fact, most of the psychological race differences which strike us so prominently are cultural rather than biological. If one could take a Japanese infant, alter his features to the Anglo-Saxon type through plastic surgery, & place him with an American family in Boston for rearing—without telling him that he is not an American—the chances are that in 20 years the result would be a typical American youth with very few instincts to distinguish him from his pure Nordic college-mates.”
RE: HPL and Amerinds,
Here’s a longish quote:
HPL:”Therefore it is wise to discourage all mixtures of sharply differentiated races—though the colour-line does not need to be drawn as strictly as in the case of the negro, since we know that a dash or two of Mongolian or Indian or Hindoo or some such blood will not actually injure a white stock biologically. John Randolph of Roanoke was none the worse off for having the blood of Pocahontas in his veins, nor does any Finn or Hungarian feel like a mongrel because his stock has a remote & now almost forgotten Mongoloid strain. With the high-grade alien races we can adopt a policy of flexible common-sense—discouraging mixture whenever we can, but not clamping down the bars so ruthlessly against every individual of slightly mixed ancestry.”
RE: Lovecraftian humor,
Well, there’s always The Night Gallery episode “Professor Peabody’s Last Lecture.” It’s available on HULU:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/58787
@16 trajan23, I heard Natalie Wooley was Black too, though HPL didn’t know that. I also heard Pearl Merrit, James Morton’s wife, was of African American descent (biracial?) and they seem to get along fine. Though I don’t know whether it’s true or not.
As for Braithwaite – yes, they corresponded, but HPL didn’t know he was Black back then. When he knew… well, you can read his reaction here. It’s not pretty.
His “tolerance” stems mostly from the fact that, at least at the end of his life, he did “get” socialization thing and understood that many differences we perceive as biological are really cultural (except for Black people and Australian aborigines. Them he thought biologically inferior.) He wrote: “Many qualities commonly regarded as innate—in races, classes, and sexes alike—are in reality results of habitual and imperceptible conditioning”. But even cultural differences and so-called “threat” to the culture of Anglo Saxon civilization were enough for him to have racist freakouts over.
@19 Ruina:”As for Braithwaite – yes, they corresponded, but HPL didn’t know he was Black back then. When he knew… well, you can read his reaction here. It’s not pretty.”
Actually, HPL corresponded with Braithwaite after he discovered that he was Black.The letter that you linked to was dated May 5, 1918 (“-H. P. Lovecraft to Rheinhart Kleiner, May 5, 1918.”), and Joshi (in “Lovecraft: A Life,” 200) notes that HPL corresponded with Braithwaite in 1930.
As I understood it, in the later years of his life, even Lovecraft’s anti-Semitism sharply declined. In particular, he exhibited strong approval of the New Deal supporter Rabbi Stephen Wise, remarking to Robert Bloch that “I can well imagine the polite Nazis of Wall St. cursing him as a blasphemous non-Aryan intellectual!”
This is a roundabout way of saying that we should make Social Justice Lovecraft a Thing: “Other races! I suppose they’re OK!”
It would be hard to be closely involved with genre publishing, now or a century ago, and not correspond with a few Jewish people. Not that we’re secretly planning to take over the country via dominance of the New York publishing world or anything. *looks around furtively*
*is deeply grateful to live in a time when I can afford to make that joke*
Basically, some of Lovecraft’s best friends were Jewish, black, hell probably even Dutch. He got a little better about his general opinions over time, which is better than the alternative. If he’d lived longer, he might have done still better. And yet…
I do notice that in many of these stories, cultural fears stand at least as prominent as genetic ones. I don’t think that’s better, but I do think it’s interesting. In many ways it seems as if he sees racial purity, ultimately, as a means to the end of preserving the only culture that (in his perception) doesn’t worship dark elder things from beyond the stars.
@22: He never embraced cultural mixing but it’s another area in which he improved. In 1936, he wrote:
“What is more, it is equally silly to belittle even the admittedly hybrid art of Judaeo-Germans or Judaeo-Americans. It may not represent genuine German or American feelings, but it at least has a right to stand on its own feet as a frankly exotic or composite product-which may well excel much of our own art in intrinsic quality.”
Which if not wildly enthusiastic is at least good for his time and probably ahead of, say, John W. Campbell. There also a letter to Jonquil Leiber from November 1936, where he compares Massachusetts and Rhode Island:
“Whilst Rhode-Islanders undoubtedly shared the general New-England preoccupation with ethical & theological matters, they had nothing of the savage Massachusetts approach. They fought not for the narrow enforcement of one creed but for the tolerance of all. We welcomed Jews in Newport as early as the 1670’s & their synagogue of 1763 still remains in use. Not a single case of witchcraft prosecution ever occurred on our soil, & Quakers-the bane of the bay-flourished in our midst.”
We didn’t get to see much of this in the fiction as that was primarily written by the younger, less tolerant, Lovecraft but while the older Lovecraft was still very much an elitist, he attempted to be meritocratic about it. In At the Mountains of Madness, we can find a sentiment like this: “Radiates, vegetables, monstrosities, star-spawn – whatever they had been, they were men!”. Which is rather more interesting than “The Horror at Red Hook”.
@23: Don’t forget Elder Things were basically overthrown by the slave race that ruined their culture. Of course HPL would empathize with that. And he wrote about RI tolerance even earlier – well, that’s a historical fact, what else he had to do with that? (I find it deeply ironic that Lovecraft is pretty much the most famous citizen of this very liberal state). But his late elitist fascist-socialist political views are still interesting material – I hope to see them discussed at lenth in the future.
@24: Yes, his political views were weird. Didn’t Robert E. Howard try to point out that Lovecraft’s allegedly superior elite would just rig the selection process? Good point on the Shoggoths: the Elder Things slavery-based society didn’t last in the long-long run or benefit either group. However, what interests me about that quote is that Lovecraft has gone from the instinctive dislike of the alien seen in “The Whisperer in Darkness” and “The Shadow Over Innsmouth” to a kind of wary kinship with Elder Things and Yith. I tend to think that Lovecraft tended to dial up the horror so that the old Puritan in him could handle the things he was interested in but really, if Lovecraft (say, post-1930) learned that he had Innsmouth heritage, would he have killed himself the way melodramatic Arthur Jermyn did or would he have headed off to the beach to join his relatives in Y’ha-nthlei? I tend to think he would have gone for the latter, even if he would have moved to some smaller town later, complaining that the mid-Atlantic metropolis was soulless…
The Outer Ones (“Whisperer” and Deep Ones (“Innsmouth”) are an interesting pair to contrast with Elder Things and the Great Race. (Man, we kind of suck at naming species…) They aren’t just instinctive dislike of the alien, but revulsion mixed with attraction–rejected in the former case and ultimately accepted in the latter, but you can’t read the bit where the disguised Outer One shares the secrets of the cosmos, and not see a certain guilty interest in their cosmopolitan company. The Elder Things and Great Race have some of that, but the ultimate acceptance isn’t merely that they’re tempting (especially since they’re both out of reach), but that in their imperfect conquest of other races they show a kinship with Lovecraft’s beloved modern anglos. And they both make frighteningly plain the impossibility of human anglos, or even humans, staying on top forever.
@23 Ruina “Don’t forget Elder Things were basically overthrown by the slave race that ruined their culture.”
It’s a bit more complicated than that; if I remember correctly, Elder Thing culture was deteriorating on its own (decay being something of a universal law in the Lovecraftian cosmos).The overthrow by the Shoggoths was symptom, not cause.
@26 R.Emrys:”The Elder Things and Great Race have some of that, but the ultimate acceptance isn’t merely that they’re tempting (especially since they’re both out of reach), but that in their imperfect conquest of other races they show a kinship with Lovecraft’s beloved modern anglos. And they both make frighteningly plain the impossibility of human anglos, or even humans, staying on top forever.”
The Great Race of Yith really do stand apart, though, even when compared to the Elder Things.The Elder Things (Don’t want to get too far ahead here) degenerate over time.The Great Race, in contrast, have triumphed over time:
“But most of the tales and impressions concerned a relatively late race, of a queer and intricate shape resembling no life-form known to science, which had lived till only fifty million years before the advent of man. This, they indicated, was the greatest race of all; because it alone had conquered the secret of time.”
@27: That’s true. It’s rarely discussed, but I think the fear of chaos/decay was no less important for Lovecraft’s life and creativity that his famous Fear of the Unknown. Of course, both influenced his racial and political views, among other things, and both weren’t limited to them alone. And the desire to “conquer the time”, expressed in his works as well as in his life, was definetely the part of this fear.
@26 R.Emrys: ” The Outer Ones (“Whisperer” and Deep Ones (“Innsmouth”) are an interesting pair to contrast with Elder Things and the Great Race. (Man, we kind of suck at naming species…) They aren’t just instinctive dislike of the alien, but revulsion mixed with attraction–rejected in the former case and ultimately accepted in the latter, but you can’t read the bit where the disguised Outer One shares the secrets of the cosmos, and not see a certain guilty interest in their cosmopolitan company. The Elder Things and Great Race have some of that, but the ultimate acceptance isn’t merely that they’re tempting (especially since they’re both out of reach), but that in their imperfect conquest of other races they show a kinship with Lovecraft’s beloved modern anglos.”
I’m not sure about that.I think that the “cosmopolitan temptation” is very much at the heart of “The Shadow Out of Time.” After all, a case can be made (Cf Robert Silverberg’s encomium) that this is the single most powerful passage in the story:
I learned—even before my waking self had studied the parallel cases or the old myths from which the dreams doubtless sprang—that the entities around me were of the world’s greatest race, which had conquered time and had sent exploring minds into every age. I knew, too, that I had been snatched from my age while another used my body in that age, and that a few of the other strange forms housed similarly captured minds. I seemed to talk, in some odd language of claw-clickings, with exiled intellects from every corner of the solar system.
Trajan23 @@@@@ 29: We are agreeing most strenuously. I see that my “they” was kind of ambiguous, but what I was trying to get at is that all four species provide tempting company, but only the Elder Things and the Great Race are implied to have anything in common with what Lovecraft saw as the pinnacle of human civilization. The Elder Things show its inevitable downfall, while the Great Race transcend that downfall by not only preceding but supplanting humans. Though the GR also get overrun by a species they conquered, which is why they end up jumping into giant beetles in the first place.
I’m so unreasonably fond of the Yith, arrogant and genocidal though they are. Best librarians ever!
I’m kind of unreasonably fond of shoggoths myself. So adaptable, so bouncy!
That quote from Shadow Out of Time posted by Trajan23 is pretty much the reason I keep coming back to Lovecraft despite his many, many, many issues.
Well, that quote and the languorous weirdness of Kadath and his other Dreamlands stories.
AMPillsworth @@@@@ 31: Someday, someone is going to write the story of the shoggoth uprising from a shoggoth’s point of view.
No comment on whether “someone” is likely to be me…
@31 & 33: The challenge there is writing a story where much of the dialogue consists of “Tekeli-li!”.
A Shoggoth is your squishy friend,
He’ll be with you until the end,
Dissolve your enemies and then
He’ll turn his gaze on you
He’ll build your towers, carve your frieze
With bubbles in a congeries
The continents he’ll help you seize,
Then turn his gaze on you
The Shoggoth has so many eyes
Each of a diff’rent shape and size
He’ll stare as he “Tekeli-li”s
Then turns his gaze on you
Both penguin and Elder Thing
Join tentacle and flightless wing
Try not to notice as you sing
He turns his gaze on you.
[ideally to the demented, hyperactive tune of some Saturday morning toy commercial]
@35: I imagined it being sang by Lt. Uhura to “Charlie is Our Darling/Devil Ears and Devil Eyes” tune.
DGDavis @12, re: Lovecraft’s use of Mesoamerican deities: there’s also 1930’s The Electric Executioner, a collaboration with Adolphe de Castro.
I think “Tekeli-li” is just the undertones of actual shoggoth spoken communication, which is mostly in the ultrasound band, like the insect-like buzzing in “Wink of an Eye”, the ST:TOS episode