I do a lot of thinking about horse intelligence, where it comes from and how it works. Part of it is personal interest, and a good part is practicality. I spend hours every day in the company of horses. I have to understand how they think, and why, or I’ll be a wet spot on the barn floor.
On my expeditions through the internets in search of new information, I’ve come across frequent references to the fact that when humans domesticate animals, the animals are “dumbed down.” Their brains get smaller and they lose the capabilities that kept them alive in the wild. Humans breed for tractability first, and then for specific uses that aren’t necessarily related to the animal’s original function.
Of course, as the article notes, we haven’t studied this subject enough really to draw firm conclusions. With horses, we’ve recently discovered that as far as we know, there is nothing left of the original wild stock. So there’s no way to know what changes we made in the intelligence of the root stock, because there’s no root stock to compare to.
There are wild equids, notably zebras, but zebras are more closely related to donkeys than horses. Interbreeding is possible, but they’re not the same species. They’re also notoriously difficult to train.
What struck me in reading about zebras was how they’ve evolved in an environment packed with major predators, from lions to humans. As a result they’re extremely spooky, extremely aggressive—they will kick each other to death in close confinement–and they just don’t make the connection to humans that horses and donkeys (and cats and dogs) have. There also something that the young woman who trained a zebra noted, which is that zebras’ attention spans are quite short, and they don’t retain information as well as horses.
It seems to me that when it comes to assessing intelligence, attention span and information retention should be pretty high on the list. According to that measure, domestic horses out-smart wild zebras by a wide margin.
Zebras are lethal biters and ferocious, targeted kickers—they look, they aim, they fire—and that’s crucial to their survival on the savanna. For humans who try to handle them, it’s a serious problem. The National Geographic claims that zebras do the most damage to zookeepers. More than lions or tigers or crocs or even elephants.
They’re mean. And horses (and donkeys), though they definitely have their moments, are pretty generally not.
That’s a fundamental difference. And I think it goes all the way back. The original wild horse would have had instinctive behaviors that human captors would have to train or breed out. Spookiness and the natural paranoia of the prey animal, aggression particularly on the part of intact males and nursing mothers, resistance to confinement—handlers and trainers still deal with these things after thousands of years.
But the horse at base is a good-natured animal. It’s not aggressive unless seriously challenged, and generations of breeding have ramped down the claustrophobia significantly—to the point that horses can cope with life in stalls and small paddocks, and won’t kill themselves trying to get out. Even feral horses, with some time and patience, manage to survive in captivity. Which in fact is more than can be said for many feral cats.
So, in light of all that, can we speculate that the modern horse is less intelligent than its wild ancestors? It’s been said that dogs can’t come near wolves in terms of overall smarts, but cats seem to have the world figured out regardless of where they happen to live. Rodents don’t seem to have lost any intelligence under human influence.
With horses, there’s no wild population to compare. If zebras are any analogue—and they well may not be, considering how different their personalities are—horses may actually be smarter, if we’re measuring attention span and ability to retain information. For all we know, we may have bred for more intelligence rather than less, in among breeding for docility, speed, color, size, strength, and all the other things we’ve bred horses for over the millennia.
Horses need quite a bit of social smarts to get along with humans. They have to be cooperative. They have to respond well and quickly to training, and be tolerant of human error. A horse that can’t interpret broad ranges of signals won’t do well as general-purpose transport. He has to ramp down his instincts, trust his handlers, and hold steady when by all natural rights he should be completely losing it.
I keep coming back to the way the articles about domestication of horses default to “meat and milk first, transportation later.” So easily, so casually, they talk about milking mares. Having not, apparently, thought about the logistics: where the faucets are and what it takes to get up under there and fill a bucket.
If people were milking mares in the beginning and not getting maimed or killed, and those mares were either wild or only a generation or two removed from wild, then that wild stock has to have been willing to cooperate. They tolerated human handling, they allowed themselves to trust the predators who had taken control of their lives and decisions. They made a choice—because while humans might figure out how to confine a herd in a fortified corral or blind valley and then cull it for meat, actually milking a mare requires the mare to agree to it.
Domestication goes both ways. In the case of the horse, there’s been a whole lot of abuse and misuse, but a lot of positive interactions, too. It’s quite likely the horse survives as a species because humans found it so useful—and so easy to use, thanks to their nature and personality. Otherwise they’d simply have been hunted out of existence, like the aurochs and the Irish elk.
Judith Tarr is a lifelong horse person. She supports her habit by writing works of fantasy and science fiction as well as historical novels, many of which have been published as ebooks by Book View Cafe. She’s even written a primer for writers who want to write about horses: Writing Horses: The Fine Art of Getting It Right. Her most recent short novel, Dragons in the Earth, features a herd of magical horses, and her space opera, Forgotten Suns, features both terrestrial horses and an alien horselike species (and space whales!). She lives near Tucson, Arizona with a herd of Lipizzans, a clowder of cats, and a blue-eyed dog.
Jared Diamond has quite a bit to say about the “domesticability” of different animal species, and how things like zebras just aren’t worth the trouble.
A certain amount of affability on the part of the original wild horse stock would explain quite a bit. On the other hand, the Ice Age tundra and grasslands to the south of it weren’t bereft of predators. In fact, before the extinction of much of the Eurasian Ice Age fauna, there were things like sabre-toothed cats, cave bears, and lions prowling much of Eurasia below the Ice. Just as dodgy an environment as the modern African savannah.
Maybe I’m being an omnivore chauvinist, but I find it easy to believe that an herbivore would get smarter after domestication. The problems of a wild equine seem relatively simple compare to those a wild predator or a domesticated equine. Even more so since horse-related problems requires both the human and the horse to work together to solve them.
I wonder how many generations it would take to create zebras which behaved like horses, we know that with foxes it only takes a handful of generations… I suppose if I ever became a megalomaniacal billionaire then I would set up such a breeding scheme. Possibly on Mars, with all the rest of my maniacal billionaire brethren and sistren.
Also, this article’s title reminded me of a Ranma 1/2 fanfic.
>It’s been said that dogs can’t come near wolves in terms of overall smarts
Well, yes, that gets said pretty often. But it depends what kinds of intelligence you have in mind. For social intelligence and figuring out humans, dogs have wolves at a thorough disadvantage, as one might expect.
http://scienceblogs.com/thoughtfulanimal/2010/08/31/dogs-are-pretty-smart-they/
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/why-dogs-are-more-like-humans-than-wolves-22095590/
My Cavaliers aren’t especially smart as dogs go — but they’re highly empathic. I can’t watch a movie where someone cries or screams because that kind of thing upsets them too much.
Domestication of most animals has the human advantage of using the herd/pack instinct. Cats seem to see us as a mother figure since they aren’t pack oriented.
I find the question of intelligence changes moot because there’s different ways of defining intelligence as well as the particular uses of intelligence.
@1, and who was responsible for the extinction of said Ice Age megafauna? Good old Homo Sap. Maybe Horses decided to get on our good side before their turn came.
@6 I wonder if we could explain zebras, dogs, horses and then the mega-fauna we hunted to extinction in terms of humans learning to domesticate vs their ability to hunt. Zebras are undomesticated and alive because we couldn’t domesticate them or hunt them to extinction before they evolved enough that we couldn’t. Dogs and horses (and other domesticated animals) because we/they figured out domestication and we weren’t good enough at hunting to exterminate them before domestication. Mega-fauna went extinct because we were so good at hunting that we wiped them out before we could domesticate them.
@@.-@ There was a BBC show a year or so back where they tested dogs for types of intelligence and they accidentally managed to prove that domestic dogs will instinctively react to a distressed human by trying to comfort them. No matter what the dog, what else it was doing, or whatever its temperament, our best animal friends will drop everything if they think we are in distress. It was quite heartwarming.
That is very true, when I came home from work early many years ago because I felt awful the cat didn’t care but my sweet Lab/Shepard mix did.
Cats are basically lizards with fur.
@10 I feel this is a slur on some damn fine lizards. I don’t know of any lizards that have driven entire species to extinction, for a start, unlike cats. Cats are humanity’s first, most enduring and insidious environmental disaster.
@6
I’m not sure that the Eurasian megafauna was wiped out by human beings – remember, they’d coexisted with us and our ancestors for over a million years. Places like Australia and the New World, however – no question.
@11
“some damn fine lizards” – this phrase makes me very happy.
@10 — One of Tanith Lee’s Flat Earth books (Delusion’s Master) had a very brief origin story for cats that, well, your comment kind of summed it up.
Attention span and information retention, absolutely. Animals are domesticated with specific goals in mind, and those bred to be “beasts of burden” must be able to learn and perform tasks toward that role. In order to learn a task, even something so simple as going to a gate, attention and concentration are essential, as well as the ability to retain and recall what has previously been learned. Attention and concentration are hallmarks of interactivity. In order to interact, you’ve got to be able to attend to and concentrate on, and respond appropriately to cues with another being. Because we as humans are so interactive as a species, I think this happens on an almost subconscious level when humans breed animals, selecting and favoring the more interactive animals in their breeding programs, especially animals they use for riding, packing, and herding/farming/ranching tasks.
I’m thinking along the lines of heavy horses, which are bred for docility, willingness to work, ability to learn, understand and perform specific tasks, and the ability to acquire and understand a repertoire of signals, both tactile (reigns) as well as auditory (whistles and spoken commands). A well trained logging team is a beauty to behold. So is a well-trained sheep dog.
I must be fair. I once owned a cat who noticed when I was upset and tried to comfort me. The dog had run away and I’d been all over the neighborhood looking. I came home, collapsed in a chair and started bawling. Celbe – she was named Idril Celebrindal, Celbe for short – jumped on my lap all concerned. One of the two really good cats I’ve had. Out of some thirty odd over my life time.
BTW we found the dog. Boy was he in trouble!
Watched a show a few years back that tested the problem solving skills of a wolf and a dog. The interesting thing to me was not that with simple tests, the two animals were relatively similar in terms of speed. It was when they got frustrated. In this case, there was a piece of meat in a cage and they had to figure out how to get to it. The wolf would turn to violence. Digging and biting at the cage. The dog would try a little of this, but eventually backed off and looked to the human for assistance.
I know that there are plenty of derpy animals out there, but even in the wild you’re going to find your share of MoonMoons (though they do tend not to live as long), so it seems to me that it’s not necessarily a lack of intelligence, but a willingness to look to humans that makes the biggest difference between the wild and domesticated cousins.
Also, I love these essays. I hope they continue.
I’ve shared my life with multiple dogs, cats, and a horse. All have displayed an enormous amount of empathy for me and their fellow human/animal pack members. Sure, there are cats who have no empathy, but there are humans, dogs, and horses who have the same lack of empathy. Dicks exist in all species, but that doesn’t define a species.
@9 I was living in a small room with my cat Cally the year of the first Iraq-US war. I had been following the news, hoping against hope that war would be averted, and then I switched on the radio one morning and gave Cally her breakfast and sat down to eat mine and the radio said the words “missiles are falling on Baghdad” and I knew it hadn’t been averted and I was horribly sad. I couldn’t do anything with my sadness, I had to leave for work in 20 minutes, so I just sat there and listened to the radio and ate my breakfast and then suddenly Cally, who was ordinarily focussing on her own breakfast, jumped on to my lap, and didn’t sit down – she was never a lapcat – but just kept circling on my lap, brushing her head against me. I am absolutely convinced that she knew I was upset, and wanted to comfort me.
Not all cats do this: but I have had more than one cat who knew when I was upset, and who very definitely wanted to make me feel better.
I love my cats, even if they are self sufficient and demanding.
@3/random22: Wait, what? Foxes that act like horses after a handful of generations? This I gotta see! Foxes don’t seem the thoroughbred or gaiter type, but I’m guessing they might take naturally to dressage…
I think we’re all being a little selective when we think “domesticated animals” and turn immediately to cats, dogs, and horses. Those are probably our biggest successes. Consider also the chicken, cow, camel, turkey…
Ha! Spend the day hauling horse feed, come back and find everybody is talking about cats. And foxes. I love foxes.
I do not remember which article it was, but one of them mentioned that after a few generations, tame foxes, like dogs, start developing drop ears. I didn’t have time to pursue this. Weakening of ear cartilage for some reason? Neoteny?
That never has happened to horses, though they seem to have developed a much heavier, longer mane and a bushier tail. The Przewalski horse has a stiff upstanding mane like a donkey, but since it’s not really a wild descendant, we can’t be sure it’s the original type.And of course with domestication, horses have become much bigger.
I will be talking more about types of intellgence next time. Thanks to everyone who has ruminated on this. It’s fascinating stuff.
@8 Haha, yes dogs are very responsive to distress. I got a few of mine over their fear of water and got their swimming instinct to kick in by just going out and pretending to drown a bit. One minute they’d be fighting the waves and not realizing they already ‘knew’ how to swim, the next they’d be paddling out like a champ to see what was the matter with me. It’s worked literally every time, and is very endearing.
Even without being domesticated, are there any animals, away from Antarctica and the deepest sea, that have evolved without human pressure?
Some animals have been prey.
Others, that might have preyed on humans, have been subject to deliberately hunted out a threat to human life. No group of humans will let a pack of wolves target and kill and eat a child, and just go on with life. The adults of a human group will turn around and kill as many wolves as they can of any pack that does this.
And even animals that aren’t directly interesting to humans have had their habitats altered and encroached on.
@22
The current theory is that the process of domestication is actually a process of selecting for animals with less active adrenal glands. Since the part of the adrenals that is associated with fear/stress reactions is derived from the neural crest cells in the developing embryo, you get a lot of tag along effects – melanocytes are derived from neural crest cells, as are the cells producing the cartilage supporting the ears, so (at least in some animals) domestication is associated with spotty white colouration, and folded ears. Not always, obviously – never heard of a horse with droopy ears.
Whenever we talk about the process of domestication of animals, I always feel like it is a chickens and eggs situation. Did the animals who are the most domesticated get picked from the start because they were more suitable, or did they end up more suitable because of their long interaction with humans?
@20/Ian: I wanted to write “Of course foxes can become horses – some foxes already are horses!”, but then I checked my dictionary and found that the kind of horse we call Fuchs in German is called chestnut in English. Hmm, chestnuts that act like horses…
@22/capriole: “I do not remember which article it was, but one of them mentioned that after a few generations, tame foxes, like dogs, start developing drop ears.”
That was a breeding experiment by Russian geneticist Dmitry Belyayev that started in the 1950s. Here’s an article on it that contains some adorable photos.
@25/Raskos: That’s really interesting. Do you have a source for it? (I’m not questioning your statement, I want to know more.)
@@@@@ Janajansen
The account that I was reading was in a recent New Scientist (newsstand copies are generally about a month out of date where I live) – it’s on line – https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23731660-600-the-tamed-ape-were-humans-the-first-animal-to-be-domesticated/. This isn’t a primary literature reference but is a nice precis of recent thought on the topic, building upon Belaev’s initial experiments and proposing some testable hypotheses. Sorry, would dig a little deeper for you , but I am fighting off the flu and also much besieged by students.
@28/Raskos: Thanks for the link, and get well!
I’m making notes for the next SFF Equines post. Thanks very much to everyone for great comments.
The fox-domestication link is amazing. Apparently you can adopt them, for a hefty import fee; they only keep the top 5% as breeding stock and either sell the rest for fur or sell them to people as pets.
I’ve had animals all my life (don’t remember when I didn’t have one around). As far as horse intelligence goes, I’ve had an interesting experience with that. I used to work at a historic rice plantation that gives carriage rides. The horses used are American Belgians, and we had one in particular who was too smart for his own good. He watched me open the gate once, and from then on, could open any gate on the property that was designed like that. Which meant that he (and the other horses) could go into the gardens, the Stableyards, the visitor parking lot…
More like he was too smart for your good! That must have been an Einstein among horses.
Geldings especially are weirdly smart about fasteners. Mine will untie your shoes. But I knew a stallion who needed a padlock on his stall to keep him from going walkabout and visiting the ladies.