Skip to content

The Wild Robot Knows the Meaning of Life, If You’re Willing to Listen

16
Share

<i>The Wild Robot</i> Knows the Meaning of Life, If You’re Willing to Listen

Home / The Wild Robot Knows the Meaning of Life, If You’re Willing to Listen
Movies & TV The Wild Robot

The Wild Robot Knows the Meaning of Life, If You’re Willing to Listen

If you're looking for a film about the joys and terrors of this thing we call living... you've come to the right place

By

Published on October 2, 2024

Credit: DreamWorks

16
Share
Roz and gosling Brightbill touching foreheads in The Wild Robot

Credit: DreamWorks

I’ll admit to a deep-seated fascination with the oeuvre of certain animation directors. The one that most influenced my childhood (and therefore personhood) was Don Bluth, and Miyazaki is a given in these conversations, but Chris Sanders creeps higher and higher on my list with every movie he makes. As the driving force behind Lilo and Stitch, How to Train Your Dragon, and The Croods, Sanders has already built a fascinating roster of stories. So you can imagine my interest when I learned that he was adapting Peter Brown’s The Wild Robot for the big screen.

The Wild Robot is the tale of Rozzum Unit 7134 (Lupita Nyong’o), who crashes on a remote island and immediately wakes with the intent of fulfilling her primary function—to perform tasks for her owners to perfection. With no humans available, “Roz” attempts to serve the animals around her by learning their methods of communication, but finds no one in need of her services. While trying to contact her manufacturer for pickup and redistribution, Roz accidentally crushes a goose nest, killing all but one egg. She keeps the egg safe until it hatches, seeing to the birth of a runt that she eventually names Brightbill (Kit Connor). Informed that this makes her a defacto mother by opossum Pinktail (Catherine O’Hara), Roz is at something of a loss on how to get this goose fed, swimming, and eventually flying. The fox Fink (Pedro Pascal), who had first been determined to eat the little guy, eventually agrees to help Roz raise him up right in exchange for all the food she keeps unwittingly providing to him.

It’s hard to overstate how good this voice cast is, but knowing the talent involved, you can likely guess. The soundtrack from Kris Bowers takes his years of scoring intense, realistic dramas and puts them to dazzling new use. And if you’re just in it for the animation, run-don’t-walk to the theater right now. There’s a deliberate homage to Miyazaki in crafting the characters and surroundings with a “hand-painted” finish that lends incredible texture everywhere you look. This is also the last film from Dreamworks to be animated entirely in-house, a staggering disappointment when you see the skill on display. The devaluation of this artform will be a detriment to all upcoming animated projects, but we can at least appreciate what we’ve got here.

Just to start, Wild Robot takes an important step in fixing one of my largest personal peeves in science fiction: The fact that your “stock” robot characters are nearly all male-coded. Robots, of course, do not have true gender at inception—they are often programmed one way or another, and because humanity uses male as the default state of being, your average robot sidekick is typically given a male voice and male pronouns; C-3PO and R2 in Star Wars; Lucifer in the OG Battlestar Galactica; Baymax in Big Hero Six; Robot in Lost in Space; the eponymous Terminator; Kamelion and K-9 on Doctor Who; Number Five in Short Circuit; Data in Star Trek; Max in Flight of the Navigator. When robots (or, more commonly, program interfaces similar to Siri and Alexa) are given female-coded programming, there’s usually intention behind that choice—and that intention is nearly always wrapped up in the male gaze and their interest in human men: think Miss Minutes in Loki; Samantha in Her; Lisa in Weird Science. Even stories that intend to subvert that trope (Ex Machina being a prime example) participate gleefully in it at the same time. But Brown’s books, and now this movie, have done the opposite: they’ve defaulted the “stock” robot figure to female coding with no fanfare whatsoever.

There are ways in which this coding could be subverted in another gendered manner in The Wild Robot—Roz’s need to aid others and motherhood becoming her first clear task certainly leans in that direction—but Sanders is masterful as always in portrayals of family units in ways that never come off overtly gendered. Moreover, the story itself is far less concerned with the concept of motherhood on its own and far more concerned with what life is, fullstop. Its answer seems to be devastatingly simple on that front:

Life is a desire to care for others. What shape that care takes is immaterial. We are made to look after one another.

Roz is a robot manufactured to complete menial tasks for humans, but caring for Brightbill and for Fink gives her meaning. There is, pointedly, no sugarcoating of this concept: the actions of care itself are often thankless and messy rather than profound, and this self-appointed task takes a devastating toll on Roz’s body—just as Pinktail warns her it will, being a mother of seven (or is it six?) herself. But it also doesn’t steer directly into martyrdom as an answer either. Roz commits herself fully to the care of others and, when she needs it, winds up receiving that care in return. Her worldview, her meaning, teaches those around her in turn.

As for the “wild” aspect of the story, Roz’s environment has a great deal to teach its audience about the symbiotic tides of our own world: cycles of birth and maturation, what it means to be part of a full ecosystem, the movement of seasons. The cultural adherence to Darwinian “survival of the fittest” as a concept has messed about with our understanding of nature for long enough. More recent scientists have put paid to that idea and indeed discovered the opposite out in nature and amongst ourselves; yes, nature necessitates a circle of life and death, but survival is rife with symbiosis and cooperation. We succeed because work together, not because we compete the best. In many ways, you could argue that this story is a testament to that concept, though it couches it in fantastical terms. As Fink later tells it, kindness is Roz’s greatest survival mechanism. That’s it. That’s the message.

The film also slyly pushes against concept of productivity as a measure of value with this interplay. Roz is designed to complete “tasks,” a nebulous concept with no end in sight for her. When she completes a task, she’s meant to immediately receive a new one. Yet her choice to parent Brightbill is not a simple task despite her attempts to organize it into stages and goals. A great deal of the endeavor, whether she realizes it or not, consists of existing alongside her chosen family. Productivity isn’t relevant to the life that she builds, and that is what fulfills her.

There are rooted concepts you find in every Chris Sanders project, and the more films he makes, the more this perspective comes clear. Intrinsic to each of these stories is the idea that families come in all sizes and configurations, that what is new should never be feared, that cooperation and coexistence are essential, and that disability should never be met with destruction. That last one is perhaps the most radical point, and one that The Wild Robot showcases without ever resorting to sermonizing; Brightbill is a “runt” and has to work much harder than the rest of the geese to migrate when winter comes. He is visibly different and therefore ridiculed, but it’s his perspective that’s most valuable when the flock is in danger. It’s not in the foreground of the narrative because this is primarily Roz’s story, but that vantage point remains a cornerstone of Sanders’ work.

It’s also key here that Roz was created by humans to do various forms of labor, but that her instinct to protect a being that would have surely died in “nature”… is a very human trait. So while corporations might be inclined to abuse technology for their own profit (as we see of the Universal Dynamics company that created Roz), this story is designed to point us toward our better selves. Toward the version of us that rescues unwanted animal offspring who wouldn’t make it with the rest of their litter. Toward the version of us that wants to work together even when it’s difficult.

Toward the version of us that loves stories about robots who live in the wild and care for goslings until they can fly.

I’m hard-pressed to come up with another film that so easily communicates the joy of being alive while never once underselling life’s inherent traumas. In many ways, The Wild Robot takes themes from adjacent films like The Iron Giant and Wall-E and does them each one better. It is about being an individual and a community; about being a family and needing to accomplish things for yourself; about existing within nature and still knowing when to push back on instinct. It is a film that takes the work of life and makes it magic. And I’m not sure I can offer higher praise than that. icon-paragraph-end

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ChristopherLBennett
6 months ago

“The cultural adherence to Darwinian “survival of the fittest” as a concept has messed about with our understanding of nature for long enough.”

That’s actually the coinage of economist Herbert Spencer in reference to what Darwin called natural selection, though Darwin later endorsed it as a useful alternative to convey that the “selection” was not by a conscious being but by reproductive success. It’s been grossly misinterpreted by laypeople to mean some kind of Battle Royale where the strongest survive, but it simply means that those traits that maximize reproductive fitness — that are most suitable for survival and reproduction in a given environment — will therefore be reproduced more successfully than less suitable traits. In many cases, the fittest survival trait is symbiosis or cooperation. So what you’re criticizing as “Darwinian” is actually other people’s profound misunderstanding and corruption of what Darwin intended.

I’m trying to think of fictional robots/AIs that are portrayed as female without being sexualized or gendered. How about the Tachikomas from Ghost in the Shell? They’re lethal battle robots shaped like giant spiders, but they have cutesy schoolgirl voices and personalities. Okay, that’s maybe gendered in equating femininity with cuteness, but they come off more as just childlike than specifically female. Then there’s Summer Glau’s Cameron from Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Ooh, and there’s Levi from Scavengers Reign, who’s got a female voice artist but a seemingly male name, and whose pronouns I don’t think have been specified. The show wiki lists Levi’s gender as “Robot” and uses only Levi’s name rather than a pronoun.

Bodiless AIs or spaceship computers often have female voices, e.g. Starfleet computers. The hero in the ’90s series Time Trax had a holographic AI advisor named SELMA whose appearance was modeled on a photo of his mother, but I don’t recall that being particularly relevant to their relationship, since she didn’t have his mother’s personality.

I suppose giving a female presentation to a being in a support role, like a secretary or librarian, is kind of gendered, but I guess it’s cancelled out by the fact that many male-presenting robots are in equally supporting roles, often given the personality of an English butler (as with C-3PO and K-9).

Avatar
Mark
5 months ago

The computer in Alien was named MOTHER.

Avatar
Cybersnark
6 months ago

There’s the Andromeda Ascendant/Rommie from Gene Roddenberry’s Andromeda, of course. We also see other High Guard ships with male-identifying avatars, so Rommie’s gender seems clearly chosen.

Transformers has evolved in its use of female-identifying Cybertronians, from rare anomalies in G1 to being relatively commonplace (and thus needing no explanation) in more modern takes.

A more obscure example: the android gynoid Janice Em from the Robotech: Sentinels spin-off novels. Granted, she was originally designed to be an idol singer (an inherently gendered role), but quickly adapted to becoming a competent military officer and interspecies diplomat.

ChristopherLBennett
6 months ago
Reply to  Cybersnark

Andromeda was an amalgam of a couple of different Roddenberry premises with some of Robert Hewitt Wolfe’s ideas for a hypothetical post-fall-of-the-Federation Star Trek series. The broad strokes came from Roddenberry’s Genesis II/Planet Earth pilot movies, but the idea of a sentient starship came from a rather vague Roddenberry proposal that would’ve been called Starship, which didn’t seem to have much worked out beyond concept art in Roddenberry’s lifetime, but at one point there was a plan underway to develop it as an animated series in collaboration with Stan Lee’s media company at the time, with Space Battleship Yamato and Captain Harlock‘s Leiji Matsumoto doing the designs. It could’ve been amazing, but Lee’s company went out of business before it could happen.

Anyway, I’m not sure if the sentient ship in Roddenberry’s proposal would’ve presented as female, but it stands to reason. Andromeda Ascendant presumably presented as female because of her name. Although I wouldn’t exactly say her avatar was ungendered, given that her outfit showed off her cleavage. (Back on the Andromeda fan boards, which most of the writing staff participated in during the first couple of seasons, I once complained about Rommie’s low necklines and asked what practical purpose they could possibly serve. Co-producer Ethlie Ann Vare replied, “You can keep pencils there.”)

wiredog
6 months ago

Is Murderbot gendered?

ChristopherLBennett
6 months ago
Reply to  wiredog

Murderbot is agender, going by “it,” but is a synthetic/cloned humanoid with cyborg components. SecUnits are not robots, except in the original Karel Capek sense of an artificial organic being created as slave labor.

Given that, it kind of reinforces Emmet’s point that both GraphicAudio’s full-cast adaptations and the upcoming live-action TV series have cast male actors as Murderbot, respectively David Cui Cui and Alexander Skarsgård, even though there’s nothing about the book character that implies it’s masculine-presenting in any way. When I read the books, I imagined a gender-neutral voice and appearance as much as possible.

Avatar
Stuboystu
6 months ago

Didn’t Iron Man have a female coded AI in his suit in one of the movies? I want to say FRIDAY?

ChristopherLBennett
6 months ago
Reply to  Stuboystu

Yes, F.R.I.D.A.Y. was the replacement for J.A.R.V.I.S. after he became the Vision, based on Tony’s AI secretary Friday from the comics (as opposed to Jarvis, who was the Avengers’ real live butler in the comics). She was named in reference to a “girl Friday,” a common term for a secretary dating from the early 20th century and derived from Robinson Crusoe‘s “man Friday” (i.e. the native that Crusoe named Friday and treated as a manservant).

Avatar
JUNO
5 months ago

Here I thought It was a reference to “His Girl Friday”, wow

ChristopherLBennett
5 months ago
Reply to  JUNO

Well, yeah, His Girl Friday was called that in reference to the expression “girl Friday,” which had been in the vernacular for over a decade by that point. After all, the character the title refers to is named Hildy Johnson, not Friday. The title means that Hildy is the indispensable right-hand woman to Cary Grant’s character, although it’s perhaps ironic, because it implies a loyal subordinate, while IIRC the leads of the film are constantly bickering and bantering.

Avatar
6 months ago

Hmmm, how about Anne McCaffrey’s The Ship Who Sang?

wiredog
6 months ago
Reply to  nancymcc

She’s not an AI or robot.

Avatar
6 months ago

This is a beautiful analysis of a beautiful story. (I’ve read all the books but have yet to see the movie because a member of my household is immune-compromised.)

I am also a huge fan of animation, and I am so thrilled that (according to every review I’ve seen) the movie gets it right.

I am furthermore a woman who got a computer science degree in 1978 (yes, 46 years ago), so I’m all in on the female-coded robot. The books were just so natural I didn’t even notice this.

What joy!

Avatar
5 months ago

I confess, I was somewhat disappointed with the extent to which they anthropomorphised the animals (I’ve not read the book, but the initial trailer made me hold out hope that it might be two hours of mostly silent pantomime–something that probably would never fly for a big budget kids’ movie), but I thoroughly enjoyed it nonetheless. I particularly loved the subtle worldbuilding during the migration sequence, when we get to see the geese fly over various overgrown cities and the like (loved the visual of the drowned Golden Gate bridge). And while this might be seen as somewhat dystopian, I actually find it hopeful to imagine a future with both robots and wilderness as a part of it.

Avatar
Leah
5 months ago

I went to see this movie based on your article, and I excited at the idea of a female-coded robot…except this robot is automatically slotted into the role of Mother. Whose accomplishments are sacrificing herself for her child. I don’t think this is a step forward. How about we have a male-coded robot pushed into the “mother” role, or a female-coded robot who has a life and meaning outside her children? It was a beautiful movie, but absolutely not an advance for the gendered portrayal of robots or the role of women in our culture.

Avatar
JUNO
5 months ago

Very beautifully put, Emmet! Though I was not as sold on it as you were. (BTW, I have reread the book in full as a child, so I have history here.)

The soundtrack from Kris Bowers takes his years of scoring intense, realistic dramas and puts them to dazzling new use

…Funny that’s actually one of my criticisms of the movie. Often times, the music just feels like too much and tries so hard to be emotional that it ends up draining out the emotion of the scenes themselves (the less said about the song playing over Brightbill’s training montage, the better). I feel like in a story as environmentally centered as this one, you have to let the forest speak for it self. The swelling music is just too much. That’s my personal opinion