There are other worlds than these, pilgrim, and The Dark Tower movie tries to be the best of both, bringing Stephen King’s epic dark fantasy novel series to the broadest possible audience. But lots is lost in translation, and neither fans nor newbies to the material will find much to make them happy.
Theresa DeLucci has only read the first two novels and Pritpaul Bains has read them all—so how differently did they both hate this movie?
Spoiler warning: several major plot elements of King’s earlier Dark Tower books are discussed in passing, but nothing major from the final books.
Theresa: I’ve read several of King’s novels and collections but had The Dark Tower series on my TBR pile for years. I’m a big fan of Weird West and Westerns in general but I didn’t want to commit to such a big series at the time. I really adored The Gunslinger and the second novel, The Drawing of the Three. Lobstrosities! So while I wasn’t overly familiar with the source material, I had a base understanding and have tons of friends who say that at least the first four books are excellent.
Pritpaul: King has been the biggest influence on both my reading and writing since I was 10 years old, when I snuck a copy of Misery out of my local library. But I held off on The Dark Tower series until a few years ago, in part because of my reluctance to associate King with the fantasy genre. When I cracked open The Gunslinger for the first time, I quickly realized my folly. (If you’d like a refresher on the source material, check out a recent reread on our sister site.) My love affair with Mid-World, Roland, Eddie, Susannah, Jake, and Oy peaked right around the time that buzz around the development of the movie began to grow, around 2015, and when I learned of the casting of Elba and McConaughey, my initial skepticism gave way to anticipation.
Theresa: Of course I was excited to see Idris Elba as Roland Deschain; the man deserves his own franchise. I am also an unabashed Matthew McConaughey fan, especially when he gets a chance to chew scenery (see: Reign of Fire.) And I did enjoy director Nikolaj Arcel’s Oscar-nominated, Mads Mikkelsen-starring sexy period drama, A Royal Affair. But the ever-shifting release date of The Dark Tower did not inspire confidence, to say the least.
Pritpaul: And the trailer raised some pretty immediate red flags with me, too. Between Roland’s arrival in New York and what appeared to be the presence of the Manni and the Taheen, that the movie seemed to be amalgamating bits and pieces of story across all eight books in an attempt to streamline the plot for viewing audiences was… concerning. And don’t even get me started on the PG-13 rating.
Theresa: So it’s fair to say we both went in with low expectations, right?
Pritpaul: Yes. And they were rewarded right off the bat when the movie opened with Jake’s vision of Mid-World instead of Roland in Mid-World.
Theresa: Right! “The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed” is one of the all-time great opening lines. So why are we in New York? It took far too long for Roland to be introduced. You have Idris Elba! Why be stingy?
Pritpaul: This was Stephen King watered down to a YA movie, but Hollywood usually gives kids more credit with fantasy worlds than they did here. Positing Jake as the protagonist, rather than Roland, irked me on a fundamental level. Tom Taylor isn’t a bad actor, he was just a bad choice to anchor this movie because frankly, his world is just regular old earth, not Mid-World, so by default it’s less wondrous. And in this particular series, especially with a runtime of 95 minutes, any time spent not immersed in Mid-World feels like a waste—a missed opportunity to organically introduce viewers to the systems and rules of King’s universe, rather than force-feeding them the rushed, patronizing infodumps that ruin the flow of the movie later on.
Theresa: I loved the simplicity of The Gunslinger because it was about a man torn between his quest to get to the tower and destroy the Man in Black, who had corrupted his family, his entire society, at odds with Roland’s struggle to retain a spark of humanity, embodied in his care for Jake. Was that really not easy enough to understand? Why the Last Action Hero-ness of it all?
Pritpaul: For a movie that mined plot points from across all eight books, I was especially frustrated by how much was missing—especially information that would help viewers actually care about the universe and characters in such a way that they would be invested in future installments. Roland’s character and motivation in the movie are entirely different from the book-verse. In the book, he’s consumed by his quest for the Tower at the expense of all else, but the events that shape his character along the way are stripped out of the film.
Gone is the massacre at Tull. Gone is the dangerous beauty of Mid-World. Gone is the sacrifice of Jake. Gone is Cort’s tough love. Gone is any kind of history for Roland, Steven, Marten, and Gabrielle. Gone is any real attempt to convey the weight of Roland’s quest and backstory. Instead, the movie posits him as driven by vengeance for his father, and not really giving a shit about the Tower at all. In fact, Jake is the one who guilts Roland into defending the Tower from all the way over on Keystone Earth—an argument that apparently required less than a minute in which Roland changes the entire course of his life.
We meet Steven Deschain for about 30 seconds, and that half-minute is expected to do literally all of the following work for the movie: (A) Establish Roland’s reasons for wanting revenge. (B) Establish weight behind the relationship between Steven, Roland, and Walter. (C) Establish Walter’s power. (D) Invest viewers in Roland’s desire for revenge. (E) Establish the power and stature of gunslingers in Mid-World. That’s a lot of weight to give 30 seconds of footage, and it predictably failed. I’m all for story simplification, but this was just plain old dumbing down. That may be my biased book-brain speaking, though; Theresa, did you feel the movie had enough gravitas to pull you in?

Theresa: This is where we talk about how Matthew McConaughey failed as a villain. First off, it’s hard to sound scary when your name is Walter, but okay. But, really, McConaughey was less a dark wizard than… Gob Bluth with bad FX. McConaughey had more charisma when he was a stripper in Magic Mike than he does in this movie. Also, I recoiled every time he said “mah magicksss.” I never felt he was anything more than just an annoyance. So, no, no gravitas.
Pritpaul: The FX didn’t do Walter any favors. And his henchmen were all nameless redshirts, lowmen and vampires, with a token nod to the Taheen. His delivery was flat and entire plot points from Wizard and Glass—like a collection of glasses from Maerlyn’s Rainbow that he CASUALLY RETRIEVES FROM A GODDAMNED CABINET—were just thrown in like they were no big deal. Not to mention how convenient it was to locate portals between worlds in the movie-verse. Roland spends months in the books tracking down portals, but here, they seem to be on every corner in New York and oh! Here’s one in Mid-World in this random village that for some reason appears to be a mash-up of River Crossing and the Manni. Great.
Theresa: And as corny and nonsensical as the Mid-World stuff was, The Dark Tower’s time on Earth wasn’t much better. I did think Jake’s mom had the most humanity out of anyone in the movie and I liked her scenes in isolation from the rest. And as much as I hated Jake being the main character, I thought the actor that played him was good. There were also some cute moments, like Roland eating his first hot dog, but Roland was such a dull cipher, the movie missed a great opportunity to really push some (tooter)fish out of water humor. I’m not even mad at Idris Elba; he just wasn’t given any character to work with.
Pritpaul: And there were moments of fun in the gun battles that helped establish Roland’s expertise, but nothing that managed to sustain itself through a complete action sequence. Just a couple of cool shots for a few seconds here or there. I guess it’s a blessing the movie was only 93 minutes long. 93 minutes!
Theresa: The ending filled me with rage because it was so goddamned corny. Jake’s basically got no family left, so understandably he’s somewhat eager to accept Roland’s invitation to join him back in the world of… whatever the hell is in his world. Is it evil-free now? No lobstrosities or demons? But when Roland says “Let’s go… gunslinger,” I expected a high-five, freeze-frame, and star wipe to the end credits. It was that much like an 80s sitcom. No, Jake, you are not a goddamned gunslinger. You barely touched a gun and real gunslingers had years of training and a careful code that Roland basically threw out the window when he offered such an honorific so flippantly. Now I must go punch things. With mah magicksss.
Pritpaul: What troubles me most is that there was a legitimate opportunity to be had here, had it not been shoehorned into a YA shell. Turn this into a hard R, slow burn horror-western. Take the baseline structure of The Gunslinger. Keep Roland as the protagonist, as he should have been all along. Capitalize on the beauty of the desert landscape—take your cinematic cues from the sandy color palettes of Fury Road instead of settling for whatever the hell the generic, bland aesthetic of this movie turned out to be. Let the viewers learn about the universe through Tull and its denizens, through Jake’s arrival, through the slow mutants. Let the viewers learn about Roland through the fallout of Tull, through Cort and Marten and Roland’s parents, through Jake’s sacrifice. Make a movie that credits its audience with some intelligence.
Roland claims, “Pleasant dreams die; the unpleasant ones live forever.” I sincerely hope this is not the last we see of The Dark Tower on the silver screen. It would be a shame for such an iconic series to begin and end in so wretched a fashion. But if any upcoming shows or movie options being picked up are contingent on the success of this film, well… there will be water if God wills it. About the great matters, we have no say.
Theresa: The Dark Tower disappointed me in the same way Robert Jordan fans must’ve felt when they saw that bizarre 2 a.m. Billy Zane Wheel of Time rights-grab nonsense. Just… there are other movies than these, pilgrim. Let’s go watch them… gunslinger.
Pritpaul and Theresa high-five before a freeze-frame and a star wipe to end credits. The Dark Tower is in theaters now. But probably not for long.
Theresa DeLucci and Pritpaul Bains have not forgotten the face of their fathers. Join their ka-tet on Twitter: @tdelucci and @pritpaulbains.
This was god awful. Why they didn’t just make a movie version of the first book is beyond me. I really wanted to like this, but it was just so bad. M.M. Was a horrible choice for Walter. The only thing missing was him saying “All Right All Right, let’s do some magiks. Make this into a Netflix or HBO series and do it right.
Yup, we live in a world where The Hobbit gets three long movies and a seven book series gets an hour and a half. (Storywise, TWTtKH is easy to leave out.)
I admit it was better than I was expecting, but my expectations were at rock bottom when I went. And if it wasn’t summer, I wouldn’t have bothered. (No AC)
Clearly, there was a lot left on the cutting room floor or neither the writer or director understands pacing. If they ever release an expanded version, I’ll probably give it a shot.
I was expecting this to be the beginning of the next (and final?) trip for Roland through the cycle, with an opening shot of him pursuing the man in black across the desert… with the Horn of Eld, and changes that start out small but culminate in him saving Jake instead of letting him die.
As a huge fan of the books I was incredibly disappointed. My husband who hasn’t read the books was just confused. I get that trying to find the middle ground between life long fans and people with no prior knowledge of the story is tricky but I’m not sure they could have done a worse job. Rumor has it the tv series will focus on Wizard and Glass. Seems like a series is the right medium for a story this large so maybe it can redeem itself?
One thing I did love – the TET Corporation logo at the beginning!
A question for Book Fans.
“The Good Man” that led his forces to destroy Giliead. Is he Flagg?
I don’t recall the books confirmed that.
@5 Nope, Flagg was Walter, who was an advisor of The Good Man, John Farson. Well, not so much an advisor as the Crimson King’s agent who stirred up Farson and co.
No, Flagg is the producer of this movie.
Upfront I didn’t enjoy the movie, but I can see how it is the movie we ended up with. You start with thousands of pages in a niche appeal series from an author whose star has been on the wane for fifteen years. A series that is hard R to NC17, requires an actor who can play a 12 year old for seven years of filming, gets meta as anything by the end, and starts with a lead who is only ever explained in narration. So instead of focusing the script on the most interesting character some executive with power of the money decides it should focus on the most accessible character. Of course the most accessible character being Jake means you’re not doing an R and you’re not doing a franchise. Add in some test screenings with low audience scores before the reshoots to complete the issues.
This is what you get. A movie by people who clearly liked the books, but had to make a movie that was inspired by instead of adapted from. Shame they didn’t manage to make a movie that was good on its own merits.
@7 That would explain so much!
I will be honest. No matter how good they might of made this film I would not of liked it. There is only one actor that could play Roland and that is 30-40ish Clint Eastwood. IMO this is one book series that should NEVER have been adapted to a movie unless they could invent a time machine and bring a young Eastwood to the set.
The reviews for this reinforce my long-standing observation that good Stephen King movies are the ones made from his non-supernatural, non-fantasy stories. (THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION, STAND BY ME. I might make an exception for THE GREEN MILE.)
@11
Uh, Carrie, The Shining, and arguably The Dead Zone.
@12 Yup. I’d definitely argue for The Dead Zone. One of my favorites, in fact. Pet Semetary isn’t great, but it’s got some great moments. So does Misery. King’s got a zillion book adaptations. Not all of them can be Oscar-caliber. And I wouldn’t say he’s on the wane, either; he’s still hitting the bestseller lists and his Twitter account makes national news frequently. I think IT is going to do much, much better than The Dark Tower.
Let this sink in for a second: the movie made $19 million over the weekend. 19.
@13, well, we can hope…
Theresa:
“Now I must go punch things. With mah magicksss.”
That cracked me up. Thank you.
And thank you both for this review. I probably will not go and see this movie. I rarely let myself be influenced by reviews, but the factual evidence you gave here says a lot.
What amazes me about making this a movie is that, with the new trend in binge viewing, this would have been so much better as a Netflix Original or Amazon Prime series with an entire season released at one time. Even with the Dead Zone, the movie wasn’t bad but they got so much more out of the content with the series.
I actually really enjoyed it. I didn’t go in expecting an adaptation of The Gunslinger, which seems to be the problem for most people. I felt like they were just trying to get at the heart of the overall story’s conflict, which is Sombra and the breakers and the Dixie Pig, not the first sentence of the first book. Isn’t it kind of crazy that after 8 books, people still fetishize the first sentence? The first sentence isn’t the story, and if you look at the whole saga, that time in the desert is a fairly small piece. The Dark Tower is more than King Arthur’s Cowboys of the Wild West Round Table!
I thought McConaughey was exactly how I pictured Walter/Marten/Flagg. Totally nihilistic, bored, and killing on a whim. In the books, he always seemed to be the one who knew he was in a story, so none of it mattered anyway.
I liked that there was a conclusion, so that you have closure if no more movies get made, but there are still bigger threats to the Tower if they do make more, culminating with The Crimson King himself.
I do hope the Netflix series adaptation starting from the events of Wizard & Glass does actually happen, because that’s the story that couldn’t be told in a movie.
I’m going to go in a different direction than most. I loved the movie and I have read the Tower books more than 5 times each. Let me explain…. BOOK SPOILERS AHEAD
Watch this movie as if it is Book 8, another trip around Ka’s wheel….
At the end of Book 7, Roland is back in the Mohaine with the Horn of Eld and Jake (now Toren instead of Chambers) is with Eddie and Sus doing their ice skating thing. (Keep in mind, the book ends with the iconic line “…and the Gunslinger followed”, yet we are never specifically told where Walter is, the line being used to indicate the journey starting over.)
The movie opens with Algul Siento and the Breakers trying to kill the Tower, Jake in New York (note: this isn’t Jake Toren (nee Chambers), the Jake from books 1-7), and Roland in the desert. The movie Jake, not being the book series Jake is free to go his own path. After all, “there are other worlds than these”. The attitude of movie Roland being very loner near the beginning of his quest (pre-lobstrosities) matches nicely with his book counterpart, with the exception of “Tower protector” instead of “Tower seeker”.
Considering it as Book 8 allows so many things to not need further explanation: Taheen, the Dixie Pig, the Wizard’s Rainbow, the portals, the world having “moved on”, the constant rose imagery, Sombra, North Central Positronics, the Breakers, the Tet Corporation logo (which with that logo proves it is Book 8, the Corporation existing fully on another Earth having been established in the book series), etc.
Is the movie perfect? Absolutely not.
Are there things that could be improved? Yes.
Is it for everyone? Not in my opinion, no. I went with a friend who had never read the books and she said that she knew 15 minutes in that she was missing a lot of the details. Having to try to enjoy it as a regular film, she thought it was “just ok, nothing special”.
Does it provide an adequate starting point for further adventures? Yes. If viewers are confused enough to not like it now, imagine the confusion of the movie fans when Roland’s varied Ka-tets’ from previous trips around Ka’s wheel start trying to merge with this (hopefully) final go around. We could have a full multiverse cast of characters, i.e. multiple Jakes’, Eddies’, Susannas’, Alains’, Cuthberts’, etc.
I spent the whole film catching the tiny details that scream “sequel” instead of “reboot” or “reimagine”. This time, Roland’s trip to the Tower need not be full of the slow (yet personally enjoyed in the books) pace of the books.
Am I being overly optimistic, having desired my love of the Tower Series to become the wide spread fandom I know it could be? Possibly…
Correct me if I am wrong but Stephen King himself approved the screen presentation for this movie as he expect more version of the series to be coming forth, plus there is a TV series in the planning to encompass the whole series.
I gather from the storyline of the movie, that it covers the part of the series of Jake’s life and his contact with the Gunslinger. The whole series is a circular story with constant flashbacks especially when Roland starts using the doors. It took me several re-reads of the novels to get the process straight, plus you get those references to the other novels like Salem’s Lot.
Also remember all of us have a unique mind view of the story too.
That first photo: Doctor Who as it could be next time round.
@10 Some people have suggested Clint’s son Scott Eastwood for the role. Personally I think Idris is great casting for a Clint-Eastwood-esque character like Roland. Sadly he wasn’t given the material to demonstrate that.
Grossest misinterpretation of literature EVER!
The writers of this movie, obviously never read the book or purposely set out to make this as wildly different from the book as possible.
Akiva Goldsman, Jeff Pinkner, Anders Thomas Jensen and Nikolaj Arcel should all be introduced to Pennywise for their part in this.
When is a Dark Tower not a Dark Tower?
http://realitysandwich.com/322122/when-is-a-dark-tower-not-a-dark-tower/
I also enjoyed it. Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t love it, and I know how much material they left out– but I thought they did a fairly good job of taking an incredibly long storyline and boiling it down to its core essence. I read the reviews before I saw it, and knew that it had been almost universally bashed by the critics. I went in with extremely low expectations, which made it easy for the movie to surpass my expectations. But my feelings about it are mixed, because I’m afraid that all the negative reactions to it will decrease the likelihood of any more movies or a TV series being made for years to come.
Oh hell no, Clint Eastwood would have been absolutely horrible in the role. Such boring, bland and obvious machismo, trying so hard to be tough, just awful. He was lucky he was round in the 70s because he would be laughed off the screen now.
So far as looks go, insofar as the books went Lucas Bryant would have done well.
However, Idris Elba was excellent and just was not given the material to work with. Of course they couldn’t possibly just start with just the first book and work their way forward, but they could have given us 2 hours and at least a couple of books and let us enjoy the lead up to a greater fight.
And that ending. Really? Am hoping there will be a second movie and they will show us that the ending was a red herring.