Perhaps the most futuristic thing about Star Trek: The Next Generation was that way back in 1987, the show’s creators and designers predicted that the portable phones of the future would become jewelry. In the grand scheme of wearable sci-fi tech the Trek communicator badge is iconic for its simplicity, but also because it made a silly idea into something legitimately cool. But now that the communicator badge has returned—a full century early—on Star Trek: Discovery, what are diehard fans supposed to think? Did Section 31 rip-off the future?
Spoilers ahead for Star Trek: Discovery season 2, episode 5, “Saints of Imperfection.”
In the latest episode, just as the USS Discovery is getting sucked into the Mycelium Network, newly-minted Section 31 agent Ash Tyler reveals not only that a Section 31 ship is hanging out nearby, but also that he has an awesome communicator, one which just looks like a regular Starfleet badge. When Ash calls for emergency backup by tapping his badge, an incredulous Captain Pike says, “What the hell kind of communicator is that?” Viewers who are very new to Star Trek might be asking the same question, but those of us who grew up on TNG, DS9 and Voyager already know that in the 24th century, the Starfleet combadge replaces the flip-up handheld communicators of the 23rd century. So, what’s the deal? Haters might say that Discovery is, once again, messing with established Star Trek canon, but maybe it’s not.
It’s relevant to note that the flip-up style communicator used by Burnham and company on Discovery has, at this point in the timeline, existed for about 100 years. In the prequels series Enterprise, Captain Archer (Scott Bakula) and crew use a flip-up style communicator throughout all four seasons of the show, which take place from 2151 through, roughly, 2161. In fact, in the Discovery season 1 episode “The War Within, The War Without,” Admiral Cornwell name checks Captain Archer and references the events of the first Enterprise episode ever, “Broken Bow,” when she talks about how it’s been “nearly 100 years” since a Starfleet ship has visited the Klingon homeworld.
What does this have to do with communicators? Well, in 2151, Starfleet needed literal human translators, like Hoshi Sato, to talk to aliens like the Klingons. During the run of Enterprise, Hoshi invents the universal translator, meaning the flip-up communicators of the 22nd Century don’t have the same functionality as the flip-up communicators of the 23rd. So while the communicators that exist during Enterprise in the 2150s and Discovery in the 2250s, look similar (they both have flippy lids), they perform very different functions—the point being, aesthetics don’t necessarily denote functionality.

Ash Tyler has a combadge that he taps in 2257, and so does Captain Picard in 2364, but that doesn’t mean Tyler’s combadge has the same functionality. For all we know, Tyler’s version is only an emergency communicator and could be limited to a one-time-only usage. Or, like the tech split that separates the Enterprise communicator from the Discovery ones, it seems likely that Tyler’s comm badge doesn’t have the same functionality—like a built-in automatic universal translator—like the ones from the 24th century. (And it certainly doesn’t automatically brew coffee like Janeway’s badge certainly does on Voyager.)
Weirdly though, there are other explanations that are little more far out. This is bizarrely not the first time a TNG-style combadge has appeared in the 23rd century. In the 2012 IDW Star Trek comic book series, following the adventures of the reboot crew, Captain Kirk taps his badge to talk to the Enterprise. This can easily be explained because the technology of the alternate 23rd century is way more advanced than the Prime Timeline because Starfleet cannibalized so much technology from Nero’s time traveling ship from the future. Or to put it more simply, Kelvin Universe Captain Kirk can have a combadge because of time travel shenanigans. Which, could explain Ash Tyler, too.
What if there is time travel going on in Discovery right now? What if Ash Tyler’s combadge is just as sophisticated as the kind from Picard’s era? Why would Starfleet repress this technology? The boring answer is that they intentionally want to hold back certain experimental tech, mostly because Section 31 is a super manipulative and paternal organization, and likes to control the flow of innovation in the galaxy. But, again, that’s the boring answer. The exciting answer is this: Section 31 is already time traveling and is part of the Department of Temporal Investigations.

In “Saints of Imperfection,” Leland seems really familiar with time travel, while Captain Pike is more dismissive. That could be because Leland and his Section 31 crew are already time traveling, and perhaps manipulating history in subtle ways. Now, I’m not saying this will all prove that Discovery isn’t in the Prime Timeline, but there is a Trek precedent for this kind of thing. In the Voyager episode “Relativity” Seven of Nine is recruited by a future-version of Starfleet who basically acts exactly like Section 31. Her mission is to travel back in time and prevent the USS Voyager from being destroyed by a hidden explosive. In the Deep Space Nine episode “Trials and Tribble-ations” members of the Department of Temporal Investigations grill Captain Sisko about time traveling back to the 23rd Century to save Captain Kirk’s life. These guys also act like they’re from Section 31.
In Discovery, Section 31 is way more out in the open to the main characters than it was in Deep Space Nine. But, Deep Space Nine is over a hundred years in Discovery’s future. Who’s to say that between now and then, Section 31 won’t clean-up it’s super-obvious meddling, using time travel? Because if Ash Tyler literally borrowed his combadge from the 24th century, think what else Section 31 might know…or already have.
Ryan Britt is the author of Luke Skywalker Can’t Read and an editor at Fatherly. He is a longtime contributor to Tor.com.
Oh God I hope not.
As a military veteran, I can honestly tell you that (even in our own timeline), the Special Ops teams and Covert Organizations (ie Navy Seals, Army Rangers, Delta Force (CAG), etc., are most often the teams that recieve new Tech … long before it’s even known to anyone.
Many times, the new Tech is often created specifically for (or even BY) such Covert Operations Teams.
That being said, who’s to say that Section 31 didn’t in fact develope these communicators to use covertly as a recorder as well as secret communications devise? Just as James Bond uses a watch or ink pen to record and/or communicate. And, just maybe, Ash (being a new recruit) majorly screwed up by using it in front of others.
No, they didn’t get the commbadges from the future, the same way the Starfleet in Discovery didn’t get touchscreens and holographic communicators from the future.
And Sato didn’t invent the UT, she was just needed to work on feeding it new languages and help develop it practically, and step in if it fails, because it’s still experimental. I’m currently rewatching ENT and it’s never said she invented it. She does create Linguacode, a translation matrix to be used in first contact situation and when the UT is not viable.
The future Timefleet from VOY or DTI agents in DS9 do not act like S31.
It makes more sense that it started, did some bad things, and then was disbanded to be re-established later.
So many errors and inconsistencies in this show, have any of the writers even watched an episode of TOS, or Next Generation?
If they are time traveling, I hope they bring back something Discovery really needs: a good script!
There seems to be a tendency to sieze upon something and come up with the most complicated explanation of its significance. What I believe was a more subtle nugget provided in this episode was the mention of Cestus III.
Leland, the head of Section 31, just came back from Cestus III after being up to his ass in alligators (Gorn) there. Section 31 is setting up a ‘listening post’ there in 2257 to keep tabs on the Gorn? Eventually, Commodore Travers will command the base, whose existence will bring on the Gorn attack in 2267 during the episode ‘Arena’.
plesse… no time traveling. I find that with rare exceptions, the use of it in Trek stories is the result of lazy story writing and telling.
It sucks to be forced to work around a 60s (or 70s) vision of the 24th century. I say that we either not make any more series that are set in the same time as the original series, or give it a rest and be okay that the tech is updated. We didn’t complain about the advances made from TOS to the movies…too much.
@Ken: But the films play (slightly, but still) after the TV show and the jump doesn’t seem that far-fetched.
There had been different choices. Place the show even further in the future. Or: Embrace the “alternate technological history” of Trek. Just accept it as a point of divergence and play with that. Or: Reboot it and state that it’s Trek, but not in the same continuity as the original. The problem here is that the production team chose the most problem-laden path and now they have to come up (on the fly) with contrived reasons all of this still very much fits with what we’ve seen so far. I really wished they’d just say: “Screw you, guys, it’s a fresh timeline. And now let us do our work. Thank you.”
About the idea of a time-travelling Section 31: There’s a lot of potential in that, because they can go whenever wherever. You could have a “Trials & Tribble-ations” every week. But I’m not sure the current writers are organized enough to pull this off without it seeming gratuitous. So, I’d rather they wouldn’t.
@9 I’m pretty sure we just didn’t have the Internet to amplify complaints. And since it was in the future of the series rather than a prequel, it was easier to handwave technology changes. (Albeit not changes to, e.g., Klingon appearance.)
Discovery was driving me insane with all of the inconsistencies and violations of canon. Like, keeping me awake at night, insane. So I just let it go. I watch it like I watch the Orville. I just pretend it’s not Star Trek, never was, never will be. Some of the species are the same, some even coincidentally have the same names, but it’s not Star Trek, because women could not command Star Ships, and were expected to get married and settle down after their little starship game. And aliens did not serve on starships with the exception of the odd Vulcan here and there. And doctors weren’t gay, they were backward redneck bigots who verbally taunted Vulcans with insults about their logic and green blood. Now, don’t get me wrong, I watched TOS since it came out, and in reruns to this day. I had books and merchandise and went to a Star Trek Convention once. But Discovery makes a horrible prequel to TOS. It should have been in the future. Then all would have been well. So just tell yourself, it’s Discovery, but it’s not Star Trek and you’ll sleep like a baby.
@12 –
There’s a farm in rural Pennsylvania screaming for you to come back home.
I thought about it again and… actually, time travel may be the answer that Discovery needs. Section 31 somehow got time travel technology, the regularly make or made jumps to the future and brought future tech back. Some is too far advanced to reverse engineer, but the incongruous things (like the holoprojectors) could be easily explained that way. And: If you do this, it means that Discovery (and following shows) are now on a new branch of the timeline, invalidating any criticism about canon violations. Yeah, this would be pretty much a panacea.
Also: Would be pretty cool to have Ash or Georgiou or Leland show up in – say – Star Trek VI and realize that it wasn’t Kirk who saved the day but the people working behind the scenes. Or realizing how in The Best of Both Worlds the Borg *would* have taken over the Federation if not for Georgiou stopping them (and taking some cool Borg tech back to the 23rd century).
So, after thinking about it: I actually embrace the Time Tunnel Section 31 idea.
Why is it automatically added that section 31 is widely known? Couldn’t it be the other way around? Discovery herself is no ordinary ship, and her crew is likewise no ordinary crew… I mean… Black alert? Special unis and insignias? Spore drive? It was all explained in the very first episode. Is it too far fetched to consider that this crew is entirely made up of personnel with higher-than-typical clearance levels and just are all “read-in” on section 31?
@9 – Ken: That’s exactly what the show does, update the tech. Most fans are okay with that.
@12 – Lynn: Psst… it is Star Trek, no matter what you tell yourself.
@13 – Carlos: By travelling in time to 1960. :)
@14 – Sonic: No, it’s not an alternate timeline. It’s the prime Star Trek universe.
@15 – xcalibr: True.
Really… Time travelers? Section 31? STD? All this is a contradiction in terms…. LOL.
Also all this is A.A Trek, not G.R. Trek, there is a big difference. What is A.A. Trek? All Access Trek or what is really known as Prime Canon or Prime Time Canon. G.R. Trek is known as Gene Roddenberry Trek. What the fans don’t seem to realize is that the two Treks are totally different and should be seen as such. A.A. Trek is something of a total and complete reboot of the Star Trek Franchise for CBS All Access and has nothing to do with Gene Roddenberry Trek which is 50 years of series, movies and books. I have accepted this the moment it came out and knew right away what Prime Canon meant when Kurtzman did this series. So, I will be honest, I don’t accept A.A. Trek, I am a fan of G.R. Trek, and no… no hatred or pun is intended here so don’t take it as such.
@16 MaGnUs: I know it’s the Prime Timeline. But once you introduce a time travelling Section 31 you can argue that it has now branched off of the old timeline. You essentially get rid of 50 years of clutter and the complaints about discrepancies stop. You could use this as a way to finally move past the nitpicking.
@18 Brian: That is an argument that toxic people like Doomcock and Midnight’s Edge spread, it’s not a proven or even slightly valid theory.
A Section 31 time traveling show could open up a lot of storytelling possibilities. It’s success would, of course, depend on execution. Obviously, we’ve had such stories before, like Kirk and Crew Save the Whales. The charm of such stories would require a main character that is warm and charismatic, say a Doctor Who type. Plus likable companions.
Unfortunately, there are no such characters on the horizon. We have a tortured Klingon-turned-human, an evil empress from an alternate universe, and a dark-ops type we don’t know much about. None of these figures inspire warmth or affection, which I would argue would be necessary to follow a crew on time travel shenanigans.
The legacy of season one Discovery’s darkness may have infected any chances of telling time travel stories with likable characters.
Time travel? I don’t know… I love time traveling as any other Trek head out there, but not this one. You should progress on your own not because someone or something came from the future to give you a lift forward. That’s why “Trials and Tribble-ations” (not being one of my favorite episodes) works. The incursions into the past is to prevent alterations on the timeline to stop a malignant agent who wanted to kill Kirk. But getting a technological push forward, isn’t a form of violation of the Prime Directive (General Order One)? Can we made the same objection Pike made on “New Eden” when he decided that the best course of action was not to intervene with the natural development of a society? By bringing technology from the future, the Federation is taking the risk of changing the timeline and is maybe mocking the scientist that are working for a better tomorrow.
For anyone who’s not aware of our commenting guidelines, you can find them here. Please keep the conversation civil and constructive in tone.
Spoiler for next Disc episode:
Guess we now have theorizing on the show itself that the Red Angel is a time traveler.