You can often separate your generations out by Disney movies, though it seems a strange thing to do. And one of the movies that was absolutely key for mine happened to be The Lion King.
But here’s the kicker—The Lion King wasn’t intended as a golden egg-laying goose. In fact, it was the unloved cousin that Disney wanted swept under the rug from the outset. It was expected to fail. Here are a few tales, a few behind-the-scenes gems that make it clear why this oddball project that was based on no fairy tale whatsoever became something of a classic.
To begin with, perhaps the most interesting fact of all—this movie was not something Disney was banking on. The hierarchy in the animation division at that point in time went thus: all the best movies were about people. If you got stuck working on the movie about talking animals, good luck, but critical acclaim was not to be yours. So those who were largely considered Disney’s “A-team” were all hard at work during this period… on Pocahontas. The Lion King was basically meant to be a “gap year” piece of filler to give audiences something to watch while the next Disney pet project was still underway.
The connections between the film’s plot and Shakespeare’s Hamlet (an often talked-about influence) were not initially intentional. In earlier drafts of the script, Scar was not Mufasa’s brother—he was a lion without his own pride, who wanted what Mufasa had. Later on in story meetings, it was suggested that they could be related. The writers quickly realized that it gave the story certain parallels to Hamlet and started running wild with it. Apparently they considered going so far as to have Scar say “Goodnight sweet prince,” to Mufasa before letting his brother fall to his death. The next morning everyone, better for some sleep, agreed that it was a terrible idea and they reined in the references.
It is important to note that The Lion King is the first animated feature that Disney created independent of direct source material. Most people who heard of the overall plot scoffed at the idea. But for whatever reason, the people who ended up on their team became utterly dedicated to making it work. The script was overhauled more than once—at one point in time it had no music, and was going to be more of an animated “National Geographic special.” One of the original titles was “King of the Jungle,” which was scrapped when it was finally noted the story took place in the savannah. It was then that The Lion King came into play.
Because the music is one of the defining aspects of The Lion King, there is (unsurprisingly) much to say about its evolution. Elton John and Tim Rice were tapped for the songs and Hans Zimmer for the score. But Zimmer desperately wanted to recruit Lebo M to help him with the music; they had worked together previously on the film The Power of One. Unfortunately Lebo M, a singer and composer who was exiled from his country of South Africa at the time, proved impossible to get a hold of. Zimmer kept trying to leave him messages, but never heard back from the man. Eventually, he got a call from the directors (Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff) that they were coming over to see what he had written, and that he needed to have more of the soundtrack finished soon. After the call, his doorbell rang—Lebo M was standing there on his doorstep. Zimmer dragged him indoors and told him about the project.
Lebo M asked Zimmer to explain the plot of the film to him. As Zimmer did so, Lebo M began to write down the basics in Zulu to give himself a reference of word and phrases he might pull into the music. The directors arrived and asked Zimmer about the opening of the film—it was previously agreed that the movie would begin as the sun rose over the pride lands, with a single voice to herald it. Zimmer had Lebo M head into the recording studio he had set up, told him what they were trying to accomplish in that first moment, and asked if he could just riff to see if anything came to him. Lebo M tried many variations, but nothing fit quite right. Zimmer and the directors were beginning to panic over whether they would have the opening number complete in time to screen for the up-and-ups, chatting back and forth about what they might have to do….
Suddenly, Lebo M calls out: “Nants ingonyama bagithi Baba!”
Everyone stops. They all know it without saying a word. That’s it.
Once the opening number was complete, on both the music and animation sides of things, “The Circle of Life” was screened for Mike Eisner, the head of Disney at the time. As the screening ended, Eisner informed the creative team that they’d messed up big time. They asked why and held their breath.
Eisner’s response? “Because now the rest of the film has to be this good.”
He had a good point.
Based solely on the strength of “The Circle of Life,” the initial Lion King trailer was the very first Disney preview that opted to show a single uninterrupted scene rather than cuts of footage. It was a hit with audiences instantly. Fascinatingly, this trailer contained no spoken dialogue whatsoever.
Part of the strength of Lion King rests on the laurels of some honestly excellent voice talent. From James Earl Jones to Jeremy Irons, the cast had the calibre that audiences had come to suspect from Disney features… but they could have easily ended up with a different set. For instance, Nathan Lane and Ernie Sabella were originally called in to audition for two of the hyenas. The actors were in the middle of a run of Guys and Dolls together and were asked to audition side by side, which led to their casting as Timon and Pumba instead. Timon’s unforgettable sidetrack “What do you want me to do—dress in drag and do the hula?” was actually an ad-lib from Lane.
Additionally, the film intended to reunite Cheech and Chong as the two main hyenas, but when scheduling did not permit Tommy Chong’s appearance, one hyena was rewritten as a female. This, of course, resulted in the stellar casting of Whoopi Goldberg as Shenzi.
Because so many Disney films were based on fairy tales and children’s books, it was more common for their backdrops to feature vague Western-style castles or to be set in Europe outright. The Lion King was one of the first films to abandon this entirely, and the first to be inarguably set in Africa. (Aladdin does not quite make the cut—it’s location is unclear, more likely in the Middle East.) Interestingly, though Disney translates many of its films into a variety of languages, The Lion King was the very first (and one of very few in cinema, period) to be translated into Zulu, the language that comprises all of the non-English lyrics in the soundtrack.
But all of these perfect alignments of fate aside, The Lion King has been widely praised for its ability to accurately communicate loss to children. One of the animators spoke in a tearful interview of a letter they received following the release of the film. It was from a recently widowed father with two sons. He claimed that he hadn’t known what to tell his boys when they asked where their mother had gone following her death. When they went to see the film and the two boys saw Mufasa speaking to Simba from the clouds, he was able to explain to them that this was where there mother was. That she would never leave them, just as Mufasa had never left his son.
This is more likely the true reason The Lion King is so well-loved and well-remembered twenty years later. For all that could have gone wrong in a second-string production, everyone working on it banded together because they wanted it to succeed. They had something to say. Instead of sticking by their B-team status, the creative crew elevated themselves and made their own challenges. It is a underdog story that ends with a brand new tale—one that still has the ability to teach future generations about family, cycles of life and death, balance, and social responsibility.
And it was meant to be a silly romp with talking lions. Which just proves that there’s no good reason to settle for being second fiddle.
This story originally appeared on Tor.com on June 15, 2014.
Emmet Asher-Perrin remembers seeing that first Lion King trailer in the theater and being utterly breathless by the end. You can bug her on Twitter and read more of her work here and elsewhere.
I actually went to Disney World in Orlando in 1993, and got to see many of the original animation cels for this movie on a tour of the animation studio. I knew just looking at them that it was going to be incredible.
Maybe not a fairytale, but it WAS heavily based on another property despite Disney denying it. Check out the comparison shots here between The Lion King and Kimba the White Lion: http://www.kimbawlion.com/kimbawlion/rant2.htm
I love this movie & can still watch it whenever it is on tv.
Rather glad that Tommy Chong wasn’t available. Not only for the fact that the dialogue would have been like their routines but also it would have meant missing out on Whoopi’s Shenzi – a true crime that.
The music is perfect and of course Timon & Pumba steal the movie.
Kato
The Lion King was the formative Disney movie for me too. I was six, and my lifelong love for fictional villains began with those hyenas, who I obsessively adored for years. And thought I was basically the only person ever to do so, though a loyal friend or two humored me on it, until The Internet recently introduced me to their fandom. Kids these days rarely have to suffer that.
(You’d think it would be The Little Mermaid, but in fact I first watched that one in college and didn’t exactly relate to it)
This was one of the great ones. Sometimes, everything just falls into place and the whole becomes greater than the sum of the parts.
This is an honest question, not troll bait. I was exactly in the right age range for Lion King to be a gigantic part of my childhood. . .but it wasn’t. I admired it but I’ve never loved it the way most people do. (True confessions–I vastly preferred Pocahontas.) And I’m really trying to figure out why Lion King tapped into the zeitgeist so intensely but passed me over. So, besides viewers actually coping with loss like the ones the author cites: why, exactly, did Lion King speak so much to you? Open mike. I feel like there’s something important here about the cultural history of this time period that I’m just missing and it’s kinda driving me crazy.
@6
For me, it was a combination of genuinely amazing songs (literally not a bad one, I even love ‘Be Prepared’ even though it’s not as iconic as all the others) and the epic feel of the movie, which I haven’t seen (or hadn’t at that point in my young life) in any other Disney film. Years pass, life goes by, the son becomes the father, all in the space of about 75 mins. I was stunned by the scope of it.
And lastly and most importantly, I’d never seen a tragic death of a paternal figure in a kids movie before. When Rifiki is telling Simba his father is alive, I remember thinking ‘of course! He isn’t dead after all!’ The brutality of it was upsetting of course, but it’s what makes it the most powerful film I saw in my childhood.
Absolutely right that the strength & endurance of the film is in communicating loss, especially loss of a parent, and not just to children. I saw it a few months after my father died in 1993 and cried & cried & cried. Seeing my sense of wrongness & heart-injury & pain pictured on the screen was very hard and very helpful. Plus, as a child whose parent died unexpectedly, the bewilderment & shock portrayed were powerfully cathartic. I was 30 at the time.
How can we even know all this is true, when we know disney is lying through their teeth about a load of details of the development of the film because of the obvious legal implications? read as: intended remake becomes plagiarism when they were unable to secure the rights to the original material.
@6: Chance and preference, I think. It’s exclusively about animals, which I’ve always loved. And (possibly for that reason) someone happened to give me the video of it at a pivotal time, as I was hardly ever taken to watch movies in theaters. I watched it a bajillion times, had friends who loved it too, and savored the diversity of sights and songs. And eventually saw the stage musical, which is ruddy spec-tac-u-lar and everyone should listen to its soundtrack. *starts playing it on Spotify*
Pocahontas? I first-watched it just a few years ago, while catching up on the many Disney classics I’d never seen. But I somehow saw the “Colors of the Wind” segment many times — on some videos previews, maybe? — and it lent credence to the stories I wrote about wild girls who lived in wilderness, loved those considered “enemies,” and imparted greater respect for both.
@Various, from 1994 LA Times article (full citiation below)
Takayuki Matsutani, president of Tezuka Productions in Tokyo, said there is some similarity between the animated creations on two counts: the son grows up to be the king’s successor after his father’s death, and the symbolic scene where Simba stands on a rock in “The Lion King,” whereas in the Japanese version, the opening scene has Kimba standing on a rock. He also agreed there were similarities in the baboon, the bird, the hyenas and the evil lion.
“However, quite a few staff of our company saw a preview of ‘The Lion King,’ discussed this subject and came to the conclusion that you cannot avoid having these similarities as long as you use animals as characters and try to draw images out of them,” Matsutani said.
“If the Disney Co. had gotten a hint from ‘The Jungle Emperor,’ Osamu Tezuka, a founder of our company, would have been pleased,” he continued. “And, we feel the same way, rather than making a claim.
“Therefore, our company’s general opinion is ‘The Lion King’ is a totally different piece from ‘The Jungle Emperor’ and is an original work completed by the Disney production’s long-lasting excellent production technique.”
Asked about the apparent similarities, Minkoff said that whenever a story is based in Africa, it is “not unusual to have characters like a baboon, a bird or hyenas.”
“I know for a fact that (“Kimba”) has never been discussed as long as I’ve been on the project,” said Minkoff, who joined the film project in April, 1992. “In my experience, if Disney becomes aware of anything like that, they say you will not do it. People are claiming copyright infringement all the time.”
WELKOS, R. W. (1994, July 13, 1994). A ‘kimba’ surprise for disne. LA Times
@9, @11
It’s not especially surprising considering Disney’s influence on Japanese animation. I guess it all comes full circle.
A similar coincidence is the similarity between Harry Potter and Neil Gaiman’s Books of Magic comic book.
From this article, “An unassuming English kid with glasses obtains a pet owl, and takes up his preordained destiny to enter a secret world of magic hidden in plain sight—brought to you by one of the world’s most successful fantasy authors.
That thumbnail summary of course describes Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling’s hit series first published in 1997, which is still a massive pop-culture phenomenon today. But the description also fits The Books of Magic, a DC Comics miniseries published 25 years ago…”
Well, yes, but the Books of Magic / Harry Potter similarities stop there; the shots in TLK mirroring shots from Kimba are pretty blatant.
@11@12
Right, I love the lion king and I don’t question the fact that africa as a setting limits you to similar tropes, same as a coming of age wizard story, but two points:
1-Just because Tekuza productions admire Disney, doesn’t make it OK for Disney to fail to aknowledge reality, they intended to make a remake and all those quotes just confirm the way Disney won’t acknowledge it. Theres production evidence of the kimba remake, not to mention the multiple artistic choices that are wholly paralell. Disney didnt want their work to go to waste when they couldnt secure the rights, so their stance since has been deny knowledge.
2- I’m not really questioning the damage or malintent of Disney, Im saying how can I trust what the stories of preproduction say, when I know Disney is lying about multiple aspects of it. For example, Im sure a big reason The Lion King was a bastard child for Disney was precisely the fear of getting sued.
@10: An abridged version of the Colours of the Wind song featured on the Lion King VHS as a preview for that movie (along with an ad for Disney World, the Aristocats etc.; I watched that VHS to death as a child)
@15, I remember that from the VHS I owned. Disney always had these big VHS cases for their movies, I remember my mother buying many of them, because she really thought they had staying power and I could pass them on to my kids. And we did still have a VCR for a few years after my daughter was born, so we did get a lot of use out of them. It’s kinda sad though too, how the medium was replaced rendering all my mother’s effort so worthless.
@16 – I still have my very extensive Disney VHS collection and we (my family) still watch them :) And yes, I totally remember that ad!!!
Interestingly, I’m in the same boat as 6. I really like Lion King, and I was born in 82, so basically the right age, but it doesn’t immediately spring to mind as one of my favorites. For me the ‘golden age’ of Disney that best represents what I think about when I think ‘Disney’ based on my formative years is the Little Mermaid – Beauty and the Beast – Aladdin trifecta, as well as the steady diet of ‘classics’ (Sleeping Beauty, Cinderella). Maybe because I’m a big sucker for songs and romance and fairy tales, and the songs in Lion King didn’t really do it for me (I know, I know…) or maybe it was just Jonathan Taylor Thomas that totally annoyed me. It’s still in the top half, but not one of my go to movies. In fact, when looking at movies from the same era, I’d say I even prefer Hercules and Hunchback of Notre Dame.
But, it definitely is a pretty fantastic movie (I can probably appreciate it more now as an adult), and it’s interesting to hear the Hamlet connection spelled out. I never totally bought the ‘Lion King is a direct remake of Hamlet’ that I’ve heard some people try to argue, although I could agree they had some tropes in common and maybe took some inspiration, but it’s interesting to know that they even toned it down a bit.