In February 1989, audiences saw, for the first time, a young Keanu Reeves lean close to a young Alex Winter and declare, “Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.”
It was a critical moment, not only in the plot of Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, but in pop culture. As the movie posters had it, history was about to be rewritten by two guys who couldn’t spell. It was a goofy movie, and most of the critics didn’t get it. Teenagers did, though. For those of us who were young in 1989, Bill and Ted gave us exactly the time travel movie we needed.
Now they might be able to do it again.
A new Bill and Ted movie is in pre-production. There are reasons to be circumspect; people have been talking about a new Bill and Ted movie for years. And the franchise that followed Excellent Adventure—a second movie, animated series, video games—was uneven, to put it charitably.
It’s worth remembering, too, that the original movie has serious problems. There’s a homophobic slur played for humor, most of the female characters exist solely to satisfy a really gross male gaze, and the historical figures whose perspectives on modern life form the film’s MacGuffin are nearly uniformly white and male. To rewatch Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure is to smile, to groan, and to cringe.
But the movie did one thing very right: it made a time-travel movie about how history can be shaped by joy and friendship. And it made it at precisely the right moment.
Time travel as a genre is about cause and consequence, about the constant of change. It’s about how we got here, as individuals and as a civilization, and where we want to go. “We have to ask these questions, don’t we?” James Gleick writes in Time Travel: A History. “Is the world we have the only world possible? Could everything have turned out differently?”
In the mid-1980s, time-travel movies tended to be informed by regret, fear and nostalgia. In the United States, this was a period bookended by a recession and a stock market crash. Scientists had just confirmed that acid rain was a serious threat. Christopher Hitchens railed in The Nation in 1985 about “the rulers of our world, who subject us to lectures about the need to oppose terrorism while they prepare, daily and hourly, for the annihilation of us all.”
Yeah, it was a cheerful age.
In 1984’s Terminator, we learned that the future was trying to kill us. The following year, the past tried to take a piece of us too.
Back to the Future was the first time-travel movie I saw, and as fun as it was, it was also terrifying. There’s a minor chord running through it, from the gun-toting terrorists in the van, to the family photograph from which Marty McFly slowly disappears. Back to the Future was literally about the existential horror of living in a world determined by Baby Boomers’ choices. It was, in other words, peak 1985.
Then in 1986, we got Peggy Sue Got Married, about a woman who is transported back to 1960 to come to terms with her life choices. Again.
“Regret is the time traveler’s energy bar,” writes Gleick. And in the mid-1980s, there seemed to be no shortage of things to regret.
But by the end of that decade, something had shifted. There were signs that apartheid’s days were numbered in South Africa, perestroika was underway in the Soviet Union, and the Berlin Wall was soon to come down. People were using the phrase “new world order” without irony.
“What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War,” wrote Francis Fukuyama in 1989, “or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.”
The end of history.
Into that moment stepped Bill S. Preston, Esq. (Winter) and Ted “Theodore” Logan (Reeves), two high-school kids in San Dimas, California, who are about to fail their history presentation. If they do, Ted’s father will send him away to military school, which means the two will never learn to play their guitars.
This matters, it turns out. Bill and Ted are about to learn that we humans can dare to ask for more than survival. The future can be awesome, with a little help from the past.
Time Travel: A History is a book mainly composed of questions and narrative told at a distance, but on one point, Gleick takes a stand. He discusses Ray Bradbury’s “A Sound of Thunder” and Isaac Asimov’s The End of Eternity and declares: “Bradbury was right and Asimov was wrong. If history is a dynamical system, it’s surely non-linear, and the butterfly effect must obtain. At some places, some times, a slight divergence can transform history… Nodal points must exist, just not necessarily where we think.”
Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
Buy the Book


Alice Payne Rides
Bill and Ted are definitely not Great Men of history. But they matter. A man named Rufus (George Carlin) tells them that a future utopia is founded on the music of their band, Wyld Stallyns. If Ted goes to military school, none of that can happen. So they have to kick ass on their history presentation.
Which they do, of course, in charmingly earnest fashion.
The reviewers were confused. “The stars themselves are frisky and companionable, like unkempt ponies,” wrote Hal Hinson in the Washington Post. “If ignorance is bliss, these are the most blissed-out kids ever. But because the characters they’re playing and the lingo they spout are already out of date, the timing of the picture seems out of whack. It’s peddling last year’s hip.”
I was a 12-year-old living in rural Manitoba and I didn’t know last year’s hip from a flying phone booth. Like all my friends, I incorporated “whoa” and “dude” and “excellent” into my vocabulary. The movie taught kids how to navigate the 1990s.
And it helped audiences prepare for the comedy of the 1990s. The series of Wayne’s World sketches on Saturday Night Live, also featuring a couple of earnest and clueless dudes who say, “party on” a lot, began the day after Bill and Ted hit theaters (although the Wayne character had actually debuted on Canadian television in 1987).
It didn’t matter what the critics thought of these kinds of characters. We were young at the end of history. We wanted to believe we weren’t trapped. We wanted joy. And we wanted to be excellent to each other.
And now here we are, looking back at the putative end of history three decades later, looking into a future in which the consequences of climate change are and will be devastating, and that’s only the beginning of our worries. Could 50-something Bill and 50-something Ted bring us a movie with hope for the future and affection for past? A movie about time travel that celebrates friendship and goodwill—and that manages to do it without the toxic masculinity this time?
Or will it be an insipid nostalgia piece, a return to time travel as the genre of regret?
I’ll be first in line to find out.
Originally published in May 2018.
Kate Heartfield’s time-travel novella, Alice Payne Arrives is available from Tor.com Publishing, and its sequel Alice Payne Rides publishes March 5th. Her first novel, Armed in Her Fashion (ChiZine) is out now, as is her first interactive novel, The Road to Canterbury (Choice of Games). She is a former newspaper journalist who lives in Ottawa, Canada, and tweets at @kateheartfield.
Yes, the original has its problems (though the overwhelming white maleness of the historical figures, plus Joan of Arc, can be attributed to the limitations of the 1980s California public school system that Bill & Ted were writing their paper for), but ultimately I can’t have anything but fond thoughts about a movie whose core philosophy is “Be excellent to each other and PARTY ON, DUDES!” With the added bonus of that line coming out of the mouth of Abraham Lincoln……..
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
“Back to the Future was literally about the existential horror of living in a world determined by Baby Boomers’ choices.” Really? Marty’s parents and their contemporaries are Forgotten Generation, not Boomers. The oldest Boomers in 1985 were 40, comparable to the oldest millennials today.
“Cringing” at things in the past that were not an issue of contention at the time is problematic, and a sign of the societal problems of today. Certainly, if the movie were made today, line-for-line and scene-for-scene, as it was then… certainly there would be something to say about the issues. However, throwing the buzzword of “toxic masculinity” at the movie really is pushing a (rather biased) modern sensibility on something that isn’t modern. Let’s recall the time this movie came out, when the average beer commercial had girls in bikinis playing volleyball, just to throw out an example; then throw in that this is a comedy, and one of the overriding themes of this movie is that Bill and Ted are both rather unintelligent and caricatures of a certain type of high school student. Otherwise pretty much every teen comedy of the 80s turns into something that must be avoided and disdained.
I’d rather just enjoy the movie for what it is.
#3
There’s a curious tendency today to point out the “problematic” (another overused buzzword) things from culture of decades past. Granted, some of it is done as a genuine exploration of how things have/haven’t changed, but I find all too often it’s done in this sort of showy way of proving one’s “wokeness,” as if there’s this invisible sociology professor standing over us at all times and we want to get the best possible grade. Or else we get expelled from that trend-setting university called society.
It’s also a defense mechanism. Yes, I enjoyed this old thing, professor. But I’m also aware of the outdated problematic things in it. I’ve pointed them out. I’ve labeled them. I’m compartmentalized them. I dutifully cringe at all the right places, even when I’m watching it alone. Sometimes I cringe all the way through just to be safe. Have I passed the grade today? Excellent!
Hey, if you enjoy the original movie and none of it makes you cringe, more power to you. Yes, it was a product of its time. The NEW movie that’s being made will be a product of 2019 (or later). So for those of us who happen to be non-white or non-male or otherwise marginalized, it’s not too much to hope for a more sensitive treatment.
#5
Not sure we can, or should, hope for a great amount of sensitivity from characters whose main traits, and dare I say likability, is their ignorance about everything. In that vein, perhaps their goal should be to offend as many people from across as many groups as possible, stupid white guys included. E pluribus insult em.
Except Bill and Ted’s whole philosophy is that people should be excellent to each other. So I don’t quite get why the movie should strive to offend everyone equally. But hey, you do you.
#7
Not offending in a mean-spirited way, rather that Simpsons style satirical way of taking shots of anyone and everyone. Excellence through good-natured dumbness. Like the original.
Also, “you do you”? We’re talking about a silly comedy here, not real life. Movies aren’t representatives before the General Assembly of Decency. They should be allowed to be acerbic, biting, messy, vicarious, while also thought-provoking. You know, like George Carlin was.
Yeah, while B&T was sexist, I don’t think it was toxic. I think there is a difference, in fact B&T were rebelling against the prospect of Toxic Masculinity in the form of the threatened Military School and social isolation. The B&T future is “Excellent” and carefree and gentle, which is the very antithesis of Toxic Masculinity. Problems get out thought, albeit in a very baffling way, not out fought.
https://quotationcelebration.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/when-a-person-tells-you-that-you-hurt-them-you-dont-get-to-decide-that-you-didnt-louis-c-k-2/
When a person tells you that a scene in a movie made her cringe, you don’t get to decide that it didn’t.
The author didn’t say “I cringed.” They said to rewatch it is to cringe. As such, it is perfectly ok for the rest of us to put forth that one doesn’t have to cringe watching this movie. Also, that listing things that entertainment got away with decades ago that they wouldn’t today is usually not necessary. Personally, I’m amazed that this ridiculous romp ever warranted this level of analysis, let alone 30 years later.
Then again, my favorite comedy of all time is Blazing Saddles. So maybe I’m not the right person to comment on how offensive stereotypes and marginalization may have been.
It’s hard to imagine Bill or Ted hurting someone intentionally. The whole point of the movie was their essential gentleness.
The over-the-top stereotypes were there in 89, and they are clearly there on purpose. This movie isn’t just shockingly stupid today, it was shockingly stupid when it came out. Were any of you alive in the 80s? I get the feeling not many people here are in on the joke. This movie is the cinema version of a Terry Pratchett novel. The core message of “be excellent to each other” is deep and meaningful, but delivered with the shallowest trappings possible. We ate this anti-sanctimonious stuff up in the 80s; it’s why we liked Madonna, Letterman, Mel Brooks, etc.
What a great line that is. In 1955, Boomers weren’t old enough to be in high school, but it’s spot on as a representation of how the kids in the 80s felt watching the movie. It’s worth pondering that Millennials probably feel that way about GenXers, and that may be why some people don’t see the humor in movies like Bill & Ted anymore.
@14: Millennials don’t live in a world defined by Gen X’s choices. They live in a world that continues to be defined by the Boomers’ choices.
@12
The offensive stereotypes and marginalization in Blazing Saddles are absolutely intended, in order to highlight the absurdity of the stereotypes and marginalization. It’s very self-aware. Which is why it’s aged so well.
Gen-Xers are doomed to live in a world shaped by the two larger generations either side, we get screwed by Boomers hoarding all the cash, and we’ll be screwed by the Millennials anti-Boomer policies when we reach old age too. Not to mention we’re screwed by the Boomers destroying workplace rights and career ladders, and again by Millennials insisting on the exhausting and insecure gig economy (until Millennials reach late middle age when they will suddenly prize security and stability, but by then we’ll all be dead). Nobody will ever live in our shadow, because as a demographic Gen Xers are too small to cast one. A pox on both their houses.
As a Gen-Xer, yep, @random22 . . . Boomers said a good education would get us work, which I took to mean an entry-level job, but all it got us was contempt for having that so-called good education. Not excellent treatment at all!!!
Considering almost a year has passed since this article was originally written and we haven’t heard a thing more about this remake, maybe it’s back in development hell?
@19 Ryamano: I suspect you’re right, and I’m not sure that dissappoints me. Whilst I enjoyed it the first time round, the idea of revisiting it doesn’t make my heart leap. That probably has more to do with my history than the film, but I’m not enthused. Neither do I dread it though, and I’m sure sure it has a market, but 80’s nostalgia pieces are draining on me now.
Looks like it’s official, now:
https://nerdist.com/article/bill-and-ted-3-title-starts-filming/
—Keith R.A. DeCandido