“The Naked Time”
Written by John D.F. Black
Directed by Marc Daniels
Season 1, Episode 6
Production episode 6149-07
Original air date: September 29, 1966
Stardate: 1704.2
Captain’s log. The Enterprise is orbiting Psi 2000, a planet on the verge of disintegration, there to pick up the scientific team that’s been studying the breakup up until the last moment. But the research station has no power when they arrive, and Spock and Lieutenant Joe Tormolen beam down in environmental suits to find the entire team of a half-dozen scientists dead, and everything frozen thanks to the power being off. The engineer’s body is at his post, seemingly uncaring, one woman was strangled, another was showering with his clothes on.
Tormolen checks out a room, and then—because he apparently slept through the part at the Academy where they taught safety procedures—takes a glove off to scratch his nose. He then takes a few readings without putting his glove back on (putting his bare hand on a freezing surface, no less!), and then doesn’t notice a bit of red water that moves to his unprotected hand on its own.
Spock then comes in and shows his tremendous capacity for dramatic irony by saying, “Expose yourself to nothing.” Tormolen then proves himself a credit to his uniform by not saying anything at all to Spock, including the fact that he exposed himself to something.
Then Spock reports to Kirk that the team is all dead. When asked what caused it, Spock waits for the camera to zoom in on him, and then he says, in ultra-stentorian tones, “It’s like nothing we’ve dealt with before.” At which point Horatio Caine puts on his sunglasses and makes a bad pun, and then Roger Daltrey shouts…
Scotty beams Spock and Tormolen up and puts them through decontamination, and then they report to sickbay. McCoy finds nothing wrong with either of them, though Tormolen is freaked out by the six corpses.
Kirk, Spock, Scotty, McCoy, and Rand gather in the briefing room to look over the scans Spock and Tormolen made on the planet. They find nothing unusual—well, except for the circumstance itself.
Tormolen heads to the mess hall to get some chow. He keeps staring at the hand he stupidly left exposed, and then is joined by Sulu and Lieutenant Kevin Riley, who are discussing fencing. They try to bring Tormolen into the conversation, but he goes bugnuts, ranting and raving about how humans don’t belong in space and the six people who died and a whole bunch of other stuff before pulling out his knife. Sulu and Riley try to stop him, but he falls on the knife, and both Sulu and Riley have touched him, so guess what’s happened to them?
The planet is condensing at a greater rate than expected. Spock is all giddy about the prospect of watching it fall apart. Meanwhile, Kirk and Spock try to figure out why Tormolen got so uncharacteristically suicidal. Spock says he’s shown a tendency to self-doubt, but not on this level, and he’s baffled as to why it came to the fore so fast.
Down in sickbay, McCoy and Nurse Christine Chapel work on Tormolen, but he dies on the table, despite McCoy fixing all the damage.
Sulu suddenly abandons his post out of nowhere to go to the gym for a workout, to Riley’s annoyance. But then when Spock notices that Sulu is AWOL, Riley bellows, “Have no fear, O’Riley’s here,” and starts going on an Irish nationalist rant that prompts Spock to send him to sickbay. Spock orders security to make sure Riley gets to sickbay and then summons Kirk to the bridge.
Riley does go to sickbay, finds out Tormolen died from Chapel (and also gives her the funky virus by holding her hand), and then heads down to engineering, where he tricks Scotty and his crew into leaving and then locks himself in, transferring control of the ship there. Unfortunately, this means the relief helmsman can’t fix their orbit when the planet contracts again, and they’re about twenty minutes from burning up in the atmosphere if they don’t get control back.
Kirk’s first attempt to leave the bridge is thwarted by Sulu, who—having gadded about the corridors of the ship bare-chested with his rapier, pretending to be d’Artagnan—shows up on the bridge waving his sword around. A handy distraction from Uhura and a Vulcan nerve pinch later, and he’s taken care of and sent to sickbay, and Kirk finally heads to engineering. Riley is serenading the ship with “Kathleen,” and Scotty reveals that Riley’s routed all ship’s power and control through engineering (which it seems to me a lieutenant shouldn’t be able to do, but whatever). Uhura reports incidents all over the ship, prompting Spock to put the ship on alert and various sections sealed off to limit crew contact with each other.
McCoy is examining Sulu, trying to figure out what’s wrong. Chapel seems a little loopy, but McCoy is too busy wondering why the biopsy lab isn’t answering his calls to focus on that.
Because Riley keeps messing with the communications systems, Kirk can’t give orders to people or get reports from them, so he sends Spock to light a fire under Scotty’s ass and to check on McCoy’s progress—encountering various goofy crew along the way. When he arrives at sickbay, Chapel takes his hand and declares her love for him. Spock rebuffs her, though he is obviously affected, though by her words or the virus (or both) isn’t clear. Spock starts to lose his emotional control, almost crying at one point. Instead of reporting to the bridge, he stumbles to the briefing room, repeating the mantra that he is in control of his emotions, even though he very obviously is not. He tries to take control by reciting mathematical sequences, but that doesn’t work and he breaks down.
Kirk is with Scotty and two security guards when he cuts through the door to engineering. The guards take Riley to sickbay (“no dance tonight,” he mourns), and then Scotty is appalled to realize that Riley turned the engines completely off. Turning them back on will take half an hour, and they’ve got six minutes before the ship burns up. Kirk recommends a controlled implosion, but that’s only a theory that’s never been tested and working out the formulae would take weeks.
Kirk finds Spock in the briefing room, and tries to get him to focus on the problem, but Spock is too busy whining about the fact that he never could tell his mother he loves her. Kirk tries to snap him out of it, but in the process, Spock gives him the virus and he, in turn, starts whining about how much the ship takes from him, and how he can’t notice his yeoman, and all sorts of other nonsense. Spock snaps out of it long enough to figure out the intermix formula Scotty will need. Kirk manages to stumble to the bridge, where McCoy is waiting with a hypo that cures him.
Spock and Scotty do the voodoo they do so well, Sulu engages the engines, and the ship goes ZOOM! out of orbit, so fast that they actually go backward in time. Sulu slowly reverses engines, and things are back to normal, although they’ve gone back in time three days.
Can’t we just reverse the polarity? The source of the Enterprise’s power—the mutual annihilation of matter and antimatter—is revealed in this episode. “Mudd’s Women” established that the ship’s power is channeled through lithium crystals, and later this will be reconciled that the energy created from the annihilation of matter and antimatter is what’s channeled through the crystals (retconned to the somewhat more fictional dilithium).
Fascinating. While previous episodes (especially “Where No Man Has Gone Before”) indicated that Vulcans don’t have human emotions as such and are governed by logic, Spock’s monologue in the briefing room establishes that it’s more complicated than that: that Vulcans deliberately suppress their emotions because they’re too intense, and must be held in check with logic. (Supposedly, Leonard Nimoy improvised that entire bit on set, as he wanted something deeper for Spock to go through than what was called for in the script, and the reason it was all done in one take was that they only had time for one take, so he ad-libbed that. Nimoy would later claim that his fan mail went from dozens of letters per week to thousands after this episode aired.)
I’m a doctor not an escalator. McCoy does excellent work here, heroically trying to save Tormolen, and only failing because the man himself lost his will to live, and figuring out what the virus is and finding a cure with refreshingly little drama.
Ahead warp one, aye. Sulu’s shirtless romp through the corridors of the Enterprise with his sword is one of Trek’s iconic moments, and it’s no surprise that George Takei cites this as his favorite episode of the series. Reportedly, Takei worked very hard on his sword technique, and also did a ton of pushups once he realized he was going to be bare-chested. He also chose a rapier rather than a katana, figuring that in the 23rd century, people wouldn’t automatically adhere to their ethnic background.
Hailing frequencies open. Uhura gets quite possibly her best-ever line when Sulu grabs her and refers to her as a “fair maiden,” and she says, “Sorry, neither.” She also takes over at navigation, something she’s also done in “The Man Trap” (which was actually using footage from this episode), and will do again in “Balance of Terror” and “Court Martial.”
I cannot change the laws of physics! Hey, look, it’s the episode this category title comes from! Scotty says this while insisting he needs thirty minutes to restart the engines, until he and Spock do change the laws of physics, and do it in six. Woo doggy.
Go put on a red shirt. Poor Joe Tormolen, done in by a badly designed environmental suit and a spectacular inability to follow proper hazmat procedure.
No sex, please, we’re Starfleet. Kirk makes it clear that he thinks Rand is totally hot, but can’t notice her because of his position. That doesn’t stop him from staring at her suddenly-and-inexplicably-in-soft-focus face while on the bridge and wistfully muttering, “No beach to walk on” like a lovesick puppy right before the engine restart.
Channel open. “Your blood pressure is practically nonexistent—assuming you call that green stuff in your veins blood.”
“The readings are perfectly normal for me, Doctor, thank you. And as for my anatomy being different from yours, I am delighted.”
McCoy being either borderline racist, totally incompetent, or both, and Spock proving that he’s not in that much control of his emotions if being nonhuman “delights” him.
Welcome aboard. Majel Barrett debuts the recurring character of Chapel in this episode, having previously appeared in “The Cage” as Number One; Barrett will also recur on TNG and DS9 as Lwaxana Troi, and she provided the voice of Starfleet computers on all five TV series as well as several of the movies (including in the 2009 Star Trek, her last role before she died). Chapel will continue to recur throughout the live-action and animated series and also appear in two of the movies.
Bruce Hyde makes the first of two appearances as Riley; he’ll be back in the role in “The Conscience of the King.” Stewart Moss plays the ill-fated Tormolen, while William Knight and John Bellah play two of the crew affected by the virus.
And we’ve got other recurring regulars DeForest Kelley, George Takei, James Doohan, Nichelle Nichols, and Grace Lee Whitney.
Trivial matters: The original plan was for this to lead into “Tomorrow is Yesterday,” with the time travel at the end resulting in the Enterprise showing up in orbit of Earth in the late 1960s, but they didn’t want to have that kind of episode-to-episode continuity (and the episodes didn’t get aired back to back anyhow), so they changed it to just three days back in time and Spock making foreshadowy noises about trying it again some time.
This episode will have a sequel on TNG, called “The Naked Now,” when the Enterprise-D encounters a similar phenomenon, though the exact cure McCoy finds here won’t be effective.
This is the only episode that features all three of the series’ recurring female characters (Uhura, Chapel, Rand) in the same episode. The only other time the three appear together onscreen will be in The Motion Picture (in which Rand is the transporter chief and Chapel is the chief medical officer).
Sulu’s skill with a sword will be seen again onscreen in “Day of the Dove” and the 2009 film, and it will continue to be a theme in various bits of tie-in fiction, such as pretty much every novel and novelization by Vonda N. McIntyre (who showed a great fondness for the character, also giving him his first name of “Hikaru” in The Entropy Effect), Shadow Lord by Laurence Yep, Forged in Fire and The Sundered by Andy Mangels & Michael A. Martin, Q-Squared by Peter David, and tons more.
Kevin Thomas Riley has an extensive resumé in the tie-in fiction, as well, most notably in The Galactic Whirlpool by David Gerrold, in which he leads a first-contact team (a nascent version of the formalized away teams of the TNG era), The Lost Years by J.M. Dillard, in which he serves as Admiral Kirk’s aide, Foul Deeds Will Rise by Greg Cox, a sequel to “The Conscience of the King,” and many others.
Riley mentions that “last week it was botany,” referring to the last hobby Sulu tried to get him interested in. Sulu was seen hanging out in the arboretum playing with plants on his off-duty time in “The Man Trap.”
This is the only actual credited script by John D.F. Black for the series. Black served as executive story consultant and associate producer of the show for much of the first season. He also wrote the first draft of the framing sequence for “The Menagerie,” though Gene Roddenberry rewrote it and took sole credit. (Black filed a grievance with the Writers Guild, but lost.) Black would return briefly to TNG, getting a story credit for “The Naked Now” due to it’s being a sequel to this episode, and also co-writing “Justice” under the pseudonym of Ralph Willis.
Along with “The Menagerie” (which won) and “The Corbomite Maneuver,” this episode was nominated for a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation at the 1967 World Science Fiction Convention.
Scotty tells a member of his staff to get something from his office. Scotty’s office is never actually seen. Later on TNG, La Forge will refer to his office in “Galaxy’s Child”—but we never see his office, either…
The Enterprise’s activities when it was in two different places during the same three days were chronicled in the trilogy The Janus Gate by L.A. Graf.
To boldly go. “I’ll take you home again, Kathleen!” On the one hand, this is an iconic episode of Star Trek, establishing the true depths of what both Spock and Kirk have to deal with, not to mention Sulu’s love of swashbuckling swordplay and Chapel’s unrequited love for Spock. Riley crooning “Kathleen,” Scotty’s inability to change the laws of physics, Uhura’s “Sorry, neither,” it’s all here.
But man, is the episode dumber than a box of hammers.
For starters, the virus only makes it onto the ship because Joe Tormolen is the world’s stupidest human. Seriously, he’s in a frozen wasteland. Taking his glove off and then touching a wall with his bare hand should’ve given him frostbite, never mind the loopy virus. And then when Spock specifically tells him not to expose himself to anything, he doesn’t say a flipping word about what he just did, just happily beams back up to the Enterprise. He almost leaves the transporter pad before Spock has to hold him back to go through decontamination. Ladies and gentlemen, your Darwin Award winner for 2266…
To be fair, it’s not all Tormolen’s fault. What idiot designed an environmental suit that doesn’t have a neck seal? Then again, Tormolen was dumb enough to take off his glove, he probably would’ve undone a sealed helmet to scratch his nose anyhow. Dumbass.
And then we’re supposed to believe that a drunk lieutenant can somehow clear engineering (seriously, Scotty, how gullible are you and your staff?) and reroute every single ship’s function to one room? There’s no way that should even be possible, and even if it is, it’s the sort of thing that only the ship’s captain or a flag officer should be able to do, not the guy who helps fly the ship.
The story has its good points, certainly, besides the fun stuff (George Takei and Bruce Hyde show phenomenal comic chops here) and Spock’s breakdown (impressively played by Leonard Nimoy, who manages not to descend into kitsch). The suspense is very well played, with the ticking clock of the Enterprise’s deteriorating orbit, and Riley’s crooning just making an already tense situation worse. (The bit where Kirk and Uhura snap at each other and then apologize is a very human moment, well played by both William Shatner and Nichelle Nichols.) And again we have the sense of the wider community of the Enterprise, mostly in the rec hall scene with Sulu, Riley, and Tormolen, but also little things like the relief helmsman and navigator, the guys helping Scotty, the lab tech McCoy was talking to, not to mention the introduction of a nurse.
In the end, however, for all that there’s so much entertaining stuff here, it’s an idiot plot, one that relies on the protagonists being incredibly stupid in order to work, and that’s among the most frustrating kinds of stories.
Warp factor rating: 4
Next week: “Charlie X”
Keith R.A. DeCandido will be a guest at Treklanta from the 24th to the 26th of April in Atlanta, Georgia, alongside Trek actor Sean Kenney, Battlestar Galactica’s Anne Lockhart, Babylon 5’s Jason Carter, and Axanar’s Alec Peters, among many other nifty writer, actor, artist, and performing guests. Come on down!
Sulu’s swordplay here is also referenced in the 2009 reboot movie.
grenadier: Oooh, right! I’d forgotten that!
Robin! To the edit function!
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
“Sorry, neither” is absolutely one of Uhura’s best lines – and it’s almost lost in the drama of the scene. Doesn’t get any weight at all from the pacing, and I think I almost like it that way…
I’m not sure that McCoy is necessarily being racist or incompetent. I think he’s just poking fun at Spock in their usual way. His tone is a little off, but we’re early still; I can certainly take it as a much more lighthearted comment. And, of course, Spock is responding in kind. Just my read of that exchange.
I’m apparently mixing rewatches in my head, because I couldn’t find the “home for out of work genre actors” category. Whoops…
Now then. You say the episode is dumber than a box of hammers, but I’d say only the plot is, and I can separate the two and enjoy one without the other. I’d have rated this episode higher (for all that a number is worth) on the strength of the acting, the interplay between characters, some choice lines, all the things you noted as good. In fact, if you ignore the stupidity of the plot, I’d say this is actually a damn fine episode. Now, ignoring the plot is a bit of an ask, I know. The plot is, indeed, ridiculous. But everything that shitty plot gives us – honestly, Sulu encountering and chasing those two baffled crewmen in the corridor may be my most favorite TOS scene ever – makes the plot tolerable for me. I mean, Tremors has an absolutely terrible plot, too, but I watch it for the scenery-chewing goodness. “The Naked Time” has a lot more going for it than that.
Keith, “Mudd’s Women” doesn’t portray lithium crystals as the ship’s power source, but rather as a key component of the power relays. There’s a reference in the opening scene to “lithium crystal circuits,” and Spock later says “The entire ship’s power is feeding through one lithium crystal.” So there’s no inconsistency here — antimatter powers the ship, (di)lithium channels the power. Which is basically the same assumption ST has made ever since. The only episode that did portray dilithium as the actual energy source was “The Alternative Factor,” which forgot about “The Naked Time” and treated antimatter as something only found in other universes.
And I think Geordi’s office was that side alcove in the engine room where he usually worked, the one on the other side of the glass from the warp core.
Anyway, I never really thought about how much didn’t make sense in the plot here, since the character work is so strong and so important to defining the core characters, especially Spock.
Which is not to say there weren’t things that bugged me. For one thing, there’s Joe Tormolen dying by falling on a butter knife. Seriously, that thing doesn’t look sharp at all. Then there’s the annoying trope that Trek has used too often, the idea that a ship will fall out of orbit if its power fails. Nope. Orbit is a nonpowered trajectory. The Moon doesn’t need engines to stay up there. If you’re in an actual orbit, you’ll stay there with or without power; indeed, you’d need to apply reverse thrust in order to fall out of orbit, and would be stuck in orbit without power. The only way the “falling out of orbit” trope makes any sense is if the ship is in a forced/powered orbit, using engine thrust to counter gravity and keep station over a given point on the planet. Which could make sense if the ship is riding herd on a landing party and needs to stay in comm/transporter range, but doesn’t seem to make sense if it’s just observing the planet’s collapse.
Then there’s the gratuitousness of the time-travel ending. They gave up on leading into a time-travel episode, but they kept the time-travel tag even though it no longer served any purpose. It would’ve been better to cut out the time travel altogether.
In addition to the other dumb stuff that happened, there are two other minor plot holes. Just looking at the picture shown within “Ahead warp one, aye” suggests that Uhura should have caught the virus from Sulu. In addition, Spock should have caught the virus right then and there from Sulu when he neck pinched him, instead of later from Chapel.
@@.-@ In the case of the powered orbit ( and it’s been a few weeks since I watched it ) I seem to recall that they needed to be extremely close to the planet for their sensors to scan the breakup/shrinking phenomenon which they were there to study, hence the unstable orbit.
Once on a vacation in Tuscany I saw this episode on TV dubbed into Italian. As histrionic as some of it may seem in English, in Italian it was positively operatic (Spock’s breakdown especially sounded like something by Ponchielli).
@6/lerris: Granted, now that I check the transcript, I see they did say they’d be in “a critically tight orbit.” The use of “critical” implies that they’re right on the brink of being able to maintain a viable orbit. I looked into that a bit online, and though the term “critical orbit” isn’t really used in that sense (it has some other meaning in mathematics), it turns out that in a very low orbit, not only would atmospheric drag slow the ship down and cause its orbit to decay, but variations in the planet’s density would alter an orbit onto an elliptical path that could collide with the surface. So I guess that made somewhat more sense here than it usually does in episodes (of Trek and other shows) that use the “no power = falling out of orbit” trope..
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t this episode also spawn “sobbing mathematically”?
Keith –
I always assumed the red shower curtain outfits Spock and Tormolen wore were heated for cold weather environments, not hazmat situations. All they likely knew before beaming down was that the power was off and it was cold. No reason for the to suspect dangerous SPAAAAAACE MAAADNEEEES…
Tormolen then proves himself a credit to his uniform by not saying anything at all to Spock… Ha! Yes indeed. As long as one can get past the incredibly stupid plot device that sets this episode in motion (really? they couldn’t have come up with something better?), then this is a standout of the first season. Great write-up, Keith, as always, even if you think the episode is overall dumb. As Meredith says above @3, it’s hugely entertaining; and, as Christopher mentions @@.-@, it’s pivotal in the development of Spock. I sense it could have been for Kirk, too, as originally conceived – he’s very Pike-like in this one. Eventually he finds ways to … erm… walk beaches… while still functioning as an effective starship commander. (Unless we posit that he’s talking about more than just noticing beautiful women, and means a serious, stable, long-term committed relationship. Will we ever see a happily married starship captain in Starfleet? Have there been any in the tie-in fiction? I see Christopher has Hoshi Sato engaged in Uncertain Logic (no spoilers, not done yet!)… Was Robert April married to Sarah while she was ship’s doctor, or is that just from J.M. Dillard’s Final Frontier?)
I never knew that about John D.F. Black and “The Menagerie” envelope story. That’s my favorite episode, too, largely because of how skillfully the pilot footage is framed. Shame on GR. Oh, well.
I remember reading in Asherman’s Compendium that an early draft of the script had their back-in-time moment creating a whole new galaxy or something, and Kirk ordering a “day of rest” for the crew – is that right?
My favorite line from this episode is Joe’s retort to Sulu: “You don’t rank me and you don’t have pointed ears, so just get off my back!” A very revealing (and, later, uncharacteristic) view of what the “lower decks” crew thinks of Mr. Spock!
Oh God, I just touched an ice cube and now I can’t feel my finger tip. Am I gonna get frostbite and die?
I think that Joe Tormolen’s negligent behavior can be justified, given what we know from the episode. The virus made him suicidally depressed — but it couldn’t create new emotional states, it just amplified what was already there beneath the surface. Which suggests that Tormolen was already suffering from some degree of depression even before his exposure. One of the possible symptoms of depression is a loss of interest in taking care of oneself or doing one’s work diligently. So that could explain Tormolen’s negligence with regard to safety procedures.
Yes, it was extraordinarily stupid of Tormolen to take off his glove. But not saying anything about it later? In my experience, people do that all the time. It’s annoying, it’s stupid, it turns small mishaps into disasters, but unfortunately, it isn’t extraordinary at all.
@14 Yup. And the thing is, if people think they are gonna get punished for it, clamming up about it is also exactly what they do too. The horrible thing you’ve got to do is let people off with their stupidity if you want to limit damage, ’cause otherwise they’ll gamble that either nothing will happen or that by the time something does happen no one will be able to pin it on them. That said, I can’t be too sad that Tormolen’s idiocy led to his own death ahead of critically endangering the ship.
I wonder if those space-hazmat suits had some sort of Sci-Fi type of seal, like whatever they are made of automatically stayed closed unless the wearer specifically disrupted it, or if there was some sort forcefield thing in that overlap. I mean, yeah it ought to have been a physical hard seal in order to place another step between an idiot and contamination, but at least then it would make some sort of sense.
@15 Sadly, I bet they used Space Velcro.
This is one of the first episodes I’ve ever seen. As a kid, I’ve liked this one as a successful mix of humor and action. Today I can appreciate all the wonderful little details in the acting and characterizations, so I like it even more.
As for the really dumb setup for the plot: I agree that it was as stupid as a box of hammers. Fortunately, the story that followed didn’t really depend on that ludicrous setup, since there are countless of other ways in which the virus could have been brought to the Enterprise.
So while there is something really annoying in having setup which is both dumb and completely unnecessary, it didn’t hamper my enjoyment of the rest of the story. And the rest of the story was great, on many different levels.
@11 – Will we ever see a happily married starship captain in Starfleet? Have there been any in the tie-in fiction?
I am pretty sure Picard and Crusher are married in the TNG tie-in fiction now. Personally, I’d have liked to see that on the show, but better late than never.
On this episode, I do enjoy it as long as I don’t focus on the plot contrivances. And that, “Sorry, neither” line really is great.
The only thing I really have to add is that during the fight scene in the mess, those extra shipmates were fraking useless. I know who I wouldn’t want manning vital consoles during a dangerous mission: The three ninnies who just stood there watching.
Seriously, I guess I understand not wanting to get in the way and get stabbed (with that butterknife – Thanks, CLB), but why wouldn’t it occur to anyone to, I don’t know, call security??
In addition to Picard and Crusher, two of the prose-only captains — Captain Mackenzie Calhoun in New Frontier and Captain David Gold in Starfleet Corps of Engineers — are each happily married. Plus, as established in Nemesis, Captain Riker is all matrimonial and stuff now. :)
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
Fun fact: While “I’ll Take You Home Again, Kathleen” is often associated with Ireland, it is not an Irish song. It was written by a German immigrant in the American Midwest in the 1870s, whose wife was homesick for the old country. But because of the popularity of Irish music hall shows in the East, the publisher changed the name of the woman in the song to Kathleen, put it in an Irish stage show, and it has been associated with the Irish ever since.
As to Robert and Sarah April and happily married starship captains, I suspect that answer to that one is somewhere in the dialogue in the animated episode “The Counter-Clock Incident”, but I don’t have video to hand just now to check.
@10/Jose Tyler –
All the more reason to lock yourself into a hazmat suit, no? Beaming into an unknown environment, where something has gone wrong, but you’re not sure what happened…hell, I’d go in a hamster ball and not touch anything.
“He also chose a rapier rather than a katana, figuring that in the 23rd century, people wouldn’t automatically adhere to their ethnic background.”
Now if only Bruce Hyde had the same idea…
@22/JohnCBunnell: No need for video — the transcripts are available online:
Chakoteya’s TOS transcripts
That site has transcripts for all the series and every movie except Into Darkness. There’s also this tool someone recently created that lets you efficiently search all the transcripts for any desired word or phrase, even sorted by series, speaker, or location.
Anyway, “Counter-Clock” says nothing about whether the Aprils were married during their time on the Enterprise.
@25 – Thank you for the script search link! I’ve been plugging search terms into Google (just restricted to the Chakoteya site). I didn’t know the specific search site existed but it’s bookmarked now.
One thing krad (and everyone else) skips over is, why call it “The Naked Time”? That’s two things wrong with the title!
@11/Mike: It’s not only starship captains who don’t marry or have long-term relationships – no one from the original cast ever does. Work on a starship seems to preclude marriage. It gets better in the 24th century, though.
At least Sulu gets to raise a daughter.
Speaking of Sulu, I liked it that his fencing is treated here as merely the latest of his hobbies (“Last week it was botany…”). It would have been fun to see him obsessed with a different hobby every few months.
This episode is the first in a long line of indications that all Starfleet ships have a button marked “Press here to take over ship” somewhere aboard them.
And, between tis episode’s use of Engineering and later episodes’ use o Auxiliary Control, apparently the MAIN BRIDGE is THIRD in the control heirarchy of the ship. Umm… That’s just bad system design.
@23/Meredith P
“All the more reason to lock yourself into a hazmat suit, no? Beaming into an unknown environment, where something has gone wrong, but you’re not sure what happened…hell, I’d go in a hamster ball and not touch anything.”
Agreed. But try telling this simple bit of common sense to Starfleet officers, whose standard procedure for unknown Class-M planets is to beam down completely unprotected.
It’s one of those standard Trek cliches where we simply need to suspend our disbelief, if we want to enjoy the show.
During late-night work sessions in college, a friend and I would crack each other up by randomly calling out, “And now, crew, I will render Kathleen again, one more time!”
What can I say? It was late and we were slaphappy. :)
I guess Tormalen and whoever was manning the bridge engineering station while Riley took over (He did not notice everything being reruted through engineering? Was he updating his Facebook page instead of monitoring ship functions?) were from the Jonathon Archer wing of Starfleet Academy. Screw procedure! Real humans just forge ahead blindly! At least they are not openly proud of it anymore.
@20 – If memory serves, did not the future timeline of “All Good Things” have Crusher and Picard unhappily married, that is, divorced at the time the events in the episode happened?
@29, Antoniemey
In addition to crummy system design they also appear to have forgotten about fuses and seatbelts in the 23rd century.
Crusader75 @33 – That is indeed correct, to the extent that Beverly had kept the last name (leading to the mildly comical tag team when the unwitting crew member called out to “Captain Picard”).
Aside from the aforementioned Captain Riker in Nemesis, I can’t think of any onscreen captains who were family folks. The closest I can peg is that Sisko was very much happily married while serving on the Saratoga. Unfortunately, he was widowed before being given a command of any sort.
the episode dumber than a box of hammers.
That is unfair to encased hand tools everywhere!
The TNG sequel to this was pretty damned awful, almost turned me off to TNG. But I gave it a second chance. Lots of second chances. Eventually it got good.
ST4: Save the Whales uses the “slingshot effect” from this episode, too.
@29, it’s not too surprising that the brigde is so far down the hiearchy. You’d want at least two back-up controls off the bridge. One in case there’s a failure on the bridge (like battle damage) but everything else works, so it’s a full up station. Another as close as possible to the engines/warp core (that way if the panel is gone, so’s the engines) so that even if nothing else works you can still fly the ship. The hiearchy would be: last-ditch back-up, off-bridge, brigde, because that last thing you want is command priority stuck somewhere you can’t use it.
@18/Kallie: Yes, you are correct. About an hour after I posted my comment, I slapped myself on my forhead (well, mentally) with an appropriately Homer Simpson-esque D’oh! Clearly, I am not current on my TNG tie-in fiction… And @20/Keith, thanks for telling me about those, as well. Thanks to all for not laughing me out of the forum. I do hope we’ll see a starship captain with a successful marriage onscreen someday, though. (Yes, Riker and Troi are married for the events of Nemesis, but Riker’s not the captain until they go to the Titan.)
@21/Alan: That’s an interesting tidbit! Maybe Riley’s “Irishness” isn’t as thoroughgoing as he’d like to think (the way some folks who are 1/16th Choctaw claim to be “Native American”). Clearly his pride in his ethnic heritage, whatever its extent, isn’t as full blown as Chekov’s will be.
@28/Jana: You’re right, although my impression is that the would’ve-been-newlywedded Martine and Tomlinson (“Balance of Terror”) might have gone on serving aboard the NCC-1701 together (though I confess this is never stated in the episode). The latest Pocket Books e-novella, Shadow of the Machine by Scott Harrison, features Sulu wrestling with the Starfleet career-family conflict.
@27/Sara: Maybe I’m missing something, but I’ve always assumed the title was self-evident. “The Naked Time” refers to this time, this incident, in which the crew’s inner selves are laid bare to each other by the virus. (Kind of like “Amok Time” in season 2 is the time when Spock, well, runs amok.) Maybe I misunderstood your comment?
What irked me was TNG’s first proper episode calling itself “The Naked Now.” (Well, what really irked me was them remaking the episode straight out of the gate…) I’m with @36/wiredog on that one.
Here’s something I’ve never seen anyone address: When the Enterprise is hurled back in time 3 days, does that/should that have any impact on the timeline? I guess they just laid low for 72 hours, staying the heck away from Psi 2000 so as not to run into themselves? Things weren’t restored as they were, a la the Guardian of Forever? I wrote a fanfic once where Tormolen woke up in his body bag in sickbay, because, hey, it’s 72 hours ago now. Shouldn’t he be alive? I was told by another fan, “No, that’s not how it worked.” But couldn’t it have? The way this episode treats it, it seems like they’re really just skipping time zones and anticipating one helluva jet lag, not really going back in time.
Tormolen went to the same school as those guys in Prometheus: Starfleet Academy, Venus campus. Mascot: The Sleepy Armadillos. Motto: “Too dumb to live since 2013”.
Maybe Scotty was still logged in with his command codes in Engineering?
Anyway, haven’t seen this episode in a while, but I’m assuming that “decontamination” now has gotten past the point of stripping down to one’s underwear and slathering gel all over each other’s bodies.
@38: The Janus Gate trilogy by L. A. Graf (“Present Tense”, “Future Imprefect” and “Past Prologue”) takes place during the three “live over again” days and address the problem of the two Enterprises existing at the same time.
@27/sara7: I see what you did there.
@36/wiredog: Actually the “slingshot effect” was from “Tomorrow is Yesterday.” It involved using the gravity well of a star or black hole (actually a pretty good approximation of Frank Tipler’s time travel proposal in “Rotating Cylinders and the Possibility of Global Causality Violations,” a paper written seven years after “Tomorrow is Yesterday”). This was a different time-travel mechanism resulting from the experimental formula Spock used to restart the warp engines (“a theoretical relationship between time and antimatter”).
“…because he apparently slept through the part at the Academy where they taught safety procedures” and “dummer than a box of hammers” sums it up pretty well for me.
Ripping off one of the worst ever TOS eps turned me off TNG for at least three years and still compromises my appreciation of anything else the series accomplished later on. (Not that Encounter at Farpoint was a positive experience out of the gate.)
As for the Naked Time. Totally agree with Keith’s assessment. ST: TOS had so many great episodes, well written and well realized pieces that raised story-telling to an artform. Balance of Terror, Dagger of the Mind, The Devil in the Dark, A Private Little War and so many others were more than just adventures in space, they held up a mirror to the world and made us think about our own lives and attitudes to things like mental illness, proxy wars, the need to overcome fear/racism and MAD theory. But man, when they sucked they really sucked. Starfleet is all about the best and brightest.
I just don’t believe a starfleet officer would expose himself to an alien environment the way Tormolen did and with my suspension of disblelief destroyed I was unablle to enjoy the episode — even though it did have other things going for it and is thus important to the canon. What’s really frustrating is that it would have been so easy to write in the solution and not change anything significant while paving over the crater-sized plot hole that ruins it.
Consider:
On the planet Spock returns to the room and says something inane about how the catastrophe that killed everyone on the station seems to be the result of sabotage rather than industrial accident/equipment failure, and possibly related to some kind of infection or madness — thus introducing the idea of a contagion to the viewers (clumsy but better than what we got in the end and I’m sure I could come up with something more elegant given more than five minutes).”Touch nothing. Our environmental suits have limited protection against microbial agents.” “Yes, sir.” Then the planet, which is undergoing all kinds of nasty upheavals, quakes and Tormolen falls against the Engineer’s station. The red goo gets on his suit and infects him. The pair beam up, the decontamination scans fail to pick up the virus (another plot hole, but it can be addressed later — maybe the red goo mimics human cells or beneficial gut bacteria or something), McCoy’s exam finds nothing and everything else proceeds as scripted. It’s not perfect, but it’s way better than what we got.
@34/Ragnarredbeard: Seatbelts? Ancient technology if you can have inertial dampers! So 23rd century children are probably allowed to sit or lie down anywhere in the car again, like they used to when I was small :-)
Plot-wise, I’m going to have to give TNG the better score. At least Geordi was a blind man who stumbled across a frozen corpse by accident. Tormolen was simply unprofessional by any kind of Starfleet standard.
At least the episode is fun, even though like Naked Now, I think it was too soon to break out the “characters acting out of character” storyline. Should have been a late season entry rather than episode 7.
I always hum the Kathleen song. I was surprised we got to revisit Riley in Conscience of the King. He should have been made a regular.
In the Blish adaptation, there was never any time travel epilogue. Riley got to his senses long enough to restore the ship’s functions and drive them away from the planet. I’m glad that was changed. There’s no more iconic scene in this show than Scotty’s: “I’ve got to have 30 minutes” speech.
Supposedly, the original Spock crying scene had some drunk artistic crewman painting a moustache on his face, making him cry even louder. I don’t know it if that would have been hilarious or profoundly stupid. It was John Black’s decision to write it that way, and I’m glad Leonard fought to change it, turning the whole thing into a pivotal character moment.
When I read Star Trek Memories, I always recalled Shatner’s account of Takei’s sword lunacy. He could have been exaggerating the event, but you can see the insane glee in Takei’s eyes. Supposedly, he poked truck drivers on the Desilu lot with that sword, to the point where some of them threatened the actor’s continued health.
Also, I can’t think of any reason Bones would rip Kirk’s shirt to adminsiter the injection other than the visual impact, because it makes no sense! Wouldn’t that be equally unprofessional?
@35: Sisko was married for Kasidy for several episodes before DS9 ended.
@34/Ragnarredbeard and @44/JanaJansen –
There have been plenty of seat restraints, though. We see shoulder harnesses in shuttlecraft in TNG, the captain’s chair has armrests that swing down to become a seatbelt in ST:TMP, Archer’s chair has seat belts in ENT (this was apparently reused from a deleted scene in Nemesis), and I swear I remember some automatically-unfurling metallic seatbelts in one of the movies – maybe on a Klingon ship? Or was it in Generations? In any case…lotsa restraints, harnesses, seatbelts.
Married to Kasidy.
@46 – and as the Prophets prophesied, that didn’t necessarily work to a happy conclusion for him.
@49: True, but there were still a few episodes of marital bliss coupled with being a captain. Most notably the one where Kasidy burns their dinner.
@44/JanaJansen: The “inertial dampers” argument would only work if there weren’t hundreds of episodes showing people getting flung across the bridge when the ship is hit by something. Obviously the inertial dampers don’t work perfectly. They may keep you from getting smooshed to jelly by the thousands of gees of acceleration a starship undergoes, but they won’t keep you from getting flung out of your chair and cracking your skull open against the edge of a console. Therefore, there should be seat restraints.
@45/Eduardo: As I’ve said before, it’s inaccurate to say that the two “Naked” episodes are about the characters acting “out of character.” The point is that the infection merely releases their inhibitions and amplifies the urges that are already inside them. So they’re not out of character — they’re revealing their inner characters. And that’s why it’s valuable to do it early in the series. As Keith mentioned, this was the first episode that really defined the nature of Spock’s emotional control and the inner struggle he waged. We couldn’t really see that until his control was stripped away.
As for the shirt thing, I don’t think it had yet been established that hypos could inject through clothing. And time was of the essence. Still, it’s a bit silly that those futuristic garments could tear so easily.
@51: Interesting way of looking at it. From a character perspective it makes sense, since we’re still getting to know them.
Of course, we still have Leonard Nimoy’s persistence to thank for getting that scene across. Had it been up to John D.F. Black and Marc Daniels, we might have gotten the silly moustache gag instead.
If my count is right, Riley here becomes the series second spaz-next-to-Sulu!
I echo the criticisms of the unconvincing ways the episode bends over backward to get the plot in motion and keep it going (why not just have an accident breach Tormolen’s suit, but they end up not detecting the virus, as was the case in the episode itself?), ultimately, I end up just going with it under the logic that it’s a classic for a reason.
-Andy
@51/Christopher: Oh well, I guess you’re right. Pity. Still, people mostly don’t get thrown very far, so I can imagine Starfleet thinking for a while that restraints weren’t necessary. Especially since people live on these starships, walk around in corridors, sleep and have lunch etc. I wouldn’t want to be restrained every time I sit down to play a game or have some ice cream. I think it works better if we assume that all these hundreds of episodes represent really unusual situations.
McCoy tearing Kirk’s shirt: How long would it have taken to push up the sleeve, half a second? Probably the same amount of time it took to tear it.
For some reason I never saw this episode before TNG’s “Naked Now”. That episode was memorable if only for the Data/Yar scenes. It’s a toss up for me which is “better” but they’re both entertaining. Once I saw “Naked Time” I remember thinking “wow, TNG was ripping off TOS in its second episode!? Wow!”
As for Nimoy’s performance:
“Spock’s breakdown (impressively played by Leonard Nimoy, who manages not to descend into kitsch)”
I personally thought it was cringe-worthy. Stewart’s performance of Picard’s emotional roller-coaster while proxy or what have you for Sarek…now THAT was impressive!
@54/Jana: I doubt the personnel on real battleships try to sleep or have lunch or play board games or whatever during a red-alert situation. If you’re on a spaceship crew and expecting sharp accelerations or impacts, then you prepare for it accordingly. That’s the whole purpose of declaring an alert — to tell the crew to get ready for action.
I admit that I don’t know the first thing about real battleships, but in Star Trek, people sleep, walk the corridors and do medical examinations during a red alert. They probably don’t play board games, though.
“Sorry, neither.” Not that anyone expected Uhura to be a virgin, but she’s not shy about it either. Remember this show was made just as the sexual revolution was really getting rolling.
As far as Tormolen is concerned, we don’t have to go any further than the recent Ebola outbreak to see that biohazard protocols only do so much if people make a mistake or the protective clothing is insufficient. The fact that Spock had to keep reminding everyone to be careful shows that he didn’t have a lot of confidence in the protocols training.
As 55/Danis noted, in TNG “The Naked Now” we also learn that Data is programmed in a variety of techniques. Yeah, I didn’t need to know that.
@57/Jana: Yeah, and they don’t have seatbelts either. I’m talking about how they logically should do things, not how they actually did.
This is one reason I love the set design on Star Trek: Enterprise so much. If you look at the sets like the bridge and the corridors, you see there are handholds placed all over the walls and consoles. Those are implicitly there in the event of an artificial-gravity failure. It’s a design that, like any reasonable design, allows for the possibility of equipment failure and builds in a safeguard. And that’s really, really smart.
@41/Rich: Really? I had no idea. Thanks for the tip, I will definitely check those out.
@43/Al3x: Love your rewrite!
@46/Eduardo: Oh, yeah. That too. Double d’oh[/i]! (Speaking of The Simpsons, which, unlike Christopher, I obviously didn’t realize @27/sara7 was doing…!)
@47/Meredith: I think the automatically unfurling restraints are in Into Darkness. They got a big laugh at the screening I attended, because “everyone knows” there were no seatbelts on the Enterprise… bleh.
Odd, normally I have a hard time getting over huge plot holes to enjoy an episode. Moreso in TOS. But this time, the total idiocy of Tormolen and the Enterprise’s protocols doesn’t bug me … that much.
Maybe it’s just out of love for the scene where Sulu chases down the two baffled crewmen with a sword.
It’s refreshing that the physics of the unstable orbit actually make sense this time around — from a decent distance away, a collapsing planet shouldn’t actually induce any change to its gravitational field, but from very close-up, it could. On the other hand, it’s a pity that they didn’t end up explicitly tying this end-of-episode discovery to the Enterprise’s later “slingshot effect” exploits.
@60/MikePoteet – Aha! Thank you. Right you are, as seen here. That was going to bug me for a while…
@61/McKay B: The orbital physics may not be completely screwed up, but the references to the planet changing mass are still pretty silly. Mass is pretty much a constant, unless it’s somehow expelling huge gouts of magma into space like the Genesis Planet at the end of The Search for Spock, and then the Enterprise would have worse problems than density shifts to worry about.
Also, the very idea of a planet breaking up is problematical. Collapsing as its core freezes, perhaps; that would tend to cause a decrease in volume and the inward collapse of its surface, though that would probably happen over millions of years. But breaking up? No way. Its gravity is holding it together. It would take a huge amount of energy to break a planet’s mass apart and accelerate the pieces out of its gravity well. So no planet is just going to disintegrate under its own power.
I used to have a problem with the idea of the planet freezing because “its sun went dark.” That’s not how main-sequence stars die. The kind of main-sequence stars that could support inhabited planets would swell into red giants and leave bright white-dwarf husks behind. Presumably Black was thinking of the old belief that the Sun’s heat came from gravitational compression rather than fusion and that it would gradually cool as it aged. But then I realized that Psi 2000 could perhaps have been a planet orbiting a brown dwarf, which could generate enough light and heat to sustain a planet in a tight orbit, but would gradually cool and darken over time, just like people used to believe the Sun would.
@43Al3x, that would have been so much smarter. Far too late now.
I saw this for the first time as a neurotically shy kid. This was my worst nightmare, suddenly doing every stupid thing in public you would never, ever want people to see you do.
Oh, and nearly get everyone killed while you’re doing it. Just in case they didn’t have enough reason to regard you as a social leper by the time it was done. That’s the real reason we don’t see Riley for three years. He was hiding in a corner, trying to live down the shame.
@63 – Supposedly, a red dwarf star in the main sequence at 0.35 solar masses or less will not go red giant. For instance, Gliese 581 seems to have planets in the habitable zone and comes in 0.31 solar masses. However, a star that small also has a ridiculously long lifespan compared to the Sun (heck, compared to the current age of the universe), so any similar star going dark won’t be happening for billions of years.
As far as the planet goes, it getting rapidly smaller makes no sense either. The materials planents are made is relatively incompressible on a planetary scale without huge amounts of gravity, so there should not be large shifts in the planets diameter that the Enterprise wold be keeping station with. The writers seemed to mix up mass with volume to the confusion of everything.
Expanding on noblehunter @37- Local function of machinery (shipboard, industrial, whatever) usually is as close to wired-directly-to-power-as-possible because it is not normal operation and sometimes your permissive circuits glitch up and an override is needed. Think MV Alabama– pirates can have the ship, but flip a switch in the steering gear room (and weld the door shut, if one is there) and remote control from the Bridge is impossible; no matter who is on the Bridge, the rudder will be where the local control puts it. This can be changed- many newer installations have a local control routed through the same PLC as normal/ auto to keep safeguards and permissives in place- but then you lose the “run to eventual fail” that you might need (personal experience, 10 hrs OT last week to prevent A Bad Thing!) Controlling or at least cutting power to everything from Engineering makes sense and is hard to avoid.
Slow restart makes more sense that other BS dilemmas later, too (although I also hated the repeated “orbit decaying” trope-to-cliche). Nuclear reactors, depending on how long and how completely they were shut off, can take hours or days to start. Trying to rush will pop the scram breakers or break the plant. Like melting the core or “losing containment”. Antimatter power generation could be similar.
Real “battle stations”, General Quarters, whatever- if it goes on for too long with no action, people with little to do get bored. This was an issue with the USN in early WW2- ships would go to GQ too early before expected action, and crew would lose their edge. A good solution was partial alerts- one of three main battery turrets fully manned, one gun director manned, etc. I can see a repair party playing pinocle or something on a smartphone if it went on too long. Walking around is difficult; watertight compartment doors do NOT get opened. Unless the Admiral’s staff is getting hot.
And this was obviously not Tormolen’s first mistake. Why else is he the only officer to ever wear Lieutenant, Junior Grade stripes?
ETA: this may be my longest post ever :P
@65/Crusader: Which is exactly why I went for a brown dwarf rather than a red dwarf. Brown dwarfs can be expected to cool down within the age of the universe.
And yes, the materials may be incompressible, but I’m thinking they’re expandable by heat. If the planet’s core was molten but has now solidified, there’d be some contraction. We know this is actually happening with Mercury, though again, it’s on a vastly slower time scale than is shown here, billions of years rather than hours.
Now, does this count as a ripped shirt episode or not?
@68/Jana: I’d count it as a ripped-shirt episode. There’s not much exposure, but the sheer gratuitousness of the shirt-rippery makes it stand out.
I’m with Christopher, Jana, this is definitely a ripped shirt episode, just because the shirt ripping was SO INCREDIBLY POINTLESS…..
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
@42 – Very good!
“Naked Time” also reminds me of a Dana Carvey skit where he tells of his kids running around the house, literally naked.
I just saw this episode and overall was quite impressed. Tormolek is extremely careless, but it’s not unrealistic, people violate safety protocol all the time. And the characterization on the rest of the episode was excellent, much better than TNG.
I do agree that McCoy is borderline racist. We accept his teasing of Spock throughout the show and movies because “it’s fun”, but he’s being a fricking racist always commenting on Spock’s lack of discernible feelings, green blood, pointy ears, etc. Yeah, a Vulcan shouldn’t care, but that’s still appalling behaviour from a doctor, and from a Starfleet officer. It’s no better than the sexism shown in the show.
@73/lordmagnusen: Plus, there are times when he is openly hostile towards Spock, e.g. in “The Tholian Web”. Sometimes it seems that he actually dislikes Spock. Spock, on the other hand, seems to like McCoy – after all, he invites him to his wedding as one of his friends. They get along because Spock is so patient about the whole thing, and because they both care about Kirk.
Yeah, but it’s not even about friendship. I mean, slightly racist name calling between friends might be acceptable, behind closed doors… but while serving in an official capacity as a Starfleet doctor? It seems… very out of place, even for a 1960s TV show.
Well, I wouldn’t mind it as long as the tone stays friendly and respectful. If certain jokes between friends are acceptable behind closed doors, then why not in the workplace?
Because between friends, said friends know that what is being said is completely in jest, while doing it in front of subordinates, who you are supposed to be setting an example for, might be taken as if you mean it.
And McCoy’s tone towards Spock is pretty vitriolic at times..
For example, I might make certain kind of jokes with my friends, but never in front of my son, lest he thinks that’s how I actually think.
For all that”s been said about Bones being hostile and potentially racist to Spock, it should be noted he was the first one to defend the Vulcan on situations like Boma’s insubordination on Galileo Seven (a discussion best left when we get to that episode).
@77: Yes, that’s a good point. As I said, I don’t know how McCoy actually thinks either…
@78: Thanks for the reminder! I watched “Galileo Seven” a long time ago and don’t remember much of it.
I’m not saying Bones is actually racist, or that he doesn’t actually like Spock. I’m saying it’s not appropiate behavior for an officer in front of the rest of the crew.
@80/lordmagnusen: But that’s exactly why McCoy does it — because it’s inappropriate. It’s in his nature to push the boundaries and challenge expectations like that. His goading of Spock is more about trying to provoke a reaction than any real animosity. Although one could argue that he takes it too far in this instance.
Yes, I know it’s not out of any actual animosity, that’s his personality, etc… I can see why he’d do it around him, Kirk, Scotty, etc… but not around everybody else, behaving that way, he couldn’t have gotten far as an officer; even if Spock is not offended (and actually enjoys their verbal sparring), any other non-human crewmember (who we don’t see on TOS, but we know should exist) at any of his previous postings would have said something.
And in any case, it’s just that, for me, endless teasing (good natured or not) about someone’s species does seem to mesh with the multicultural acceptance setting of Star Trek. That’s all.
@82/lordmagnusen: Yes, one would think McCoy should be a little more sensitive to interspecies diversity, this being the 23rd century and Starfleet and all. On the other hand, TOS-era Starfleet seems surprisingly segregated by species (all the great efforts of licensed fiction writers notwithstanding). The Intrepid was crewed entirely by Vulcans, yes? And Spock is the only non-human we see aboard the Enterprise until TAS.
I understand the pratical, real world reasons this was so; but, in-universe, it could suggest that Starfleet still has some growing to do. (On the other hand, as a lot of licensed fiction has also suggested — Diane Duane’s springs to mind — there could be many very good, practical reasons we don’t see more extaterrestrials serving aboard majority human starships.)
I do agree that just because teasing is meant as good-natured doesn’t automatically make it okay.
@83/Mike – We know of at least three ships with primarily or entirely Vulcan crews – the Intrepid from TOS, the Hera from TNG, and the T’Kumbra from DS9.
Yeah, I know what we saw on TOS, haven’t read much Diane Duane, but the TITAN series offers a good explanation for why the less-humanoid aliens don’t serve along the more humanoid ones… but there are lots of “humans with small make-up additions” species that could serve along humans.
I know those are more of a a TNG thing, and I understand the practical and/or the writers of the time not coming up with those things back then, but having segregated ships still doesn’t mesh with the spirit of the show as shown on TOS itself.
The Hera didn’t have an all-Vulcan crew. In fact, the Hera was captained by La Forge’s Mom…..
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
@86/Keith – Hence “primarily.” To quote Memory Alpha:
@85/lordmagnusen: Since in TOS so many aliens look entirely like humans, any number of the human-looking crewmembers on the Enterprise might actually be aliens after all.
Of course, everyone we get to know by name seems to have a human name.
@84/MeredithP: I always thought all-Vulcan crews made sense because Vulcans seem to prefer keeping to themselves. Also it would allow them to arrange Pon Farr leaves for their crew without any non-Vulcan noticing.
I actually think that an all-Vulcan crew makes no sense, because it’s ilogical to feel more comfortable working without non-Vulcans. :)
They’re not always as logical as they pretend to be.
Meredith: Really? I don’t remember that at all from “Interface.” (I’m not denying it, just pointing up how incredibly unmemorable it was, which is a neat trick for an episode that features Ben Vereen and Madge Sinclair…..)
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
Keith: There’s a throwaway line spoken by LaForge’s dad: “The service for the Hera will probably be on Vulcan; most of the crew was from there.” Ta-da, random canon source to bolster a theory!
AHA! There we go. Thank you, Meredith. :)
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
Well, just to be ultra-nitpicky, not everyone who’s from Vulcan is necessarily a Vulcan. Immigration is a thing. Although screen Trek does usually default to assuming that every planet is monoracial and monocultural.
Yeah, there is immigration, but most non-Vulcans would probably hate it on Vulcan. :)
@95: Not necessarily. Vulcans can’t be the only species that’s adapted to hot, dry conditions. Cardassians, for one, would probably love the climate there. And Hortas would probably be quite content there; they got along extremely well with Spock.
And you know, I often wonder why Vulcans are presented as the only race in the galaxy that embraced logic and emotional regulation as a way of life. If it worked so well for them, you’d think that somebody else somewhere would’ve developed a similar philosophical system. And there could be individuals of other races who were drawn to the Vulcan philosophy and way of life as well, “converts,” as it were.
@96: Miranda Jones is an example of this.
You’re definitely right on all those counts, Chris.
I guess this is a digression from the actual episode, but since we’re talking about the species that make up ship’s crew, I figured I’d throw my two cents in. I think I may have said this elsewhere before, but I’ve got two thoughts about the whole notion of crews being primarily of a single species.
1. My first instinct is that what we see on screen is just a small cross-section of a ship’s crew, and that the larger makeup of the crew is, in fact, somewhat more representative of the makeup of the Federation. I was a little bummed when the Titan books confirmed that, in the novel continuity, a ship of the Titan‘s diversity is the exception rather than the norm.
2. If we are proceeding under the assumption that most ships are rather heavily crewed by a single species, I assume it’s because there are multiple Starfleet Academies, probably one on each of the most populous UFP member worlds, maybe? And perhaps each of those has their own shipyards? So when we see a mostly-Vulcan crew, it’s because that ship is more or less based out of Vulcan space, likewise for human ships, Tellarite ships (not that I can recall seeing any of those in the Federation era), etc.
But basically, as long as we’re not going with the assumption that humans are the only Federation members that care about being in Starfleet, I’m cool. ;)
-Andy
@96 I feel kind of pedantic pointing this out, but actually I wonder if the average Cardassian would indeed feel comfortable in Vulcan’s climate. Not the heat, as they say, but the humidity, or lack thereof. I seem to recall that one of Garak’s complaints about living on DS9 was how dry it was, and Memory Alpha seems to say that Cardassia has a fairly humid climate. But maybe they’d be fine on Vulcan as long as they had one of those little misting devices. :)
And, honestly, I sort of imagine that plenty of humans and other species not ideally suited for Vulcan’s climate would live there — in the 24th century, I imagine you could choose to spend most of your time inside if you wanted to. Of the people I know in New Mexico, that’s sort of the MO during summer anyway.
-Andy
Diane Duane had a multi-species crew (including a Horta) on the Enterprise in her books. She also had some ships with very limited species aboard due to them having special life support requirements.
My understanding is that Paramount later insisted that all ST:TOS books had to be built around the Holy Trinity which eliminated the opportunity to really explore how other species fit in.
About the Titan, IIRC what they state is that they have a wider representation of less-humanoid or special environment crews, not that there aren’t that many non-humans in other ships.
@101/wiredog: Diane Duane introduced some great non-humanoid beings (glass spider!), but I wonder about the Horta crewmember. When we meet them, they’re eggs. They must hatch, grow up, and go to Starfleet Academy first. Shouldn’t that take some more years?
#103: As Duane reminds us, “Devil in the Dark” occurred very early in the original five-year mission. Then we have this, from early in My Enemy, My Ally :
Once out of the egg, the hatchlings grew with their usual speed; they were tunneling rock within minutes of their birth, and all the thirty thousand that hatched reached latency, and high intelligence, within standard days...
…as for the political formalities, a creature used to moving easily through solid rock will be only slightly slowed down by red tape. It took no more (and in some cases much less) than the three years in which a Starfleet Academy class graduates for Hortas to start appearing on starships.
And thereby we can have Naraht, aka “Ensign Rock”, onstage near the end of the original five-year mission.
Note also that when the first of these novels was originally published, one view of continuity postulated a second five-year mission springboarded off the end of the first movie. Which is also why, in some of the books dating from that period, you see references to some of the bridge crew having been promoted (“Lt. Commander Uhura”, for instance). I have some memory that more recent reprints may have tinkered with those promotions in light of subsequent rearrangement of official continuity, but I don’t recall specifics just now; Keith or Christopher will undoubtedly remember more about that.
@104: Thank you, I kind of remembered that the subject was addressed somewhere, but I had forgotten all the details. Of course, high intelligence still isn’t the same as basic education, but on the other hand, it’s nice to have a Horta crewmember :-)
Also, I used to think the Duane novels took place before Kirk’s promotion but I may be mistaken.
@104/JohnCBunnell: Actually the assumption that seems to have been used in Duane’s early novels and some others from the time was that there had been a second five-year mission before ST:TMP, or at least that the mission ran considerably longer than five years. After all, the movie came out a decade after the series ended, and the actors were visibly older. The intent of the film was that there was only one 5-year mission — Kirk references “my five years out there,” which is actually the first canonical reference to that mission duration outside the opening narration — and that Kirk had been an admiral for two and a half years since then, but many viewers missed that and assumed that the in-story interval prior to TMP was the same as the real-world one, more or less.
So Duane’s first few novels, The Wounded Sky, My Enemy, My Ally, and The Romulan Way, are evidently set in that second pre-TMP 5-year mission. TRW asserts that it’s set eight years after “The Enterprise Incident,” but it’s also before TMP. Spock’s World is the first Duane novel to be set after TMP, implicitly shortly after it.
Although it gets confusing later on. The next book in the Rihannsu sequence, Swordhunt — published in two volumes as Swordhunt and Honor Blade — was written quite a few years later under a different editor, who had Duane set it before TMP despite being after Spock’s World. Then, it was another five years before she did the concluding novel The Empty Chair, but that was under yet another editor with different ideas about how to resolve the chronological issues (or maybe Duane herself had changed her mind), so it was accompanied by an omnibus edition of MEMA, TRW, and Swordhunt which reworked all of them to be in the post-TMP era.
Other ’80s novels that purported to be several years after TOS yet still pre-TMP include Corona by Greg Bear (before he was famous), Pawns and Symbols by Majliss Larson, and Memory Prime by Judith & Garfield Reeves-Stevens (their first Trek novel).
Ah, this gives the Horta five more years to grow up. I’m satisfied!
@106/Christopher: What is the current canonical position on other five-year missions? Is the “second five-year mission” post-TMP accepted?
I have always found the notion of a second five-year mission after TMP to be spectacularly lazy. “We just did a thing before, now let’s do THE EXACT SAME THING we did before, except we’re wearing gray and white instead of bright primary colors.”
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
@109/Keith: But wouldn’t Starfleet still be interested in space exploration? Of course, it doesn’t have to be for exactly five years.
@108/MikePoteet: Canonically, in terms of actual onscreen evidence as opposed to generally accepted apocrypha, we have very few solid data points for the chronology of TOS and TMP. Voyager: “Q2” established that the 5-year mission ended in 2270, and that Kirk subsequently “regained command” of the Enterprise, implicitly referring to TMP. The 2009 movie established that Kirk was born in 2233 (in both realities, since the timeline split occurred just minutes before Kirk’s birth). That means that “The Deadly Years,” in which Kirk was explicitly 34, happened in 2267 (something the Star Trek Chronology had assumed for many years, but that was never unambiguously established in screen canon until the ’09 movie). We also know from TNG: “Cause and Effect” that the Bozeman was lost in 2278, with the crew wearing TWOK-style uniforms, so TMP must be at least a few years before then. Given TMP’s reference to Kirk being an admiral for two and a half years, we can reasonably conclude that TMP took place in 2272-3 (the Pocket Books continuity assumes 2273). This, along with Kirk’s “my five years out there” line in TMP, pretty much rules out the ’80s novels’ suggestion of a second 5-year mission before TMP.
As for a 5YM after TMP, there isn’t a shred of canon to support the idea; it’s pure fan/novelist conjecture. A lot of people tend to assume that 5-year missions are routine, or even that they’re the only possible mission profile for a Starfleet vessel, which makes no sense. Different missions should have different durations. In fact, we only have evidence for exactly one 5-year mission undertaken by exactly one ship — the Enterprise during TOS/TAS. And the only actual canonical references we have to that mission (outside the main title narration) are Kirk’s line in TMP and Icheb’s in “Q2.” A single instance is not evidence of a pattern. For all we know, the 5-year mission in TOS was the only one of its kind, ever. But fans have heard that phrase “Its five-year mission” so often that they just take it for granted.
On the one hand, Keith is quite right that there’s no reason to assume all starship missions are 5 years. On the other hand, a number of novels have assumed that they are. For instance, Peter David’s The Captain’s Daughter, a novel that’s been referenced by several other works in the modern novel continuity including every subsequent John Harriman or Demora Sulu story and my own Ex Machina, asserts that there was a post-TMP 5-year mission that ended in 2278 (and indeed that Sulu would’ve joined the Bozeman crew and been lost with it if he hadn’t stayed behind to raise Demora). So while there’s no canonical basis for it, it is an established fact within the novel continuity.
However, we can have it both ways, since the official timeline puts The Wrath of Khan in 2285 (for some strange reason, even though that’s 18 years after “Space Seed” instead of 15 — but it’s been referenced enough in books that we’re kind of stuck with it). That means there are seven years between the end of the post-TMP 5-year mission and the events of TWOK — plenty of time for the ship to go on missions with different profiles and durations, rather than just another boring old 5-year tour. I made this explicit in my novella Mere Anarchy: The Darkness Drops Again (edited by Keith), which spanned much of the gap between TMP and TWOK and showed that, in the years between 2278 and Kirk’s two-year retirement in 2282 (per Generations), the Enterprise was Admiral Kirk’s personal flagship under Spock’s command, and periodically went on various special missions under Kirk while serving as a research and training vessel under Spock in the interim (making what we saw in TWOK basically an extension of that). So far, none of the other books have explored that period, though.
In my books, I’ve interpreted “five-year missions” not as a standard, unvarying practice, but just as the maximum recommended duration for a Constitution-class vessel to be in the field without major repairs and refitting. So Connies could go on missions of any duration up to that length — including the mission seen in “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” which I see as a separate, months-long mission to the galactic edge and back that preceded the 5YM. After all, the ship was clearly refitted between WNM and the series proper, and a refit is more likely to come between tours of duty than in the middle of one.
@111: In Voyager’s “Endgame” I think alternate future Harry Kim states that he was on assignment for four years. There’s also the mission of Lisa’s ship in “The Sound of Her Voice,” and I don’t remember exactly, but it implies it was a deep space mission of 8 years or something.
@112/crzydroid: There’s also Excelsior‘s three-year Beta Quadrant survey, per Sulu’s log in the opening of The Undiscovered Country.
It’s also worth noting that, while Into Darkness does have the Enterprise begin a 5-year mission at the end of the movie (in 2260), it also suggests earlier in the film that 5-year exploration missions are a brand-new idea that’s never been tried before.
@111/Christopher: the Enterprise was Admiral Kirk’s personal flagship under Spock’s command, and periodically went on various special missions under Kirk while serving as a research and training vessel under Spock in the interim (making what we saw in TWOK basically an extension of that).
I’ll buy that, but it seems to blunt the impact of McCoy’s admonition to Kirk, “Get back your command…” if the 1701 was basically Kirk’s whenever he wanted the keys. Maybe I’m misunderstanding the arrangement.
Thanks for the info on the canonical timeline! I like your suggestion that five years is the maximum duration, rather than the standard – kind of a “do not exceed” recommendation, if I understand correctly. (At the risk of reopening the “Enterprise exceptionalism” can of worms, though, it could also support the idea that completing its five-year mission more-or-less intact really was quite the achievement!)
“Ensign Rock”? Nice, why don’t we call the Vulcans “Ensign Pointy-Ears” and the Tellarites “Ensign Porky”?
@115: The “Ensign Rock” coinage is actually a formulation of (perhaps amused) respect in context; it’s used specifically by the Rihannsu Commander Ael and gives the connotation that he is the personification of an Element. (The uppercase is intentional; Rihannsu religious tradition, in significant part, involves practicing respect for the various traditional Elements.)
Ah, I thought that was his shipmates calling him that.
It’s a shame that not more episodes had Sulu and Uhura at the center of it. Like Mirror Mirror, either and especially both could really carry a scene. I think a story around them as well too. To me would have elevated the whole series that much more (yes, shame on you Shatner for wanting 100% of the attention). To me, they are much more interesting than any of the TNG supporting cast.
Overall, a memorable episode that is part of Star Trek Lore.
@118/blistex649: Actually it was the runaway popularity of Leonard Nimoy, and the resultant network pressure to center more heavily on Spock, that led to the loss of the early ensemble flavor. It was Roddenberry as much as Shatner who wanted to keep Kirk central, but they had to fight for that against the desire of the network and the fans to make it the Spock show.
Besides, there weren’t that many ensemble shows back then. The norm was to focus heavily on one or two leads. That’s not Shatner’s fault. Heck, look at the credits to the first pilot. Jeffrey Hunter was the only non-guest actor to get lead billing. The rest of the cast was relegated to “co-starring” credits in the end titles.
@118/blistex649: While I take a different view on Kirk/Shatner, I fully agree that it would have been great to have some stories revolving around Sulu and (especially) Uhura, and also that they are more interesting than most of the TNG cast. The real shame is that we only got three meagre seasons.
@120/Jana: For a pre-1980s SF show, three seasons was actually a relatively long run. Not many made it that far, and only a few made it farther. Prior to ST:TNG, the only American live-action SF/fantasy shows that lasted longer than five seasons were The Adventures of Superman and Bewitched.
I think Jana’s just saying she would have liked more seasons. Me too, but not like season 3. :)
Just wanted to pop in and note that I just read Bruce Hyde, Lt. Riley himself, has passed away. You can read more at TrekMovie.com.
Thanks for the heads up, Michelle. Very sad… :(
—Keith R.A. DeCandido
My thoughts exactly watching this were ‘wait, these absolute imbeciles are meant to be the brightest and best of humanity???’, the dumbness really turned what could have been a truly great episode into merely enjoyable, I’m glad TNG did the sequel better (at least, more plausible)
I love The Who almost as much as I love Star Trek; it’s “Roger Daltrey”, not “Daltry”.
Emily: ARGH! Thank you! I always screw that up……………
—Keith R.A. DeCandido, who apparently will get fooled again
I thought it was very interesting that, in an interview, Leonard Nimoy said that after “Naked Time” aired his fan mail went from hundreds of letters per week to thousands. The “chink in the armour” he revealed for Spock in that episode allowed a lot of viewers to suddenly *get* the character, I guess.
As to Shatner focusing the show on himself, Shatner interviewed Walter Koenig for his show “Shatner’s Raw Nerve” – I believe the episode is still on Youtube. Koenig is pretty blunt about saying right to Shatner’s face the he took away his, Takei’s and Nichols’ feature scenes consistantly. Shanter apologized and stressed that he didn’t really realize he was doing it – and had someone drawn his attention to it, he felt he surely would have stopped. I thought it was a great exchange.
I grew up on the movies and TNG, and saw assorted TOS episodes now and then. It wasn’t until I got the series on Blu-Ray that I actually sat down to watch them in order. By the way, Keith, thanks for including the production order – it’s been helpful in watching these.
But to my point, this episode was the first one where I finally saw the characters I grew up with. This episode sort of crystallized the characters, and they seemed to have a much stronger resonance as to how the actors played them for the next 30 years or so. It’s surprising, I guess, since this is the episode where they are supposedly “out of character.” Well I guess acting intoxicated really does amplify your true character.
That “sorry, neither” was actually an ad lib on Nichelle Nichols’ part.
Worst anti-contamination protocols ever!
I have come late to the debate but couldn’t leave without saying something about this Bones bashing. For those who say McCoy is racist, I have one question: except for his exchanges with Spock, where do we see Bones acting in a racist manner? Even to the other Vulcans like Sarek and T’Pau, he is extremely respectful. In the UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY, it is Bones who does not like the Klingons being referred to as the trash of the galaxy or whatever. He is the one who raises a toast to Chancellor Gorkon.
The way he riles Spock has to be seen in the light of his friendship with Spock and it isn’t as if Spock doesn’t respond or (at times) initiate in kind.
And how come Spock is never called racist because of the way he suppresses his human heritage? Aren’t there many Eurasians, Anglo-Indians, Afro-Americans who are ashamed of their mixed heritage and try to pass off as what they consider to be the ‘superior’ race? Doesn’t Spock also try to do that, why is he never called on that?
Coming back to the Bones-Spock relationship, Bones often does stand up for Spock: CONSCIENCE OF THE KING, PLATO’S STEPCHILDREN, MENAGERIE, FINAL FRONTIER. How many times do we see Spock standing up for Bones?
@132/bk: “How many times do we see Spock standing up for Bones?”
Perhaps not the same thing, but he saves his life in “Bread and Circuses” and refuses to leave him to die in the snowstorm in “All Our Yesterdays”. And we know that he considers him one of “his closest friends” because he invites him to his wedding in “Amok Time”.
@132, Vulcans are extremely racist. Spock probably sees nothing remarkable in McCoy’s digs and returns them in kind as a matter of course. There is no malice in the game, and only rarely genuine anger
@134/Roxana: IMO McCoy crosses the line to being mean in “The Galileo Seven”, “The Tholian Web”, and to a lesser extent in “Bread and Circuses” (the only time he calls Spock “hobgoblin”). I think he gets mean when he is afraid.
@135, I agree. And i think that Spock knows better than to take McCoy’s insults under stress too seriously.
133/ JanaJansen
If Spock saves McCoy’s life in Bread and Circuses than McCoy sacrifices himself in The Empath. And as for All Our yesterdays, Spock is concerned about McCoy till the time he sees that scantily clad female. After that, let alone McCoy, he becomes least concerned about Jim too.
And I am glad that Spock invited Bones to his wedding in Amok Time since it is only Bones’ presence of mind that averts a major tragedy.
And thank you very much for such a prompt response since I never thought the thread was alive.
134/ Princessroxana
That is precisely my point: Vulcans (including Spock) can be extremely racist, yet it is always Bones who gets the short end of the stick. Spock is clearly contemptuous of his human colleagues vis a vis his Vulcan protege in THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY (in fact, while the Spock in the serial is somebody whom I like immensely, his portrayal in the movies leaves much to be desired).
135/ JanaJansen
In THE GALILEO SEVEN, Spock seems more concerned about the inhabitants of the planet than his own crew members, one of whose death is clearly on his head. I can’t fault McCoy for being rude to him.
@133: Bones, Kirk and Spock take turns saving each other in The Empath.
I totally lucked out as a kid. “The Naked Time” was the first Trek episode I saw in 1974 or so.
@137/bk: I’m always glad when someone new comes along I can talk about Star Trek with, so thank you.
Yes, McCoy and Spock keep saving each other, but it isn’t a competition, is it? I think it shows that they both like each other.
In “All Our Yesterdays” Spock is still concerned about McCoy after seeing Zarabeth. He gives up too easily on going back and finding Kirk, but he still nurses McCoy back to health.
@138/bk: But McCoy starts being nasty almost immediately, before they even meet the inhabitants (“At least it’s your big chance”, “Not his head, Mister Boma, his heart”). He doesn’t try to support and advise Spock the way he does Kirk. In these early episodes, they both need Kirk. They work together much better in “The Paradise Syndrome”.
140/ JanaJansen
No, it is not a competition. They both care about each other and as Bones says to Spock in SEARCH FOR SPOCK that he’d die if he was to lose Spock again. But then after all this why is Bones considered a racist?
In ALL OUR YESTERDAYS, Spock is so angry with McCoy that he turns violent, all the years of sharing and caring gone in one instant. Bones comes across as insensitive but actually he is being logical and rational. Though I do wish they had somehow brought Zarabeth back with them, the thought of her being all lonely over there has always seemed so sorrowful.
As for McCoy not advising Spock during THE GALILEO SEVEN, this could be 1) He wasn’t in favour of the mission to the planet as being a doctor he’d be more interested in getting the medicines delivered where they are badly needed. This scientific research might have seemed as indulgence to him when people were dying but he had to surrender to Kirk and Spock’s passion for such research and so perhaps he was in a foul mood to begin with. I admit this is just speculation but knowing the doctor, it could be one of the reasons.
2) And this is not speculation: Spock doesn’t take kindly to advice. When Lt. DeSalle offers him one in THE SQUIRE OF GOTHOS, Spock responds very nastily. Bones wasn’t quite going to volunteer what was not appreciated. And for that matter, Spock could have asked him to advice him as to how to deal with the situation but he didn’t, preferring to keep his own counsel. This is unlike Kirk’s way of functioning who takes the final decision himself but is open to suggestions and often asks for advice from the other crew members.
And I am glad that later on Spock himself realises this and we have this gem of an exchange in OBSESSION:
“Doctor, I need your advice.”
“Then I need a drink.”
*
And finally thank you for making me feel so welcome.
@141/bk: I don’t think that McCoy is universally considered a racist. In this comment thread, MeredithP and Christopher Bennett have argued against this idea. Can we say that both Spock and McCoy say inappropriate and insulting things at times, and that it’s hard to tell who started it?
“All Our Yesterdays” shows that, even though they both care for each other, they also grate on each other’s nerves. Spock turns violent when he realises that he has never liked being called “pointed-eared Vulcan”. I can understand that – on Vulcan, he has been insulted because he was human, and on the Enterprise, he’s being insulted because he’s Vulcan. Of course, you could say that he invites people to react that way by going on about Vulcan superiority, and also that McCoy only does it because the whole idea about repressing emotions freaks him out, and he sees that it isn’t good for Spock, and is concerned about him. But he has a weird way of showing his concern. All this is rather complicated, and quite realistic, and I’m very fond of both characters.
Good point that Spock doesn’t take kindly to advice.
The thing is, racism isn’t a single thing, but a whole spectrum of behaviors and social assumptions, some of which are far subtler than others. At one extreme, it’s lynch mobs and concentration camps; at the other, it’s “harmless” jokes and microaggressions that the people using them don’t even realize are hurtful. You don’t have to be a card-carrying, willing racist to say or think things that are part of a larger social construct of subtle racism. If racist assumptions or barriers are built into society, you can perpetuate them without wanting or meaning to, just because you were raised to take them for granted. A single individual may mean no harm by them, but a large number of individuals unthinkingly perpetuating them adds up harmfully for the people they’re directed at.
There were a lot of attitudes about race, gender, etc. that social norms in the ’60s didn’t recognize as hurtful or offensive but that we do recognize as such these days. And that’s why having the TOS characters constantly comment on each other’s species differences was seen as harmless teasing at the time but is recognizably more problematical today.
@143 Indeed, and there is also what is called “N” word privileges too where people who have a personal history together put up with slurs and “teasing” because it isn’t insulting on a personal level, basically treating it as an in-joke. However, even though those are harmless and inoffensive between members of that group it can still be harmful to observers as it can trigger reminders of abuse in the onlookers as well as encouraging those not in that personal group to think such words are okay in general. It is complicated, but Kirk should really have told McCoy and Spock to knock that shit off in public. If they want to spend time insulting each other in private, then fine, but as soon as they were somewhere other people could see then they should have acted less like jackasses to set an example.
Regarding TOS/TMP/TWoK timing, I’ve been partial to the idea that there was a significant gap of time between TMP and TWoK. It fits for a few reasons:
– If you consider TMP to be shortly after the 5-year TOS mission, the actors were portraying themselves younger than their actual age.
– With a large gap of time between TMP and TWoK, this allows the second movie to be the actors playing closer to their own age.
– It makes room for the post-TMP novels.
– It allows time for the establishment of the “Planet of Galactic Peace” from Star Trek V. If you presume TWoK (and therefore TSFS) is only a few years after TMP, then it would have been established far too close to “Balance of Terror” to make any sense.
– It allows Admiral Morrow’s comment about the Enterprise being “20 years old” to make more sense. The line clearly came from the broadcast time gap, but why would a ship that had recently been refit–so much that comparisons to Theseus are made–be considered too old to keep on active duty a few years later? On the other hand, if it had been 20 years since the refit, the line works, even if the writers didn’t intend it that way.
The biggest sticking point with this approach is Khan’s 15-year exile. But I’ve always felt like handwaving it as lengthier Ceti Alpha V years is the more elegant solution than ignoring the other issues, as long as you are forced to disregard SOMETHING.
@45/Eduardo Jencarelli: I believe that shortly after The Conscience of the King, the Reilly actor quit acting and became an acting teacher. Although, perhaps if he was hired to be a reoccurring character, he would have stayed in the acting business ;) It’s a shame, he was a likeable character. Shame for us, that is. I’m sure he had no regrets in his career choice.
I always wondered why they were in those suits at all. The scientific team had been on the planet for some (not specified) time. If their had been some sort of contagion, wouldn’t the science team reported it? So why would the Enterprise team wear anything other than cold weather gear?
Now, there was a contagion so they got caught. But why would they be worried about it until they were onsite and saw the bodies.
@147/costumer: My guess is that they failed to get any response from the science team when they hailed them, and were unable to get a scan from orbit (perhaps due to interference from the planet’s death throes), so they didn’t know what might be wrong and took precautions before beaming down. This was the first time in the series proper that we saw a landing party beam down into an unknown situation where they had reason to suspect a hazard. Maybe at this early stage, it was intended to be standard procedure to go in wearing biohazard gear just in case. Which, really, it should have been.
@147/costumer:
Those suits have confounded me for a long time. I was never sure if they were supposed to be hazmat suits or some funky idea for futuristic cold weather suits. I tend to think the later, which answers your question. The reason I think cold weather suits, is because the head piece is not sealed and surely Tormolin can’t be so dense as to remove his glove if it was an hazmat suit. And further, Spock returns from his search of the outpost and tells Tormolen to be sure to expose himself to nothing (although too late to do any good). Again, if it was an hazmat suit, would Spock really have to tell his subordinate that?
All seriousness aside, the real truth is that they were just wearing shower curtains
I think this episode is far too entertaining too be merely an average score. Lots of great stuff with the characters. That Riley is adorable and it’s a shame he only made two total appearances on the series.
I think it was smart of George Takei to decide to use a fencing sword as opposed to a katana. Very forward thinking on his part.
Like with “The Naked Now” on TNG, I think this episode would have been better placed later in the season after audiences had gotten to know the characters better. However, in my case that didn’t really matter since I’ve seen lots of episode and the movies all out of order before this one. Speaking of “The Naked Now,” I can’t believe the producers of TNG decided on basically redoing this same story on their series.
I was surprised by the time warp ending. I was expecting it to lead right into another episode but obviously that didn’t happen so it seems very superfluous. The “trivial matters” section of this rewatch does help to explain how it came to be at least.
And I have to say I personally don’t find Yeoman Rand all that attractive. She seems to have a perpetual scowl on her face and a bug up her butt so that it diminishes any physical attractiveness she might otherwise have. I wonder if Grace Lee Whitney was given notes to play the character that way or she just did it that way on her own.
Riley’s ability to hijack Engineering isn’t surprising: in Conscience of the King, Spock told Kirk that Riley came up from Engineering. Then Kirk sent him back and nearly got him killed… But he could have been down there for a year or more learning what he was trained to know.
But also both Marvick and even Khan– and it seems like the occasional random android and alien invaders both– anyone with a little bit of engineering knowledge– could take control of the ship, apparently with very little effort. Maybe the idea of “User Friendliness” was taken a bit too far in designing the Constitution-type starships during the 23rd century.
@147: Somebody once said that there is no such thing as “fool-proof” when it comes to a dedicated fool. Tormolin was dedicated.
The reviewer Keith brought up some of the absurd plot contrivances in this episode, but they were made to move the story along. I mean, the funny water had to get aboard ship somehow (Tormolen’s carelessness) and O’Riley had to take over engineering somehow (lying to Scott). Beyond that, this was a very interesting episode. And I wish Uhura and Rand had been infected – imagine their hidden desires and fantasies! But I was never sure what exactly Tormolen’s problem was. If he thought space travel and exploration was “wrong” why would he keep re-enlisting in Starfleet?? That would be like a peace-loving hippie going to fight in Vietnam! Was Tormolen just mentally ill and suicidal?
@153/Palash: “I was never sure what exactly Tormolen’s problem was. If he thought space travel and exploration was “wrong” why would he keep re-enlisting in Starfleet?? That would be like a peace-loving hippie going to fight in Vietnam! Was Tormolen just mentally ill and suicidal?”
Tormolen was still processing the recent trauma of finding six dead people on the planet below. The death of an entire research team for dubious scientific gain is the sort of thing that could spark depression and doubt about the value of exploration, even if it’s not the way Tormolen normally thought or felt. We all sometimes have setbacks that make us question our life choices and wonder if it’s all worth it, even if only briefly. Normally, Joe probably would’ve worked through that depression and doubt, but the virus amplified them to an extreme degree.
Okay, I just watched this episode and after Riley has taken over engineering and Kirk calls down there, Riley answers “You rang?” This HAS to be reference to what Lurch on the “Addams Family” show always said!! An insider joke perhaps? Addams Family started in 1964 and, oh, Ted Cassidy who played Lurch, was Ruk on Trek! Small universe!
@155/Palash Ghosh: The reason Lurch said “You rang?” is because that has long been a standard thing for butlers to say when their employers, well, rang for them. I believe the phrase “You rang, sir?” is associated with P.G. Wodehouse’s Jeeves, the archetypal fictional butler, introduced in 1915. So Lurch was referencing something much older and more commonplace; the joke was how he said it, this iconic, polite query of an elegant, refined butler delivered in a menacing, sepulchral drone by a cadaverous hulk. So Riley was no doubt referencing the same thing, a standard butler’s query, rather than any specific fictional butler.
Indeed, Lurch wasn’t even the first sitcom character to popularize the phrase; that was Maynard G. Krebs (Bob Denver) in The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis, which ran from 1959-63. There, the joke was probably that this dissolute beatnik character was speaking like an elegant butler.
A previous commenter pointed out that the classic “Sorry, neither!” line was ad-libbed by Nichelle Nichols. This seems very plausible. I would imagine that if the scriptwriter (whom I believe was white) wrote it like that, it might be viewed as offensive to Uhura. But coming out of Uhura’s/Nichols’ own mouth was downright funny and brilliant! Maybe her best line ever. But I wonder how many other lines on TOS were ad-libbed and kept in final versions. I have read that Martin Scorsese encourages his actors to come up with their own lines, but I’m not sure if that practice occurs in episodic TV.
The discussion above about McCoy’s “racism” towards Spock was interesting, but I must point out that as a Vulcan, Spock in not another “race”, but rather another species, hence McCoy would be “speciesist” (if that’s even a real word). Also, aside from Kirk and maybe Uhura no one else seems to “like” Spock at all. The “Galileo Seven” episode really highlighted how the crew’s resentment towards Spock is always bubbling under the surface. And if I was a (human) crewmember of the Enterprise I’d also dislike Spock. I mean, what’s there to “like” about him? Yes, I would admire his intelligence and outwardly show him respect as a senior officer and follow his orders. But “like” him? No way! Spock is cold, unfeeling, humorless, unpleasant and his behavior often borders on arrogance. No, I would not like him either! Plus, would not Spock’s constant criticism of humans and human behavior also be considered bigoted and even cruel?
@158/Palash Ghosh: “Speciesist” has often been used as a word in science fiction or fantasy contexts. However, I think it’s missing the point to dwell on the technical accuracy of the word rather than the mentality it’s being used to convey. Science fiction is usually an allegory for real-life issues, after all, so sci-fi speciesism is a metaphor for human racism and other forms of prejudice.
As for whether people would like Spock, keep in mind that Leonard Nimoy got far more fan mail than the rest of the cast combined, and most of it was from female viewers. People recognized his inner vulnerability beneath the cold surface, or they identified with him as a neurodiverse social outsider (even though we didn’t have that terminology for understanding it back then), or they thought he was totally hot and wanted to melt that icy facade, like Chapel did.
ChristopherLBennett: I understand Spock’s appeal to the fans due to his inner conflicts and what-not, I’m just saying that if he were a “real person” that I knew directly, I would not like him at all. In a similar vein, fictitious TV characters like Archie Bunker, Fred Sanford and Tony Soprano are each extremely appealing to their fanbases for all kinds of reasons — but what if they were your neighbor or work colleague in “real life”? Would they still be so enjoyable? And, as for Spock’s popularity with female fans, all I can say, anecdotally, is that the few women in my life who are Trek fans, not one of them found Spock “attractive.” They either liked Kirk or Chekhov. Just my two cents, or, uh, credits!
@160/Palash Ghosh: Different people like different things, and they see different things in other people. There have been people who disliked me and found me arrogant, aloof, or annoying, while other people have seen me more positively and become close and caring friends. So my point is, just because you (or a handful of people of your acquaintance) wouldn’t like Spock, that doesn’t mean you should be surprised that other people do. It is a well-documented fact that Spock was the breakout character of TOS and a huge sex symbol with 1960s female audiences (hence the enlargement of his role as the series went on, the fact that seasons 2 & 3 both opened with Spock-centric episodes, and the fact that Bantam’s first two original novels were titled Spock Must Die! and Spock: Messiah!), and facts do not vanish in the face of personal opinions or expectations.