Welcome back to the Lovecraft reread, in which two modern Mythos writers get girl cooties all over old Howard’s sandbox, from those who inspired him to those who were inspired in turn.
Today we’re looking at Stephen King’s “Crouch End,” first published in New Tales of the Cthulhu Mythos (Edited by Ramsey Campbell) in 1980.
Spoilers ahead.
“Sometimes,” Vetter said, stealing another of Farnham’s Silk Cuts, “I wonder about Dimensions.”
Summary
American tourist Doris Freeman totters into a police station just outside the London suburb of Crouch End. To constables Vetter and Farnham, she describes the disappearance of her husband, Lonnie.
They came to Crouch End to dine with Lonnie’s colleague John Squales, but Lonnie lost the address. Their cab driver stops at a phone box so he can call for directions. Doris spots a strange headline in a newsagent’s window: “60 Lost in Underground Horror.” Leaving the cab to stretch her legs, she spots more weirdness: momentarily rat-headed bikers, a cat with a mutilated face, two children (the boy with a claw-like hand) who taunt them and then run away.
Worse, their cab unaccountably deserts them. They start to walk toward Squales’s house. At first Crouch End looks like a modestly affluent suburb. Then they hear moaning from behind a hedge. It encloses a lawn, bright green except for the black, vaguely man-shaped hole from which the moans issue. Lonnie pushes through to investigate. The moans become mocking, gleeful. Lonnie screams, struggles with something sloshing, returns with torn and black-stained jacket. When Doris stares transfixed at a black (sloshing) bulk behind the hedge, he shrieks for her to run.
She does. They both do, until exhausted. Whatever Lonnie saw, he can’t or won’t describe it. He’s shocked, nearly babbling. Screw dinner, Doris says. They’re getting out of Crouch End.
They pass up a street of deserted shops. In one window is the mutilated cat Doris saw earlier. They brave an unlit underpass over which bone-white trains hurtle, heading, they hope, toward sounds of normal traffic. Lonnie makes it through. But a hairy hand seizes Doris. Though the shape in the shadows asks for a cigarette in Cockney accent, she sees slit cat eyes and a mangled face!
She wrenches free and stumbles out of the underpass, but Lonnie’s gone and the street’s grown stranger. Ancient warehouses bear signs like ALHAZRED, CTHULHU KRYON and NRTESN NYARLATHOTEP. Angles and colors seem off. The very stars in the plum-purple sky are wrong, unfamiliar constellations. And the children reappear, taunting: Lonnie’s gone below to the Goat with a Thousand Young, for he was marked. Doris will go, too. The boy with the claw-hand chants in a high, fluting language. The cobblestoned street bursts open to release braided tentacles thick as tree trunks. Their pink suckers shift to agonized faces, Lonnie’s among them. In the black void below, something like eyes –
Next thing Doris knows she’s in a normal London street, crouching in a doorway. Passersby say they’ll walk her to the police station until they hear her story. Then they hurry off, for she’s been to Crouch End Towen!
A nurse takes Doris away. Veteran constable Vetter tells noob Farnham that the station “back files” are full of stories like hers. Has Farnham ever read Lovecraft? Heard the idea that other dimensions may lie close to ours, and that in some places the “fabric” between them stretches dangerously thin?
Farnham’s not much of a reader. He thinks Vetter’s cracked. It’s funny, though, how other constables at the Crouch End station have gone prematurely white-haired, retired early, even committed suicide. Then there’s Sgt. Raymond, who likes to break shoplifters’ fingers. It’s Raymond who explains that the “Towen” Doris mentioned is an old Druidic word for a place of ritual slaughter.
Vetter goes out for air. After a while Farnham goes looking for him. The streetlights towards Crouch End are out, and he walks off in that direction. Vetter returns from the other direction, and wonders where his partner’s gone.
Farnham, like Lonnie, disappears without a trace. Doris returns home, tries to commit suicide, is institutionalized. After her release, she spends some nights in the back of her closet, writing over and over, “Beware the Goat with a Thousand Young.” It seems to ease her. Vetter retires early, only to die of a heart attack.
People still lose their way in Crouch End. Some of them lose it forever.
What’s Cyclopean: Nothing, but there are “eldritch bulking buildings.” Someone should do a survey of which adjectives neo-Lovecraftians most often use to honor the master.
The Degenerate Dutch: King’s working class casts are prone to racism, sexism, and a general background buzz of other isms. Ambiguously gay characters like Sergeant Raymond tend to be Not Nice. And like many of King’s stories, “Crouch End” walks the fine line between body horror and ablism and falls off the wrong side—if you’re scarred or have a birth defect, then congratulations, you’re a servant of the elder gods.
Mythos Making: The Goat With a Thousand Young takes her sacrifices from the London suburbs; Cthulhu owns a warehouse.
Libronomicon: Aside from Lovecraft himself, the only book mentioned is a “Victorian pastiche” called Two Gentlemen in Silk Knickers. Unclear whether it’s a pastiche or a pastiche ifyouknowwhatImean.
Madness Takes Its Toll: Farnham assumes Doris is crazy. And Lonnie, in the brief period between initial encounter and consumption, is working hard on a nice case of traumatic dissociation.
Ruthanna’s Commentary
A good horror writer is more frightened than you, and manages both to make that fear contagious and project it onto something worth being afraid of. King is very, very good at this. His descriptions of terror are visceral. They range from the hyperfamiliar—who hasn’t had moments of I can’t I can’t I can’t?—to ultraspecific mirror neuron triggers, the fear-dried mouth tasting sharply of mouthwash.
Lovecraft sometimes manages this, but frequently lacks the needed self-consciousness. He doesn’t entirely realize what parts of his experience are universal, so you get odd moments when he assumes you’ll have the same visceral reaction he does, and doesn’t bother to do anything beyond mention the Scary Thing. Which might be angles, or foreigners, or all-devouring entities that care nothing for human existence. King is aware that he’s more frightened than the average person, and has a keen instinct for how to remedy that gap.
“Crouch End” is full of these telling and terrifying details. Some are adapted from Lovecraft. (The warehouse district, incongruity reminding even jaded mythos readers of the strangeness of those names. The bynames of elder gods turned into a child’s street chant.) Some are King’s own. (The unseen horror veiled by a suburban hedge. The thing under the bridge.)
The things that are so effective about “Crouch End” make me even more frustrated by the things that aren’t. King was a staple of my teenage years, when I read him mostly for comfort. Carrie and Firestarter in particular I read as revenge fantasies—high school was not a fun time—while in retrospect they also reflect fear of women’s power, and like Lovecraft fear of what the powerless might do if their state changes. College was a fun time, and as my life has steadily Gotten Better, it’s been a couple of decades since I’ve gone back to this stuff. I regret to report that there have been Fairies.
King’s relationship with sex and sexuality is always odd. I was fine with this in high school, but it doesn’t age well. The ambiguously gay bad cop is particularly jarring, but I could also do without the bouts of intensive male gaze and whining about political correctness. King has narrators who don’t do these things; it’s something he chooses to put in. But all his stories have this background miasma of blue collar resentment, which he writes the same way in rural Maine and urban London. The sameness of the texture, from story to story, grates.
Then there are the things that are less self-conscious, and equally frustrating. Deformity in King’s work always has moral implications, and is always played for maximum body horror. “Crouch End” includes both a cat/demon with a mangled face, and a boy/cultist with a “claw hand.” Surely an author who can make fear taste like mouthwash can make it look like something other than a kid with a malformed limb.
Back to things that work—the degree to which the story’s arc is a movement from disbelief to belief, with belief leading to often fatal vulnerability. This is a more subtly Lovecraftian aspect of the story than the overt Mythos elements. So much of Lovecraft hinges fully on a character moving from ignorance to denial to the ultimate italicized revelation. King’s multiple narrators give us multiple takes on that journey. Farnham resists belief and actively mocks, but is drawn into the “back file” reports and then into the ‘towen’ street. Lonnie has a similar arc, but compressed. Doris survives her vision of reality, but pays it tribute with the little madness of her closet graffiti. And Vetter survives, keeping his head down, right up until he takes that survival for granted by retiring. I guess the Goat With A Thousand Young doesn’t like it when you try to move out of range.
Last thought: Lonnie and Doris’s initial helplessness hinges on the inability to find a cab. Cell phones, of course, disrupt horror; once they’re in place terror depends on lost signal or supernaturally bad cybersecurity. Are smartphone cab apps the next story-challenging technology?
Anne’s Commentary
Stephen King is on the short-short list for writer who best combines contemporary mundanity with fantastic horror. Compared to Lovecraft’s typical protagonists (the scholars, the hunters after the uncanny, the outright revenants or ghouls), King’s characters usually are normal folk. He writes lots of writers, yeah, who might be considered a slightly outre bunch, but plenty of regular folk too, like our unlucky American tourists Lonnie and Doris and our unfortunately stationed constables Vetter and Farnham. Okay, so Vetter’s read SFF. That doesn’t make anyone weird, does it?
Ahem. Of course not.
I wonder how Lovecraft would have written this story. As Doris’s “rest home”-scrawled memorandum or pre-suicide letter, she most likely remaining unnamed? But King isn’t fond of nameless narrators, protagonists or supporting characters. Here we get everyone’s surname at least, except for the weird kiddies (maybe unnameable!), the cab driver (real bit part) and the kitty. We all know the Goat’s real name, right? It’s Shub, for short. My memory may fail me, but King’s also not fond of the found-manuscript form.
Lovecraft might also have centered the story on one of the constables, as he centers it on Detective Malone in “Horror at Red Hook.” King does this in part, using PC Farnham as his law enforcement point of view and ponderer of mysteries. “Red Hook’s” structure is simpler than “Crouch End’s,” for all its plot twists and turns, whereas King’s plot is pretty straightforward, his structure more complex.
We start off in present story time, with the constables after Doris’s departure. King’s omniscient narrator, in the police station sections, stays close to Farnham, preferentially dipping into the younger PC’s thoughts and perceptions. Then we drop back to Doris’s arrival and establishment in the interview room, the beginning of her story, which takes us through “normal” London, where there’s even a McDonald’s. Vetter mentally notes that Doris is in a state of complete recall, which he encourages and which accounts for what’s to follow: Doris’s grisly account, in Doris’s point of view, with lusciously exhaustive detail.
So we have story present, the post-Doris police station starring Farnham. We have story near-past, Doris at the station, where Omniscient Narrator stays close to Doris, with occasional swerves to Farnham and Vetter. And we have story deeper-past, Doris front and center, remembering all that happened in Crouch End. Well, all of it except for her Lovecraftian loss of consciousness and/or memory at the climax of the TERRIBLE THING: She doesn’t know how she got from Crouch End to the “normal” street.
King deftly interweaves story present, story near-past and story deeper-past to heighten suspense and to prevent Doris’s story and Farnham’s puzzlings/fate from becoming two monolithic narrative blocks. Then there’s the epilogue, all Omniscient Narrator, denouement plus ominous closing: It ain’t over at Crouch End, people. It can never really be over at Crouch End. Unless, perhaps, the stars come right and the names on the warehouses manifest to claw the thin spot wide open, unleashing chaos upon the entire planet.
There’s a pleasant thought. Maybe that’s the kind of musing that led to poor Vetter’s heart attack. Imagination’s a bitch. Too little can kill (see Farnham); too much can drive one to debilitating habits, like a daily six (or twelve) of lager.
Strongly implied: Crouch End has a debilitating effect on those who come close. Constables age beyond their years, turn to self-medication, kill themselves. Neighbors shun the place and flee from those who’ve penetrated too deeply, to the Towen. As far off as central London, cab drivers are leery of taking fares to the End, and the one who finally does accommodate the Freemans bails as soon as the weirdness starts manifesting. Unless, to be paranoid, he was IN on the eldritch evil, meant to strand our hapless couple!
And what about this John Squales guy? He LIVES in Crouch End. Could he be unaffected by its alien vibes? “Squale” means “shark” in French. A shark is not only a fish – it’s also a person who swindles or exploits others. Has Lonnie’s work acquaintance set him up to take the place of someone dearer to Squales, a substitute sacrifice to the Towen? The weird kids sure showed up fast when the Freemans arrived in Crouch End. Maybe they were waiting. Maybe they’re the ones who MARKED Lonnie in the first place.
And finally, what about Sgt. Raymond? He breaks pickpockets’ fingers, supposedly because a pickpocket cut his face once. But Farnham thinks Raymond just likes the sound of bone snapping. Raymond scares him. Raymond walks too close to the fence between good guys and bad guys. I bet the boundary between normal London and Crouch End is one of those fences. In the mere line of duty, Raymond must have hopped the fence more than once, absorbing eldritch vibes, exacerbating any natural flaws in his moral temperament, you know, like sadism.
Doris Freeman thinks that the stately manses in Crouch End must have been divided into flats by now. I bet not. I bet there’s not much of a renters’ market in the End, and a high turnover of any renters who might sign leases there. No, you can buy the stately manses cheap and live in them all by yourself. Only caveat: If your lawn starts to moan, ignore it. Also, lay out cigarettes for the cats – don’t make them have to beg. Oh, and if the neighborhood kids wave at you, move out.
Next week, we tackle Joanna Russ’s “My Boat.” [RE: I have no clever quips about this one because I haven’t read it before, and have no intention of spoiling myself for a Russ story just to have a clever quip for the coming attractions.] You can find it in Doizois and Dann’s Sorcerers anthology (available in e-book even), Russ’s own The Zanzibar Cat, and several other anthologies that are mostly out of print.
Ruthanna Emrys’s neo-Lovecraftian novelette “The Litany of Earth” is available on Tor.com, along with the more recent but distinctly non-Lovecraftian “Seven Commentaries on an Imperfect Land” and “The Deepest Rift.” Winter Tide, a novel continuing Aphra Marsh’s story from “Litany,” will be available from the Tor.com imprint in April 2017. Ruthanna can frequently be found online on Twitter and Livejournal, and offline in a mysterious manor house with her large, chaotic household—mostly mammalian—outside Washington DC.
Anne M. Pillsworth’s short story. “The Madonna of the Abattoir” appears on Tor.com. Her first novel, Summoned, is available from Tor Teen along with the recently released sequel Fathomless. She lives in Edgewood, a Victorian trolley car suburb of Providence, Rhode Island, uncomfortably near Joseph Curwen’s underground laboratory.
Congratulations to H.P. Lovecraft for his doubly posthumous nomination for the Retro Hugo, Best Fan Writer of 1941!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNs8oXShTiU
Here is pretty good adaptation of Crouch End for TV from 2006.
“Crouch End” is a good story and London is a city whose geometry is naturally eldritch: I rather suspect our lost American couple would have fallen victim to one of London’s less savoury human residents long before Shub-Niggurath could get to them…
Eldritch incursions shouldn’t be left to the local police: I bet Carter and Regan could have handled it:
King on Lovecraft: from the introduction to Against the World, Against Life:
“… [T]he shrill pitch of HPL’s compulsion was balanced by a kind of lumbering poetry and an unearthly range of imaginative vision. His screams of horror are lucid.
… Lovecraft’s literary importance may be secondary to the fact … that HPL continues to remain not just popular with generation after generation of maturing readers but viscerally important to an imaginative core group that goes on to write that generation’s fantasy and weird tales… and, by so doing, to chart that generation’s deepest fears.”
In Danse Macabre: King recalls that his first encounter with Lovecraft came in the form of the 1947 Avon collection The Lurking Fear and Other Stories:
The artist, whose name King didn’t know, is A. R. Tilburne.
Happy Birthday to: Frank Belknap Long (1901-1994).
Anne
While I haven’t read so much King in the last few years, I was a huge fan of him from the late 80s through early 00s. While he didn’t use the found manuscript often, I think he did delve into it a couple times to various degrees with a couple of short stories.
Going by compilations (since I couldn’t tell you where any of them were originally published — this post enlightened me to how Crouch End was a lot older than I thought, since it was in a far more recent compilation), there was Survivor Type in Skeleton Crew, which was the diary of a heroin smuggling doctor stranded on a tiny island who gradually goes insane and amputates parts of his body for food. It wasn’t really a “found manuscript”, as I don’t recall there being anything to the story except his diary (therefore, no one finding it and getting freaked out by the main character’s descent).
And earlier, in Night Shift, there was Jerusalem’s Lot, which was mainly told through a collection of diary entries and letters and was more Lovecraftian in theme, with weird unspeakable worm-like monsters and one of those mystical books o’ evil that could be used as a stand-in for the Necronomicon in a pinch.
A genuinely creepy piece, and one of the better neo-Lovecraftian tales.
Speaking of which, any plans to tackle Stross’s A Colder War? It’s online here: http://www.infinityplus.co.uk/stories/colderwar.htm
@@.-@: There a recent long story in the found (or, well, spoilers…) manuscript mode: “1922” from Full Dark, No Stars.
The book in “Jerusalem’s Lot” is De Vermis Mysteriis, one of Robert Bloch’s creations (from “The Shambler from the Stars”).
@5: I recall “A Colder War” is on the list but the stories presently being considered are shorter while Ruthanna and Anne’s novel edits are ongoing.
This was apparently inspired by events that happened to King and his wife. They were in London and went up to Crouch End to visit Peter Straub and got lost. They even wound up under a railway bridge. And yes, that means that Crouch End is a real place. Ray Davies (and presumably his brother Dave) and Jean Simmons are from there. It was a common stopover for people going between London and the north.
My impression of Raymond was not that he was ambiguously gay, but rather that he was impugning Farnham’s sexuality.
I also found King’s efforts to make the policemen seem English a bit over the top. They came off a bit caricatured.
What’s very interesting to me here is that you seem to be working from a slightly different story than I have. I have the 1980 printing of New Tales of the Cthulhu Mythos. There is no mention of the Black Goat at all. The creepy children mention the Whistler from the Stars, Eater of Dimensions (which is a little too on the nose, if you ask me), the Blind Piper who is not named for a thousand years, and Him Who Waits. Doris also has a different fate. After her attempted suicide, she “spent a year in a rest home” and “came out much improved.” No scribbling in the back of the closet. You probably didn’t have the continuity error either. In my version, the story takes place in 1974, but the cop who committed suicide in the story’s past did so in the hot summer of 1976.
I think the subject that really needs delving into here is that cover art to New Tales of the Cthulhu Mythos.
It’s both hideous AND spectacular, like many mythos stories.
@8: I have no explanation. Tim White did quite a few Mythos covers Back In The Day, though I don’t think I have any of those Grafton editions. I do like quite a few of his non-horror covers (including his work on Zelazny’s Amber) but I don’t care for any of his Lovecraft pieces.
I haven’t read this, but Jerusalem’s Lot is the bomb.
A Colder War: I love that one, but it’s indeed waiting for a week when we can spare it the appropriate time. I think it’s a novella?
Ambiguously heterosexual Raymond: Most straight guys don’t impugn others’ sexuality by hitting on them, unless they are safely *much* higher in some hierarchy. That looked like out-and-out sexual harassment to me.
Different versions of the story: Mine was from Nightmares and Dreamscapes, conveniently available as an e-book, and I presume tidied up. He says in the introduction that it’s seven years’ worth of stories, so could have come out considerably later.
The cover: What I love is that the eldritch horror looks a lot more freaked out than she does. Like “I put on this human skin to seduce you for nefarious ends, but you have an endoskeleton and a tiny mouth and not enough limbs, and oh sweet Cthulhu don’t make me I just can’t deal!”
@11: If a week comes up when you need a shorter story, Ambrose Bierce’s “The Damned Thing” would be appropriate.
@Ruthanna: OK, I see your point. I didn’t read it as Raymond hitting on Farnham, but rather undercutting his masculinity. More of a dominance thing, basically. (Maybe a version thing again? In my copy, he keeps calling Farnham “poppet” and occasionally “darling” with implications that Farnham is sexually inexperienced.) But however you read it, it really doesn’t contribute much to the story.
@6: Thanks, I hadn’t read 1922 yet, so I didn’t know that. One of those novella collections where that one seemed really interesting, but the other three didn’t captivate me as much and I have so much other stuff to read that I didn’t bother with it. Over the years, King has gone from “must-read” to “check and see if you’ll like it first before buying”. That’s the sort of thing that happens when you read Duma Key and From a Buick 8 and have the opinions of them that I did. Or “started to read them and abandon them halfway through because boredom”, to be more accurate.
@8: I had completely blanked out on that pic before you posted this. After looking at it, all I could think of was the most amateurish creepypasta of all creepypastas, but in the form of a picture instead of horribly mangled text.
@11: Yeah, Nightmares and Dreamscapes is where I read this. Couldn’t remember if it was in that one or Everything’s Eventual. I can probably name about everything in Night Shift and Skeleton Crew, but I get those two collections mixed up all the time.
@14: “Great Themed Novella Collection” is a dragon King has chased intermittently since Different Seasons (still my favourite King book): I thought “Fair Extension” was Twilight Zonesque but missing the payoff, while other two in Full Dark, No Stars were contemporary crime and suspense focused stories of the kind which appeal to me less (I like my horror fiction supernatural and strange). I found “1922” worthwhile; I also enjoyed the paperback bonus story “Under the Weather” (also in The Bazaar of Bad Dreams).
Concerning more contemporary King novels, I thought Joyland was one of the more successful titles: again, closer to crime than horror but tighter and more focused than many (possibly because he was writing to fit the Hard Case Crime format). I did notice that one I haven’t read, his 2014 novel Revival, references Lovecraft and Machen.
Hey, I’m a servant of the elder gods! I’m not sure how to feel about this.
The thing about Crouch End – Peter Straub lived there, and the tale was generated by a visit Steve made to his and Susie’s home (not that their home suggested it – I suspect just the name of the district did).
@17: According to George Beahm, Stephen and Tabitha King really did get lost in Crouch End while looking for Peter Straub’s house. (Since this story came out, the Crouch End property market has changed dramatically: as the area now has an overall average property price of over £630,000, I imagine even the Elder Gods can no longer afford to live there…)
@17/18:
Supposedly, they also ran into this sculpture of a spriggan, which planted even more ideas in his head.
@20: That was Jason Van Hollander’s first cover: he has also provided covers for S. T. Joshi’s Black Wings series and the Night Shade collections of William Hope Hodgson and Clark Ashton Smith.
Whoa, that frog-man is totally happy to see that pitcher! Must be a thirsty fellow!
@20: That’s the cover I have, too. Was your story subtly different from what our rereaders had the same way mine was?
Since Ruthanna started her post by mentioning Suck Fairies (which detoured me into a long read of the original post), I guess we should note the apparent presence here of the Revision Fairy, which has attached itself to several of King’s works, and not always (ever?) for the best.
R0bert @@@@@ 22: Thank you for making me snort seltzer water out my nose — my sinuses feel much better!
Mr. Vathek @@@@@ 8: The garter-suspended stockings would doubtless repel most Spawn of the Outer Gods. But I am confuzzled by the Spawn itself. It’s got two little forelegs and two sturdy hindlegs, but WHAT is that elongated purplish mass under its putative belly? Sorry, I can categorize it as nothing else but a knobbly phallus or a tightly tucked lumpy tail or the loaf of French bread it was bringing for dinner, until terrorized off by garters.
Also anomalous: the heap at the lady’s feet. It kind of has a leg and foot, doesn’t it? Body? Deflated sex doll? Deceased kangaroo?
@25 Anne: I think that’s part of the horror’s leg. It’s high stepping. And the heap is probably the lady’s paramour. But I like your interpretations better.
My assumption, given the wrinkly emptiness of the heap, was that the horror had been disguised in human skin until it decided to nope out.
The things my brain thinks are obvious can sometimes be pretty strange, upon reflection.
Oh, is Michael Shea’s Fat Face on the list? Because damn is that one disturbing.
@22: my first thought was “man, Kermit has really let himself go.”
Re Squales, perhaps he’s naturally weirdness-blind: he just doesn’t notice that he’s living in an Eldritch Borderland. The elder horrors could eat him, but what fun is that if you can’t drive the victim to madness first?
Another difference from Lovecraft: HPL wouldn’t have made a cat one of the bad guys. :)
In case you need more stories (I bet you don’t), i can rec this story by a Swedish writer, Anders Fager. This is the only story (yet) translated, but he does a great job weaving Lovecraft’s mythology together with Swedish myths as well as contemporary Life. “The Furies From Boras” is a charming story about a group of teenaged girls who likes to do what girls usually likes. Music, makeup and dancing. And sacrificing boys to the Goat of Many Faces…
https://www.facebook.com/svenskakulter/posts/167181106766305
Crouch End is definitely a real place. You can get there via rail service from London. I’ve never been, which may be a good thing… ;)
King DEFINITELY has a kind of weird attitude about differently-abled people in his writing (as well as about people of colour and women). However, his daughter uses a wheelchair. A couple of years ago there was a NYT article about King’s work and his family (which was pretty repsectful for a Times article about a “pop-culture” writer). I am sorry for not posting the link – I am too lazy – but I’m sure it’s easy to find on Google. However, in the article, it was very gently hinted at that Naomi King might not only be differently abled but have other kinds of challenges as well. That really makes me re-think his challenged characters like Tom Cullen and Sheemie. Again, NOT trying to “excuse” him in any way – but Maine is statistically just about the “whitest” state in the entire U.S. – and was (as incredible as it seems), even LESS diverse when King was growing up.
All that being said, this story scared the you-know-what out of me when I was a teenager…
I intensely dislike King and I disagree that his protagonists are “normal folk”. They aren’t. They’re always white middle class people, and any non white person is just about invariably a Magical Ethnic whose only purpose is to aid them for no reason. Our maybe it’s just my resentment as an ethnic (brown) person myself showing up.
I intensely dislike King and I disagree that his protagonists are “normal folk”. They aren’t. They’re always white middle class people
Loving the implication here that no white middle-class American could possibly be described as “normal”.
Let’s say King’s characters are representative of a very particular sub-population.
There’s actually a whole area of psych research devoted to the non-normality of white middle-class Americans–look up Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic sometime, it’s fascinating. As with specfic, the issue comes not when *some* stories/studies focus on such a narrow population, but when a great majority do, and huge parts of the world go unrepresented.
Been reading all Stephen King since the 80’s and now re-reading. Some things do not hold up well and I would be put off if it was released today. Back in the 80’s/90’s he seemed progressive to even have black people, women and older people in his stories. Even now why are black people always described as black but white people are just tall or thin? Skin color assumed white? King still does this.