Welcome to the Malazan Re-read of the Fallen! Every post will start off with a summary of events, followed by reaction and commentary by your hosts Bill and Amanda (with Amanda, new to the series, going first), and finally comments from Tor.com readers. In this article, we’ll cover Part Two of Chapter Eight of Toll the Hounds (TtH).
A fair warning before we get started: We’ll be discussing both novel and whole-series themes, narrative arcs that run across the entire series, and foreshadowing. Note: The summary of events will be free of major spoilers and we’re going to try keeping the reader comments the same. A spoiler thread has been set up for outright Malazan spoiler discussion.
CHAPTER SUMMARY
SCENE ONE
Nimander recalls his youth (via a flashback to how Deadsmell and some rum had brought these stories out in the ship they’d come in on), brought up in a keep by someone they called Father, with scores of kids and Rake “wandering the corridors in godlike indifference.” Before that had been a priest, “an ancient companion of the Son of Darkness [Endest],” who had taken care of them. He thinks how the children had tormented that poor old man until the arrival of Andarist, who after some fighting with Rake about something unknown, took them away to Drift Avalii and how Endest had wept when they left, Endest whom they’d thought a heartless “ogre.” They traveled via portal with Andarist, who taught them weaponscraft and whom they came to love despite his sternness. Nimander thinks about how children make great soldiers but the vessel “breaks” and speculates that the Dying God is a child. He recalls two Dal Honese who had been shipwrecked on Drift Avalii and of their cultural habit of not burying their dead, but making them part of the huts’ mud walls, each corpse beginning a new wall until three corpses allowed for the new room to be roofed over. The shipwrecked pair had said the pressure of living with one’s dead often drove people insane and told the tale of how the land was filled with constant war, blood vengeance, and that the only rational response was to flee. Kallor interrupts Nimander’s thoughts with a comment on the scarecrows they’re passing and notes that the plants are “not even native to this world.” Kallor and Skintick debate whether things change and if things get worse. Kallor claims greater wisdom and Skintick complains about the desire by the old of keeping the status quo. Kallor tells Skintick to get off his lawn and turn off his damn noisy music. Kallor reveals he can see them as kin of Rake and mockingly asks what they think will happen when they find Rake, telling them “Anomander Rake is a genius at beginning things. It’s finishing them he has trouble with.” He tells them he knows Rake, but they are interrupted by a Jaghut ruin. The Jaghut recognizes Kallor and invites him, Skintick, and Nimander in for tea.
SCENE TWO
Inside the tower, two of the walls have been replaced with “black, glimmering barriers of some unknown substance” that make Nimander feel dizzy to look at. The Jaghut discusses gods, essences, first forms, chaos, DNA (though not calling it that) and then tells how it met a wolf god when the Jaghut was fleeing in disguise from the Imass that had been allies against a Tyrant but turned against him and the other Jaghut they’d been helping. The Jaghut says he killed 43 T’lan Imass and a Bonecaster and then names the Tyrant they imprisoned as Raest, one of his “more obnoxiously arrogant offspring.” The Jaghut grabs Kallor’s wrist and tells him he (Kallor) “wounded that wolf god . . . terribly when you laid waste to your realm.” Kallor threatens to kill the Jaghut, who points out the ruin used to be an Azath House and asks if Kallor would like the Jaghut to awaken it. Kallor recognizes the Jaghut now as Gothos. Gothos orders Kallor outside just as the tea starts to have an effect on Nimander and Skintick. Unfortunately, Nimander falls through the strange walls.
SCENE THREE
Desra thinks how there are strong people and weak people in the world and the weak were worthy of contempt, despite outnumbering the strong. Most of the strong are just as bad, bullies more often than not, but some are worthy—the quiet ones who often thought themselves weaker than they were but when push came to shove held out. Clip is not one such, Clip whom she will use as necessary. Nimander, however, is one of the worthy ones, she has decided.
SCENE FOUR
Kallor exits and tells the others the Jaghut has decided to “use” Nimander and Skintick. Desra heads for the tower.
SCENES FIVE AND SIX
Skintick awakens to find himself naked on a stone platform surrounded by a grove of olive trees and broken columns. He sees corpses, feels an “evil” sun, and realizes this is a world with no one left alive, a dying world where someone had “seeded a world with life . . . then nudged the sun to anger.” The question “Who is the Dying God” keeps repeating and then he finds himself flying free because “nothing mattered anymore . . . We all die. Meaningless!” He is slapped awake by Gothos, who calls him a “bad choice . . . Answering despair with laughter like that.” He continues: “There is a last moment when every sentient creature alive realizes that it is over, that not enough was done . . . You Tiste Andii understood that. Anomander Rake did. He realizes that to dwell in but one world was madness. To survive, you must spread like vermin. Rake tore his people loose from their complacency, and for this he was cursed.” When Skintick says he saw a dying world, Gothos replies, “So it is. Somewhere, somewhen. On the paths of the Azath, a distant world slides into oblivion.” He asks what Skintick felt and when Skintick responds “free,” Gothos repeats he was a bad choice. Desra arrives.
SCENE SEVEN
Nimander finds himself in darkness, being grabbed and pummeled. Suddenly a giant figure grabs him and runs up a slope and then down into a caldera filled with heat and ash. The “child-like” giant tells Nimander “Like you, I too do not belong here,” and explains that Nimander’s attackers were “Spirits. Trapped like ants in amber. But . . . it is the blood of dragons.” He is named Elder by the spirits and he says he doesn’t know how he arrived here and that he is lost. He talks of how he used to build houses of stone that would vanish just as he finished them and thinks if he could build another he’d stop being lost, but the spirits’ attacks prevent him. Nimander explains what happened to him and the Elder says he remembers Gothos, recalling how Gothos would appear “just before the last stone was set. He would look upon my house and pronounce it adequate . . . And then he would walk inside and close the door, and I would place the last stone, and the house would vanish. Nimander speculates to himself that the Elder builds Azath Houses. When the Elder says the spirits cannot get inside the caldera, Nimander suggests he build the house there, using the rim as the foundation, and that Nimander set the last stone from outside (knowing that it would trap him there forever and accepting that sacrifice so as to help the Elder escape).
SCENE EIGHT
Gothos tells Desra he doesn’t know how to get Nimander back. He admits to drugging the two Andii, explaining he “had reasons for doing so, which seem to have failed. Therefore I must be more direct.” He asks that when they meet Rake, they tell him “He chose wisely. Each time, he chose wisely. Tell him, that of all whom I ever met, there is but one who has earned my respect and he is that one.” Desra looks inside the walls and thinks she sees motion.
SCENE NINE
Kallor tells the other Andii no Jaghut should be trusted, especially Gothos. Kedeviss guesses Kallor is being chased and Aranatha says, “He has always been hunted.”
SCENE TEN
Nimander watches as the Elder is nearly done (he has no sense of time in this place) and wonders what a tower built of dragon’s blood would do. The Elder explains what Nimander will need to do to set the last stone, but wonders why they can’t both stay inside and have the Elder set the stone from there. Nimander says wherever the tower will take the Elder, maybe to his home realm, it will not be Nimander’s home. The Elder replies the spirits will war over Nimander and kill him. Nimander sees the truth of that, but accepts it and goes out through the window, then sets the final stone. As he does so, he falls down the slope and feels his hands grabbed. He is pulled out of the wall by Desra. Gothos yells at Nimander for what he’s done with the Elder, saying, “I was saving that one for later. And now he’s free . . . I needed that one. There is now an Azath in the blood of dragons . . . You idiot, Nimander. Dragons don’t play games. Do you understand me? Dragons don’t play game. I despair, or I would if I care enough. No, instead I will make some ashcakes. Which is will not share.”
SCENE ELEVEN
The Andii exits Gothos’ tower and Aranatha says she needs to talk to Gothos and goes in. Kallor calls her “uncanny” and wonders what she has to say to Gothos.
SCENE TWELVE
The Captain tries to convince Karsa he is the Captain’s heir but Karsa refuses, saying he will free all the slaves and without them the Captain’s kingdom will be destroyed and all forgotten. Dying, the Captain whispers, “You could have lied.”
SCENE THIRTEEN
The Captain dead, Karsa tells everyone to exit the carriage, saying they don’t have much time. He recalls how once “he had set out to find glory, only to discover that it was nothing like what he has imagined it to be. It as a brutal truth that his companions then had understood so much better . . . [but] the power of Karsa own will had overwhelmed them. What could be learned from that? Followers will follow, even unto their own deaths. There was a flaw in such people—the willingness to override one’s own instinct for self-preservation. And that flaw invited exploitation . . . Confusion and uncertainty surrendered to simplicity, so comforting, so deadly. Without followers the Captain would have achieved nothing. The same the world over. Wars would disintegrate into the chaos of raids, skirmishes, massacres of the innocent, the vendetta of blood feuds, and little else. Monuments would not be raised. No temples, no streets . . . no cities . . . Every patch of ploughed land would shrink to what a few could manage. Without followers, civilization would never have been born.
He would tell his people all this . . . make them not his followers but his companions. And together they would bring civilization to ruin. . . Because for all the good it created, its sole purpose was to breed followers—enough to heave into motion forces of destruction . . . at the whim of those few cynical tyrants born to lead . . . with irony words—duty, honour, patriotism, freedom.” He sets the carriage aflame and exits.
SCENE FOURTEEN
Karsa tells everyone the slaves are free and the loot shall be divided amongst everyone—officers, soldiers, slaves—equally. He tells them to leave, but adds that next time he sees them, in however many years, he will come “as a destroyer” where they hide in their cities. Years later, these people will speak of how “Broken Face” came among them.
SCENE FIFTEEN
Traveller tells Samar Dev “I once led armies. I was once the will of the Emperor of Malaz . . . We served death of course in all that we did. For all our claims otherwise. Imposing peace, ending stupid feuds and tribal rivalries. Opening roads to merchants . . . Coin flowed . . . And yet, behind it all, he waited . . . Where all the roads converge, where every path ends. He waits.” They see flames ahead and when Traveller wonders what burns, Samar says, “Karsa Orlong burns, Traveller. Because that is what he does . . . The Skathandi are no more.” Traveller says her tales of Karsa frighten him and she understands.
Amanda’s Reaction
This flashback to Nimander’s early life says so much about he and the others and how they came to be—running happy as imps, with a distant father and a dismayed guardian, not knowing the future that awaits. It seems odd to think about Tiste Andii as children, but these solemn creatures must have come from somewhere.
Damn, Andarist turned them into killers. I hate this picture of children as the perfect killers—wreaking destruction without any remorse or morality. Anomander might have been a distant father, but we all know he would never have done this to his children, not even if he felt there was some cause for it. I think that he would rather take the burden than make children fight on his behalf.
Nimander might have no ancestors, but I guess that is because most of those who would have become ancestors are still alive! They just have too much indifference to try and guide those who come after them.
Ack, see, now Kallor is a mystery to me—on the one hand I hate, hate, hate him for what he did to Whiskeyjack and for some of the atrocities he’s committed, and yet I have to reluctantly admire his pragmatism created through such a long life. For instance, knowing that at some point he is likely to be on the same side as Anomander Rake again—and also seeming to know Rake’s perspective on life incredibly well: “Anomander Rake is a genius at beginning things. It’s finishing them he has trouble with.”
Ha, what is old if even Tiste Andii think it’s old?
You know something? Nimander and Skintick come across here as a little bit wide-eyed and naive—both about Kallor and the world around them. I guess their isolation from the world hasn’t helped. They certainly don’t know much about Kallor and his past, and I think Kallor is quick to interrupt this Jaghut as he states: “I know who you are, O Lord of Futility. King of Ashes. Ruler of Dead Lands. Born to glory and cursed to destroy it every time. Killer of Dreams. Despoiler of—”
You know something? When it all gets too deep in these books, I totally see Kallor’s point here. And I wonder if Erikson put it in deliberately as a nod to those who complain! “In my empires, philosophers spewed such rubbish for centuries, until, of course, I grew tired of them and had them tortured and executed.”
Every time I see the word tyrant I wonder if it is to do with the tyrant from Darujhistan! Before it was made clear there was such, I always thought it was a Jaghut tyrant. And now I don’t know either way! Luckily this time the name Raest is mentioned, so I know we’re talking Jaghut! So this is the father of Raest we’re dealing with here?
Ah, Gothos—a familiar name. If Gothos is the father of Raest and Icarium, does that make them brothers? Or when Gothos says “offspring” about Raest, he just means another of the Jaghut race?
Ah, it’s always lovely to see one of our more main characters seen from the point of view of another—Desra acknowledging that Nimander is one “whose strength was absolute.” It’s particularly interesting, this perspective, considering we’ve seen the way that Nimander views himself—as a person who is weak and unable to take charge in the manner that everyone expects.
I’m a little confused by what Gothos is doing here, sending Nimander and Skintick through the paths of the Azath. What is he searching for? Why is he using Nimander and Skintick for this? He does seem disappointed in his choice of Skintick for sure!
Nimander, at least, seems to be demonstrating his quiet strength here as he meets the Elder. Despite his obvious confusion and his panic, he tries so hard to reassure the Elder and work out how to solve his issue. I find the idea of Gothos stealing these Houses and, it seems, keeping the Elder prisoner, very unlikeable—although I do accept that I might have the wrong end of the stick there. It wouldn’t be the first time!
I’m disturbed by the idea of the Elder building a house within the blood of dragons. It fills me with a great sense of foreboding.
Oh, there is so much here to try and digest. So much. Who is the Elder? Why is he so different as he builds? And, the big one, did Anomander plan Nimander—who has looked after him, what life experiences he had—in order to bring him to this point, where he is able to become what the Elder needs here? It seems so. Anomander does play the long game, doesn’t he?
It’s quite upsetting to me that Nimander has ended up in that position thanks to such a sorry character as Clip, and trying to make him whole again.
Now the Elder is referenced as the mason—and I somehow feel that should have capitals applied. The Mason has been seen throughout the series, with that role being attributed to various characters. And now the Mason is free. I wonder what that will mean for the future.
Kallor is sort of seeing to the heart of Aranatha here: “That bitch sister of yours is uncanny.” It says something that, after Nimander and Skintick have been blatantly used by Gothos, Aranatha still isn’t worried by the idea of going to face him.
Karsa really is one in a million as a character. I think there is my triumvirate of favourite characters—Anomander Rake, Cotillion and Karsa. True for anyone else? Who is yours? I know I have woefully left out any of the Bridgeburners. Oh, and hang on, I’ve left out Quick Ben. And Itkovian *sobs*. Oh, wait, there is Coltaine as well. And Tehol and Bugg. Damn. Well, for this minute only, that is my triumvirate of fave characters. For the next minute, who can say? That really is the triumph of this series, isn’t it? The fact that we have an endless parade of memorable characters, who make us laugh, achieve epic feats, have quiet conversations, cause us to sob like babies. I don’t think I’ve read another series with such a large quota of truly tremendous characters.
Bill’s Reaction
It is odd, as Amanda says, to think of mischievous Andii children. Though also a bit heartening, this sense of kids being kids. Poor Endest….
Look at that idyllic description of Drift Avalii: “A place of warmth, of stretches of soft sand and pellucid waters, of trees crowded with fruit.” What a sharp contrast to what is done to the children there.
That description of children as “perfect soldiers” is sad enough in the context of this novel, but when one considers the world, and images we’ve seen of eight-year-olds holding AK-47s and the like, it’s heartbreaking.
“The Dying God, Nimander now believed, was a child.”
I’ve said many times (really, many times. Tell me to shut up when you all get sick of these repetitions) how one of my favorite aspects of fantasy is its ability to make the metaphoric literal. We see that here with the Dal Honese story. Over and over in this book and in the series we see people haunted by the past, by their past, by the dead, by their dead. And now we see the Dal Honese bury their dead in their walls and thus literally are forced to “live with their dead,” with their past. And what that leads to: insanity.
I really enjoy this generational battle between Skintick and Kallor, this, ahem “age-old” debate. Kallor does have a point with regard to the way nostalgia sets the past awash in a golden light, that “Golden Age of the Past” sort of thing, which all too often ignores the realities or confines itself to a small swath of those who things were “better” for. And I think part of this is just how one defines what is changing. I mean, one could say folks still kill each other, so things “never change.” But then again, violence has declined over time. There are still hate crimes, bigots, etc. So things haven’t changed. But then, it’d be hard to argue there is less acceptance of difference (gender, race, sexuality) than before.
“Anomander Rake is a genius at beginning things. It’s finishing them he has trouble with.” Is Kallor right? Or does he lack the long-term perspective he needs? File.
Oh, is there anything better than Jaghut humor?
Look at Gothos talking about DNA! “If I but scrape your skin . . . that which I take from you beneath my nail contains every truth of you, your life, even your death, assuming violence does not claim you. A code, if you will, seemingly precise and so very ordered. Yet chaos churns. For all your similarities to your father, neither you . . . nor any of your brothers and sisters is identical to Anomander Dragnipurake.” I’m curious how folks felt about this moment.
Yeah Amanda, it wouldn’t surprise me if Kallor is standing in for certain readers here. Then again, I wonder how many of those readers would still be here to get this line from Kallor. Though I guess from some of our comments, I guess a lot of folks just suffer through the philosophy but keep going.
If Gothos is the literal father of Raest (“offspring” leaves it a bit vague), then he and Icarium would be half-brothers.
A few clues as to the tea: “The tea was heady, hinting of mint and cloves and something else.” Gothos stopping Kallor from drinking the tea.
Mysteries atop mysteries in this chapter, that’s for sure.
Amanda raises a good point: what was Gothos’ goal here? It wasn’t to send Nimander to meet the Builder, apparently. What was he hoping to achieve with these two Andii? It seems he did mean to send them along the paths of the Azath, but seemingly at random. It didn’t appear that he knew what Skintick would see, for instance. He seems disappointed that Skintick responded with a sense of freedom (in the “nothing matters” way is how I took that) to “potential snuffed out.” What was he hoping for? Compassion? Grief? Anger? Action? Was this a test of some sort? And what will he now do because this failed, something more “direct”? We’ll have to keep an eye out for him and this new plan. And what about his words for Rake? Has he always thought Rake chose wisely each time, or did this “failure” bring this thought around to him? What choices by Rake does he mean? The confrontation with Mother Dark? Partaking of Tiam’s blood? Leading his people here? So many possibilities—were all of them right? It’s interesting we get this view after Rake himself seems to be questioning at least some of his choices.
The Azath Builder/Mason/Elder. What is he? (This may be something we pick up if we remember in FoD reread). He remembers a land of three suns. Starvald Demelain had three suns (from our reread of RG: “a sky with three suns. Clip welcomes them to Starvald Demelain”); is this what he recalls? Where do the Azath houses vanish to? Do they go where we’ve seen them? Or do they go to some big Azath warehouse warren, which they exit when needed? How many builders are there? Gothos seems to imply more than one when he says “I needed that one.” What does Gothos mean, “he’s free?” Is he implying that he’s been imprisoning such builders? Or is it simply that he now doesn’t know where this Builder disappeared to? Are there repercussions of Azaths being built without Gothos able to transport them to wherever he goes? Is there a repercussion to an Azath in dragon blood? Can’t wait to get all these answers as we keep reading….
I agree Amanda that this little scene with Desra shows the power of shifting POVs. We’ve been given a pretty narrow view of Desra—using sex as a tool toward power, not much of a thinker, preferring Clip, scorning Nimander. And here we see that’s all turned upside down. She is a deep thinker. And she sees Clip as one of those who “imagine themselves strong but were in truth, weak.” While Nimander is not at all contemptible in her eyes. Instead, she “felt weak” before him and sees him as “one to whom she might surrender whatever she chose without fearing he would one day use it against her.” I like how this group of Andii is getting more and more fleshed out, how things we thought we (and they) once knew about them are being shown to be false or at least not wholly true, and how they are starting to show signs that they might form a cohesive, mutually protective group. Clip, meanwhile, we’ve been told/shown is blind to much of what he doesn’t choose to see—will he see any of this?
And while we’ve heard complaints about Nimander, seen him scorned by Clip, heard him diminish himself, this scene with the Azath builder seems to show Desra has him right. Strength plus goodness, power combined with compassion. What might his willingness to sacrifice himself for the Builder say about what might be coming up for him and his group?
Note Kallor still feels “besieged” by Aranatha.
Note she “strides” toward the tower.
Note she feels the need to speak with Gothos. As Kallor says, why? How does she have something to say to him? “Uncanny,” yes.
And c’mon—what a great ending to this scene: “I will make some ashcakes. Which I will not share.” Give me more Jaghuts!
That line from the Captain is a pretty concise on-the-nose summation of Karsa in many way ways: “You could have lied.” And it’s implied “But you didn’t.”
We know Karsa of now is not the Karsa we first met, and here is Karsa himself recognizing this: “he had set out to find glory, only to discover that it was nothing like what he has imagined it to be. It as a brutal truth that his companions then had understood so much better.” Remember how he mocked those companions? Our little giant barbarian has grown up!
Karsa’s musings on followers, though he is focused on civilization and political/military leaders, is an especially appropriate side trip in a book that deals with so many gods (The Dying God, The Crippled God, The Redeemer) and at least one loyally-followed Ascendant (Rake).
He raises an intriguing question—is civilization inherently better? Or does it merely serve as a magnifier of all that is bad within us, thus allowing for greater scope of violence? (if I’m reading his thoughts right). Are raids and skirmishes better than wars? Is this what he is saying? If we return to farmsteads and villages—no roads to connect them, no bridges—would this on the whole be better? Would evil remain evil but be defanged or lessened by lacking the power of numbers and technology and anonymity?
Is this the lesson of the carriage and Karsa’s torching of it: the carriage the symbol of civilization—full of fine foods and clothing and art (via trade and slavery and death), ever moving (i.e. “progressing”), never standing still, never thinking to stand still, that there might be benefit in standing still, but always moving forward, stripping the land around it. And here is Karsa, burning it all to the ground. How the hell is a Karsa trilogy going to end, one wonders.
From one man’s musings on civilization to another’s: The Malazan Empire, which has been in many ways presented as a boon to those it conquered (the outlawing of slavery for instance), still served Death, according to Traveller. Though if it’s merely that Death “waited” behind it all, it’s hard to see what doesn’t serve Death.
One imagines there isn’t much that makes Traveller afraid. Makes for a nice close then, this anticipation of the meeting between him and Karsa.
Amanda Rutter is the editor of Strange Chemistry books, sister imprint to Angry Robot.
Bill Capossere writes short stories and essays, plays ultimate frisbee, teaches as an adjunct English instructor at several local colleges, and writes SF/F reviews for fantasyliterature.com.
I don’t think Rake was specifically setting up Nimander to release the Mason however many 100s or 1000s of years after he last saw him… that just seems to impossible to predict.
But I do think that perhaps Gothos was trying to send Nimander and Skintick on vision quests through the Azath as a sort of test of their character and mettle, judging them by how they would react, and was hoping to see that Nimander has the same qualities as his father.
That aside though, Gothos sure is an intriguing fellow. From the way we’ve seen him in several Azath houses but not acting as the Guardian of them, and here having the Elder who can seemingly buld Azaths hidden away here, plus that it seems Gothos might have been guiding where the Azath houses the Elder built before would go… definitely seems like Gothos has a very big link with the Azath. And one must then wonder if he has any links with the Nameless Ones, too…
Don’t get me wrong, I really love Karsa as a character now, and he’s come a LONG way in his growth, but, I don’t get his desire to “destroy” everything. It seems too simplistic. I know he’s a pretty “black and white” character, but I do hope that he continues to evolve and comes to understand “gray”. Thoughts about him, anyone?
This is one of the better Nimander group chapters….good back ground info, and fleshing out of some characters.
It was nice to meet Gothos too. He does seem inextricably tied to the Azaths. I loved what he said about Rake. I hope Rake gets the message.
I’m curious to see how some of the foreshadowing here plays out in the coming books, on this, my second read.
I think Kallor is confused as to who can’t finish things (a bit of Dunning/Kruger at work there).
The Builder and Gothos and the Azath–Oh My! Such delicious questions.
This really is a fantastic piece of a chapter.
Bill:
And c’mon—what a great ending to this scene: “I will make some ashcakes. Which I will not share.” Give me more Jaghuts!
Yes please. :D Especially one possibility comes to mind…
That line from the Captain is a pretty concise on-the-nose summation of Karsa in many way ways: “You could have lied.” And it’s implied “But you didn’t.”
That’s because Karsa simply cannot lie.
@Tek:
As I see it Karsa only goes in ‘destroy mode’ when he sees enslavement/chains. Which is fine by me. He is talking about how he will bring down his army and destroy human civilization on Genebackis all the time, but remember in HoC he came to a conclusion where he decided the Malazans weren’t his enemies.
I’m sure there will be some character development, since there will be three books upcoming about him instead of one. Not sure if it will give him a ‘grey thinking zone’ though. I see it more as him deciding/realizing on which part of the dividing line between black and white people are to be placed…
Gothos’ actions in this chapter are certainly mysterious. First of all, what is he doing in the ruin of an Azath in the middle of nowhere? I don’t buy that he just wants to enjoy his retirement in an obscure place where no one would ever suspect him to be. I think he wanted to meet Nimander’s group and deliberately placed himself in their path. Also, what an opportunity this was to finally imprison the High King in an Azath house. I suspect that Kallor has tried to stay away from Azath houses throughout his life, this might be the first time he has ever entered an Azath house.
Back to what Gothos actually wanted from Nimander, I wonder if he knows what Rake is really planning and this has forced him to meet Nimander. Also, it is possible that he actually wanted to meet with Aranatha (or the other way around), and used this as an opportunity to also test Nimander.
Triumvirates, yay! Ok, Karsa, Fiddler and Gruntle.
But yeah, it hurts to think of all the deserving candidates that have to be left out.
I’m leaning toward Gesler – Fiddler – Whiskeyjack right now myself, but my favorites are always ephemeral. Fiddler almost always makes my list though. Probably my favorite overall character, and arguably the “main” character, or as much as one person can be in this series.
Gothos: It’s funny we meet so many Jaghut (in Seven Cities and Genabackis) after we were previously taught that the Jaghut had no chance against T’lan Imass, were slaughtered and wiped out. The T’lan Imass almost seem inept.
We already met Gothos before this, right? Was it in Tremorlor?
Gothos has appeared in at least one Prologue also. Both in Midnight Tides and Reaper’s Gale? If one considers who is capable of long term planning you have to consider Gothos among them.
I don’t think he is in the know on Rake’s course of action, but that might not mean he doesn’t know, if that makes sense.
@Salt-Man Z (9):
In Deadhouse Gates, he was in the Deadhouse when Fiddler and co. passed through it from Tremorlor and into Malaz City. Since we’ve also read NoK, we know he was not the Deadhouse’ Guardian at that time (or at least it doesn’t seem necessary for him to be so).
I find it interesting, too, that Gothos has such freedom to move about the Azath houses considering Icarium was supposedly wounded destroying an Azath house that had trapped Gothos. Could Gothos be a part of the Nameless Ones and manipulated his own son into attacking the Azath and being tainted by the amnesiac curse, turning his own son into a weapon for the NOs???
@11 Tufty
I believe in DG Gothos himself says that he had no wish to be ‘freed’ from the Azath and his son was mistaken in attempting it, or something along those lines. It sounded even then like it was less of a cage and more of a partnership of mutual benefit between Gothos and the Azath.
Favourites. Fiddler, Anomander Rake, Cottilion.
Gothos really confused me here. In DG I had thought that he was the guardian of the Deadhouse (I hadn’t read NoK). Seeing him here, in another Azath house seemed strange. I can understand him being able to go to various houses like Fiddler did, but there being a house in the middle of nowhere, with no apparent guardians doesn’t make sense.
And Jaghut humour, can’t wait for more.
when Gothos says “it used to be an Azath” it certainly seems that he isn’t bound to / caged in the House. I still haven’t read NoK, so I formerly thought he was trapped (If I could have remebered that we’ve seen him before, which I didn’t.) –
Thanks for the clarification
I’ll buck the current trend in favorites:
Kulp, Quick Ben, Iskaral Pust
Favourites (probably):
Toc the Younger, Leoman, Fiddler
But I could go on and on: Trull, Tehol, Rake, Kallor, Udinaas, Gruntle etc etc
Favourite more ‘minor’ characters:
Bruthen Trana, Itkovian, Greyfrog, Corabb
And probably a million more which will come into my head as soon as I hit post.
Fiddler, Cotillion, Rake.
And also (but more minor character) Samar Dev :-) and Bottle.
In duo’s: Tehol & Bugg; Fid-Kalam-Quick (ok, = trio); Samar & Karsa
yeah, right, it’s Karsa…
It’s so hard to pick 3 for the series. It’s possibly easier to find 3 favourites per book, but even that is tough.
Inevitably Anomander Rake and Cotillion rank highly for me, but to pick just one more wouldn’t do justice to all the others already mentioned above, not to mention Kruppe, Rallick Nom, Apsalar, Murillio, Duiker, Stormy, Gesler, Mappo, Silchas Ruin, Icarium, Shadowthrone, assorted other Bridgeburners. Need I go on? Haven’t even mentioned any of ICE’s characters…
Felisin (Elder), Tavore, Banaschar
Getting back to the chapter, I think here that we see Gothos and Desra showing respect for the inner fortitude that Nimander has, where we’ve seen it previously in Aranatha, really begins to demonstrate character growth in the Andii group.
I know people probably still aren’t a fan of this Dying God plotline but I hope my notion that at least these characters are developing from the flat group they used to be is showing up. It’s becoming apparent I think that they are all different and there’s an upward trajectory at least for some of them.
Rake has chosen wisely every time? Is he impervious to error? Is Gothos, if that is the reason for him to respect only one other living being? Gothos has a high opinion of himself. It makes me wonder if he is more than Jaghut. We’ve seen him before show no fear or respect before 2 elder gods. Is it possible he is an “elder Jaghut”?
djk re: Gothos. I don’t know that this helps, but I recall (although don’t know if it was from later readings), that he has a brother who seemingly holds similar views. Perhaps futher speculation as to his (or his) nature is unwarranted at this time.
rereaders: if this is not obtuse enough, I’ll edit (or delete) it.
GOS
Wait, did I say Gruntle? I meant Hellian!
…oh forget it. : )
I tend to look at the comment regarding DNA and the similarities/differences as a commentary on Erikson and his father, who he had just lost.
As a first time reader, I’m trying to figure out the mystery surrounding Hood. I know he’s a Jaghut, and I believe we saw his body slowly decaying on a frozen throne. But then there’s this passage:
I may be grasping at straws here, but is Gothos actually Hood?
To continue asking what may turn out to be ridiculously inaccurate suggestions, is this “Elder” child actually Icarium reborn? We don’t know what happened to him after he entered the fire mechanism at the end of RG, and there are a few things in this passage that make me think of him.
· He is a child who is also “Elder”
· He has an affinity for building things
· Constantly talking about being “lost”
· Doesn’t belong in this realm because like Nimander, he is not actually dead
Why are there millions of lost souls in the blood of dragons? Why hasn’t Hood come to collect these souls? Is this where Traveller will go if he dies? And what IS the blood of dragons?
Love the fact that Gothos tells the Andii not to trust Kallor, and Kallor immediately tells them not to trust Gothos.
I wonder if this book is setting up the future Karsa trilogy. I assume the rest of this series deals with the Crippled God, but Karsa’s speech to the freed slaves makes me think this is the direction SE plans on going for the Karsa trilogy.
Excited to see Traveller and Karsa together. I hope there is more interaction than there was between Icarium and Karsa.
@Kulp
Nope, Hood and Gothos are two different people, but both are extremely significant Jaghut. A lot more about Hood looks to come out in the prequel trilogy, and I’m hoping to discover more of Gothos too.
As to Icarium, nice linkage, but no, Icarium is still out there, and we will return to him in a later book.
The Elder here is a fascinating character – he seems to be building the Azath Houses themselves. Yet the Azath are wooden and grow, as seen in Darujhistan and in Tremorlor. So what on earth does the Builder actually make, and what is Gothos doing with them?
The Blood of Dragons … well, in essence it seems to be Power. Recall back to the Bonehunters, where we found dead Sorrit spiked on a cross.
“Who could have managed such a thing? Within the dragon is the heart of the warren itself, its well-fount of power. Yet … someone defeated Sorrit, drove her down into the earth, into this cavern within a sky-keep, and spiked her to Blackwood — how long ago, do you think? Would we not have felt her death?”
…
“Speak to me, Mappo. Tell me what you know of spilled blood.”
…
“Who first dipped their hands into this fell stream? Who drank deep and so was transformed, and what effect did those Otataral spikes have upon that transformation? Icarium, this blood is fouled –“
“All blood spilled, my friend, possesses power. Beasts, humans, the smallest bird, blood is the life-force, the soul’s own stream. Within it is locked the time of living, from beginning to end. It is the most sacred force in existence. Murderers with their victim’s blood staining their hands feed from that force, whether they choose to or not. Many are sickened, others find a new hunger within themselves, and so become slaves to the violence of slaying. The risk is this: blood and its power become tainted by such things as fear and pain. The stream, sensing its own demise, grows stressed, and the shock is as a poison.”
The blood of Sorrit was strong enough to destroy a Jaghut ritual, even as it became corrupted. Solidified, it seems to fall through realms until it returns to the realms at the heart of things. And the Builder is working with the remnants of the blood of the Dragons slain in the heart of Starvald Demelain. That … is Power indeed.
@27
Thanks for the summary Mayhem. I figured I was way off base with those guesses. Sometimes I’m so desperate to figure out what’s going on in these books I make connections that aren’t there. Good clarification of what is going on with the dragon’s blood, I hadn’t picked up on those passages when we ran into them the first time through.
On my first read-through, I was right with you on Clip. He’s an arrogant, contemptible shit. But on this, my second read, I love him. Not for his own sake – he’s still an arrogant, contemptible shit, but for what he is: a catalyst.
In Reaper’s Gale, we have Ruin’s party bickering and wandering with very little direction. Clip shows up, and bam, we have evidence of an actual goal (beyond survival). And we have people from this group actually taking part in significant events!
In Toll the Hounds, we have a group of Tiste Andii who are doing the Andii equivalent of teen angst, who we’ve had more or less two books (the Phaed scene in Reaper’s Gale is an exception, but I personally felt the stylistic choice for how Nimander’s exhaustion effected the scene went too far and ruined the impact). Introduce Clip, and before long we have them actually pulled out of their ennui and acting of their own accord, hauling their comatose catalyst along for the ride.
Clip takes the broken down characters who seem like they’ve largely given up, and gives them direction, in many cases leading to their most memorable scenes. Frankly, I like him best when he’s comatose. The Andii adolescents far surpass Ruin’s group in my eyes, and we have the added benefit of his catalyzing effect stemming from the fact that he’s no longer talking and playing with that damned garrote.
——
Regarding Gothos’s little thing on DNA, I quite enjoyed that scene. I’ve never understood why major spellcasters in fantasy – people who’ve supposedly had centuries or millennia to do whatever they feel like doing – are usually just as primitive as all the normals they live around. In older works, it makes sense (Gandalf is a higher being who’s stepped in specifically to help deal with another higher being: Sauron; he’s specifically not supposed to tinker too much with people’s lives outside of that goal), but in works where normal mortals (be they human, elf, Jaghut, etc) get access to such powers and understanding, surely they’d actually start figuring out some of how things work. Hell, the core concept of how DNA gets converted into visible features was figured out by a monk with an obsessive fondness for pea plants. Surely someone who’s lived for as long as Gothos has, and has access to the kinds of powers he throws around on a whim, can figure out what Mendel managed to cobble together with no more than a few decades of work.
—–
Regarding the civilization issue that Karsa brings up, I feel it’s worth noting that the concept of followers is not so much a matter of good vs evil as it is law vs chaos (to use DnD alignment terminology; it’s a useful framework for discussing such issues.) Consider the following examples of evil:
Naziism was based on a strict adherence to law. Incredibly twisted, unjust law, but everything they did was done in accordance to proper procedure. Gassing Jews, make sure you keep careful records of who you killed and what you looted from which corpses. The ultimate in real world Lawful Evil. This is the kind of evil that Karsa seeks to prevent. Without that strict adherence to the laws laid down by each person’s superiors, the Nazi regime would have fallen apart. (As it stands, there were plenty of assassination attempts intended to bring the whole thing tumbling down; Hitler was astonishingly lucky over the years). So as Karsa would put it, such evil relies on followers blindly allowing their leaders to direct their actions.
Conversely, consider the serial killers. Gacy, BTK, Pickton, etc. While some of these relied on civilization for their murders – Elizabeth Bathory targeted her servants, for example – most act fully outside the trappings of civilization. There’s no follower mentality here, they just grab a victim, have their fun and move on to the next one. Chaotic Evil, in the DnD sense. Karsa’s dream of a follower-less society would be the ultimate haven for such creatures. Most serial killers are masters of disguise, fitting into normal life so well that even those they seem to have close personal relationships with never suspect what they are. A world of separated farming communes without any overarching structure provides them the perfect chance to escape – if someone gets suspicious, just move on to the next community. Civilization provides the best solution to this sort of thing – for one, you have people keeping track of the people in all these communities, who can do the math and realize that someone’s going from town to town, killing people along the way. You also have people whose job it is to stop the killer.
All in all, I think Karsa only has half the picture for building a society without evil. His solution gets rid of institutional evil, but it ignores individual evil almost completely. One could argue that disposing of institutional evil is worth the passive acceptance of individual evil – it’s certainly capable of far grander, more organized and efficient forms of evil – but it’s worth noting that we have no way of knowing how bad individual evil might get in a true anarchy. Certainly a lot of our fiction on the topic portrays anarchy as a bloody chaos, but it’s hard to know what people would actually do in such conditions over the long term.
@Rashkavar:
Yay, someone else is reading in 2018!
I also enjoy Clip as a catalyst, or at least the changes to the more interesting characters around him as he gives them a goal to work towards. He is an annoying little shit otherwise though. I also like your thoughts on Karsa’s issues with civilization. I enjoy Karsa as a character/unstoppable force of nature, but I can’t get behind his stated goals. I can’t buy into his idea of anarchy bringing about some Nietzschean utopia of ubermensch. Also I firmly believe that even if Karsa was able to smash every civilization on the planet, it would inevitably reform as communities grew and clashed.
I like your analogy of state vs individual evils compared to DnD alignments. Evil governments can cause incredible harm, far more so than any individual, but that is due to the nature of having more resources and manpower to do so. But, a good/neutral state can provide its people (and the people of other states in a global society) food, safety, and education, enriching their lives more than they could on their own. You can also look at evil individuals like serial killers that would kill as many people as possible were they not stopped by a state’s force. They may never kill millions, but there are alleged killers of hundreds, especially earlier in history when forensic science was much less sophisticated.
Anyway, I quite enjoyed this chapter! I feel like things are picking up and I look forward to meeting this Dying God.
If we’re still doing favorites: Apsalar, Cotillion, Fiddler, but that’s a hard choice.
I’ll join the 2018 comment train! First time reader here. No complaints about TTH so far.
Top 3: I think Kalam has been underrepresented. I’ll go with Fid and Trull to round it out.
In this chapter: I was a little bummed by Karsa describing his future mission as to destroy civilization.
Very intrigued to find out who/what is going on with Aranatha.
Belated thanks to the original commenting community for shedding even more light on the series and doing a mostly great job of keeping it spoiler free.
Nice to see people still popping in here and that this is serving as a useful reference, as well as a place to engage! Love the commentary on Lawful/Chaotic evil. I’d love to chime in with more trenchant response, but it’s been so long my grasp of details is at its fuzziest.
Ha this feels extremely odd to be posting a good 5 years down the track but since the balls already rolling, what the heck. Gotta go with good ol Kruppe & Pust as two of my favs, the guys never fail to wring a smile out of me. And I really just can’t go past the awesomeness that is Karsa to round out my top 3.
I’ve been trying to get a mate to read MBotF for aeons & have directed him to this thread, which I’ve been thoroughly enjoying on my reread (Huzzah! I’ll finally have someone I know in my personal life to discuss this epic series with, since my stubborn siblings still refuse – their loss I know). I’ll add my thanks to the chorus of appreciation already directed at Bill & Amanda – I wish I’d come across this reread earlier but I’ve still enjoyed the experience immensely, kudos!
In fantasy tales such as this, set In a universe where death is explicitly a step in the souls ongoing journey, rather than THE END, it is much harder to view death as a purely bad thing. Surely such evil things as pain, torment and suffering during life should be the subject of the castigation expressed by Karsa and Traveller, rather than the act of dying itself.