Max Gladstone’s fantasy series the Craft Sequence was written and published out of order (scandal!) with Book 3 coming first, followed by Book 2, then Book 5, and so on. Although Gladstone’s books converge into a fantasy series, every book is itself a standalone story taking place in the same world, and a reader can start the series with any book and still get a full experience.
With the first five volumes of the Craft Sequence now out on book shelves, readers can choose their own chronological or anti-chronological voyage through the series. So what order should a reader approach the Craft Sequence in?
Note: This article is spoiler-free, but the comments section probably isn’t. Proceed with care!
The July 26, 2016 publication of Four Roads Cross created an unbroken five-book run through the Craft Sequence, allowing readers to start with Book 1 and continue through to Book 5, following the series’ internal timeline. That chronological order is:
- Book 1: Last First Snow
- Book 2: Two Serpents Rise
- Book 3: Three Parts Dead
- Book 4: Four Roads Cross
- Book 5: Full Fathom Five
But if you do that, do you lose something unique to the experience of reading them in the following publication order?
- Book 3: Three Parts Dead
- Book 2: Two Serpents Rise
- Book 5: Full Fathom Five
- Book 1: Last First Snow
- Book 4: Four Roads Cross
A couple months back I got the opportunity to read Gladstone’s series for the first time in chronological order, something that wasn’t possible for readers until this year. Does the series hold up even though it was written “out of order”? Does reading it in chronological order eschew author Max Gladstone’s intent? Here are the pros and cons that I discovered while reading the Craft Sequence with this approach.
Pro for Chronological Order: The series starts with one of its strongest books.
Last First Snow is a lean and mean book, introducing Gladstone’s vast world and its concepts through the intimate lens of a former warrior priest who is just trying to create a safe environment for his family. The story is tense, growing step by step from an urban planning meeting (really!) into a reckoning between urban development, gentrification, and the tricky social politics of “Occupy Wall Street”-style movements. There are no good guys or bad guys here, and no simple answers, and yet still the story manages to logically culminate in one of the most epic scenes in the entire series.
(The events in this book also subtly influence characters and events later on in the series, since it takes place first in terms of the series’ internal chronology. This helps give some weight to events in Two Serpents Rise and Four Roads Cross.)
Last First Snow was the fourth book written in the series, so Gladstone’s writing style is sharp, refined, and at its height. It’s difficult not to get sucked into the series after reading LFS. Although, if you don’t find yourself enjoying LFS, then you can walk away satisfied that you read through one of the best books in the series and therefore gave it a proper chance to wow you.
Con for Chronological Order: The writing can be uneven.
Last First Snow features some of the most experienced writing in the series, but the next chronological book Two Serpents Rise features Gladstone still figuring out the rhythm of his series. As such, TSR can feel rushed and exploratory at times, and overall feels like a thinner story than the potboiler epic that Last First Snow becomes. Moving on from TSR to Three Parts Dead also feels somewhat jarring, as Three Parts Dead was the first book written and thus packs in a lot of initial worldbuilding. When read in chronological order, Three Parts Dead changes from being an introduction to the series to being a widening of the series’ scope. It’s an extremely interesting shift to experience, but it is a shift nonetheless.
Interestingly, although Three Parts Dead was the first book written for the series, and Four Roads Cross the latest book written for the series, the two of them mesh together seamlessly.
Pro for Chronological Order: The villainous joy of The Red King.
So there’s this guy who shows up in Last First Snow and he’s known as The Red King and he’s extremely powerful and very decision-oriented and also he’s a red skeleton so he’s already dead and really hard to kill as a result. So if one of his decisions ruins your life than that really sucks for you because how are you going to stop it?
The Red King essentially personifies the corporations and bureaucracies that make us feel powerless in our own lives. These faceless organizations that decide what health care you should receive, or how much data you should be allowed to purchase, or how much your rent is going up this year. There is no appeal to the faceless things that make your life harder for their own benefit, and this is essentially how The Red King (who is literally faceless) functions in the Craft Sequence.
However villainous he seems, The Red King is genuinely trying to engineer a greater good for the city he runs and the humanity at large that he sees himself as serving. He’s just as plugged into the day-to-day details of running a city as he is summoning eldritch horrors from beyond the stars and eating their hearts. This makes him a lot of fun to watch in action and starting the Craft Sequence in chronological order puts his best work right at the forefront of your reading experience.
Con for Chronological Order: Big series mysteries get revealed quickly and other big reveals land differently.
Two Serpents Rise hints at two big events that happened in the past. For those reading along with the publication order, those events become reveals that occur later on in the series. For those reading in chronological order, those events occur immediately, reducing the later mysteries in Two Serpents Rise to mere references. The same reversal occurs between Four Roads Cross and Full Fathom Five.
Whether this ruins the story is a preference left to the reader’s individual taste. Personally, I enjoyed knowing about the events before they were hinted at, as knowing the precise details of these events made the character’s subsequent actions much more deeply motivated. In fact, a certain character’s actions in Full Fathom Five may actually seem a bit too puzzling if you don’t know what happens in Four Roads Cross.
Reading in chronological order also has a different effect on how much weight the characters later in the series have. I found Tara’s introduction in Three Parts Dead to be greatly assisted by the two books that come before her, as I knew the FULL power of a world she was brashly dismissing, thus making her journey into maturity more potent.
A chronological readthrough changes Elayne Kevarian’s character, as well, making her less enigmatic yet somehow even more appealing. Which reminds me…
Pro for Chronological Order: Lots and lots and lots of Elayne Kevarian.
Elayne is the absolute best and starting the series chronologically immediately puts you deep within one the greatest conflicts of her life. (You’d have to wait four books for it, otherwise. Noooo!)
Con for Chronological Order: The basic details of the world aren’t explained until halfway through.
Last First Snow does a good job explaining the intricacies of the Craft’s magic system, and you get a lot of information about the city of Dresediel Lex, but it’s not until Three Parts Dead that you really understand the FULL scope of the Craft, the gods, the cities, and the world they turn upon. This can give the reader an incomplete impression of what’s at stake in Last First Snow and Two Serpents Rise, and it could frustrate readers who are annoyed by hoping that a fantasy series will explain something later on. (A common frustration, to be sure.) Like the big mysteries present in the series, this aspect is ultimately down to a reader’s individual preference.
Pro for Chronological Order: If you didn’t know the series was published out of order, you wouldn’t be able to tell just from reading it.
This is what stunned me the most in regards to reading the Craft Sequence in chronological order: It fits together ridiculously smoothly even with the changes in rhythm that occur between Last First Snow, Two Serpents Rise, and Three Parts Dead. In fact, if the rhythm of the series’ prose and structure didn’t change, you’d have a hard time telling that the books were written out of order. That’s some slick story structuring right there.
It gets even better. Regardless of whether you read the series in chronological or publication order, Four Roads Cross still packs a giant culminating punch, so you’re guaranteed a proper epic pay-off.
In the end, whether to read the Craft Sequence in chronological or publication order is up to the reader. The only all encompassing advice I would suggest is: Don’t start with Four Roads Cross. It’s too bad-ass.
Chris Lough writes about fantasy and superheroes for Tor.com and would make a really media-focused Craftsman.
My usual response to the question of whether a series should be read in publication order or chronological order (where they differ) is: Why not try both? Do your first read in publication order, then at some later time when you want to revisit it, re-read the series in chronological order. That way your revisit will bring something new to the experience, and you won’t have to settle for choosing just one or the other.
(Of course, finding the time for a chronological revisit can be tricky. I’ve been meaning for some time to do a chronological re-read of Asimov’s Robot/Empire/Foundation universe and a chronological rewatch of Star Wars: The Clone Wars, but I haven’t found the time to do either yet.)
If you dismiss the King in Red as a villain, you may be missing the point. Even in the Skatterskill Rising situation, he was acting against people who wanted to bring back human sacrifice. His lover was murdered that way by the same priests. From his point of view, he’s fighting ISIS and their useful idiots.
Obviously, there is room for shades of grey. Elayne doesn’t agree. But she also doesn’t want human sacrificing theocrats coming back either.
@2. DG
I definitely agree with you about the King in Red. I just finished Four Roads Cross, and a different character (in a different context) says something to the effect of “I’m not a villain, our goals are just different.” I think the King in Red perfectly exemplifies this, since he has his own goals which aren’t necessarily “evil” but they are often at odds with the goals of the protagonist. But it can be easy to see him as “evil” because he is the prime example of the uber-1%.
@2, 3 I think that’s why it’s good to get a close look at the Red King early. Sure, he’s a lich with more money than God but someone needs to wield the power that keeps the bloody-handed priests at bad. Later treatment as just a frightening specter gain delicious irony when you know he started as a vengeful lover.
Publication order always.
The writer usually wrote them in that order and you take the same journey they did.
@1: I’m right there with you. I’ve been exactly a year behind the Craft books release schedule in finding the time to read them, so I’m only now making time for LFS. And I’ve wanted to do a somewhat altered “both”. Publication until LFS, and then reread.
So 3, 2, 5, 1, and then, (this was in theory while waiting for 4) start at 1 and do 2, 3, 4, and 5. Still might do it this way, but this article is a great list of both sides.
@5 This particular author is screwing with you though.
@7/noblehunter: Yeah. I think if the writer makes a point of releasing the books out of order and actually gives them titles that indicate their chronological order, that’s pretty much coming out and saying that it’s meant to work both ways.
Again, I have to say that 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 is what I’d want recommended to me if I were just starting the series.
Has Gladstone indicated his future plans for the series? I don’t want to be greedy (five books in four years is all anyone should need, right?) but I’ll preorder the next ten books today. And as much as I enjoy the naming/numbering system, I hope it doesn’t constrain him.
MILD SPOILER ALERT
MILD SPOILER ALERT
MILD SPOILER ALERT
@@.-@ noblehunter
However little they want to admit it, the great Craftsmen have blurred the lines between the human and the divine. Maestro Gerhardt discovered the fact that Gods are just accumulations of power given reality and sentience by human belief. The most powerful Craftsmen have gained the same power through Craftwork and legal contract. They might have destroyed the tyranny of faith, the bigotry and ignorance of the old world, but too many of them seek to replace it with a new order of magical law twisted to the service of the powerful. Look at the way the Craft forbids “slavery” and replaces it with “renting your body out to pay a debt for an extended period of time”.
@2 DG
The King in Red’s problem is not that he’s a mustache-twirling villain or a sadist. His error is in constantly hungering for the moral clarity of the war, the righteous anger that kept him going after his lover’s murder. He needs his enemies to be ISIS so that he doesn’t have to confront his own sins and the flaws in the new world he helped bring into existence. The end of Two Serpents Rise surprised me in a good way, but he still has a long way to go before he can start using his power for good on a regular basis.
As a guy who started with the Choice of the Deathless game, which is really just a choose your own adventure game type thing, I would urge everyone who is interested in this series to go and play those games sometime after or during your read of the series. Its a little iffy but Choice of the Deathless is I believe the first chronological writing in the universe. Ironically the First Choice of the Deathless is somewhere toward the end I think.
Anyone know where The Ruin of Angels fits chronologically?
@12/Philip Foster: I gather that The Ruin of Angels takes place after the first five books. Maybe the reason he dropped the numerical title convention is because they’re just going to be in chronological order from now on. More here: https://www.tor.com/2017/09/05/ruin-of-angels-5-things-to-start/
Thanks Christopher!