Back when paperbacks were first invented, Penguin used to sell their books with orange covers that told you nothing but the name of the book and the name of the author. A little later, when they got more sophisticated, they started to use different colours for different genres, black for classics, turquoise for non-fiction, orange for literature, purple for travel and green for crime. They never had one colour for SF and fantasy, but Gollancz did: yellow—the sight of a yellow spine still makes me happy. The original Penguins didn’t have back cover blurbs or anything, just the author’s name and the book’s title. I suppose they thought that would be enough for anyone to know whether they wanted it—if you think of old leather bound books, that’s what they were like, after all. You’d probably heard of them, and if not, and if you wanted to know what they were about, you read them.
Steven Brust’s Agyar is the only one book that I feel ought to have an edition like that, entirely unmarked except perhaps for genre in the most general terms. When my husband saw that I was reading Agyar, he pursed his lips and said “That’s going to be hard to talk about.” The problem is that while it’s a story that’s worth re-reading knowing everything, you still don’t want to spoil the joy of reading it for the first time without knowing anything about it. The thing is that it’s a completely different book when you first read it and when you re-read it knowing. It’s a good book either way, but it’s something where you want to have both experiences. And usually with some big spoiler thing, everyone delights in spoiling it and telling you about Rosebud and Bruce Willis and all of that. You wouldn’t believe how many books have spoilers in their back-cover material. But with Agyar I’ve noticed for years that people very carefully talk around it and use spoiler space because it’s not like that. The thing that Brust does here that’s most interesting is the way he takes the expectation inherent in the way people tell stories and does something with that. It’s like Attic red-figure vases—the action is in what you’d expect to be blank space, and the pattern reverses.
It has a contemporary setting. It’s kind of urban fantasy. It’s the only book on this subject I like. If you like good writing you might like it too.
Spoilers from here on!
It’s really normal to leave things out of a story, and Brust plays with that. And it’s normal to use a certain kind of metaphor, and a certain kind of indirectness. When you read something like:
I kissed her temple, her ear, and her neck. We sank down onto the bed, still holding each other.
I ran my hands along her body. Yes indeed, she was a dancer, or an acrobat, or a swimmer. She was strong, inside and out. I touched her and she shivered; she touched me and I trembled. I felt her enter the maelstrom of sensation at the same time I did, and we explored it together. She made low moaning sounds of pleasure, while mine were harsh and animallike, but the urgency was mutual.
You immediately read into that what you expect goes into the spaces. People write about sex like that when they’re not writing porn. That it isn’t sex, that her neck is what’s significant, is a level of indirection that’s really quite astonishing.
There’s also the thing where he mentions Byron saying something and you assume he’s read it, but no. The length of Jack’s life and the nature of his experience creeps up on you.
I generally hate vampires, and one of the reasons is because of the whole confusion of sex and death around them. Yet I really admire what Brust’s doing here—I admire it more than I like it, because I really don’t like vampires. I don’t read Agyar often. This is the fourth time I’ve read it. I read it, and I re-read it again right away, which is what I suppose people always do with this more than anything—I always say a second reading completes the reading anyway. This was my Halloween reading this year. It’s a magnificent achievement, whether you’re figuring out what’s happening or whether you’re watching it knowingly. And it’s a good story, with an interestingly alien viewpoint. I love Jim the ghost.
Amazing book. Nothing else like it.
Jo Walton is a science fiction and fantasy writer. She’s published eight novels, most recently Half a Crown and Lifelode, and two poetry collections. She reads a lot, and blogs about it here regularly. She comes from Wales but lives in Montreal where the food and books are more varied.
I completely agree. Amazing book. This is one of the very few books about which I’ve written a letter of gushing praise to the author. Also, I’d read this not long after re-reading “A Perfect Spy” and I thought there were structural similarities. (I asked Brust if that was intentional and he said it was a coincidence.) Anyway, that’s high praise for me, because “A Perfect Spy” is one of my favorite books ever.
Sturgeon’s “Some of Your Blood” does the leave out thing stunningly well, too. The similarity did not occur to me before.
Yes, I did just equate Brust and Sturgeon. I need to think about that, too.
I was so mad about this, because I read the Amazon blurb before buying it and only realized afterward what a massive book-destroying spoiler I had been ambushed with.
I would so have loved having the experience of going into this blind and seeing how long it would have taken me to figure it out. Judging from my Sixth Sense/Usual Suspects track record, quite a while. But I’LL NEVER KNOW, will I, AMAZON?
*grumble*
That aside, yes to this whole review. Except the part about hating vampires, because even with all the sparkly collateral damage these days, I still kind of like them. And Brust does go to show that there’s nothing so tired that someone sufficiently talented enough can’t make fresh and original again.
I’m pretty sure that last sentence made sense…
Leigh: I’m sorry Amazon did that to you.
A lot of people like vampires, and it’s not that I’m jaded with how popular they are, they’ve never done anything for me. I hate pirates too.
bluejo:
Heh. No pirates? Then I assume, ninja?
(ninjas? ninjitsu?)
Japanese doesn’t really go in for plurals, so if you want the Japanese plural of “ninja” it would just be “ninja”. The plural of the English loan word is of course “ninjas”. (“Ninjitsu” — much more usually spelled “ninjutsu” — is the set of techniques that ninja use.)
For me, the cover gave me enough clues that I figured it out within the first chapter. Sigh. But it’s still a Brust novel, so it didn’t bother me all that much in the end.
Leigh: I’ll certainly take the ninjapodes if that’s all my choices. Though it does remind me of the book my son said was awesome when he was fourteen — it had pirate ninja geishas, how cool was that?
This is one of a very select set of books I give to friends who want something new to read and are not into the SF / Fantasy genre (yet). IMHO, Brust’s best work.
I read Agyar when I was sixteen and had no idea where it was going until the last paragraph, excellent work by Brust one of my favorites but I would have to say I think To Reign In Hell his best.
Brust’s books are always a welcome read; his Khaavren Romances and Taltos books are my go-to fun reads. He also has a special place on my bookshelf for three of his books: Agyar, Gypsy and To Reign in Hell. All three do things that I thought were unique in their respective milieus, and each is worthy of a read (and perhaps a re-read, as Jo Walton notes).
AGYAR is… well, magic.
Steven Brust not merely succeeds, but excels, in so many different ways in this novel; his focus not solely on plot, characters, big ideas, and auctorial style. Steve uses those items, yes, but he also weaves them into something so much more than just another novel. I wonder, did Steve’s act of creation proceed something like this…
Okay, my main character will be a vampire. He will have lived a L O N G life. I will not reveal to readers, at least not directly, his nature as a vampire, his span of life, how he became a vampire, the choices he must make being a vampire. I will limit the plot to the quotidian, as though I were Nicholson Baker, and then twist on readers’ expectations. Then I will include how each character’s nature as a fully-formed, 3 dimensional person informs and guides his or her decisions, good or bad, vampire or no. I will write the novel discursively, with plenty of digressions on all manner of topics. Finally, I will weave all these elements, and others, into a tesseract-like structure, so that the meta-story — sub-text and all –imbues the plot and characters with the scent of destiny. And I will write it so damn well that no publisher will refuse to buy it, and no reader can refuse to read it…
I doubt Steve planned AGYAR in the plodding manner I describe, but there is no question AGYAR is sui generis. AGYAR’s nature as vampire is as central to the core story Steve tells as is David Selig’s fading ability to read minds; that is, not central at all, but a metaphor. So, Leigh, Aamzon’s reveal… reveals nothing.
And Steve has fun with exposition, something editors and publishers frown upon in genre novels. (Exposition slows down the story’s narrative thrust.)
When I was much younger, and far more naïve, I thought that the line between legal and illegal stayed close to the line between right and wrong. Well, either I was living an illusory life then, or everything has changed now, so that when the two lines intersect it seems only momentary, transitory, coincidental.
Which thesis leads directly to the novel’s final twist. Did you catch that twist coming? You did if you caught Steve’s digression on the instinct to survive, to reproduce, to…
btw, Jo, another novel that includes a vampire but is not hampered by that inclusion is Peter Watts’s
BLINDSIGHT, an absolutely phenomenal novel. Peter’s unspoken thesis — human consciousness. So what’s a vampire got to do with it? You gotta read it to find out.
Thank you (again)!
David: I haven’t read Blindsight because I’ve heard it described as a book you should read only when you’re feeling excessively full of joie de vivre. I’m prepared to believe it’s brilliant, but I don’t get in the mood for brilliant and depressing very often.
It is perhaps worth noting that AGYAR was written in a single six-week sprint. (Source: Mr. Brust himself, at a con in Cambridge in 1997.)
I read this soon after it came out, and somebody on rec.arts.sf.written had described it as “the best vampire novel ever” or some such. I was almost a hundred pages in, thinking “where’s the freakin’ vampire in this?” before I figured it out.
It’s one of my favorite Brust novels, which means it ranks very high indeed.
Jo: It’s the only book on this subject I like.
See, that’s a spoiler for people who know you. (OK, I guess some may figure it could be about pirates.)
I was “spoiled” for Agyar by Brust himself, in a written interview. But I found there was plenty of nifty stuff to uncover anyway, like the identity of the protagonist’s roommate. (Hence the scare quotes — the revelation didn’t actually ruin the book for me.)
Blindsight has vampires, but they’re not sexy, just monstrous.
… I kind of want to know what the “pirate ninja geishas” book was.
Jinian: It was Karin Lowachee’s Burndive.